Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/322107668
CITATIONS READS
0 280
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Vikas Kumar on 28 May 2018.
E-mail : vyadav21@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Fodder is found as one of the important constraints in rearing the animals. Purchasing fodder and then
feeding to the animals is not found economical. Berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum Linn) is an important
fodder crop and the quality seed of is in great demand in the market especially from the northern India. It
is very high yielding fodder crop and can give 1000 to 1100 quintals of green fodder in one season only. 5- 6
cuttings of green fodder can be taken from it. The cost of production analysis of Berseem was done at
IGFRI Jhansi with the commercial variety Wardan in the year 2010 and 2011. The rate for pure seed was
considered as Rs 100 per kilogram in year 2010 and Rs 120 per kilogram in year 2011. First cost of
production is calculated over individual farms then the data are converted into per hectare basis. The share
of variable cost and fixed cost n total cost is 79.54 percent and 11.37 percent respectively. The average total
cost is found as Rs 45616.65 per hectare. Average ungraded seed production was 202.50 kg . The average
rate of ungraded seed is found as Rs 85.79 per kilogram. The total quality seed come out is 164.12 kg and
the total of waste seed as 30.93 kg and 8.76 kg as straw. The average total return is found as Rs 69036.96 per
hectare and the total cost after processing is Rs 46430.44. The average net return is found as Rs 26262.14
and the benefit cost ratio as 1.57. The benefit cost ratio calculated on variable cost basis is 2.00. Thus, it is
clear from the study that if there is market for the sale of green fodder derived from various cuttings, the
Berseem seed production is highly profitable.
Key words : Berseem seed production, Cost of cultivation, Benefit- cost ratio, Fodder production
222
Economics for quality seed production of Berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum Linn.)
Table-3 : Cost and Return and B: C ratio at farm level (Rs per hectare basis).
with thresher. The raw produce was then processed in year 2010 and Rs 120 per kilogram in year 2011.
through processing machine and pure seed was The total working capital shows the total variable cost
produced. The variable cost and fixed cost were incurred on various operations. The total variable cost
calculated for different machines used and multiplied is calculated by adding three percent interest to total
with hours for which they used to find the expenditures working capital. The addition of all the fixed cost,
incurred on them (Kumar, 2009). The labour rate was overhead cost and rental value of land gives the total
taken as Rs 128 per manday of 8 hours. The charges for fixed cost. The rental value of land was considered as
canal are taken as Rs 300 per year. The rate of green that prevailing in the locality (Rs 10000/ha). The
fodder was taken as Rs 100 per quintal and for dry management and risk was considered as ten percent of
fodder Rs 300 per quintal and for screen reject derived total variable and fixed cost. The cost of cultivation
during processing as Rs 600 per quintal. The rate for data were calculated for every stage of crop growth.
processed seed was considered as Rs 100 per kilogram
223
Kumar, et al.
224
Economics for quality seed production of Berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum Linn.)
Table-6 : Returns analysis and Benefit Cost ratio analysis for seed production.
Fig-1 : Operation wise cost of cultivation ( per hectare Fig: 4: Itemwise cost distribution (Rs per hectare)
basis)
225
Kumar, et al.
incurred on that is Rs 2558.10. The total expenditure ratio calculated on variable cost basis is found as 1.90.
incurred on harvesting is Rs 3200 which is done It is this value that is visible to farmers as other fixed
manually by sickle. The total mandays used in costs are hidden.
harvesting is 25.00 per hectare. The average total From the average of 202.50 kg of ungraded seed, the
expenditure incurred on threshing is Rs 734.99 per total quality seed come out is 164.12 kg and the total of
hectare and the involvement of total labour mandays waste seed as 30.93 kg and 8.76 kg as straw. The
are 3.9. The average total working capital is found as average cost of processing is found as Rs 813.88 (
Rs 35225.34 per hectare (Fig. 3). The average interest Table 4). The total returns from both fields and
on working capital is Rs 1056.76. The total variable processing comes to Rs 72692.58 per hectare. The
cost is found as Rs 36282.10. The rental value is taken average green fodder production is 498 quintal per
as Rs 5000 per hectare as this is found prevalent in the hectare (Table 5). The average total return is found as
locality. The total fixed cost is found as Rs 5187.50 per Rs 69036.96 per hectare and the total cost is Rs
hectare. The share of variable cost and fixed cost n total 46430.44. The average net return is found as Rs
cost is 79.54 percent and 11.37 percent respectively. 26262.14 and the benefit cost ratio as 1.57 ( Table 6).
The average total cost is found as Rs 45616.65 per The benefit cost ratio calculated on variable cost basis
hectare. is 2.00. Thus, it is clear from the study that if there is
Item wise cost of cultivation on per hectare basis is market for the sale of green fodder derived from
presented in Table 2. The average draft power used per various cuttings, the Berseem seed production is highly
hectare is 5.47 hours. The variable cost incurred on profitable. In case, there is no use of green fodder, the
draft power is Rs 1178.94 per hectare. The average crop can be sown late but it should have at least one
total labour mandays used per hectare are 206.12. The cutting for green fodder. The price of Berseem seed
labour mandays used are higher as there are number of varies in the market form Rs 80 per kilogram to Rs 160
operations that are dependent mostly on labour only per kilogram, the farmers can take the advantage of
like weeding, rouging, green fodder cutting and high price during the sowing season, so they are
harvesting. The average total expenditure incurred on advised to sell the seed during the sowing season.
labour is Rs 26383.16 which is 57.84 percent of total
cost of cultivation (Figure 4). The expenditure ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
incurred on seed purchase is Rs 2000.00 per hectare Authors are grateful to the Head of Seed Technology
which is 4.38 percent of total cost. The total Division and Director, IGFRI for providing necessary
expenditure incurred on manures and fertilizers is Rs research facilities for this study.
3505.18 per hectare which is found as second highest
in total cost that is 7.68 percent. The average total REFERENCE
expenditure on tubewell is Rs 2133.82 per hectare. 1. Kumar, V. (2009). An Economic Analysis of Cost of
Thus the highest expenditure in percentage term is Production of Paddy In Different Farm Size Groups,
incurred on labour followed by manures and fertilizers Plant Archives Vol. 9 No. 1, 2009, 197-198
and tubewell cost. 2. Kumar, V. (2009) Assessment of Marketing Charges and
On per hectare basis the average ungraded seed Price-Spread under Different Channels in Marketing of
production was 202.50 kg . The average rate of Wheat, Plant Archives Vol. 9 No. 1, 2009, 171-172
ungraded seed is found as Rs 85.79 per kilogram. It is 3. Mukherjee and Maiti (2009) Annual –leguminous winter
calculated by deducting the cost of processing from the crop Berseem or Egyptian clover, Book on Forage Crops,
Production and Conservation, 2009, Kalyani
pure seed received. The total value of ungraded seed
Publication,106-117
has been found as Rs 17824.86 and if add the green
4. Thomas, C.G. (2008) Berseem crop. Book on Forage crop
fodder produced also, and then the total return from
production in tropics. 2008, Kalyani publication,
farm has come to Rs 69036.96. The average benefit 195-198.
cost ratio at farm only is found as 1.51. The benefit cost
226
Economics for quality seed production of Berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum Linn.)
7
Kumar, et al.