You are on page 1of 8

The History of Articulators: The Contributions of Rudolph L.

Hanau and His Company—Part II


Robert L. Engelmeier, DMD, MS,1 Donald M. Belles, DDS, MS,2 & Edgar N. Starcke, DDS2
1
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
2
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Dentistry, Houston, TX

Keywords Abstract
Rudolph Hanau; articulator history; Hanau
articulator.
This article is an historical overview of the Hanau Engineering Company from the
time of Rudolph Hanau’s death in 1930 to the present. It explores the development of
Correspondence
many articulators intended both for removable and fixed prosthodontic restorations.
Robert Engelmeier, University of Pittsburgh The article is divided into the eras of the company’s corporate history, and it reviews
School of Dental Medicine, 3501 Terrace St., articulator designs and major improvements made during each of those periods.
Pittsburgh, PA 15261. E-mail: rle14@pitt.edu.

The authors deny any conflicts of interest.

Accepted November 5, 2015

doi: 10.1111/jopr.12448

Sadly, in 1930 Rudolph Hanau passed away at the early age porate umbrella in 1993. A year later, Waterpik purchased the
of 49. Three months after his death, his last paper explaining Occlusion Line of Denar Corporation, founded by Dr. Niles
his concept of “Resilient and Like Effect” (REALEFF) was Guichet in 1965.4
presented at the Chicago Midwinter Meeting by Dr. Walter Allegheny-Teledyne was incorporated in 1966; however, by
H. Wright.1 During his impressive 9-year career in dentistry, 1999, Waterpik Technologies was spun-off from Allegheny-
Hanau designed and manufactured many articulators and made Teledyne as a separate corporation. Within 7 years (in 2006), the
prolific contributions to the dental literature.2 After his death, privately held Carlyle Group purchased it. After four decades,
management of his company was passed to Hanau’s partner, in February of 2008, the dynamic “Teledyne Era” of the Hanau
Jacob L. Stern. As president, Stern reorganized the company in Company ended when Whip Mix Corporation purchased the
1930 and steered it for the next 28 years. His wife, Olive, was occlusion and laboratory divisions of Teledyne-Waterpik. This
appointed vice president, and Edmond J. Franwick became the transaction included the entire Hanau and Denar articulator
company’s secretary, as well as head of product development.3 lines.4
It is notable that by the time of the company’s 1930 reorganiza- Whip Mix was founded in 1919. Its primary product was
tion, its product line had expanded to include alcohol torches, an innovative mechanical spatulation device that surpassed any
brass denture flasks and presses, several facebows including a other available method of mixing casting investment materials.
Kinematic model, gothic arch tracing devices, and dental man- Since the recent consolidation of these three major articula-
nequins for dental school use. Incredibly, a number of these tor manufacturers, the Whip Mix Corporation has continued
products are still in production.3 to offer the complete lines of Hanau, Denar, and Whip Mix
Following Jacob Stern’s retirement in 1958, the American instruments, along with a wide variety of their accompanying
Optical Company purchased Hanau Engineering. In 1961, the facebows and associated accessories.4
company again changed hands when it was sold to the William
Getz Corporation, which had enjoyed considerable success as
a dental materials company. Just 5 years later, in 1966, Mr. Hanau Engineering Era (1930 to 1958)
Getz traded his entire company for stock in the Teledyne Cor- The Kinescope
poration. Teledyne was established in 1960. In 1965 Teledyne
acquired Aquatek Corporation, which was formed in 1962 and The Kinescope, which followed Hanau’s original “B” and “C”
was the producer of the Waterpik oral irrigation device. models, represented a quantum leap in articulator design. It
This company was incorporated and renamed Teledyne- began life as the “Special Orthodontic Machine.” Rudolph
Waterpik in 1975. The Hanau, Getz, and Waterpik divisions Hanau simultaneously designed this instrument and the leg-
of Teledyne were eventually merged under the Teledyne Cor- endary Model H. By the time of its commercial offering in 1922,

Journal of Prosthodontics 00 (2016) 1–8 


C 2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists 1
Hanau Part II Engelmeier et al

Figure 3 By 1958, the Model H-2, which evolved from the high post
Figure 1 The Kinescope Model C of 1928 was a massive instrument
SM and SMX models of 1949 was rapidly replacing the original Model H
produced until 1964.
articulator.

by retooling with modern machinery and an increase in fac-


tory personnel. Despite modifications and refinements during
its impressive four-decade run, the basic design of the Model
H remained unchanged. Model H production ceased in 1960;
however, replacement part production continued through 1966.
Most significant of the Model H improvements during its
production years were the 1937 addition of a centric lock and
incorporation of two aluminum inserts into the lower mem-
bers to reinforce the vertically aligned posts that supported the
condylar housings. After addition of Hanau’s controversial for-
mula (L = H/8 + 12) to the underside of the lower member in
1938, the Model H was redesignated the Model H – 110 B.3
The principle limitation of the “Model H” articulator was its
Figure 2 The Delta Sigma model of 1922 was the original Hanau Model insufficient intermember distance, which prevented a facebow
H articulator design. mounting where a third point of reference was used. The high
post “SH” and “SHX” models of 1949 were specifically de-
this articulator underwent a name change to “Kinescope Model signed to accept a facebow recording using an “orbitale” third
M.” It was lauded by Dr. Russell Tench as “an almost perfect point of reference. The condylar posts were extended half an
instrument.”5 After significant design modification of its outer inch beyond those of the “Model H.” An infraorbital flag was
posts, this landmark articulator evolved into the “Kinoscope added to the upper member, while an “Orbitale” pointer was
Model A2” of 1927, then finally into the “Kinoscope Model C” added to the accompanying facebow. These widely popular high
of 1928. The Model “C” was the final design offered commer- post models of 1949 were renamed, giving birth to the incredi-
cially (Fig 1). An additional Research Kinoscope Model was bly successful “Model 96-H2” series. Prior to the 1958 sale of
developed in 1929. The “Model C” featured a redesigned lower the company to American Optical, additional refinements had
member and the Hanau Universal Incisal Guide. A centric lock been made to these landmark 1949 models (Fig 3), including:
was added in 1937. Kinescope Model “C” production contin-
ued until 1964 when it was discontinued during the company’s
r Condylar posts were further extended to ¾ inch beyond
Getz Corporation era.6 those of the original “Model H.” In addition, the maxil-
lary mounting surface was lowered by ¼ inch.
r An adjustable incisal guide table was added.
The Model H
r Extendable axis shafts were added to enable use of a
The Model “H” began in 1922 with Rudolph Hanau’s “Delta Kinetic facebow.
Sigma” design. It finally received a government patent in 1928, r A protrusive-retrusive adjustment was added to the
along with its “Model H” designation (Fig 2).7 The venerable condylar track.
“Model H” articulator enjoyed widespread popularity from the
time of its original offering until the 1959 introduction of the Despite the extraordinary success of the “H” and “H-2,”
Model “H-2.” By the mid-20th century, the “Model H” had the Hanau Company also designed and manufactured addi-
become the choice of many dental schools across the country. tional articulators specifically intended for crown and bridge
Initial demand for the “Model H” spawned significant expan- restoration. First in this series was the superbly designed “K”
sion and relocation of the Hanau factory. This was accompanied model of 1923 (Fig 4). This prototype was never commercially

2 Journal of Prosthodontics 00 (2016) 1–8 


C 2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists
Engelmeier et al Hanau Part II

Figure 4 The 1923 K Model articulator was a less adjustable version of


the Model H intended for crown and bridge restorations. It was never Figure 6 During the American Optical era, Hanau’s classic complete
produced, however, because of competition concerns for the already denture technique manual was replaced with a brief instruction man-
successful Model H. ual for the Model H-2 instrument. Also pictured is the company’s flier
supplied with the Kinescope Model C, courtesy collection Dr. Robert L.
Engelmeier.

Figure 5 The crown and bridge Model of 1934 was a very successful
stamped brass instrument produced until 1971.

offered because of company concerns over its competition with Figure 7 The 1961 Twin-Stage Occluder was a crown and bridge instru-
the already successful “Model H.”6 ment designed to be used with the Meyer “Chew-In” technique.
The remarkably successful crown and bridge “Model of
1934” (Fig 5) was a very inexpensive stamped brass instru-
ment designed by Edmond Franwick.8 It was produced until William Getz Era (1961 to 1966)
1971. The William Getz Corporation, a very successful dental mate-
rials company of the time, purchased Hanau Engineering Com-
American Optical Era (1958 to 1961) pany from American Optical in 1961. During the Getz period,
Mr. Franwick semi-retired as Director of Product Development
The classic “Model H” was discontinued during this era. De- and was succeeded by Richard Bue, who held that position
spite the change in management, Edmond Franwick continued until his retirement in 1989. Mr. Getz appointed John H. Buh-
to direct product development and manufacturing. Under his ler, former Dean at Emory University’s Dental School, as vice
supervision a number of improvements and variations occurred president of the company. Under Buhler’s leadership, Hanau
for the “Model H-2.” Most significant of these were replace- Engineering supported an aggressive campaign for U.S. Dental
ment of the centric latch with centric locking screws and ex- Schools to adopt the “H-2” articulator.10 The “H-2” remained
tendable axis shafts. Design alterations were often prompted by the company’s mainstay during the brief Getz era. Three cen-
specifications requested by dental schools using this instrument. tric lock designs were developed during this time, prompted by
Perhaps the most significant change during this era’s company customer feedback.
offerings was the replacement of Hanau’s original complete The “Twin-Stage Occluder” was the only addition made
denture technique manual,9 which went far beyond use of the to the Hanau line during the Getz era (Fig 7). This crown
“Model H.” The rather brief new manual simply covered the and bridge instrument designed by David W. Moore, DDS,
use of the instrument. During this period the company preferred of New Orleans was intended to be used following the Func-
to leave complete denture technology and philosophies to texts tionally Generated Path Technique of Dr. Frederick Meyers
by notable prosthodontic educators of the day (Fig 6).10 of Minneapolis.11 The master cast of the prepared teeth was

Journal of Prosthodontics 00 (2016) 1–8 


C 2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists 3
Hanau Part II Engelmeier et al

r Adjustable intercondylar distance with a split horizontal


axis
r Adjustable Bennett Angle
r Extendable axis shafts to accept a Kinematic facebow
r Adjustable incisal guide pin and table
r Orbital flag
r Closed condylar tracks with protrusive and retrusive
adjustments15
The cost of these instruments, of course, was expensive. This
series did evolve a bit through the 1970s but was discontinued
in 1986.

Model 145 Series


Figure 8 The Model-130-21 was the flagship in the original Twenty-one A full decade after its retirement, the “Model H” re-emerged
University series models. Its patent was granted in 1964. as the “Model 145,” inspired by collaborations between the
Hanau Company and the Pankey, Mann and Schuyler Institute.
This instrument had “Model 96 H-2” upper and lower members
mounted on the lower member. One upper member held the with “Model H” upright short posts to minimize the height of
opposing cast, while the other held the functionally generated the plaster mounts. It also featured the Schuyler guide and ad-
path recording. When Mr. Getz traded his entire company for justable pin originally developed for the “Model-130” Series.
stock in the Teledyne Corporation in 1966, the Hanau Com- Finally, it supported the Broaderick Occlusal Plane Analyzer
pany again changed hands. At that time the company’s name used to establish the curvature of the occlusal plane. Six ver-
was changed to Teledyne-Hanau. sions of this instrument were eventually developed, all uniquely
accessorized for specific customers.
Teledyne Corporation Era (1966 to 2008)
Model 154-1 Series
The four-decade Teledyne era was by far the Hanau Com-
pany’s most innovative and productive period for development The next articulator model offered by the company during this
of entirely new lines of articulators. The paradigm shift from era was the radically designed “H 154-1” of 1974. This inter-
non-arcon to arcon instruments evolved during this time.12 esting arcon instrument featured a fixed intercondylar distance,
open condylar tracks, and adjustable medial and posterior fossa
walls. The angle of the eminence was set by means of con-
Model H-2
ventional lateral check bite records. The Bennett Angle (Me-
The most significant change made in the model “H-2” during dial Wall) and Compensating Angle (Posterior Wall) were set
the Teledyne era was removal of the brass plates from the upper according to accompanying charts based on Hanau’s Classic
and lower members in 1968 to allow application of the “Sanford Formula. The settings compensated for the instrument’s fixed,
Hard Coat,” an anodized finish that facilitated cleaning. An narrow intercondylar distance. Design of this articulator was
auditory pin was added to the centric lock screws in 1973 to based on the downward, forward, and medial movement of the
secure the facebow earpieces.10 Based on research by Lauciello balancing condyle, and the simultaneous outward movement
and Applebaum,13 the orbital indicator flag was raised 7 mm of the working condyle. According to Tanaka et al,16-19 an er-
in 1977. “Model H-2” articulators can be found in an endless ror of 2.28 mm at the condyle translates to an error of just
number of dental offices, laboratories, and schools throughout 0.04 mm at the second molar and essentially zero at the first
the world. Remarkably, this venerable instrument is still offered molar. Consequently, all the paths of the condylar elements
by the Whip Mix Corporation as a key element in its Hanau of the “Model 154-1” were straight rather than unnecessarily
articulator line.14 curved. This instrument had an incisal guide table designed to
hold an autopolymerized acrylic custom incisal guide. It also
Model 130 University Series featured its own accessories, including an earbow and Kine-
matic facebow. By late 1974 the company provided a visual aid
Hanau’s paradigm shift to programmed arcon articulators be- that demonstrated the sound logic behind this design; however,
gan in 1959. This was by far the company’s most ambitious by 1978, after just 4 years of production, the “Model 154-1” was
undertaking since its establishment. The intent was to produce discontinued. It had proven too radical for market acceptance
instruments intended for fixed prosthodontics rather than just (Fig 9).20
for complete denture fabrication. The “H-130” University Se-
ries was the first line of articulators in this evolution. The “H-
Model 158 and 183 Wide View Series
130-21” was the flagship of this series (Fig 8). This assembly
of articulators included 20 additional models differing in ad- The “Model 158” series first appeared in 1976. It was a re-
justability and in how they were accessorized. Features of the turn to the ever-popular “Model H-2,” redesigned to be an
“Model H 130-21” included: arcon instrument. The lower member was refitted with solid,

4 Journal of Prosthodontics 00 (2016) 1–8 


C 2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists
Engelmeier et al Hanau Part II

Figure 11 The Model 158 articulators were fitted with a wide view
lower member in 1983, which enabled lingual access and visibility. The
Figure 9 The short-lived Model 154 series featured a logical, mathemat- redesigned lower member was responsible for the series name change
ically based design, but it proved too radical for market acceptance. to the M-183 Wide View Articulator.

lack of posterior access and visibility. This was corrected in


1983 by a redesign of the lower members. The upright posts
were replaced by a wide yoke-like lower member, cast as one
piece to support the condyles (Fig 11). With this change, the
“H-158” was renamed the “H-183.” Four versions of the wide
view “M-183” articulators were offered, differing only in ac-
cessorization. By 1985 the wide view was given a blue Teflon
finish, but a year later it was switched to black Teflon. The wide
view design gave way to the Modular System of 1987; however,
its lower member has lived on as the platform for the Hanau
Wide View Modular Articulator, currently available from the
Whip Mix Corporation.

Radial shift and modular articular systems


The final major articular designs produced during the Hanau
Company’s Teledyne era were the Radial Shift and Modular
Articulator systems. Market desire for a “Model 154” and “183”
articulator with provisions for an adjustable immediate side
shift led to the “XP-67” condylar guide design of 1975. The
starting point for this adjustable side shift, open-track condylar
fossa was that originally featured on the “M-154.” By 1978 this
project had evolved to a point where an adjustable immediate
Figure 10 The original 158 series maxillofacial model was developed side shift was possible via choices of seven interchangeable
circa 1980. It had inwardly curved upright posts that obstructed lingual Bennett Angles and three compensating angle inserts. Further
access and view. The current model has the wide view lower member.
development did finally produce condylar controls featuring an
Note the adaptors covering the condylar elements. These were devel-
adjustable Bennett Angle from zero to 30° and immediate side
oped to allow the 158 series to accept a Whip Mix earbow registration
shift from 0 to 3 mm.
at a time prior to the Hanau Company’s development of an earbow of
Over a period of 5 years of development and under several
their own. Courtesy collection of Dr. R. L. Engelmeier.
project name designations, those condylar controls were even-
tually incorporated into the “XP-88” Radial Shift Articulator.
horseshoe-shaped uprights that supported the condyles. En- It featured the “M-158” Radial Shift Articulator, the “M-158”
closed condylar tracks were featured on the redesigned upper lower member, and a redesigned upper member that could ac-
members. A series of six versions of this instrument evolved commodate the new condylar elements. With its 1980 offering,
through the 1970s, differing in how they were accessorized. this instrument was renamed the “M 166-1” Radial Shift Articu-
By 1980 the company had developed a maxillofacial version lator. Ultimately, six versions of this instrument were available,
with an upper member raised above the level of the condyles differing in accessorization and adjustability. First production
to accommodate maxillectomy casts (Fig 10). Features of the of these instruments was accompanied by two manuals, one for
“M-158” series included a black anodized hard coat finish to complete dentures, the other for extensive fixed prosthodontic
facilitate cleaning, extendable axis shafts, protrusive/retrusive restorations.
adjustment, and an orbital flag. Successful commercial sales Following persistent collaboration with Dr. Fred A. Shaw of
of the “M-158” began in 1977. Its only disadvantage was a Memphis, TN, the company developed an additional model in

Journal of Prosthodontics 00 (2016) 1–8 


C 2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists 5
Hanau Part II Engelmeier et al

Figure 13 The 1968 LTD Crown and Bridge articulator was a very
durable, non-adjustable arcon instrument pre-programmed with average
settings.

Figure 12 An early model Modular Series highly accessorized to include


an adjustable intercondylar distance.

this series. This model with an adjustable intercondylar distance


was designated the “Model XP-97.” The upper member nec-
essarily had to be completely redesigned to allow for lingual
visibility and access. Production of the 1980 M-166 Radial
Shift models ceased in 1986 when they simply evolved into
the Hanau Modular System, renamed in 1987. The company’s
intention with the Modular System was to enable the user to as-
semble a wide variety of instruments by interchanging compo-
nents. Selections included open or closed track condylar fossa,
adjustable and custom incisal guide tables, and straight and
adjustable incisal guide pins. Ultimately, the Modular System Figure 14 The 1980 Hanau Mate is a non-adjustable arcon instrument
featured six models. Each, of course, was accessorized differ- with pre-set average values. It is designed to accept earbow registra-
ently, depending on its intended use. Each of these six models tions. It is still in production.
came with a color-coded reference manual. The Hanau Modu-
lar System has survived as a three-model offering by the Whip
Mix Corporation (Fig 12).21 little or no regard for occlusion or incisal guidance. In an effort
During the Teledyne era there was a continued effort on the to lift the profession from this mindset, the company sought to
part of Hanau’s Product Development Division under Richard develop a reasonably priced, higher quality crown and bridge
Bue to produce uncomplicated, inexpensive articulators in- articulator. The result was Hanau Mate of 1980.
tended for simple crown and bridge restorations. First in this Its size and intermember distance approached that of the H-2.
Teledyne effort was the XP-34 plane line articulator of 1968. As it evolved from the XP-87 of 1979 to the M 165-7 of 1986,
This series was also known as the “LTD” or Laboratory Techni- this non-adjustable articulator featured pre-set, average value
cal Device series. These were very strong, non-adjustable arcon controls, a centric lock and incisal guide pin and table. It ac-
instruments, pre-programmed with average value settings. They cepted earbow registrations and eventually was equipped with
could accept facebow registrations to assure a patient’s arc of disposable metal thumb screws for retention of stone mounts
closure. Their smooth lines and anodized hard finish facilitated (Fig 14).
cleaning. Between 1968 and 1974, this design evolved into the In response to market interest, the company experimented
taller model 147-3 LTD. It featured an increase of 3/4 inches with a very inexpensive, disposable articulator in the late 1980s.
in intermember space, stronger solid rather than open upper The articulating components were incorporated into the cast
and lower members, pins that enabled acceptance of earbow mounts. This effort resulted in the short-lived XP-150. It was
registrations, a thumb-screw vertical stop on the posterior of a tripodal instrument consisting of upper and lower plastic
the upper members, and disposable metal thumbscrews used base formers fitted with three metal dowel posts. The posts
for retention of the stone cast mounts (Fig 13).6 were fixed to the upper member and articulated with three
By 1979 the company recognized that most dentists and com- fossae in the lower member. Gothic arches were generated in
mercial laboratories regrettably preferred the least complicated auto- or light-cured acrylic resin packed into the lower member
and least expensive crown and bridge instruments available with fossa. This device was recommended for fixed and removable

6 Journal of Prosthodontics 00 (2016) 1–8 


C 2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists
Engelmeier et al Hanau Part II

Whip-Mix still offers Hanau brass denture flasks and presses


that date back to 1930. The reliable Hanau alcohol torch
and Touchmatic Bunsen Burners, which have been popular
for decades, are also listed in current Whip Mix Corporation
catalogs.12
Though a detailed review of Denar and Whip-Mix articula-
tors are subjects of future articles in this series, brief mention
is made here of Whip Mix Corporation’s continued offering
of these two articulator lines. Current Denar articulator offer-
ings by the Whip Mix Corporation include seven instrument
series. The Mark 300 Series consists of three semi-adjustable
arcon articulators with strong, wide view mandibular members,
and removable upper members. They vary in their adjustability.
They have magnetic mounts and are factory-calibrated to allow
Figure 15 The disposable, short-lived XP-150 articulator was an inex-
instrument interchangeability.
pensive Tri-Podal instrument.
The Mark II Series essentially is a semi-adjustable version
of the gnathological D5A. It is an arcon instrument with a
fixed intercondylar distance, but does have an adjustable incisal
prosthodontic restorations, orthognathic, surgical planning, and guide table. It is not available with magnetic mounts and is not
cast storage (Fig 15).6 factory-calibrated for instrument interchangeability.
The Track II articulator is a Mark II instrument with more
Whip Mix Era (2008 to present) adjustable closed-track fossa elements. It is available with mag-
netic mounts and is calibrated to allow instrument interchange-
As stated earlier, since the 2008 consolidation of the three ability.
instrument companies, the Whip Mix Corporation has contin- The Combi II system is a semi-adjustable arcon instrument.
ued production of the Hanau and Denar articulator lines along It is similar to but less adjustable than the Mark II series. It does
with its own complete line of articulators.12 The popular Hanau not feature magnetic mounts or instrument interchangeability.
Wide View arcon series of 1982 has continued as a Whip Mix The Anamark model is also essentially a Mark II but has
offering. This series even includes a maxillofacial model with interchangeable fossa elements. Unlike the Mark II, however,
an upper member that has been raised one additional inch to it features magnetic mounts and instrument interchangeability
allow increased restorative space needed for obturator bulb fab- with other Anamark instruments.
rication. The rotation centers have correctly remained in their The Denar line includes the arcon Automark non-adjustable
original positions. One-inch extensions have been added be- articulator. It is a Mark II where all controls have been preset
tween the condylar housings and the upper member, as well to anatomical averages.
as to the support for the orbital indicator and the incisal guide The flagship of the Denar line as always remains the arcon
pin. This is actually a second generation of Hanau’s maxillofa- Class IV Denar D5A. This instrument was originally designed
cial model. The original version had a Model 158 series lower to be programmed by means of the now-discontinued Denar
member, which did not provide the lingual access offered by Pantograph; however, Denar now features the Cadiax electronic
the improved Wide View lower member. pantograph, which is capable of calculating control settings for
In addition to the Wide View series, Hanau’s Modular arcon 15 different articulators.
models of 1987 have also remained in production. These instru- The Denar’s Slidematic facebow is compatible with all ar-
ments feature interchangeable pre-programmed and adjustable ticulators in this line. A complete line of mounting jigs is also
fossae. offered.
Finally, the 96-H2 series is still being produced. This The current Whip Mix line of articulators still features the
non-arcon instrument is simply a latter-day Model H-2, original arcon Model 8500 designed by the eminent Dr. Charles
which has remained a popular complete denture instrument Stuart. Its original earbow is among the half dozen Whip Mix
for decades. The above three complete series of Hanau ar- earbows currently available.
ticulators are accompanied with a full selection of acces- The 2000 Whip Mix arcon series represents a refined version
sories including mounting jigs, incisal guide tables and pins, of the Model 8500. Though it has a fixed intercondylar distance
facebows and earbows, and the Broderick Occlusal Plane and has less adjustable condylar elements than the Model 8500,
Analyzer. its condylar elements can be interchanged with those of the
In addition to the three complete series of Hanau articulators 8500. Because of factory calibration, magnetic mounting and
mentioned above, Whip Mix offers three well-designed Hanau instrument changeability are possible with all articulators in the
crown and bridge instruments. The ulti-Mate with fixed set- 2000 series.
tings accepts Hanau Springbow registrations. The Hanau Mate The Whip Mix arcon 3000 series features a redesigned frame
non-adjustable articulator is meant for single-crown fabrica- with tracking condylar guidance. Full and modified condylar
tion. Finally, the Model Mate Plasterless Articulator is intended tracking elements are available. These instruments are also fac-
for orthognathic surgical planning, orthodontics, and surgical tory calibrated to allow magnetic mounting and instrument in-
splint fabrication (Fig 15). terchangeability.

Journal of Prosthodontics 00 (2016) 1–8 


C 2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists 7
Hanau Part II Engelmeier et al

The Whip Mix 4000 arcon series features articulators with 7. Hanau RL: Dental Articulator, US Patent No. 1,688,845, May 8,
full and modified tracking condylar elements. The lower mem- 1928
ber has again been redesigned to allow maximum posterior 8. Franwick EJ: Dental Articulator, US Patent No. 2,130,083,
access and viewing. The crossbar between the uprights of the September 13, 1938
lower member has been eliminated. These instruments are avail- 9. Hanau RH: Full Denture Prosthesis, Intraoral Technique
able with progressive side shift adjustments and are calibrated for Hanau Articulator Model H, self-published, 1930
for instrument changeability using magnetic mounts. The Whip 10. Bue R: More articulators. In Bue R (ed): The Chronicles at
Mix also offers its own complete line of accessories including Hanau Products: 1920 thru 1989. Buffalo, NY, Teledyne-Hanau,
1993, pp. 24-34
mounting and remount jigs, incisal guide tables, and a selection
11. Meyers FC: Cast bridgework in functional occlusion. J Am Dent
of six facebows.12
Assoc 1933;30:1015-1030
12. Company Archives, Whip Mix Corporation, Louisville, KY,
Conclusion 2012.
Such has been the nearly century-long saga of the Hanau En- 13. Lauciello FR, Applebaum M: Anatomic comparison to arbitrary
gineering Company. It emerged from Rudolph Hanau’s initial reference notch on Hanau articulators. J Prosthet Dent
1978;40:676-681
foray into dentistry during the storied “Articulator Wars” of the
14. Occlusion Products: 2012 Catalog. Whip Mix, Louisville, KY,
early 20th century. It has survived significant growth, competi-
2012
tion, and transitions in corporate ownership. Perhaps the most
15. Bue R: The university series articulators. In Bue R (ed): The
remarkable element in this saga has been the indomitable H-2 Chronicles at Hanau Products: 1920 thru 1989. Buffalo, NY,
articulator, which still survives as the Model 96 H-2 offered by Teledyne-Hanau, 1993, pp. 41-63
Whip Mix Corporation. 16. Tanaka, H, Bue R, A new semi-adjustable articulator—Part I:
concept behind the new articulator. J Prosthet Dent
References 1975;33:10-16
17. Tanaka H, Finger IM, Porter M: A new semi-adjustable
1. Hanau RL: Resilient and Like Effect, The Bulletin of The articulator—Part II: adjustment of a new-concept articulator. J
Chicago Dental Society, February 4, 1931 Prosthet Dent 1975;33:158-168
2. Engelmeier RL, Belles DM, Starcke EN: The history of
18. Finger IM, Tanaka H: A new semi-adjustable articulator—Part
articulators: the contributions of Rudolph L. Hanau and his
III: an investigation of the capacity of the Hanau XP-51
company—Part I. J Prosthodont 2009;19:409-418
articulator. J Prosthet Dent 1977;37:310-319
3. Bue R: Introduction. In Bue R (ed): The Chronicles at Hanau
Products: 1920 thru 1989. Buffalo, NY, Teledyne-Hanau, 1993, 19. Tanaka H, Finger IM: A new semi-adjustable articulator—Part
pp. 15-20 IV: an investigation of three semi-adjustable articulators. J
4. Whip Mix Corporation, Company Archives, 2011 Prosthet Dent 1978;40:288-293
5. Tench RW: Interpretations and registration of 20. Bue R: The 145 Series and 154 System of articulators. In Bue R
mandibulomaxillary relations and their reproduction (ed): The Chronicles at Hanau Products: 1920 thru 1989.
in an instrument. J Am Dent Assoc 1926;13:1675-1693 Buffalo, NY, Teledyne-Hanau, 1993, pp. 72-79
6. Bue R: Other articulator models past and present. In Bue R (ed): 21. Bue R: Radial shift articulators. In Bue R (ed): The Chronicles at
The Chronicles at Hanau Products: 1920 thru 1989. Buffalo, NY, Hanau Products: 1920 thru 1989. Buffalo, NY, Teledyne-Hanau,
Teledyne-Hanau, 1993, pp. 135-159 1993, pp. 101-114

8 Journal of Prosthodontics 00 (2016) 1–8 


C 2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists

You might also like