Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In the context of Poincare gauge theory of gravity and Poincare gauge theory of gravity,
we give the necessary and sufficient condition for the Schwarzschild space-time expressed in
terms of the Schwarzschild coordinates to be obtainable as a torsionless exact solution of the
gravitational field equations with a spin less point-like source having the energy-momentum
density 'i;(x) = -Mc2 6/Lo6o"tPl(a:). Further, for the case in which this condition is sat-
isfied, the energy-momentum and angular momentum of the Schwarzschild space-time are
examined in their relations to the asymptotic forms of vierbein fields. We show, among other
things, that the asymptotic forms of the vierbeins are restricted by requiring the equality
of the active gravitational mass and the inertial mass. Conversely speaking, this equality is
violated for a class of vierbeins giving the Schwarzschild metric.
§1. Introduction
There have been many attempts to describe gravity by a gauge theory. Among
such theories, we have the PoincanPl and Poincan§2) gauge theories. The former,
which we shall write as PGT, is formulated by the requirement of invariance of the
theory under the local Poincare transformations. In this theory, the Poincare group
does not work &<; a gauge group in the sense of Yang-Mills theories. The Poincare
gauge theory (PGT) is formulated on the basis of the principal fiber bundle over the
space-time, possessing the covering group Po of the Poincare group as the structure
group, by following the lines of the standard geometric formulation of Yang-Mills
theories as closely as possible, in which the group Po works as the gauge group in
the sense of Yang-Mills theories.
The energy-momentum and angular momentum have been discussed in Ref. 3)
for PGT and in Refs. 4) and 5) for PGT, in the general framework of the formulations,
by assuming that the vierbein fields and the Lorentz gauge fields approach their
asymptotic values sufficiently rapidly.
In this paper we examine these two theories. We study, among other things,
the following: (1) We obtain the necessary and sufficient condition to be imposed on
parameters in the gravitational Lagrangian density in order that the Schwarzschild
space-time expressed in terms of the Schwarzschild coordinates is obtainable as a
torsionless exact solution of the gravitational field equations with a spinless point-
like source located at the origin. (2) In the case for which this condition is satisfied,
the energy-momentum and the angular momentum of the Schwarzschild space-time
are examined in their relation to the asymptotic behavior of vierbein fields, and
conditions for the vierbeins to yield the equality of the active gravitational mass and
the inertial mass are obtained.
972 T. Kawai, E. Sakane and T. Tojo
§2. Preliminary
We briefly summarize the basics of Poincare gauge theory and Poincare gauge
theory for the convenience of latter discussion.
2.1. Poincare gauge theory
In this theory, 1) space-time is assumed to be a differentiable manifold endowed
T k1m ~f I-' v
- e Ie m
(8I-'e kv -
8v e k)
I-'+ e I-'I Akml-' - emil-'
I-' Ak
' (2·4)
Rkl ~f el-' e V (8 Akl _ 8 Akl + Ak. Ajl _ Ak, Ajl ) (2·5)
mn m n I-' " v I-' JI-' v JV 1-"
respectively. The gauge potentials Akll-' and the affine connection coefficients r>:1-' are
related through the relation
(2·6)
and we have
T kI-'V =
- kTA
R kII-'v =- k PR A (2·7)
e A I-'v' e Ae I PI-'V
with
The components TI-'''A and RI-'''AP are those of the torsion tensor and of the curvature
tensor, respectively, and they are both non-vanishing in general.
.) In our convention, the middle part of the Greek alphabet, IL, v, A," " refers to 0, 1, 2 and 3,
while the initial part, a, {3, ,,(,"', denotes 1, 2 and 3. In a similar way, the middle part of the Latin
alphabet, i, j, k, .. " denotes 0, 1, 2 and 3, unless otherwise stated. While the initial part, a, b, c, .. "
denotes 1, 2 and 3.
Schwarzschild Space- Time in Gauge Theories of Gravity 973
The field components e kJi and eJik will be used to convert Latin and Greek indices.
Also, raising and lowering the Latin indices are accomplished with the aid of (17 kl )
~f (17kl)-l and ('f}kl) , respectively.
For the matter field i.p, LM(i.p, Dki.p) is a Lagrangian*) invariant under local
Lorentz transformations and general coordinate transformations if L M (i.p, Oki.p) is
an invariant Lagrangian on the Minkowski space-time.
with
(2·10)
(2·11)
In the above, a, {3, ,,/, Ck (k = 1,2" .. ,6) and a are real constants. Also, tijk, Vk and ak
are irreducible components of the field strength T k1m , and A k1mn , B klmn , C k1mn , Ekh
hi and R are irreducible components of the field strength R k1mn . These components
are given explicitly in Appendix A. Then,
I~f ~ J
£d 4 x (2·12)
is the total action of the system, where c is the light velocity in vacuum, and £ is
defined by
(2·13)
2aG ij ( {}) + (3C2 + 2C5) [Rim ( {} )Rj m( {}) + Rmn( {} )(~mjn( {}) - ~'f}ijRmn( {}))]
1
- (2C2 + C5 - 4C6)R( {}) (~j ({}) - 417ij R( {})) = Tij , (2·14)
(3C2 + 2c5)'~[iGjlk( {}) + (C2 + C5 + 4C6)17k[iOjP( {}) = -Sijk , (2·15)
.) From now on, the Lagrangian density will simply be called the Lagrangian.
**) The theory describes the Newtonian limit also when 6) Ck = 00 (k = 1,2,···,6) and
a: + 4{3 + 9a:{3", = O. We do not deal with this extreme case in the present paper.
... ) A ... [k ... lj ... ~f ~(A ... k ... l... - A ... 1... k ... ).
974 T. Kawai, E. Sakane and T. Tojo
respectively. Here, Tij and Sijk are the energy-momentum and spin densities of the
source field <p, respectively. They are defined by
clef 1 8L M
Tij = ~ejl-'-i:-'-' (2·16)
V -9 ve'l-'
clef 1 8L M
Sijk = - Rekl-' 8A i j I-' ' (2·17)
(2·18)
(2·19)
RA
PI-'
II( {}) ~f 0 I-'
{ ), }
PV
_ 011 { ), }
P J..l
+ { ), } {
a J..l Pv
a } _ {
a
), } {
v
a
P J..l
} . (2·20)
(B) Dual components ekl-' of vierbeins are related to the field 't/J and the gauge
potentials A kI-' and A kll-' through the relation
(2·21)
k
R 1-'11
clef ~ Ak
= UI-' II -
aII AkI-' + AkII-' AlII - Ak Al
III p.' (2·22)
Schwarzschild Space- Time in Gauge Theories of Gravity 975
(D) A nonintegrable phase factor describes both of the motion of a point and the
motion of a vector. 7)
(F) It admits the possible existence of matter fields having non-vanishing "intrin-
sic" energy-momentum P k (= the quantum number associated with the internal
translation),8) and the covariant derivative of the matter field 'P takes the form
in general.
in the Schwarz schild coordinates (XO, r, 0, 4». Here, ro is the Schwarz schild radius
ro = 2G M / c2 with M being active gravitational mass of the central gravitating
body. A static chargeless mass point with active gravitational mass M is considered
- v
to produce a Schwarz schild space-time, and the energy-momentum density T p, of
the gravitational source is expected to have the expression
T: (x) = -Mc2 {jp,°{jov{j(3)(X) . (3·2)
976 T. Kawai, E. Sakane and T. Tojo
(3·3)
as we shall show below. Since T k1m == 0 for this space-time, the curvature R ijmn
(3·4)
with h ~f ro/r, where we have written the Lorentz (Latin) indices in parentheses.
Substituting Eq. (3·4) into the field equation (2·14), we obtain
T- 0 = -2a ( -h' h ) + (3C2 + 2C5) [( -h" + -hI) -h" - ( -h' + -h) -h]
+ -r2
o r 2 r 2 r r2 r2
h" hi ) 2 ( hi h ) 2]
+( 2C2 + C5 - 4C6) [ - ( 2" + -:;: + -:;: + r2 '
- '" - 0
To =O=T", ,
T- f3 _ 8 (hll
- -2a [f3 - + -h'r ) - - - (h"
x'" xf3 -2 - -r2h )]
'" '" 2 r2
(3
-(3C2 + 2C5) ( 8 f3 - 2x'"-x- ) [( -h" + -hI) -h" - ( -h' + -h) -h]
'" r2 2 r 2 r r2 r2
(3
xC< x ) [( h" hi ) 2 ( h' h ) 2]
+( 2C 2 + C5 - 4C6) ( 8! - 2--;:2 2" + -:;: - -:;: + r2
(3·5)
*) In Ref. 1), the following has been shown: (1) For a gravitational source with'Sijk == 0, any
solution of the Einstein equation is also a solution of the gravitational field equations in PGT if
the condition (3·3) is satisfied. (2) The gravitational field equation 8L/8A i J,:. = 0 contains third
derivatives of the metric tensor, unless the condition (3·3) is satisfied.
Schwarzschild Space- Time in Gauge Theories of Gravity 977
(3·6)
. {_ 2aroE2 } _ _ 2 (3)
!~ r2(r2 + E2)3/2 - Me 8 (x), (3·8)
where we have used a = e4 /167rG. For the second term A(r; E), we have
1 00 r2
o A(r;E)r2dr=-E~(C2+e5+4c6)
10
00
dx 157r r2
x2+1024E~(19c2+35e5+268e6)' (3·9)
in which the integral on the r.h.s. is divergent. As is known from Eqs. (3·5), (3·6),
(3·8) and (3·9), we have the limit
(3·10)
(3·11)
which is equivalent to Eq. (3·3), is satisfied:) Obviously, the field equation (2·15)
with Sijk == 0 is satisfied identically if the condition (3·3) is satisfied. 1)
From the above discussion and from the fact mentioned in the footnote on page
976, we know that the Lagrangian LR with the condition (3·3), which we shall employ
in the following, is favorable in various respects.
(4·1)
with e(O)k!-, being constants satisfying e(O)k!-,Tlkle(O)1 y = Tl!-'y. The general forms of
components e\, having spherical symmetry have been given by Robertson. 11) These
0) As for energy-momentum densities of the gravitational field, see §5 for PGT and §6 for PGT,
respecti vely.
978 T. Kawai, E. Sakane and T. Tojo
can be written as
_ A Bxo: (a)
e
ta)
°- , eta)
0:
=
r
,e ° = Cx(a)
r
-,
(a) _ (a) x(a)xO: x{3
e Do 0: - 0: + E -r-2 - + FE(a)o:{3-
r
. (4·2)
Here, A, B, C, D, E and F are functions of r = J(x 1 )2 + (X2)2 + (x 3 )2 and of xo,
A2 - C 2 = 1- h, AB - C(D + E) = 0, D2 + F2 = 1 ,
_B2 + (D + E)2 = (1 - h)-I. (4.3)
The six functions A, B,···, F are required to satisfy the four relations in Eq. (4·3).
Thus, if A and D are fixed, the others are uniquely determined up to their signs.
Equations (4·1) '" (4·3) lead to
lim A = A oo , lim D = D 00 ,
r-+oo r-+oo
lim B
T--+OO
= r-too
lim C = lim E = lim F = 0 ,
r--too r-+oo
(4·4)
with Aoo and Doo being constants such that
(4·5)
The role of the divergent term on the r.h.s. of Eq. (5·1) is to produce reasonable
generators, 3),4) and it does not affect the field equations. .
The canonical energy-momentum MJ." the orbital angular momentum LJ.'v, and
the spin angular momentum Sij are generators of coordinate translations, of Lorentz
coordinate transformations, and of internal Lorentz transformations, respectively,
and they are expressed as 3), *)
i
(j
S ij def
= 1(j
tots-
ij
Vd
av , (5·5)
with
totij v ~f ij' v + t v (5·6)
J.' J.' J."
tot- v def 8L 8L k 8L
Sij = -2 [i ejp. - 4 [ik Ajl A - iaMij'P . (5·8)
8e A,V 8A >',v 'P,J.'
Here, a and day represent a space-like surface and the surface element on it, respec-
tively, and we have defined**)
-, v def 8L M
T J.' = oJ.'v LM - a-'P,J.' , (5·9)
'P,v
- v def v 8L a k 8L a kl
tJ.' = OJ.' La - - 8k e A,J.' 8Akl A A,J.'· (5·10)
e >',v A,V
There is the relation - I II .- v
TJ.' = TJ.' ' (5·11)
which follows from the fact that L M is a scalar density. Also, we have the identities
oL k oL Akl tot - v _ 8 v>.
- oe\eJ.'- OAkiv J.'+ TJ.' = >.qiJ.' ' (5·12)
.) In general, integrands in representations (5·3) "" (5·5), etc., of physical quantities are singular
at :Jl = 0 and on the horizon T = TO. But, for the case of the example given in Appendix B, this
causes no trouble if K(xO) = constant> O. For the energy-momentum M"" for example, this can
be confirmed easily by using Eqs. (5·3), (5·12), (5·20), (B· 1) "" (B·5). In what follows, we restrict
ourselves to cases such that the singularities at :Jl = 0 and on the horizon T = TO cause no trouble
(also see the footnote .. ) on page 984) .
.. ) The gravitational energy-momentum density t;
is not vanishing, even if the condition (3·3)
is satisfied. The integrated gravitational energy-momentum, however, vanishes when the condi-
tions (3·3) and (5·25) are both satisfied. This density does not reduce to the gravitational energy-
momentum density employed in Ref. 10), even for the case with Ck = 0 (k = 1,2" . ,,6) and with
Tklm == 0, for which the relation La = aRC {}) holds.
980 T. Kawai, E. Sakane and T. Tojo
(5·13)
E . .I-'V
'J
~f -2 [ 8 AaL
'J
_ 2a ( vc:; [I-'. vJ. -
- ge , e J e
(0)[1-'. (O)vJ .)]
•e J (5·14)
I-',V
Jijv p ~f _! 8L R
(5·16)
28A ijv ,p ,
with
(5·18)
(5·19)
The expression of tV 000< and of tV 0<0i3 in terms of A, B, ... and F are given by
where we have defined h' ~f dh/dr, A' ~f dA/dr, etc. Also, we have
F2 - DE ( xo:x(a)) (D + E)F x i3 ]
E(o)(a) Oa = 2a [ Ll DCa) - ~ - Ll f.(a)ai3-;:
1 h' D(D + E)
-6C2 - -
[2 r Ll
(a
O( ) - - -
a
xax(a))
r2
Schwarzschild Space- Time in Gauge Theories of Gravity 981
with the aid of Eq. (5·12), where dfl represents the differential solid angle. We can
show that
Mo=167ra}~~r(1-h-A:) ,
Ma =0, (5·23)
by use ofEq. (5·20). We look for the condition imposed on the functions A, B, C, D, E
and F by the requirement
M,.. = -D,..°Mc2 , (5·24)
which implies the equality of the active gravitational mass and the inertial mass.
The condition (5·24) is equivalent to
.
hmr (1-
AD)
- =ro
-. (5·25)
r-+oo L\ 2
If we express AI Aoo and D I Doo as
A h D
-=l--+P j)=l+Q, (5·26)
Aoo 2 ' 00
Equation (5·24) agrees with Eq. (5·6) of Ref. 3), which has been obtained for generic
systems that are at rest as a whole.
5.2. Angular momentum
By virtue of Eqs. (5·12) and (5·13), Eqs. (5·4) and (5·5) can be rewritten as
M k ~f
A
-
1 totT
A
k
I-'d0"1-" (6·1)
S kl ~f
A
-
1 U
u
totsA
kl
I-'d
0"1-" (6·2)
with
(6-7)
(6-8)
A 1-'11 A 1-'11
The functions F k and F kl have the expressions
+2a yc;-.g
-y
[e[/' k (evJ1e AI,A _ eA1e vJ I,A ) + e Ak e[l'l evJ I,A'
]
• I'V • [l'vJ • I'V
Fkl = -2J[kIJ + F[k '!/JIJ' (6·9)
with
(6·10)
•
F CO )
0", 1(
= 4a;: A -..1 -:;:'
D) x'"
~CO)Ca)
A 0", [1
= 2a ..1 (F 2 - DE) ( 8(a)
'"
- ~ -
ca
x"'x ») (D + E)F
..1
x{3]
E(a)",{3-:;:
2 h x"'x Ca )]
+ - - - - - 4a-1r ( A - -D)
..1 r2 r2
x'"
-'!/JCa)
..1 r
2 x"'x Ca ) x{3
+2a ( - - G -2 - + [A'B - G'(D + E)] FE(a)",{3-
r r r
I
+ { [A'B-G'(D+E)]D-;:..1 B} ( x"'x
8(a)-~
ca
»)) '!/JCO) ,
2 x"'x(a) x{3
- [ 2a ( - - G -2 -+[A'B-G'(D+E)]FECa)",{3-
r r r
6.1.1. Energy-momentum
By using Eq. (6·11) and the expression
(6·13)
(6·15)
. ( D A)
hmr - - -
r-+oo Doo Aoo
=ro
-.
2
(6·16)
A h D
-=l--+U -=l+V (6·17)
Aoo 2 ' Doo '
then the relation limr-+oo U = 0 = limr oo V follows. Equation
-+ (6·16) is equivalent
to the condition
lim r(U - V)
r-+oo
= o. (6·18)
This is quite natural, and we assume it to be the case. Here, 'ljJ(O)k and (3 are constants
((3 > 0), and O(l/rn) with positive n denotes a term for which r nO(l/rn) remains
finite for r - t 00; a term which is O(l/r n ) may of course also be zero.
*) In view of this agreement, we use the same symbol Mp. for these two energy-momenta.
**) We choose this field to be regular everywhere in the finite region of space-time. This is
possible, because the field 'Ij; can be chosen arbitrarily, as has been shown in Ref. 2).
Schwarzschild Space- Time in Gauge Theories of Gravity 985
(6·21)
which follows from Eqs. (6·2) and (6·8). From Eqs. (6·12), (6·15) and (6·21), we
obtain
(6·24)
are both satisfied. Equations (6·22) and (6·23) show that Ski agrees with the orbital
angular momentum 4) around the origin of the internal space R4. These equations
agree with Eq. (5·8) of Ref. 4), because the first term on the r.h.s. of this equation
vanishes for the Schwarzschild metric.
6.1.3. Canonical energy-momentum and "extended orbital angular momentum"
The generator Mel-' of coordinate translations and the generator t; of GL(4, R)
coordinate transformations are the canonical energy-momentum and*) the "extended
orbital angular momentum", respectively. They have the expressions
(6·25)
(6·26)
tot ~ v clef A v (A AV k A AV kl at k at )
TI-' = L81-' - Fk A A,I-' + Fkl A A,I-' + a1jJk,v 1jJ ,I-' + acp,v cp,1-' , (6·27)
(6·28)
with
A VA ~f A VA A VAAkl
.p I-' - Fk Ak
I-' + F kl I-' • (6·29)
From Eq. (6·25) and the identity
(6·30)
*)Note that the anti-symmetric part L[I-'''I ~f L[/11"I>" is the orbital angular momentum.
**)The energy-momentum density of the gravitational field is defined by the r.h.s. of Eq. (6·27)
with L replaced by La. This density does not yield a vanishing energy-momentum when it is
integrated over a space-like surface.
986 T. Kawai, E. Sakane and T. Tojo
the expression
MAC
I.L =
j A
.pI'
O"'2
r n",dfl , (6·31)
is obtained. By evaluating the r.h.s. of this, we obtain
MC=O
I'
(6·32)
which follows from Eqs. (6·26) and (6·30). By evaluating the r.h.s. of this, we obtain
0
A
when the conditions (6·18) and (6·33) are both satisfied. Also, we have
(6·36)
M- k ~fl
-
totT- kI.Ld 0"1' =
- 0, (6·38)
a
with
totT- I' ~f at . at R = 0
k - ao/,k
'f' ,I'
+ '/, a <p,1' k<P - . (6·39)
(6·40)
with
tot -
SkI I' def at at
= -2--[k-'l/JI] - 2-[k-el]v - 4
at
[k A I]mv - 1,8
. at M kl<p· (6 4 )
. 1
a'l/! ,I' ae 1/,1' aA mv,1' 'P,I'
Schwarzschild Space- Time in Gauge Theories of Gravity 987
(6·42)
where
(6·44)
with the aid of Eq. (6·42). The integrand in Eq. (6·44) agrees with that in Eq. (5·29),
and it follows that
(6·45)
which holds for any A, B, C, D, E and F satisfying the conditions (4·3) and (4·5).
The canonical energy-momentum Me/.' is expressed as
(6·46)
with*)
~
tot
TJ.t
1/ def
= L8J.tv - (at
v
ao/,k
'PIV
k + aeat ek>',/.' + aAkl
1/J,J.t kA,V
at A kl >',1' + a'P,/.'
A,l.'
at) .
<P,li
(6·47)
(6·48)
(6·49)
From Eqs. (5·3), (5·7), (5·12), (6·46), (6·48) and (6·49), we can show that
(6·50)
with
M;A ~f -2 (xv totT1-'>' _ q; I-'VA)
(6·53)
the first of which implies that the orbital angular momentum is vanishing. We have
(6·54)
if
1 2 1 3 5 4
P = - 23 h - 24 h - 27 h +Z , (6·55)
For this case, the dynamical energy-momentum Nh, which is the generator
of internal translations, has the expression (6·15)*) if the condition (6·16)
(or equivalently the condition (6·18)) is satisfied. For the total angular mo-
mentum Ski, we have Ski = 21j;(O)[kMl] if the conditions (6·18) and (6·24) are
both satisfied. This shows that the total angular momentum of this space-
time is only the orbital angular momentum around the origin of the internal
space R\ which is quite reasonable, because this space-time is a static and
(B) The case in which {1j;k, ek,.., Akl,.., 'P} is employed as the set of independent
field variables.
For this case, the dynamical energy-momentum JVh identically vanishes, 5)
and also the spin angular momentum Ski and the orbital angular momentum
L[,..[ll both vanish for any A, B, C, D, E and F satisfying the conditions (4·3)
and (4·5). The canonical energy-momentum Mc,.. agrees with the energy-
momentum M,.. in PGT, and the active gravitational mass is equal to the
inertial mass if the condition (5·25) is satisfied. The "extended orbital angular
momentum" L; vanishes if the condition (6·55) is satisfied.
Finally, we would like to add several comments:
[1] In general relativity, an expression identical to (3·2) has been obtained 10) for the
energy-momentum density of the source of the Schwarzschild space-time. Thus,
the gravitational field of this space-time can be interpreted to be produced by
a point-like particle with mass M located at x = O. The regularization scheme
employed is crucial in giving this result. 10) In the present paper, we have devel-
oped our discussion on the premise that this interpretation and the regularization
scheme are both applicable also to PGT and to PGT.
[2] For the Schwarzschild space-time, the Lorentz gauge potentials Akl,.. agree with
the Ricci rotation coefficients Llkl,.., and the results given in §§5 and 6 show that
reasonable energy-momenta and angular momenta are obtainable, even if the con-
dition 3), 4)
0) Recall the discussion in the paragraph just below Eq. (6·14) and note that the relation Mp.
= -Mc2 8p.° gives the equality of the active gravitational mass and the inertial mass.
990 T. Kawai, E. Sakane and T. Tojo
(7·2)
1) '
are not satisfied. Here, ..1 kl 1-', (m), for example, denotes the m-th order partial
derivative of ..1 kl l-' with respect to x>'.
[3] As we have seen in the summary, the requirement that the active gravitational
mass is equal to the inertial mass restricts the behavior of the vierbeins at spatial
infinity. The physical meaning of vierbeins violating this equality is not yet clear.
In this connection, it is worth mentioning the following: (1) There is a similar
situation also in new general relativity. 12), 13) (2) Also in the framework of general
relativity, the equality of the active gravitational mass and the inertial gravita-
tional mass is violated for the Schwarzschild metric expressed with the use of a
certain coordinate system. 14)
[4] The discussions in §§5 and 6 present us with a test of the definitions of energy-
momenta and of angular momenta introduced in Refs. 3) and 4), and the results
summarized in §§3 and 4 support these.
Appendix A
- - Irreducible Components ofTklm and of R k1mn - -
A k1mn ~1
= "6 (Rklmn + Rkmnl + R kn1m + Rlmkn + Rlnmk + Rmnkl ) , (A·4)
Bklmn =
def
"41 (Wk1mn + W mnkl )
- Wknlm - Wlmkn , (A·5)
def 1 )
Cklmn = 2" (Wk1mn - W mnkl , (A·6)
def 1
Ekl = 2"(R kl - R 1k ) , (A·7)
def 1 1
hi = 2"(Rkl + R 1k ) - "47]kl R , (A·8)
R ~f
- 7]
klRkl, (A·9)
Schwarzschild Space- Time in Gauge Theories of Gravity 991
with
def
Wklmn = Rklmn - 21 ('rJkmRln + rJlnRkm - 'rJknRlm - 'rJlmRkn)
1
+6"('rJkm'rJln - 'rJlmrJkn)R, (A·lO)
R kl def mnR
= 'rJ kmln' (A·ll)
D=± 1 (B·2)
1 + K(xO)h w '
The signs in the expressions for Band E are chosen to be the same!) Also, J(~ 0)
and ware real constants, and K(~ 0) is a real-valued function of xO.
The function A in the above is independent of xO, and we have the following:
L1 = ±1, (B·6)
Aoo = ± 1, if and only if J = 0 or w > 0 , (B·7)
Doo = ±1, if and only if K == 0 or w > 0 , (B·8)
where the choice of signs in Eq. (B·6), Eq. (B-7) and Eq. (B·8) are the same as in
Eqs. (B·4) and (B·5), Eq. (B·l) and Eq. (B·2), respectively. The restrictions imposed
on w, J and K by the asymptotic conditions (5·27), (6·18), (6·24), (6·33), (6·37), etc.,
can be easily determined.
References
1) K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, Prog. Theor. Phys. 64 (1980), 866.
2) T. Kawai, Gen. Relat. Gravit. 18 (1986), 995; 19 (1987), 1285E.
3) K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, Prog. Theor. Phys. 73 (1985), 54.
4) T. Kawai, Prog. Theor. Phys. 79 (1988), 920.
5) T. Kawai and H. Saitoh, Prog. Theor. Phys. 81 (1989), 280, 1119.
6) K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, Prog. Theor. Phys. 64 (1980), 1435.