Structural Audit Report-ETP and PCDC-compressed

ARC CIVIL INSPECTION AND NDT OF RCC & MASONRY STRUCTURES
PROJECT: BUILDINGS AT JAMSHEDPUR WORKS

CUSTOMER: M/S TATA STEEL LIMITED, JAMSHEDPUR
ETP AND PCDC BUILDING

Date of Visual Assessment: 13/12/16, 14/12/16, 15/12/2016
Date of NDT: 29/12/2016, 30/12/2016, 31/12/2016, 03/01/2017,
04/01/2017, 05/01/2017, 07/01/2017
Civil Inspection & NDT Testing of RCC & Masonry Structures
Report No.:JAM16TSL554/KOLTSL1512161DJK
CONDITION ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR ETP & PCDC BUILDING WO No. No-4700055641/132 Dt. 04/07/2016
Contract Code: JAM16TSL554
SUBMITTED BY
TATA PROJECTS LIMITED
QUALITY SERVICES DIVISION
TEAM MEMBERS:
1. Mr. RAHUL AGARWAL
2. Mr. SHAMIM AHMED
3. Mr. DEBAJYOTI KHANRA
4. Mr. VIDHYA PANDEY
Disclaimer:
The Report generated by TPL Quality Services assessment team is based on the applicable codes and standards, TSL approved procedures, information, details and facts
provided by the TSL, as per the terms & conditions of the Contract. The Report furnished to the TSL is for the purpose of guidance to the TSL based on the assessment carried
out by the TPL Quality Services assessment team to above referred documents / details made available to the team by the TSL, who alone is responsible and liable for the
authenticity and correctness of the referred documents / details as well as for any omissions and / or deletions of any nature whatsoever including data / details which could
have been availed by the TSL from any third Party as a consequence of which and / or otherwise the TPL Quality Services assessment team shall not in any way be held
responsible or liable for any shortcomings, errors, acts of omissions / deletions of the said Report as well as for damages, claims, monetary losses, consequential losses etc.
of any kind or nature whatsoever arising out of shortcomings, errors, omissions, mistakes in the Report and / or in documents, data, information, details and facts made
available to the TPL Quality Services assessment team by the TSL.
Page 2 of 84
SL. No. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No’s.

Cover Page 1
Assessment Team 2
1 Executive Summary 4
2 Purpose 4
3 Scope of Work 4
4 Codes and Standards 5
5 Abbreviations & Definitions 5-6
6 Inspection methodology 7
7 Inspection limitations 7
8 Report methodology 7
9 Observations & Actions -Table 1& Photographs 8-55
10 Conclusion from Visual Inspection & NDT Results 56-58
Annexure No. ANNEXURES Page No’s.

1 General Building Information 59-61
2 Inaccessible Areas 62-63
3 Building Drawings / Sketches 64-65
4 Repair Methodologies 66-83
5 Non-Destructive Test Results 84-104
Page 3 of 84
1. Executive Summary
ETP & PCDC Building
 The Team has carried out Visual Inspection& Non-Destructive Testing of the RCC structure as per approved SOPs (ES/CMG/CIVIL/DEC/56/16)
 Visual Inspection is carried out in a comprehensive manner so as to cover all parts of the building. The deficiencies/deterioration observed are identified and
corrective actions recommended. Non-destructive tests are carried out based on the locations identified during Visual Inspection.
 This report details the actions to be taken for correcting the observed deficiencies in addition to the test results.
2. Purpose
 Assessment of overall health condition of the existing RCC Buildings.

 Obtaining quantitative values related to reinforcement & concrete’s condition/strength from Non-destructive tests.
 Recommendations to rectify any deficiency observed in the RCC structures.
3. Scope
To assess the overall structural health of the building ETP & PCDC building, identify the degree of deterioration of RCC members and associated risk on stability and
recommend corrective measures to increase the residual life of the structure. The scope includes
 Visual Inspection
 Non Destructive Tests:
 Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity
 Rebound Hammer Test
 Concrete Core Test
 Half Cell Potential Test
 Rebar Cover Test
 Carbonation & Chloride/Sulphate Content of Concrete
Page 4 of 84
 Crack Mapping
 Evaluation of Test Results
 Photographic record of defects.
 Recommendations based on Visual Assessment & Test results.
 Submission of Civil Inspection & NDT test Report.
4. Codes& Standards
1. Standards
 IS 456 - Plain and Reinforced Concrete -Code of practice
 IS 13311 (Part 1) – Non-Destructive testing of concrete – Methods of test (Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity)
 IS 13311 (Part 2) – Non-Destructive testing of concrete – Methods of test (Rebound Hammer)
 IS 516 - Methods of tests for Strength of concrete
 IS 1199 - Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete
 BS 1881 (Part 204) - Testing concrete: Recommendations on the use of electromagnetic cover meters
 ASTM C876 - Standard Test Method for Corrosion Potentials of Uncoated Reinforcing Steel in Concrete
5. Abbreviations and Definitions
5.1 Abbreviations
E: East, W: West
HCP: Half Cell Potential
KuO: Keep under Observation
NDT: Non-Destructive Testing
N: North
NA: Not Applicable
PTW: Permit to Work
QA/QC: Quality Assurance and / or Quality Control
RH: Rebound Hammer
SOP: Standard Operating Procedures
Page 5 of 84
S: South
TSL: Tata Steel Limited
TPL: Tata Projects Limited
UPV: Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity
5.2 Definitions
 ALERT - General defects which may deteriorate in near future.
 ALARM - Major defects which may result in serious consequence.
 EMERGENCY - Defects to be attended without any loss of time.
 Deterioration: The reduction in a material's ability to perform its intended purpose. This can be caused by various deterioration mechanisms (e.g. corrosion,
cracking, spalling, chemical attack). Damage or degradation may be used in place of deterioration.
 Failure: Termination of the ability of a system, structure, or component to perform its required function. Failures may be sudden or gradual depending on the
mechanism of failure.
 Failure Mode: The manner of failure. Some examples of failure modes are flexural yielding, crushing, buckling and shear failure.
 Hazard: A physical condition or a release of a hazardous material that could result from component failure and result in human injury or death, loss or damage,
or environmental degradation. The hazard is the source of harm. Components that are used to transport, store, or process a hazardous material can be a
source of a hazard. Human error and external events may also create a hazard.
 Structural Engineer: The engineer who will carry out the Visual Inspection of the building.
 Risk: The combination of the probability of an event and its consequence.
 Risk Mitigation: Process of implementation of measures to minimize, modify or eliminate risk.
Page 6 of 84
6. Inspection Methodology
Inspection is carried out both on the external and internal areas of the RCC structures. Wherever deterioration is observed it is noted along with photographic evidence.
Number and location of test points are decided based on the observations from Visual Inspection.
7. Inspection Limitations
Some of the limitations during the inspection of building are enumerated below:
 It is assumed that all the buildings have been designed for the intended loads and only visual assessment and non-destructive testing has been carried out for
them.
 Many areas of the buildings have been repaired recently and hence any structural deficiency in these areas can’t be identified now. However it is not known
whether these areas were repaired using the correct methodology and by using the appropriate repair materials. Hence re-occurrence of deficiencies at these
locations in the future is possible.
 It is difficult to understand the load transfer path accurately for those buildings whose structural drawings are not available. As drawings were not available for
many buildings, the assessment was carried out with this limitation.
 There are many equipments and process pipes at the roof level of this building. Some of these are supported directly on the roof slab. It is not known
whether the slab was originally designed for these loads or not.
8. Report Methodology
All the observations and actions required are recorded in Table 1.
Inspection observations are evaluated and analysed for the non-conformances and imperfections found and classified as below
 ALERT- General defects which may deteriorate in near future.

 ALARM- Major defects which may result in serious consequence.
 EMERGENCY - Defects to be attended without any loss of time.
Page 7 of 84
9. Observation & Action as per Table 1 Below
Remarks /
SL No. Item / Part Observations Actions Needed Cat. Photos
Action by
Exterior side
(WEST SIDE)
Remove loose
Surface plaster of masonry wall is damaged. plaster if any,
01 Masonry wall ALERT Image 1,2
Location: Near Column A1. and re-plaster
the surface.
Plaster is damage on masonry wall

02 Masonry wall Annexure 4C ALERT Image 03
Location: Between column A1 & A2.
Beam reinforcement is exposed and corroded. Spalling

03 Beam of concrete is also observed. Annexure 4A EMERGENCY Image 04,05
Location: Between A1 & A2, Beam between A2 & A3.
Remove the
angle sections if
Angle sections are attached at the corner of the
not needed or
column. It’s found to be corroded. Corroded section
else remove the
04 Column makes carbonation in concrete, which ultimately leads ALARM Image 06,10
rust with sand
to corrosion in reinforcement.
paper and apply
Location: At column A3,Column A4 respectively
coat of red-
oxide to it.
Remove any
Brick wall is exposed. Plaster is found to be damaged. loose plaster
05 Masonry wall ALERT Image 07
Location: Between column A3 & A4. and re-plaster
the surface.
Page 8 of 84
Remarks /
Action by
Reinforcement is exposed and corroded, concrete is
also found to be damaged.
06 Column Annexure 4A ALARM Image 08,09
Location: Between Column A3 & A4, At column A2
respectively.
Cover the
Concrete is found to be damaged. surface
07 Slab ALARM Image 11
Location: Beam between A4&A5 concrete with
PMM.
Plaster is found to be damaged on masonry wall. Annexure 4C

08 Masonry wall ALERT Image 13 & 14
Location: Masonry wall grid A

09 Column also found to be damaged. Annexure 4B EMERGENCY Image 17
Location: Column A7
Cover the
Surface Concrete is found to be damaged. surface
10 Beam ALARM Image 18
Location: Beam between A7&A8 concrete with
PMM.
Plaster on masonry wall is damaged. Chicken mesh is
11 Masonry wall exposed. Annexure 4C ALERT Image 19
Location: Masonry wall between A8&A9
Brickwork and plaster of masonry wall is damaged.

12 Masonry wall Annexure 4C ALERT Image 20
Location: column A8
Cover the
Surface concrete of beam is found to be damaged. surface
Location: Between beam A9 and A8 concrete with
PMM
Page 9 of 84
Remarks /
Action by
Angle section at corner of column is severely corroded.

Concrete in column is also found to be spalled. Width
of column is damaged considerably. Reinforcement at
14 Column Annexure 4B EMERGENCY Image 22
beam and column junction is exposed and corroded
severely.
Location: At column A9
NORTH SIDE
Concrete at top of column is found to be damaged
15 Column severely. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 23
Location: Column A1.
EAST SIDE
Longitudinal crack is observed on column. It is a
16 Column corrosion crack. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 25
Location: Column C1
Surface plaster at the edge of the beam is damaged.

17 Beam Annexure 4C ALERT Image 26
Location: Beam between C1 & C2.
SOUTH SIDE
Segregation of concrete is observed at end of Chajja. Cover the
Concrete is also found to be damaged at the edge of surface
18 Chajja ALARM Image 27 & 28
slab. concrete with
Location: Chajja Between A9 & B9. PMM
Page 10 of 84
Remarks /
Action by
Surface concrete of the beam is damaged.

19 Beam Annexure 4A ALARM Image 29
Location: Chajja Between A8 & B9.
Longitudinal crack is observed on the bottom of the

Annexure 4A
20 Beam beam. It’s a corrosion crack. ALARM Image 30
Location: Beam bottom between A8 & A9.
EAST SIDE
Cover the
surface
Beam surface concrete is found to be damaged.
21 Beam concrete of ALARM Image 31,33
Location: All beam Between column C2 & C9.
beam with
PMM.
Reinforcement is found to be embedded in beam and Remove the
it’s corroded. Corroded steel makes carbonation in exposed
concrete and ultimately results in corrosion of steel. corroded steel
Location: At Column C9. from beam.
Crack is found on the column surface area. It might be

23 Column C9 a corrosion crack. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 36 & 37
Location: Column C9
Remove lose
Crack observed surface area on column and due to
plaster & do as
24 Column corrosion of steel. EMERGENCY Image 38
per
Location: At Column C8
Annexure 4A
Page 11 of 84
Remarks /
Action by
Corroded angle section is embedded in concrete

Remove the
surface. Corroded angle makes carbonation in
25 Column embedded ALARM Image 39,40
concrete, which ultimately leads to corrosion in steel.
angle section.
Location: At Column C5, C9, C3.
Interior side
Bolt is found to be embedded in slab and it’s found to
be corroded. Corroded bolt makes carbonation in Remove the
26 Slab concrete which ultimately results in corrosion in steel. bolt from slab & EMERGENCY Image 41
Dampness is also observed on slab bottom Annexure 4I
Location: Ceiling between B8, C8, B9, C9.
Reinforcement is found to be exposed and longitudinal
27 Beam crack is observed in beam. It’s a corrosion crack. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 42
Location: Beam between B8 & C8.
Bolt is found to be embedded in slab and it’s found to
be corroded. Corroded bolt makes carbonation in Remove the
28 slab concrete which ultimately results in corrosion in steel. bolt from slab & ALARM Image 43
Dampness is also observed on slab bottom Annexure 4I
Location: Ceiling between B7,C7 & B8, C8
Dampness is observed at the bottom of slab.
Location: Ceiling between B7, C7 & B8, C8, Ceiling Image
29 slab Annexure 4I EMERGENCY
between B5, C5 & B6, C6. Ceiling between B4, C4 & B5, 44,45,46,47
C5.
Remove any
Plaster on beam is found to be damaged, Dampness is loose plaster
30 Beam also observed on beam. and re-plaster EMERGENCY Image 48
Location: Beam between B5 & C5 the surface.
Annexure 4I
Page 12 of 84
Remarks /
Action by
Annexure 4A
Crack and dampness is observed on bottom of slab.
31 slab and Annexure EMERGENCY Image 49
Location: Ceiling between B3,C3 & B4, C4
4I
Dampness observed on beam.

32 Beam Annexure 4I EMERGENCY Image 50
Location: Ceiling between B2,C2 & B3,C3
Dampness observed on slab.

33 Slab Annexure 4I EMERGENCY Image 51
Location: Ceiling between B2,C2 & B3,C3
Transformer Room
Repair the
Concrete in column is found to be damaged.
34 Column concrete using ALARM Image 52
Location: Column A3.
PMM.
Reinforcement is found to be exposed and corroded.
Spalling of concrete is also observed in slab.
Location: Ceiling between ,
35 Slab Annexure 4B EMERGENCY Image 53 & 54
A4, A5 & B4, B5.
A6, A7 & B6, B7.
A8, A9 & B8, B9.
Longitudinal cracks are observed on beam, It’s a

36 Beam corrosion crack. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 55
Location: Beam between B8 & B9.
Exterior North Side
Page 13 of 84
Remarks /
Action by
Reinforcement of beam is found to be exposed and

37 Beam corroded, spalling of concrete is also observed. Annexure 4B EMERGENCY Image 56 & 57
Location: Beam bottom on projection slab
East Side

38 Slab corroded, concrete is also found to be damaged. Annexure 4A EMERGENCY Image 58
Location: Ceiling projection
South Side
Repair the surface

Concrete is found to be damaged.
39 Ceiling concrete using ALARM Image 60
Location: Ceiling projection slab
PMM.
40 Beam corroded. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 61
Location: Beam on projection slab
Electrical Room

41 Beam corroded. Annexure 4A EMERGENCY Image 62
Location: Beam between B1 & C1
Cover concrete of slab is deteriorating.

42 Slab Annexure 4A EMERGENCY Image 63
Location: Ceiling near C1
Page 14 of 84
Remarks /
Action by
Peeling of paint is observed on bottom of slab

43 Slab - ALERT Image 65
Location: Ceiling between B1, B2 & C1, C2.
Infestation of Termite is observed on beam

44 Beam Annexure 4G ALERT Image 66
Location: Beam between B1 & B2
Longitudinal crack is observed on Column, It’s a

Location: Column B1.
Reinforcement in slab is found to be exposed and
46 Slab corroded, spalling of concrete is also observed. Annexure 4B EMERGENCY Image 69, 70
Location: Ceiling between A1, A2 & B1, B2
Plaster is damaged on masonry wall and dampness on
Annexure 4C &
47 Masonry Wall masonry wall is also observed. ALARM Image 71
Annexure 4E
Location: Wall between A1 & B1
Separation crack observed between masonry wall &
48 Masonry Wall beam. Annexure 4D ALARM Image 73,74
Location: Wall between A1 & B1 & near A2
Roof Area
Reinforcement on top of slab is exposed and corroded.

49 Roof Annexure 4A ALARM Image 75
Location: Roof east side projection slab
Tank is kept directly on roof slab. It’s not known

Keep under
50 On roof slab whether slab is designed for such extra load. ALARM Image 76,77
observation.
Location: On roof slab
Page 15 of 84
Remarks /
SL No. Observations Actions Needed Cat. Photos
Item / Part Action by
Clear such
Extra pipes and other material kept in stacks on slab. It
unwanted
51 On roof slab only results in increase in Dead load on slab. ALERT Image 78
materials from
Location: On roof slab.
slab.
PC DC BUILDING
North Side
Remove any loose
Plaster is damage on the R.C.C wall. plaster and re-
52 RCC wall ALERT Image 79
Location: Projection slab between X1 & Y1 plaster the
surface.
East Side
Reinforcement is exposed at bottom of slab. Repair
work is already done here. But it’s not known if repair Keep under
53 slab ALARM Image 80
work is done after removing rust from steel. observation.
Location: Projection slab near Y1
Repair the cover
Concrete at edge of slab is found to be damaged.
54 Cantilever slab concrete using ALARM Image 81
Location: Between Y1& Y2
PMM.
Dampness is observed on slab.

55 Cantilever slab Annexure 4I EMERGENCY Image 82,84
Location: Between Y2& Y3 & Y4, Between Y3& Y5

56 Cantilever slab also found to be damaged. Annexure 4A EMERGENCY Image 83
Location: Between Y6& Y5
Page 16 of 84
Remarks /
Item / Part Action by
Reinforcement is exposed and corroded.

57 RCC wall Annexure 4A ALARM Image 85
Location: Between Y3& Y5.
Repair work is observed at the bottom of the slab. Keep under

58 Cantilever slab ALERT Image 87,88
Location: Between Y7& Y8. observation.
Remove the rust
from sand paper
Channel section supporting on cantilever slab is found
and paint the
59 Cantilever slab to be rusted. ALERT Image 89
channel with red
Location: Cantilever slab
oxide or Zinc
primer.
South Side
Cracks are observed at the bottom of slab.

60 Cantilever slab Annexure 4A ALARM Image 90
Location: Between X8 & Y8.
Reinforcement of beam is found to be corroded, And

spalling of concrete is also observed.
61 Beam Annexure 4B EMERGENCY Image 91
Location: Near X8 & Y8.

62 Cantilever slab also found to be damaged. Annexure4A EMERGENCY Image 93
Location: Between X8& Y8
Annexure 4A
63 Mid landing slab also found to be damaged. EMERGENCY Image 94
Location: Mid landing slab
Page 17 of 84
Item / Part Remarks /

Action by

64 Column also found to be damaged. Annexure 4A EMERGENCY Image 95
Location: At column X8
West Side
Surface Plaster crack is observed on RCC wall.

65 RCC wall Annexure 4C ALERT Image 96
Location: Between X8&X7
Longitudinal crack is observed on column. It’s a

Location: Column X7.
Reinforcement is exposed and extremely corroded.
67 Slab Spalling of concrete is also observed. Annexure 4B EMERGENCY Image 98
Location: Between X5 & Y6.
68 Column also found to be damaged. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 99
Location: Column X6
69 Cantilever slab Spalling of concrete is also observed. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 100
Location: Cantilever slab
Annexure 4H &
Remove the rust
Dampness is observed in cantilever slab & Channel from sand paper
70 Cantilever slab section is found to be rusted. and paint the ALERT Image 101
Location: Between X5& X6 channel with red
oxide or Zinc
primer.
Page 18 of 84
Item / Part Remarks /

Action by
Reinforcement is exposed and corroded, Concrete is

71 Slab also found to be damaged. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 104
Location: Between X3& X2.
72 Column Spalling of concrete is also observed. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 105
Location: At column X2.
73 Slab also found to be damaged. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 106
Location: Slab between X2, X3&Y2, Y3.
74 RCC Wall also found to be damaged. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 107
Location: Between Y5& X5.
75 slab also found to be damaged. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 108
Location: Between Y5, X5&Y4, X4.
slab also found to be damaged. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 109
76
Location: Between slab Y6, Y7& X6, X7.
Reinforcement is exposed and corroded. Spalling of

77 Column concrete is also observed. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 110,111
Location: Column Y6, Column Y7.
Reinforcement is exposed and corroded. Spalling of
78 Column concrete is also observed. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 112,113
Location: Column X7.
Page 19 of 84
Remarks /
Action by
Reinforcement is exposed.
79 RCC wall Annexure 4A ALARM Image 114
Location: Between Y6& X6
PC DC-5
Exterior North Side
80 Column Spalling of concrete is also observed. Annexure 4B EMERGENCY Image 115
Location: Column Y9
81 Cantilever slab Spalling of concrete is also observed. Annexure 4B EMERGENCY Image 116,117
Reinforcement is exposed.
82 Column Annexure 4A ALARM Image 118
Location: Between wall Y9& X9
West Side
83 slab Spalling of concrete is also observed. Annexure 4B ALARM Image 119,120
Location: Between X9& X10
84 Projection slab Spalling of concrete is also observed. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 122
Location: At Column X10
Reinforcement is exposed and concrete is also found
85 Column to be damaged. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 123
Location: Inside Column X10
South Side
86 Cantilever slab Spalling of concrete is also observed. Annexure 4B EMERGENCY Image 124,125
Location: Near X10
Page 20 of 84
Remarks /
Action by
Reinforcement is exposed and spalling of concrete is
87 Column observed. Annexure 4B EMERGENCY Image 126
Location: At Column X10
East Side
Reinforcement is exposed and cover concrete is
88 slab damaged. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 127
Location: Between Y10& Y9.
Remove the rust
M.S Chequered is rusted. with sand paper
89 slab ALERT Image 128
Location: Inside area between Y10& Y9. and apply coat of
red oxide.
Bottom side reinforcement is exposed & concrete is
90 column damaged. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 129
Reinforcement is exposed and concrete is damaged.
91 R.cc wall Annexure 4A ALARM Image 130
Location: Inside area near X10 & X9
North Side
Concrete of pedestal is damaged, and anchor bolt is Repair the cover
92 Pedestal found to be rusted. concrete with ALARM Image 132
Location: Top side slab PMM.
Pedestal concrete is found to be damaged.

93 Pedestal Annexure 4A ALARM Image 133,135
Location: Top slab, North side top slab
Page 21 of 84
Remarks /
Action by
PC DC-6(Exterior South Side)

Longitudinal crack is observed on column. It’s a
94 column corrosion crack. Annexure 4A EMERGENCY Image 136
Location: At column P2
West Side
95 RCC wall also found to be damaged. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 137
Location: Between P1& P2
Reinforcement is exposed and concrete is also found
96 projection slab to be damaged. Annexure 4A ALARM Image 140
Location: Between P1& P2
Pedestal surface concrete is damaged, Base plate is Repair the surface
97 Top slab found to be rusted. concrete with ALARM Image 141,142
Location: Top slab PMM.
Note: Image 12,15,16,24,32,34,59,67,72,86,92,102,103,121,131,134,138,139 is not used.
Page 22 of 84
Image 1 Image 2
Image 3 Image 4
Page 23 of 84
Image 5 Image 6
Image 7 Image 8
Page 24 of 84
Image 9 Image 10
Fig. 10
Not Used
Image 11 Image 12
Page 25 of 84
Image 13 Image 14
Image 17 Image 18
Page 26 of 84
Image 19 Image 20
Image 21 Image 22
Page 27 of 84
Not Used
Image 23 Image 24
Image 25 Image 26
Page 28 of 84
Image 27 Image 28
Image 29 Image 30
Page 29 of 84
Image 31 Image 33
Image 35 Image 36
Page 30 of 84
Image 37 Image 38
Image 39 Image 40
Page 31 of 84
Image 41 Image 42
Image 43 Image 44
Page 32 of 84
Image 45 Image 46
Image 47 Image 48
Page 33 of 84
Image 49 Image 50
Image 51 Image 52
Page 34 of 84
Image 53 Image 54
Image 55 Image 56
Page 35 of 84
Image 57 Image 58
Image not used
Image 59 Image 60
Page 36 of 84
Image 61 Image 62
Image 63 Image 64
Page 37 of 84
Image 65 Image 66
Image not used
Image 67 Image 68
Page 38 of 84
Image 69 Image 70
Image not used
Image 71 Image 72
Page 39 of 84
Image 73 Image 74
Image 75 Image 76
Page 40 of 84
Image 77 Image 78
Image 79 Image 80
Page 41 of 84
Image 81 Image 82
Image 83 Image 84
Page 42 of 84
Image not used
Image 85 Image 86
Image 87 Image 88
Page 43 of 84
Image 89 Image 90
Image not used
Image 91 Image 92
Page 44 of 84
Image 93 Image 94
Image95 Image 96
Page 45 of 84
Image 97 Image 98
Image 99 Image 100
Page 46 of 84
Image 101 Image 104
Image 105
Image 106
Page 47 of 84
Image 107 Image 108
Image 109 Image 110
Page 48 of 84
Image 111 Image 112
Image 113 Image 114
Page 49 of 84
Image 115 Image 116
Image 115 Image 116
Image 117 Image 118
Page 50 of 84
Image 119 Image 120
Image not used
Image 121 Image 122
Page 51 of 84
Image 123 Image 124
Image 125 Image 126
Page 52 of 84
Image 127 Image 128
Image 129 Image 130
Page 53 of 84
Image 132 Image 133
Image 135 Image 136
Page 54 of 84
Image 137 Image 140
Image 141 Image 142
Page 55 of 84
10. Conclusion from Visual Inspection & NDT Results
The overall structure or building is in the state of EMERGENCY and requires repairs to be carried out to prevent any further damage and serious
consequences. However there are some locations which fall under EMERGENCY category and require immediate repairs.
Visual Inspection:
1. Based on the visual inspection carried out, lot of serious deficiencies is seen in the structure. The root cause for most of the deficiencies is corrosion
of reinforcement and spalling / cracking of concrete.
2. No waterproofing treatment is observed on the terrace slab. Hence waterproofing should be carried out to prevent leakage of water into the RCC
members.
3. Further all observations presented in Table 1 of the report should be reviewed and addressed using the repair methodologies suggested in
Annexure 4 of the report.
Non-Destructive Testing:
The results from the non-destructive testing are presented in Annexure 5 of the report. The key findings from the report are presented below:
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Tests:
The UPV tests were conducted at 27 locations in the building. Out of which 12 nos of test are from ETP and rest are from PCDC.
1) The test results show that 6 of the 12 test locations have the UPV reading of less than 3.0km/sec which makes the concrete quality as “Doubtful” for
these locations.
A doubtful quality of concrete indicates presence of cracks, voids and other imperfections in concrete. Since about 50 % of the readings fall under this
category, it can be concluded that the quality of concrete is below satisfactory in general for ETP Building.
Page 56 of 84
2) The test results show that 13 of the 15 test locations have the UPV reading of less than 3.0km/sec which makes the concrete quality as “Doubtful”
for these locations.
A doubtful quality of concrete indicates presence of cracks, voids and other imperfections in concrete. Since about 86% of the readings fall under this
category, it can be concluded that the quality of concrete is below satisfactory in general for PCDC Building.
Half Cell Potential Tests:

1) Half cell potential results show that probability of corrosion in reinforcement is 50% & 90% for most locations. Hence it is necessary to monitor the
condition of reinforcement at regular intervals in the future as reinforcement is prone to corrosion in ETP Building.
2) Half cell potential results show that probability of corrosion in reinforcement is 50% for most locations. Hence it is necessary to monitor the
condition of reinforcement at regular intervals in the future as reinforcement is prone to corrosion in PCDC Building.
Carbonation & Rebar Cover Meter Tests:

Carbonation test was carried out at 11 locations in the PCDC building. The average depth of carbonation was obtained as 17.3 mm. The carbonation
depth is lower than concrete cover available for column and shear walls, hence the reinforcement can be considered as protected for these members.
Chemical Tests:
The results of sulphate tests show that this parameter is within the permissible limits of Indian Standards. However some readings for chloride test are
above the specified limit which indicates the presence of an environment which will lead to corrosion of reinforcement.
Page 57 of 84
Core Cutting & Rebound Hammer Tests:

The results obtained from core testing gives the average concrete strength value as 26.83 MPa. The minimum strength obtained is 15.93 MPa. This
shows that the strength of concrete is adequate at most of the locations, but there are some members whose concrete strength is on a lower side, (grid
Between P1-P2).
The rebound hammer test results provide an average strength of 19.5 MPa and 22.10 MPa respectively for ETP and PCDC building. The readings are
lower as compared to core test results. This indicates the surface concrete is weaker as compared to the internal core concrete. At many locations, the
surface concrete has strength lower than even 15 MPa which indicates that the strength of surface concrete is low in general.
Estimated Repair Cost:

Based on this structural assessment, the repair cost of the building is estimated to be Rs. 20, 00,000. This is an approximate value only and detailed cost
estimate will have to work out by Tata Steel prior to carrying out repair works.
Page 58 of 84
ANNEXURE 1: GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION
Page 59 of 84
GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION
Visual Last Structural Audit

Assessment 13/12/2016, 14/12/2016,15/12/2016 Date Not provided
Date (as reported by client)
Building Details not

ETP & PCDC BUILDING Structure Age yrs
Name provided.
Site Address Tata Steel Plant, Jamshedpur No. of Floors Ground Floor only
Building Industrial Building RCC Framed

Structure Type
Usage Approximate plinth area=3762sq.ft Structure
Internal Wall
Not applicable External Wall Type Brick Masonry wall
type
Material for
RCC Material for Beams RCC
Columns
Material for
RCC Roof Type Flat roof
Slabs
No. of OHWTs
No. of Lifts NA (Overhead Water NA
Tank)
Lift core
NA Type of OHWTs NA
material
Page 60 of 84
Is Soft Story Floor at which Soft

NA NA
present Storey is present
Finishing on
Type of Brick bat coba/Bitumen sheet is not present
Exposed Walls / Plaster
Waterproofing
Columns
RECENT REPAIR HISTORY

Is any
Can Repairs
Documentary
Type of Repair Year of Repair Information Source be seen at
Evidence
site?
Available
Structural Not provided Visual Inspection NO YES
Plastering Not provided Visual Inspection NO YES
Painting Not provided Visual Inspection NO YES
Waterproofing Not Provided Visual Inspection NO NO
Additions carried out in the building after original construction (as reported
Information Source
by client or evident from assessment)
There are many equipments and process pipes at the roof level of this building. It
is not known whether the slab is originally designed for these loads or not. Visual Inspection
Page 61 of 84
ANNEXURE 2: INACCESSIBLE AREAS
Page 62 of 84
INACCESSIBLE AREAS
List any areas where Visual Assessment

Reason for Inaccessibility
could not be carried out
Transfer Room(Electrical panel area) 24kw (Electrical area)
Page 63 of 84
ANNEXURE 3: BUILDING DRAWINGS / SITE SKETCHES
Page 64 of 84
Page 65 of 84
ANNEXURE 4: REPAIR METHODOLOGIES
Page 66 of 84
Repair methodologies for different type of defects observed in this building are presented below in sub-sections.
Annexure 4A:
Treatment for Exposed Reinforcement and Spalling of Concrete / Cracks in concrete members due to corroded reinforcement
(When new reinforcement is not required to be added)
When corrosion of reinforcement occurs, it exerts pressure on the concrete leading it to cracks in concrete. When the corrosion is severe, concrete
portions break apart from the main member which is called spalling of concrete. Spalling of concrete will lead to complete exposure of reinforcement,
which becomes susceptible to further corrosion. This makes the reinforcement ineffective and reduces the life of the concrete member.
When the loss in cross sectional area of reinforcement is not considerable, then the repair methodology suggested in this annexure can be adopted.
However if after removal of surface concrete and removal of rust from corroded reinforcement, it is seen that the bar diameter has reduced by more than
20% for beams and slabs, and 25% for columns, then additional rebar will have to be provided. In this case refer Annexure 4B for repair methodology
instead of this Annexure.
Recommendation:
 Use light chipping hammers to remove concrete from the affected area. Clean the surface thoroughly and remove all dirt & loose dust and
aggregate.
 Clean the exposed steel reinforcement with mechanical wire-brushing and by using a rust remover compound.
 The reinforcement should then be protected against corrosion by applying two coats of epoxy based zinc primer as per manufacturer’s
instructions.
Page 67 of 84
 Apply an epoxy bonding agent to the existing concrete surface so that proper bonding of the existing concrete to the repair material can take
place. The bonding agent has to be applied as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
 Apply Polymer modified mortar (PMM) to repair the concrete member and bring it to its original shape and size. The PMM should be applied while
the bonding agent is still tacky.
 Cure the repaired concrete member adequately.
Note:
1) Speed and time for application of any chemical or PMM should be as per manufacturer’s instructions.
2) It is not advisable to place PMM above 30 deg Celsius. Newly prepared surface should be protected from rainfall and other source of water. However
it should be moist cured for 1 to 3 days under ambient temperature or as per manufacturer’s instructions.
Page 68 of 84
Annexure 4B
Treatment for Exposed Reinforcement and Spalling of Concrete / Cracks in concrete members due to corroded reinforcement
(When new reinforcement is required to be added)
When the reinforcement has corroded considerably and the rebar diameter has reduced by more than 20% for beam& slab, and 25% for columns, the repair
methodology suggested in this annexure shall be adopted.
Recommendation for Repair of Columns:
aggregate.
 Add new reinforcement bars, as per the sketches provided in this annexure.
 The existing and new reinforcement should then be protected against corrosion by applying two coats of epoxy based zinc primer as per
manufacturer’s instructions.
Page 69 of 84
Page 70 of 84
Page 71 of 84
Page 72 of 84
Page 73 of 84
 Apply an epoxy bonding agent to the existing concrete surface so that proper bonding of the existing concrete to the repair material can take
place. The bonding agent has to be applied as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
 Apply Polymer modified mortar (PMM) to repair the concrete member and bring it to its original shape and size. The PMM should be applied while
the bonding agent is still tacky.
 Cure the repaired concrete member adequately.
Note:
 Speed and time for application of any chemical or PMM should be as per manufacturer’s instructions.
 It is not advisable to place PMM above 30 deg Celsius. Newly prepared surface should be protected from rainfall and other source of water.
However it should be moist cured for 1 to 3 days under ambient temperature or as per manufacturer’s instructions.
Recommendation for Repair of Beams & Slabs:
For repair of beams and slabs, following methodology should be adopted:
aggregate.
 Add new reinforcement bars, as per the sketches provided in this annexure.
Page 74 of 84
 The existing and new reinforcement should then be protected against corrosion by applying two coats of epoxy based zinc primer as per
 The concrete surface shall then be shotcreted using the wet mix process of shotcreting:
I. Thoroughly mix all ingredients.
II. Feed the mixture into the delivery equipment.
III. Jet the mixture from the nozzle at high velocity on to the surface which has to receive the shotcreted.
 Cure the shotcreted surface adequately at least for seven days minimum. Curing can be done using wet burlap and hose pipes.
Page 75 of 84
Retrofitting Details for Slab:
Page 76 of 84
Retrofitting Details for Beams:
Page 77 of 84
Page 78 of 84
Annexure 4C
Cracks in masonry walls/plaster
Since the building is an RCC framed structure, a crack in the masonry wall or plaster does not directly affect the structural integrity of the building.
However cracks on the external walls will lead to seepage of water into the walls and can also allow water to go to the concrete members which is not
desirable. Moreover the aesthetics of the buildings is affected due to the cracks in the wall.
Masonry walls also serve an important purpose in resisting the seismic forces during an earthquake and if cracks are present in the walls, they are not as
effective in taking the seismic forces.
Cracks in masonry walls are to be treated as per the procedure below:

 Cracks in the body of the masonry will have to be opened up and V-grooves should be created (of minimum width 5mm) with the help of
grinder.
 Clean the groove to remove all loose particles and wash with water. The surface must be free from dust, oil, grease, loose particles, etc.
 Shrink free crack filler material such as Dr. Fixit Crack-X Powder / Paste or equivalent can be used to repair the cracks. The crack filling material
shall be pushed into the crack with a spatula or a putty knife. The surface can then be leveled off. Allow it to dry in ambient conditions for 1-2
days before application of plaster & paint.
 Manufacturer’s instructions related to ambient conditions should also be followed.
Annexure 4D
Separation cracks in between masonry walls & concrete columns/beams
Separation cracks have been observed at beam-wall and column-wall junctions. These cracks manifest themselves at changes in material, changes in
geometry such as openings for windows or doors and adjacent to corners.
Page 79 of 84
At junctions of masonry walls with column or beam, chicken mesh should be used during plastering to prevent any shrinkage cracks due to change in
material. However when this is not done, separation cracks begin to appear.
Separation cracks should be filled using Polymer Modified Mortar (PMM). The manufacturer’s instructions should be followed for the application of PMM
and its curing.
Annexure 4E
Dampness in external masonry walls
If dampness is observed in periphery / external masonry walls of a room, it indicates that the exterior plaster is damaged due to which ingress of water into
the masonry walls is occurring.
To repair the damaged plaster, following steps can be followed:
 Chip off the damaged portion to obtain a sound surface with straight edges
 Wash the area with water & apply 1 primer coat of Acrylic or SBR based polymer mixed with cement. Primer coat to be prepared based on the
 Prepare Polymer Modified Mortar (PMM) by mixing sand, cement, water and SBR based polymer. The mix ratio has to be as per manufacturer’s
recommendations.
 Apply PMM while the primer is tacky.
 Mixing & application of PMM should be as per manufacturer’s instructions.
 Allow the repaired patch to cure adequately
Page 80 of 84
Annexure 4F
Leakage from Toilet Plumbing Lines
It was observed that water seepage is occurring from toilet plumbing pipes at certain locations. This may be due to:
 damage in plumbing pipes
 poor workmanship leading to gaps at pipe junctions
 choking of pipes restricting free movement of water
This water seepage is going into the masonry walls and concrete members. Where the seepage is occurring in the concrete members, it will lead to
corrosion of reinforcement which will lead to reduction in strength of the rebar as well as development of cracks in concrete.
Recommendation: All such locations where plumbing lines are leaking should be identified and the plumbing lines should be checked for damage,
blockages or gaps in connections.
Based on the findings, suitable steps should be taken to prevent any further leakage into the concrete members and walls.
1. Top cover of concrete to be removed and rusted reinforcement should be exposed. The exposed reinforcement to be cleaned of concrete and rust.
2. A bond of Polymer modified cement (PMC) slurry is to be applied all over the surface of concrete and reinforcement before covering it with repair
material.
3. This is to be covered in layers with polymer PMM 1:2:5 modified with 5% SBR by weight of concrete.
4. Flooring to be re-laid as per standard specifications making sure that all joints are grouted properly.
Page 81 of 84
Annexure 4G
Termite Infestation/White ants
The termites originate from the ground and move in mud tubes. Termites live in the soil and invade buildings in search of their favourite food i.e. wood and
paper (anything containing cellulose). They are known to be hidden invaders. Generally during new construction anti termite treatment is done, but the
treatment lasts only for 10 years. So termite problems generally arise in old buildings.
Recommendation:
1. Eliminate moisture problems in and around the structure by identifying the cause of moisture such as cracks in plaster, masonry wall or concrete
members. Presence of water can also occur due to leaking plumbing lines or damaged terrace waterproofing and external plaster in walls.
2. Keep proper ventilation in both the attic and the crawl space areas.
3. Use chemical such as Rentokill to kill the white ants.
4. Generally it’s better to do anti termite treatment along the plinth level soil along with the rooms where the infestation is observed. This is because
termites live in soil and find their way to the structure from the plinth level only.
Annexure4H
Dampness in Chajja
 Open verandah and balconies should have a slope of 1 in 100 to drain off the water effectively.
 Proper dripcourse/ throting should be provided to throw of the water effectively.
 Fillet should be provided at the junction, point of wall and chajja as shown in Figure below.
 Repair crack using Dr. Fixit Pidicrete URP, a polymer modified mortar.
Page 82 of 84
Annexure 4I
Leakage from Terrace Slab due to Damage in Waterproofing
At some places it was observed that leakage is occurring in the slabs through the terrace slab. This is happening due to deterioration in waterproofing.
Recommendation:
1. Fresh brickbat coba waterproofing should be carried out for the building. A specialized waterproofing contractor should be appointed to carry out
the waterproofing work. However prior to carrying out the waterproofing, the design of the terrace slab must be checked to make sure that it has
sufficient load carrying capacity to take the weight of the brickbat coba.
2. The new waterproofing should be laid such that the slope is towards the down take pipes so that water can easily exit the terrace without any
stagnation.
3. In case complete new waterproofing is not opted for at this stage, chemical waterproofing membrane or bitumen sheets should be overlaid on the
current surface. Products such as Dr. Fixit’s new coat or other similar products can be used.
4. Even if chemical waterproofing or bitumen sheets are opted for, it will be required that the slope of the terrace be towards the outlet drains.
Wherever this is not the case currently, a layer of cement slurry can be used to correct the direction of slope prior to using the chemical
waterproofing or bitumen sheets.
Page 83 of 84
ANNEXURE 5: NON-DESTRUCTIVE TEST RESULTS
Page 84 of 84
NDT Test Report
for
Tata Steel Ltd.
ETP & PCDC BUILDNG
Tatanagar, Jamshedpur
TATA PROJECTS LIMITED JAMSHEDPUR
Name of Person Signature Date
Supervisor D. K. Nag 29-12-16
Report prepared Santosh Yadav 13-02-17
Report checked Likhil Raut 13-02-17
Rahul Agarwal
Approved 13-02-17
(M.Tech IIT Bombay)
PROJECT INFORMATION PAGE
Customer Tata Steel Ltd. Building Name ETP & PCDC BUILDNG
Site Address Tatanagar, Jamshedpur Report Date 13-02-17
Number of Tests Conducted at Site
UPV 27 HCP 16
Rebound Hammer 27 Carbonation 11
Core cutting 27 Rebar Cover Meter 9
Crack Mapping 2 Chemical Test 11
Symbols used on Drawings
UPV HCP
Rebound Hammer Carbonation
Core cutting Rebar Cover Meter
Naming Conventions used in Report
- Element number as per client's drawing

Member ID - These can be based on grid numbers if no element numbers are available
- Element numbers are provided by us if no element or grid numbers are present on client's drawing
- Floor at which element is present. For columns, the start and end floor levels are indicated.
Level
- In case of industrial buildings, this can be the approximate height from ground level
Columns: whether the test has been done near the Top, Middle or Bottom of the column height
Test Location on Beams: whether the test has been done near the mid-span(MID) or near the supports (END)
Member Slabs: whether the test has been done near any of the slab edges (EDGE) or away from the edge
(CENTER)
NDT TEST RESULTS (UPV / Rebound Hammer)
Customer Tata Steel Ltd. Building Name ETP Building

NDT RESULTS
HCP Carbonation
Test Location UPV Results Rebound Hammer Results
Results Results
Test Hammer
Performe Equiv. cube
Serial Member Location UPV Concrete Potential Depth Reading Hammer
Unit Level Element Type d on strength
No. ID on (km/s) Quality (mV) (mm) (Rebound Direction
Core? (MPa)
Member Number)
1 A4 G-1 Column Mid 1.80 Doubtful 24 HOR 12
2 A5 G-1 Column Mid -375
3 A7 G-1 Column Mid 1.85 Doubtful 26 HOR 15
4 A8 G-1 Column Mid -343
5 A9 G-1 Column Mid 2.07 Doubtful 19 HOR Below 9
6 B3 G-1 Column Mid -236
7 B5 G-1 Column Mid 2.09 Doubtful -271 20 HOR 9
8 C2 G-1 Column Mid 3.10 Medium 38 HOR 30
12 C4-B4 1 Beam Mid 3.69 Good 30 VUP 12
13 C8-B8 1 Beam Mid 3.27 Medium -285 29 VUP 10
14 B1-A2 1 Slab Edge -320
15 C4-B3 1 Slab Edge 2.30 Doubtful 31 VUP 13
16 C8-B9 1 Slab Edge 2.64 Doubtful 39 VUP 23
UPV Results Summary Average 31.1 19.5

Criteria as per No. of
Concrete Quality HCP Results Summary
IS: 13311 (Part 1) readings
Criteria as per
Probability of No. of
Above 4.5 km/s Excellent 0 ASTM C876
corrosion readings
standard
3.5 to 4.5 km/s Good 1 More than -200 mV 10% 0
3.0 to 3.5 km/s Medium 5 -200 mV to -350 mV 50% 5
Below 3.0 km/s Doubtful 6 Less than -350 mV 90% 1
Notes
Name of Person Signature Date a) For calculating cube strength from rebound hammer
Supervisor D. K. Nag 29-12-16 values, appropriate reduction factors for surface
carbonation of concrete has been considered.
Rahul Agarwal 13-02-17

Approved (M.Tech IIT Bombay)
NDT TEST RESULTS (UPV / Rebound Hammer)
Customer Tata Steel Ltd. Building Name PCDC Building

NDT RESULTS
HCP Carbonation
Test Location UPV Results Rebound Hammer Results
Results Results
Test Hammer
Perform Equiv. cube
Serial Member Location UPV Concrete Potential Depth Reading Hammer
Unit Level Element Type ed on strength
No. ID on (km/s) Quality (mV) (mm) (Rebound Direction
Core? (MPa)
Member Number)
1 M2 G-1 Column Mid 2.51 Doubtful 34 HOR 24
2 N1 G-1 Column Mid 2.94 Doubtful -216 20 39 HOR 31
3 P1 G-1 Column Top 2.95 Doubtful 28 HOR 18
4 P1 G-1 Column Bot -271 20
5 Q2 G-1 Column Mid 2.26 Doubtful 34 HOR 24
6 X2 G-1 Column Mid -286
7 X3 G-1 Column Mid -215
8 X8 G-1 Column Mid 3.26 Medium 39 HOR 31
9 X8 G-1 Column Bot -265
10 X10 G-1 Column Mid 2.28 Doubtful -301 32 HOR 22
11 Y1 G-1 Column Mid -261
12 Y2 G-1 Column Mid 2.13 Doubtful 25 HOR 13
13 Y4 G-1 Column Mid 3.31 Medium 37 HOR 28
14 Y5 G-1 Column Top 2.93 Doubtful 36 HOR 26
15 Y6 G-1 Column Mid 1.98 Doubtful -291 36 HOR 26
16 Y8 G-1 Column Mid 2.50 Doubtful 37 HOR 28
17 Y9 G-1 Column Mid 2.71 Doubtful -269 40 25 HOR 13
18 X1-Y1 G-1 RCC Wall 2.30 Doubtful 10 27 HOR 16
19 Y3-Y4 G-1 RCC Wall -258 20
20 Y5-X5 G-1 RCC Wall 10
21 Y5-Y6 G-1 RCC Wall 20
24 Y7-Y8 G-1 RCC Wall 20
26 X2-Y3 1 Slab Edge 2.54 Doubtful 32 VUP 15
27 X4-Y5 1 Slab Edge 2.93 Doubtful 33 VUP 16
UPV Results Summary Average 17.3 32.9 22.1
Criteria as per No. of

Concrete Quality HCP Results Summary
IS: 13311 (Part 1) readings
Criteria as per
Probability of No. of
Above 4.5 km/s Excellent 0 ASTM C876
corrosion readings
standard
3.5 to 4.5 km/s Good 0 More than -200 mV 10% 0
3.0 to 3.5 km/s Medium 2 -200 mV to -350 mV 50% 10
Below 3.0 km/s Doubtful 13 Less than -350 mV 90% 0
Notes
Name of Person Signature Date a) For calculating cube strength from rebound hammer
Supervisor D. K. Nag 29-12-16 values, appropriate reduction factors for surface
carbonation of concrete has been considered.

NDT TEST RESULTS (Rebar Cover Meter Test)
Customer Tata Steel Ltd. Building Name ETP & PCDC BUILDNG

NDT RESULTS
Test Location For Beam / Column For Slabs / Wall Only
Main Bar Secondary Remarks

Serial Member Dimensions of Main Bars Concrete Cover Concrete
Unit Level Element Type spacing bar spacing
No. ID Member mm Nos mm Cover mm
mm mm
1 C3 G-1 Column 320 x 330 8 45
2 C7 G-1 Column 330 x 330 8 40
3 B9 G-1 Column 310 x 330 8 30
4 M1 G-1 Column 480 x 915 4 45
5 Y7-Y8 G-1 RCC Wall 860 x 950 210 240 60
6 Y5-Y6 G-1 RCC Wall 860 x 1000 200 210 65
7 Y1-Y2 G-1 RCC Wall 900 x 1000 225 250 65
8 X9 G-1 Shear Wall 790 x 1340 130 150 50
9 P1-P2 G-1 RCC Wall 950 x 1310 190 260 65
Name of Person Signature Date

29-12-16
Supervisor D. K. Nag
13-02-17
Report prepared Santosh Yadav
13-02-17
Report checked Likhil Raut
TEST RESULTS FOR CHEMICAL TEST
Customer Tata Steel Ltd.
Building Name PCDC Building
Site Address Tatanagar, Jamshedpur
Report Date 13-02-17

Test Location Chemical Test Results
Serial Member CL SO3

Unit Level Element Type 3
No. ID (kg/m ) (%)
1 M2 G-1 Column 0.600 0.688%
2 N1 G-1 Column 0.480 2.063%
3 X10 G-1 Column 0.480 0.825%
4 Y9 G-1 Column 0.960 1.031%
5 Y1-Y2 G-1 RCC Wall 0.360 2.063%
6 Y5-X5 G-1 RCC Wall 0.360 0.413%
7 Y5-Y6 G-1 RCC Wall 0.360 0.165%
8 Y6-X6 G-1 RCC Wall 0.600 1.375%
9 Y7-X7 G-1 RCC Wall 0.480 0.688%
10 Y8-X8 G-1 RCC Wall 0.360 0.151%
11 P1-P2 G-1 RCC Wall 0.360 1.375%
Notes: Permissible limits as per IS 456:2000
Ph Not less than 8
3
For PCC, maximum 3.0 kg of Chloride per m3 of concrete.
CL (kg/m ) 3
For RCC, maximum 0.6 kg of Chloride per m of concrete.
SO3 (%) Less than 4% by mass of cement in the concrete mix.
Name of Person Date

Supervisor D. K. Nag 29-12-16

CRACK MAPPING
NDT PHOTOGRAPHS
Rebound Hammer Test Rebound Hammer Test
UPV Test HCP Test

HCP Test Carbonation Test
Rebound Hammer Test Rebar Mapping Test

UPV Test Rebar Mapping Test
UPV Test UPV Test

Rebound Hammer Test Core Extraction Test
Core Extraction Test Core Extraction Test

UPV Test UPV Test
UPV Test UPV Test

UPV Test UPV Test
UPV Test HCP Test

Structural Audit Report-ETP and PCDC-compressed

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Structural Audit Report-ETP and PCDC-compressed

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ARC CIVIL INSPECTION AND NDT OF RCC & MASONRY STRUCTURES

PROJECT: BUILDINGS AT JAMSHEDPUR WORKS

ETP AND PCDC BUILDING

SL. No. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No’s.

Annexure No. ANNEXURES Page No’s.

ETP & PCDC Building

 Assessment of overall health condition of the existing RCC Buildings.

5. Abbreviations and Definitions

 ALERT - General defects which may deteriorate in near future.

 ALARM - Major defects which may result in serious consequence.

 EMERGENCY - Defects to be attended without any loss of time.

 Risk: The combination of the probability of an event and its consequence.

 Risk Mitigation: Process of implementation of measures to minimize, modify or eliminate risk.

All the observations and actions required are recorded in Table 1.

 ALERT- General defects which may deteriorate in near future.

9. Observation & Action as per Table 1 Below

Plaster is damage on masonry wall

Beam reinforcement is exposed and corroded. Spalling

Plaster is found to be damaged on masonry wall. Annexure 4C

Reinforcement is exposed and corroded, concrete is

Brickwork and plaster of masonry wall is damaged.

Angle section at corner of column is severely corroded.

Surface plaster at the edge of the beam is damaged.

Surface concrete of the beam is damaged.

Longitudinal crack is observed on the bottom of the

Crack is found on the column surface area. It might be

Corroded angle section is embedded in concrete

Dampness observed on beam.

Dampness observed on slab.

Longitudinal cracks are observed on beam, It’s a

Exterior North Side

Reinforcement of beam is found to be exposed and

Reinforcement of beam is found to be exposed and

Repair the surface

Reinforcement of beam is found to be exposed and

Cover concrete of slab is deteriorating.

Peeling of paint is observed on bottom of slab

Infestation of Termite is observed on beam

Longitudinal crack is observed on Column, It’s a

Reinforcement on top of slab is exposed and corroded.

Tank is kept directly on roof slab. It’s not known

Dampness is observed on slab.

Reinforcement is exposed and corroded, concrete is

Reinforcement is exposed and corroded.

Repair work is observed at the bottom of the slab. Keep under

Cracks are observed at the bottom of slab.

Reinforcement of beam is found to be corroded, And

Reinforcement is exposed and corroded, concrete is

Item / Part Remarks /

Reinforcement is exposed and corroded, concrete is

Surface Plaster crack is observed on RCC wall.

Longitudinal crack is observed on column. It’s a

Item / Part Remarks /

Reinforcement is exposed and corroded, Concrete is

Reinforcement is exposed and corroded. Spalling of

Pedestal concrete is found to be damaged.

PC DC-6(Exterior South Side)

Image not used

Image not used

Image not used

Image not used

Image not used

Image 99 Image 100

Image 101 Image 104