Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Test report
Revision 0
Contract Number: -
Contract Date: -
Sample number: 1
Approved:
Name: Dr. D. Degering
Function: responsible for -spectrometry
Signature:
1 Analytical results
238 230 226 210 235 231 227 228 228 40 131 134 137
Sample U Th Ra Pb U Pa Ac Ra Th K I Cs Cs Detector tm
Date of
[Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] Geometry [ks]
measurement
Mass / [kg]
1 ai < 1,9 < 21 0,83 < 1,9 < 1,9 < 4,1 < 0,90 0,93 0,65 30 < 0,14 < 0,14 < 0,17 GMX 3 65
Amezcua Biodisc 3 V.2- 1* s 0,18 0,28 0,11 4 70D 14 January 2018
s/ai 22% 30% 17% 14% 0,114
g* 0,97 11 0,18 0,97 0,97 2,0 0,45 0,34 0,13 1,2 0,072 0,070 0,085 Degering
The reference date of the specific activity is the given date of measurement.
The investigated material of the sample fulfills the requirement of ISO 13356, as shown in the following
table.
1
Amezcua Biodisc 3 V.2-
1,9 0,8 0,9 3,7 < 200 1,8%
The investigated material of the sample fulfills the requirements of EU 297/2011, as shown in the
following table. It can thus be used without restrictions.
Exhaustion of
Exhaustion of
Exhaustion of
131 134 137
Sample I Cs Cs
test value
test value
test value
[Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg]
Analytical value Test value Analytical value Test value Analytical value Test value
1
Amezcua Biodisc 3 V.2-
< 0,14 150 0,10% < 0,14 370 0,04% < 0,17 370 0,05%
Berlin 16.03.2018
1
Test Insitute Institute of Electrophotonic
Siegfriedstrasse 204
10365 Berlin // Germany
Client QNET LTD.
Units G-L, 21/F MG Tower
133 Hoi Bun Road, Kwun Tong
Kowloon East HK
Manufacturer QNET LTD.
Units G-L, 21/F MG Tower
133 Hoi Bun Road, Kwun Tong
Kowloon East HK
Test Sample Model Amezcua BioDisc 3.3
Quantity 1
Condition new
Photograph
2
Content
3
1.0. Test Equipment
EPC – Camera
This scientific device consist of hardware and software for the direct
Computer registration and analysis of glow energy of different objects under the
influences of pulse EM -field, the human energy and stress states. The recorded
images, EPC – Grammes, are created by a unique patented optical system and CCD
camera in daylight condition with real – time processing.(fig1)
EPC – ECOTESTER
The ECOTESTER is intended for evaluation of the state of the environment. The
device gives the possibility to carry out ecological monitoring.
2.0 Test of the influence of Amezcua BioDisc 3.3 on human body state.
2.1 Measurement Procedure
The product was tested on 10 apparently healthy persons (subjects) of different age and
gender. Every measurement was attended with a placebo. The measured subject and the
operator of EPC-Camera did not know about it. During the tests the subjects wore the
product in their pant pockets close to the body. It ere measured the EPC- Grammes with
and without filter. The changes of the EPC-Parameters "integral glow area" , “energy of
glowing” and "activation coefficient" were analyzed.
The "integral glow area", “energy of glowing” directly correlates with the human body bio energy.
The positive influence of the test product on the human body state is represented in the increasing
of the bio energy for healthy tired person with stress. On healthy relaxed person with optimal initial
bio energy the energy products have a neglected weak influence on the quantity, but a positive
influence on the quality of the energy: left-right symmetry and homogeneity of glowing. In case of
4
an abnormal high energy, for example inflammatory, the products reduce the body energy in the
direction of optimal body energy.
The EPC-Parameter "activation coefficient" correlates with the physiological stress of person. The
positively harmonizing influence of the test product is represented in the decreasing of stress level
("activation coefficient") for healthy person and increasing of the "activation coefficient" for the
people with inflammatory state.
2.2 Subjects
1 female 55
2 male 62
3 female 33
4 female 36
5 male 30
6 female 39
7 male 26
8 female 37
9 male 31
10 female 59
5
2.3.0 Results
2.3.1 Test group
2.3.1.1 Influence on Area of glowing(without filter)
The parameter “Area” rose for 10 of 10 subjects during the influence of 30
and 60 minutes.
Dagram 1 Area of glowing (without filter)
10000
9000
8000
7000
6000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
subjects 0 m in. 30 m in. 60 m in.
6
2.3.1.2 Influence on Area of glowing(with filter)
14000
13500
Area(pix)
13000
12500
12000
11500
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.
7
2.3.1.3 Influence on Energy of glowing(wf)
Diagram 3. Energy(wf)
1,2
Norm energy
1,1
0,9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
subjects 0 m in. 30 m in. 60 m in.
8
2.3.1.4 Influence on Energy of glowing(f)
The parameter “Energy(f)” rose or remained nearly the same for 7 of 10 or subjects during the
influence of 30 and 60 minutes
Diagram 4. Energy(f)
1,1
Norm energy
1,05
0,95
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.
9
2.3.1.5 Influence on Activation coefficient(stress level)
The parameter “Activation coefficient” reduces or remained nearly the same for 10 of 10 subjects
during the influence of 30 and 60 minutes.
5
4
3
2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
subjects 0 m in. 30 m in. 60 m in.
10
2.3.2.0 Placebo group
2.3.2.1 Influence of Placebo on Area of glowing(wf)
The parameter “Area” reduces or remained nearly the same for 6 of 10 subjects during the influence
of 30 and 60 minutes.
11000
10000
Area(pix)
9000
8000
7000
6000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.
11
2.3.2.2 Influence of Placebo on Area of glowing(f)
The parameter “Area” reduces for 5 of 10 subjects during the influence of 30 and 60 minutes.
14000
Area(pix)
13000
12000
11000
10000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.
12
2.3.2.3 Placebo Energy of glowing(wf)
The parameter “Norm energy(wf)” reduces or remained nearly the same for 8 of 10 subjects during
the influence of 30 and 60 minutes
Diagram 8. Energy(wf)
1
Norm energy
0,95
0,9
0,85
0,8
0,75
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.
13
2.3.2.4 Placebo Energy of glowing(f)
The parameter “Energy(f)” reduces or remained nearly the same for 5 of 10 subjects during the
influence of 30 and 60 minutes
Diagram 9. Energy(f)
Placebo Group Amezcua BioDisc 3.3.
EPC(GDV) - Norm energy of glowing(f)
1,1
1,05
Norm energy
0,95
0,9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.
14
2.3.2.5 Influence on Activation coefficient(Stress level) in placebo group
5
4
3
2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.
15
3.0 Test of the influence of Amezcua BioDisc 3.3 on water states
3.1 Measurement Procedure and Photographs of the Procedure
For the test was used tap water. Water was filled in two clean glasses and stands for two hours
without influence on the laboratory table. The glasses was covered with a sheet of paper.
For the estimation of changing of water states under the influence of the Amezcua BioDisc 3.3 it
was measured the "glowing" of a test or placebo water drop filled in syringe. The measurement was
carried out with EPC- Camera (Fig. 3).
The EPC- parameter of measurement was "Energy of glowing". The energizing and harmonizing
influence responses to the increasing of this parameter.
In the beginning the initial water state was measured from both glasses. Then the test product was
placed in its original package under one glass and a package without a product was placed
under the placebo water glass. (Fig. 2). The measurements were repeated after 30min,60min and
120min of influences. It was noted the average value(4x40=160 pulse) of four measurements for
one point of water state. All data of test water was normalized to initial states of test water and all
placebo data to initial state of placebo. It was calculated the average after 4 tests.
Figure 2. Water test// BioDisc 3.3 Figure 3. Water test// Test procedure
BioDisc 3.3 was placed in a box under 1- EPC Camera, 2 - attachment for tests of fluids,
a glass 3 – laptop
16
3.2 Results
The results of the changing of EPC — norm. parameter "Energy of glowing" for BioDisc 3.3
influenced water are shown on diagram 11.
Diagram 11: Results of water measurements for test and placebo - average after 4 test. Every test
results is the average of 4(4x40=160 pulse) measurements norm. data of the energy of water drop
glowing.
1,15
Norm energy
1,1
1,05
0,95
0min 30min 60min 120min
time placebo test
Difference between test and placebo after 120min of BioDisc 3.3 influences: 6,70%
17
4.0 Test of the Influence of Amezcua BioDisc3.3 on Space
4.1 Measurement Procedure
For the measurement of the influences of the Amezcua BioDisc3.3 on space states were used the
EPC-ECOTESTER with sensor –antenna “Sputnik” (Fig. 4). The signal from the antenna correlates
with the state of spaces around the antenna and was documented as the EPC-parameter "Energy of
glowing" of the metal cylinder.
Figure 4
If the space around the antenna is in a good harmonically state –the signal of antenna is higher. The
states of space is in a permanent changing because of different influences: day, month and year
dynamic, the influence of different electromagnetic fields, geoactive zones, etc.
The test took place in the laboratory room of the institute. During the tests the positions of the
devices, antenna and the influence product were always the same. The test product was placed in a
distance of 30cm from the antenna after 60min. It was carried out simultaneously test in two rooms
with one device in each room. One room – placebo measurements, another – test.Nobody was in the
rooms during the influences. Were measured and registered one pulse/min 5 hour long. Were
calculate the the average signal of 60 pulse every hour of measurements. The signal normed to first
hour average value was comparison.
4.2Results
The normalized antenna signal data average after 4 tests
Diagram 12
1,04
1,02
0,98
0,96
0h 1h 2h 3h 4h
time test placebo
18
Data table of Diagram 11
_____________________________________________________________
time of influences 0min 60min 120min 180min 240min
_____________________________________________________________
After 4 hours of Amezcua BioDisc 3.3 influences on space difference between test
signal and placebo average after four tests – 7,9%
===================================================================
5. Conclusion: differences between test and placebo
19