Dear Editors of SiELE Journal,

We have amended our articles as suggested by the

1. Reviewer’s comments/suggestions Correction made

2. The reviewer ticked “partially” for the title in the review form. We have revised our title.
3. The reviewer ticked “partially” for the abstract in the review We have revised our abstract.
form.
4. The reviewer ticked “partially” for the introduction We have revised the
introduction section.
5. The reviewer ticked “partially” for the objective of the We argue that we have
research provided the objectives of the
study; please see page 2, par. 2.
6. Additional comments: “What is the gap of this study?’ We have revised the
introduction section, especially
in providing the gap of the
study; see page 2, par. 2, line 2-
4.
7. The reviewer ticked “partially” for the research questions We have reformulated the
research questions; see page 2,
par. 2.
8. Additional comments: “Discuss previously published We have revised the literature
research that have succeeded and or not in using this review, especially in discussing
application. Do not only discuss the advantages, but the previously published research
disadvantages as well and how they are resolved by (see page 6, par. 3)
and both advantages and
experts.”
disadvantages of using quizlet
application. (see page 6, par.2)
9. The reviewer ticked “partially” for the participant, We have revised the method
instrument, data collection, and data analysis in the reviewer section, especially in providing
form. additional information; see
page 6, par.5, line 3-4)
10. Additional comments: “There is no explanation of research We have revised the method
method on motivation through observation framework.” section, especially in providing
the observation guidelines and
the observation checklist
sheets. (see page 7, par. 1)
11. Additional comments: “Where there problems while We have revised the discussion
implementing this research?” section by providing the
problems occurred when
conducting the study. (see page
11, par. 6)
12 Additional comments: “I suggest the researcher to rewrite We have revised the discussion
this part by stating the statements that answer the RQ and section, especially in matching
match with the title” the results of study with the
hypotheses and the title. (see
page 11, par. 1)
13. Additional comments: “it seems the findings and discussion We have provided the other
are not in depth.” interpretation of data in the
finding section (see page 10,
par. 1) and other previous
studies that support or
contradict to our findings to
make our research are more in
depth (see page 11, par. 1, 4 &
5)
14. Additional comments: “Moreover, the statement students felt We have revised the finding
fun and enjoy (p.8 on discussion) have no supporting data” and discussion section
especially in providing the data
(see page 10) that support our
statements (see page 11, par.
3)
15. Additional comment: “Then the researcher can strengthen We have revised the result of
the result obtained by elaborating the result of comparison finding section especially in
between teaching using quizlet and the one which did not.” elaborating the results of
comparison between students’
motivations in learning
vocabulary. (see page 9, par. 1
& 2)
16. Additional comment: “Add one more paragraph of the We have revised the conclusion
limitations of this study and what recommendations can be section by adding a paragraph
given for researchers who would like to research on similar explaining the limitation of
topics in the future.” study and the recommendation
for the further research. (see
page 12, par. 3)
17. The reviewer ticked “partially” for the references. We have revised the references
by following APA styles
guidelines.
18. The reviewer ticked “partially” for grammar and cohesion We have revised the contents
of article by correcting the
grammatical errors and make
the cohesive paragraph.
19. Additional comments: “Needs professional proofreading” We have asked a proofreader
to professionally proofread our
paper, his version of
proofreading (with Track
Changes) is sent in a different
file for your review.
20. Additional comment: “There are some are ineffective We have resolved these
paragraphs such as experts’ opinions without giving any problems by adding the
conclusions or explanations from the author, main ideas of conclusion to the experts’
the paragraphs without any supporting details, etc” opinion and giving supporting
details for the main idea
contained in the paragraph.