Individual Assignment

Supply Chain Management

Individual Assignment on “SAIL Contract”
Submitted to:-
Prof. Praneti Shah

Submitted by:-
Milan Chauhan
Roll no-181134
Batch: B
Institute of Management, Nirma University

Date of Submission
18/11/2019

1|Page
 INDEX

About the company 3

Products 10

Types of supply from other market 11

Locations of the supply outsourced 13

Types of contracts for the various 15

supply and details of terms and
conditions
Objective behind entering into such 21
supply contracts
Advantages and disadvantages 24

Future scope 25

References 26

2|Page
 PART 1
ABOUT THE COMPANY

The Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL) was created in 1973 as the holding company and
supervisory agency for those parts of the Indian iron and steel industry which are wholly within
the public sector. Its main product, by volume, is iron ore, most of which is exported. It has a
total production capacity of 11 million tons of steel per year, representing more than four-fifths
of India's total capacity. It operates its own collieries, a special steels plant, and a foundry for
pipes and castings.

The history of the iron and steel industry in modern India is closely bound up with political and
economic developments since the country achieved independence from Britain in 1947. Most
of the productive units now run by SAIL were built as state ventures with aid and assistance
from industrially-developed countries, and operated by SAIL's predecessor, Hindustan Steel
Ltd. SAIL's main subsidiary, the Indian Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., which is India's largest single
iron and steel company, developed separately as a private company before nationalization, but
it depended on state subsidies from 1951 onwards and had to function within the terms of the
government's planning system.

However, the industry did not spring from nowhere in 1947. Iron had been produced in India
for centuries, while Indian steel was superior in quality to British steel as late as 1810. With
the consolidation of the British raj the indigenous industry declined and the commercial
production of steel did not begin in earnest till 1913, when the Tata Iron and Steel Company
began production at Sakchi, on foundations laid by Jamsetji Tata whose sons had raised the
enormous sum of Rs23 million to set up the company, partly from family funds but mostly

3|Page
from Bombay merchants, several maharajahs, and other wealthy Indians who supported the
movement for Indian self-sufficiency (Swadeshi) but did not want to appear openly anti-British.
Tata was to dominate the Indian steel industry until the 1950s. The Indian Iron & Steel
Company was set up in West Bengal in 1918 by the British firm Burn & Co., with plans to
become a rival steelmaker. However, steel prices declined in the early 1920s and the company
produced only pig iron until 1937. The acute depression suffered by the iron and steel industry
after World War I was alleviated by the government's protective measures. The industry
continued to make steady progress.

From the late 1920s, when the British authorities introduced a system of tariffs which protected
British and Indian steel but raised barriers against imports from other countries, the Indian
market was divided in the ratio of 70 to 30 between British producers on the one hand and the
Tata company on the other--thus effectively excluding indigenous newcomers. By 1939 the
Tata works were producing 75% of the steel consumed in what was then the Indian Empire,
comprising the present-day India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Burma.

In the late 1930s, as European rearmament pushed iron and steel prices upward, the export of
Indian pig iron increased and two small firms began to compete directly with the Tata company
in steel production. The first was the Mysore State Iron Works, which had been set up by the
maharajah of Mysore in 1923, to produce pig iron at Benkipur, now Bhadravati. The second
was the Steel Corporation of Bengal, a subsidiary established by the Indian Iron & Steel
Company in 1937, the year after it had bought up the assets of the bankrupted Bengal Iron and
Steel Company. The Steel Corporation of Bengal was reabsorbed into its parent company in
1953. All three companies profited from the British connection during World War II. Annual
output rose from 1 million tons in 1939 to an average of 1.4 million tons in 1940-1945.

In 1947, when India became independent as the biggest, but not the only, successor state to the
British raj, the three major iron and steel companies had a total capacity of only 2.5 million
tons. A great deal of their plant was already more than three decades old, and badly in need of
repair and replacement, while demand for iron and steel was growing.

Like other Third World states that have achieved political independence but still find their
economic prospects determined by their subordinate position in the world economy, the new
republic's policymakers decided to seek economic growth through a combination of protection
for domestic industries, heavy public investment in them, encouragement of savings to finance
that investment, and state direction of production and pricing. The Mahalanobis model of the

4|Page
Indian economy, based on the assumptions that exports could not be rapidly increased and that
present consumption should be curbed for the sake of longterm growth through import
substitution by the capital goods sector, provided the theoretical justification for this set of
policies, which closely resembled what was done in the Soviet Union in the 1930s, in China in
the 1950s, and in Africa and Asia in the 1960s, though with much less loss of life than in most
of these cases.

Under the terms of the new government's Industrial Policy Statement of 1948, confirmed in the
Industries Development and Regulation Act three years later, new ventures in the iron and steel
industry were to be undertaken only by the federal government, but existing ventures would be
allowed to stay in the private sector for the first ten years. Thus the First Five Year Plan, from
1951-1956, involved the use of government funds to help Tata Iron and Steel and Indian Iron
& Steel to expand and modernize while remaining in the private sector. As for new projects, in
1953 the government signed an agreement with the German steelmakers Krupp and Demag on
creating a publicly owned integrated steel plant, which was sited at Rourkela, in the state of
Orissa, to make use of iron ore mined at Barsua and Kalta. Krupp and Demag were chosen
after the failure of Indian requests for aid from Britain and the United States, but were excluded
from the project by 1959, when the Estimates Committee of the Lok Sabha, the lower house of
the Indian Parliament, concluded that getting investment funds from them was equivalent to
borrowing at an interest rate of 12%.

In order to carry out its side of the agreement the government set up Hindustan Steel Ltd. in
1954, as a wholly state-owned company responsible for the operation of the Rourkela plant.
By 1959, when the plant was commissioned, Hindustan Steel had become responsible for two
more plants, at Bhilai in Madhya Pradesh and at Durgapur in West Bengal, under the Second
Five Year Plan, that started in 1956. The Bhilai plant, located between Bombay and Calcutta,
was designed and equipped by Soviet technicians, under an agreement signed in 1955, and by
1961 it included six open-hearth furnaces with a total capacity of one million tons, supplied
from iron ore mines at Rajhara and Dalli. The Durgapur plant, meanwhile, was built with
assistance and advice from Britain and sited near the Bolani iron ore mine. Hindustan Steel
took over the operation of all the iron ore mines supplying its plants, all three of which had
been located to take advantage of existing supplies. This policy of locating steel production
near raw materials sources reflected the relatively small and dispersed nature of the domestic
market for steel at that time, and contrasted with the market-related location policies of
companies in more advanced steel-producing countries, such as the United States.

5|Page
Hindustan Steel's other major venture was its Alloy Steels Project, also based at Durgapur,
which was inaugurated in 1964. Hindustan Steel's tasks included not only steel production but
also the procurement of raw materials, and its subsidiaries included, besides the iron ore mines
already mentioned, limestone and dolomite mines and coal washeries. It also operated a
fertilizer plant at Rourkela.

The modernization of the two private sector leaders and the program of public sector
investment together raised Indian steel output from about one million tons a year in the 1940s
to three million tons in 1960, then to six million tons only four years later. Pig iron output rose
by an even greater margin, from 1.6 million tons in 1950 to nearly 5 million tons in 1961. Both
wings of the iron and steel industry contributed to the expansion of the engineering and
machinery industries envisaged in the Mahalanobis model, and in turn were stimulated by the
increased demand to raise production volume and quality. In 1965 Hindustan Steel's latest
project, for an iron and steel plant with an associated township at Dhanbad in the state of Bihar,
was transferred to a new company, Bokaro Steel Limited. Contact continued between the two
companies, however, mainly through an arrangement whereby the chairman of each company
was made a part-time director of the other. Like the Bhilai plant the Bokaro project was initiated
with aid and advice from the Soviet Union, including blueprints, specialist equipment, technical
training, and a loan at 2.5% interest. After the establishment of SAIL the Bokaro company was
changed back into a division of the public sector steel company.

Throughout its first five years of production, 1958 to 1963, Hindustan Steel's losses rose
steadily due to Rs7.51 million to Rs260 million it made a small profit in 1965 and 1966, only
to slip back into the red and stay there until 1974, the last year of the company's existence under
that name. Among the reasons the company gave for these disappointing results were the losses
incurred at the Rourkela fertilizer plant, the Steel Alloys Project, and the Durgapur steel plant,
an increased rate of interest on government loans, an increase in provision for depreciation,
and the high costs of imported plant and equipment.

The rate of growth of the iron and steel industry, and of the engineering and machinery
producing sectors with which its fate is so closely linked, declined significantly once the phase
of import substitution was complete and the droughts of the mid-1960s had forced a diversion
of resources from industry. Pig iron output, which had risen so spectacularly in the 1950s, rose
from 7 million tons in 1965 to 10 million tons in 1985, while production of steel rose from 6
million tons to 12 million tons in the same period. The industry suffered due tostate intervention

6|Page
to keep its domestic prices low as an indirect subsidy to steel users, and--though the technical
problems were different--from a heritage of outdated and inefficient plant and equipment.

Indian government policy since 1965 has been to use its iron ore less as a contribution to
domestic growth than as an export, earning foreign exchange and helping to reduce the
country's chronic deficit on its balance of trade. Production of ore increased, from 18 million
tons in 1965 to 43 million tons in 1985, in order to supply a growing number of overseas
markets.

With the expansion and diversification of Hindustan Steel, the separate establishment of
Bokaro and the beginning of planning for new plants at Salem, Vishakhapatnam, and
Vijaynagar, it became increasingly clear that public sector iron and steel production would
need some new form of co-ordination to avoid duplication and to channel resources more
effectively. The Steel Authority of India Ltd. was established in January 1973 for this purpose,
to function as a holding company along the lines of similar but older bodies in Italy and
Sweden. The new organization was placed on a secure footing when the Indian Iron & Steel
Company was nationalized, giving SAIL control of all iron and steel production apart from the
venerable Tata Iron and Steel Company and a number of small-scale electric-arc furnace units.
At the time of nationalization the Indian Iron & Steel Company comprised a steel plant at
Burnpur in West Bengal; iron ore mines at Gua and Manoharpur; coal mines at Ramnagore,
Jitpur, and Chasnalla; and a specialist subsidiary, the IISCO-Ujjain Pipe and Foundry Co. Ltd.,
based at Kulti.

Both SAIL and its predecessor sought to expand capacity to meet predicted rises in demand for
steel. In 1971 Hindustan Steel had unveiled plans for India's first coastal steel plant, at
Vishakhapatnam. The project, which in 1991 was in the process of being opened, with one
blast furnace already in operation, will probably allow productivity of 230 tons per man year
compared with less than 50 in SAIL's existing plants. The Authority has also invested heavily
in modernizing its oldest plants, at Rourkela and Durgapur.

The 1980s were not a happy decade for SAIL. It made losses between 1982 and 1984 but went
back into the black in the following two years. Meanwhile Tata Iron & Steel was consistently
profitable. By 1986, when the Indian steel industry's total capacity was 15.5 million tons, only
12.8 million were actually produced, of which SAIL produced 7.1 million. Thus imports of 1.5
million tons were needed to meet total demand, after years of exporting Indian steel. By 1988
all the main steel plants in India except Vishakhapatnam were burdened with obsolescent plant

7|Page
and equipment, and Indian steel prices were the highest in the world. The government proposed
a ten-year plan to modernize the plants, based on aid from West Germany, Japan, and the Soviet
Union just at a time when the worldwide economic recession was deepening and the World
Bank was recommending the privatization of SAIL and the liberalization of steel imports.

In 1989 SAIL acquired Vivesvata Iron and Steel Ltd. In its first year under SAIL's wing this
new subsidiary's production and turnover showed an improvement over its last year in the
private sector. This progress contrasted with results for SAIL as a whole in 1989-1990, since
production declined, and once again planned targets were not met. Various factors contributed
to this disappointing outcome, including unrest at the Rourkela plant as a result of the
management's decision not to negotiate with a new union, Rourkela Sramik Sangha, which had
challenged the established union, Rourkela Mazdoor Sabha, and had even won all the seats on
the plant's elected works committee. Another problem, continuing over several years, arose
from defects in power supply; the impact of power-cuts on steel output in 1989-1990 was
estimated as 170,000 tons lost, and the supply of coal was unreliable.

SAIL remains in the public sector as a central instrument of state plans for industrial
development. The country's reserves of iron ore and other raw materials for iron and steel make
the industry central to the economy. At the beginning of the 1980s India had recoverable
reserves of iron ore amounting to 10.6 billion tons, a natural endowment which it would take
650 years to deplete at then-current rates of production. The high-grade ore within this total--
that is, ore with an iron content of at least 65%--was, however, thought likely to reach depletion
in only 42 years; yet it still represented about one-tenth of the world total. SAIL has had to
struggle to maintain production, let alone expand it, largely because of circumstances outside
its control. Since the purchase of raw materials has typically accounted for 30% of the Indian
steel industry's production costs, any rise in the prices of coal, ferro-manganese, limestone, or
iron ore will cut into the industry's profitability. In the first half of the 1980s, for example,
prices for these materials rose by between 95 and 150%, at the same time as electricity charges
rose by 150%. Most of these increases were imposed by other state enterprises. Nor has it
helped SAIL that the high sulfur content of Indian coal has required heavy investment in
desulfurization at its steel plants. Indeed, the industry has had chronic problems in trying to
operate blast furnaces designed to take low-sulfur coking coal. The more suitable process of
making sponge iron with non-coking coal, then converting it to steel in electric arc furnaces,
was introduced in the private sector later, though by 1989 only 300,000 tons were being
produced in this way. India's basic output costs of Rs6,420 per ton in 1986 compare well with

8|Page
the averages for West Germany (Rs6,438), for Japan (Rs7,898) and for the United States
(Rs6,786). What finally keeps Indian steel from being competitive is the imposition of levies
which raise its price per ton by about 30%, and which include excise duties, a freight
capitalization surcharge, and a Steel Development Fund charge.

In spite of such problems, and in response to them, SAIL announced in December 1990 that it
planned to increase its annual output of steel from 11 million to 19 million tons, thus
transforming itself from the world's thirteenth largest steel producer to its third largest, within
ten years. SAIL's use of its steel production capacity, running at about 77% in 1990, would be
raised to 95% by 1996, thus permitting output of crude steel to rise by two-fifths over its current
level. However, output for 1990 had actually been only 6 million tons, compared with 6.9
million tons in 1988, and 8 million tons in 1989. SAIL is no more able than large steel
companies in other countries to achieve the optimum balance between demand and supply,
between increasing the quantity of output and improving its quality by modernizing, and thus
escaping from its heritage of outdated plant and equipment. Neither Hindustan Steel nor SAIL
was ever in a position to defy the circumstances of the Indian economy or of the world steel
industry on their own, but they have largely achieved the more modest goal of contributing to
India's postwar economic growth.

9|Page
PRODUCTS:
With an unmatched range of mild steel, both in long and flat categories, as well as a wide
variety of special and stainless steels. Identify steel that meets your requirements in these pages.
Require an unusual product or an altogether new product? SAIL delivers customized steel. A
nation-wide spread of Sales offices, Warehouses, Dealers and a team of seasoned Application
Engineers ensure swift and satisfactory fulfillment of steel requirement in any corner of the
country at any time.

 Alloy, stainless and other special steel

 Bars, rods and rebars
 Cold rolled products
 Galvanised products
 Hot Rolled Products
 Pig Iron
 Pipes and electrical steels
 Plates
 Railway Products
 Semis
 Structurals

10 | P a g e
 PART 2

TYPES OF SUPPLY COMPANY SOURCES FROM OTHER MARKET

 High speed diesel

 60 TON LADLE-FLAT BOTTOM WITH CENTRAL POROUS PLUG HOLE &
CYLINDER MOUNTING & BELL CRANK MOUNTING BRACKETS
 INGOT MOULD
 TRUMPET FOR BOTTOM POURING
 FURNACE OIL
 CARBON AND SULPHUR DETERMINATOR ALONG WITH AUXILARY
EQUIPMENTS AND STANDARD SAMPLES
 A HOT TOP WITH COLLER WITH APC & POURING COMPOUND
 I P V SPA PLUG
 I P V INNER NOZZLE
 ALUTECT MORTAR FOR IPV PLUG FIXING
 92% HIGH ALUMINA CASTABLE FOR IPV PLUG FIXING
 60% HIGH ALUMINA AL203 BOTTOM POURING REFRACTORY SET
 BOTTOM POURING COMPOUND (BPC) FOR LOW & MEDIUM CARBON
GRADES
 BOTTOM POURING COMPOUND(BPC) FOR LOW & MEDIUM CARBON
GRADES
 MASTIC REFACTORY SEALENT TUBE
 A HOT TOP WITH COLLER WITH APC & POURING COMPOUND
 FSG TAP HOLE SLEEVE
 FSG WELL FILLER
 FSG RAMMING MORTAR
 FSG TAP HOLE BLOCK
 FSG HIGH ALUMINA MORTAR
 MAG-CARBON VAD WORK LINING HEAT GUARANTEE SET

11 | P a g e
  DOLOMITE BRICK SET FOR AOD TOP CONE REPAIR
 High Carbon Ferro Chrome Chips
 ALUMINIUM CUBE
 Low Carbon Ferro Chrome
 FERRO SILICON CHIPS
 0 High Carbon Ferro Chrome Chips
 14"DIA (HP GRADE) GRAPHITE ELECTRODE ,PREFITTED WITH SUITABLE
CONNECTING GRAPHITE NIPPLE OF 4 TPI TAPERED THREAD.SIZE OF
ELECTRODE
 NICKEL BRIQUETTES
 FERRO VANADIUM
 Ferro Tungsten
 FERRO SILICON CHIPS
 Silico Manganese
 NUT COKE
 ALUMINIUM INGOT
 MILL COBBLE,STRUCTURAL CUTTING,SKELP,S.M SCRAP, C.I.MIX,MM
ROLL SPOIL GAS CUT, MERCHANT MILL BAR, ROD & BILLET CUTTING
 BURNT LIME ( Imported)
 Silico Manganese
 H.C.FE.CR.CHIPS
 GRAPHITE ELECTRODE
 GRAPHITE ELECTRODE ,PREFITTED WITH SUITABLE CONNECTING
GRAPHITE NIPPLE
 GRAPHITE ELECTRODE
 NAIL CLIPPING

12 | P a g e
 THE LOCATIONS FROM WHERE THE SUPPLY IS SOURCED

SUPPLIER NAME LOCATION

IOCL Begusarai(Bihar), Baroda(Gujrat),
Guwahati(Assam), Midnapur(West Bengal),

JSIS Iron and steel India Pvt. Ltd. Kolkata(West Bengal)

Bharat Engineering Works West Bengal

HPCL Jamshedpur(Jharkhand),
Bhubaneshwar(Odisha)

Leco Corporation USA

IFGL REFRACTORIES LIMITED Kalunga, Odisha

INDUSTRIAL REF.PVT.LTD Mumbai, Maharashtra

VESUVIUS GMBH Germany

DURGAPUR CASTING & ALLIED West Bengal

PRODUCTS P LTD

KOSMOKRAFT REFRACTORY China

LIMITED

DALMIA CEMENT(BHARAT) LIMITED Assam

MAHAKOSHAL REFRACTORIES PVT. Madhya Pradesh

LTD.

TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LTD Odisha

LALWANI FERRO ALLOYS LTD. West Bengal

B. N. INDUSTRIES Ahmedabad, Gujrat

HEG LTD Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh

SRC CHEMICALS PVT. LTD Pune, Maharashtra

UGEN FERRO ALLOYS PVT LTD Bhutan

13 | P a g e
 SHARP FERRO ALLOYS LIMITED West Bengal

GRAPHITE INDIA LTD Nasik

ENERTEC CO. LTD Mumbai

CHANDRAPUR FERRO ALLOY PLANT Chandrapur

DRK METALLURGICAL PVT. LTD Kolkata

MAITHAN ALLOYS LIMITED West Bengal

DRUK WANG ALLOYS LIMITED Bhutan

MAITHAN ALLOYS LTD West Bengal

SHANDONG BASAN CARBON PLANT China

PIONEER CARBIDE (P) LIMITED Assam

VISVESVARAYA IRON & STEEL Maharashtra

LIMITED

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM CO. LTD Maharashtra, Gujrat

14 | P a g e
TYPES OF CONTRACT FOR THE VARIOUS SUPPLY AND DETAILS OF TERMS
AND CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACTS

 DUTIES OF EXECUTING AUTHORITY/ENGINEER’S REPRESENTATIVE:

The duties of Engineer’s Representative are to watch and supervise the work. He will
have no position to relieve the Contractor of any of his obligations or commitments
under the agreement aside from as explicitly gave here under or somewhere else under
the agreement, nor, with the exception of as explicitly gave there under or somewhere
else in the Contract, to arrange any work including delay or any additional installment
by the Company nor to make any variety of or in the Works.

 ASSIGNMENT / SUB-CONTRACTING:
The Contractor shall not assign the contract, or any other part thereof, or any benefit or
interest therein or there under, without the prior written consent of the Employer. The
Contractor will not sub-contract the Works, aside from where generally gave by the
agreement, without the composed assent of the Employer, and such assent whenever
given will not exonerate the Contractor from duty, risk or commitment under the
agreement and he will be liable for the demonstrations, defaults or disregards of any
Sub-Contractor, his operators, hirelings or laborer as completely as though they were
the demonstrations, defaults or dismisses of the temporary worker, his specialists,
workers or laborers. Given consistently that the arrangement of work on a piece-work
premise will not be regarded to sublet under this condition.

 GENERAL OBLIGATION OF CONTRACTOR:

The Contractor shall enter into and execute a contract agreement in the form as
prescribed by the Employer within the time specified in the letter of acceptance and in
default thereof the payment to be made to the contractor under the contract shall not be
made till the agreement is signed. By making the Offer/presenting the Tender, it will
be regarded that the Tenderer/Contractor had considered the Tender papers cautiously.
It will be assumed that the Drawings for the Work, that were accessible in the workplace

15 | P a g e
 of the Engineer, have been examined. It will likewise be assumed that the Contractor
had examined the site of the work to familiarize himself with the site and nearby
conditions, methods for access to the site of work, nature of work and every other issue
relating thereto. The Contractor has accordingly made himself mindful of the conditions
and the necessities under the Contract, and the realities on the ground, before consenting
to the Contract. The Company in this way, won't acknowledge any resulting case of
misconception or deception of basic data/truth identifying with the Work or Contract.

 LABOUR
Compliance with Labour Statutes: The Contractor will conform to every one of the
commitments under the Contract Labor (Regulation and Abolition Act), the Mines
Act/the Factories Act, the Minimum Wages Act, the Payment of Wages Act, the
Employees' Provident Funds and Pension Act, the Payment of Gratuity Act, the
Industrial Disputes Act, the Maternity Benefit Act, the Employees' State Insurance Act,
the Workmen's Compensation Act, and all other work rules until further notice in
power, and pertinent to the Works. The Contractor consents to stay with the Principal
Employer/reimburse consistently against any requests from the work or statutory
experts on this record.

Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970: The temporary worker will
acquire License from the suitable Licensing Officer of the territory before initiation of
the work and will deliver a duplicate thereof of the work alongside the first to the
Engineer quickly on beginning of the work. The first will be come back to the temporary
worker after check. He will not be permitted to embrace or execute any work through
provisional work aside from under, and as per, a License gave under the said Act for
that benefit by the approved Licensing Officer. The Contractor will altogether acquaint
himself with the arrangements of the Contract (Regulation and Abolition) Labor Act,
1970 and the Rules thereunder, and present a testament to the Engineer accountable for
the Work showing whether the arrangements of the said Act and Rules are appropriate
to him. On the off chance that the said Act and Rules are appropriate, the temporary
worker will find a way to agree to their arrangements, keep up records and registers as
required, submit reports and comes back to the endorsed specialists intermittently as
required, issue business

16 | P a g e
 cards/administration authentications and show see as per Contract Labor Rules, with
duplicates thereof to the Company.

The temporary worker will give rest rooms, containers, toilets and urinals, washing
offices and emergency treatment offices carefully as per the arrangements of Contract
Labor Rules. On the off chance that these offices are not given by the contractual worker
inside the stipulated time, a similar will be given by Company and the expense for a
similar will be charged to the temporary worker's record. The contractual worker will
pay wages to his work in a way set down in Contract Labor Rules, within the sight of
the Engineer (Principal Employer), or his approved delegate. He will

at any rate pay the base wages material under the Minimum Wages Act. On the off
chance that the temporary worker's work play out the equivalent or comparative sort of
work as the laborers straightforwardly utilized by the Principal Employer, the wages
rates, occasions, long stretches of work different states of administration of the laborers
utilized by the Principal Employer will be pertinent to the contractual worker's work
too. The Contractor will inform to the Engineer the date and spot of installment of
wages to the Engineer, who will select a delegate to observe the installment. The
Contractor will likewise submit to the Engineer a duplicate of the Wage Payment Sheets
which have been receipted by the provisional work, and counter-marked by the agent
of the Engineer. By goodness of default of the Contractor, or something else, if the
Company is obliged to give pleasantries and/or pay wages to work utilized by the
Contractor legitimately, or through SubContractor(s) under this Contract, at that point
the contractual worker will reimburse the Company completely, and the Company will
be qualified for recuperate from the Contractor the use caused on giving the said
luxuries, and/or the wages so paid by deducting it from the Security Deposit or from
any total payable by the Company to the Contractor, either under this or under some
other Contract. Given that if any debate emerges as to use brought about by the
Company on arrangements of the said enhancements, the choices of the Engineer
thereof will be conclusive and authoritative.

17 | P a g e
  Obligation of the Contractor regarding Observance of Various Statutes:
The Contractor will, at his own expense watch, perform and agree to the arrangements
of every single statutory order, rules, guidelines and bye-laws surrounded thereunder
as are appropriate for control/activity/guideline of processing plant act during the
execution of work and will keep up such registers, reports, records and so forth., as are
required under the different rules, for generation of the equivalent before the Employer
and/or other statutory specialists endorsed for this benefit, as and when required.

 Anticipatory Breach and Termination; Risk and Cost:

On the off chance that the contractor will disregard to execute the work with due
steadiness and campaign, or will cannot or disregard to agree to any sensible requests
given him recorded as a hard copy by the Engineer regarding the work or will repudiate
any arrangement of the agreement, the Company/Employer may allow seven (7) days'
notice recorded as a hard copy, to the contractual worker, to make great the
disappointment, disregard, or contradiction griped of. In the event that the temporary
worker will neglect to agree to the notice inside the stipulated period from the date of
administration thereof on account of a disappointment, disregard, or contradiction able
to do being made great inside that time, at that point and in such case the Employer will
be at freedom to utilize other laborers, and forthwith perform such work as the
contractual worker may have fail to do.
On the off chance that the Employer will think fit, it will be legitimate for him to take
the work entirely, or to a limited extent, out of the contractual worker's hands and offer
it to someone else on contract at a sensible cost or give some other material, instruments
handle or work to finish the work, or any part thereof, and in that occasion the Employer
will without being capable to the temporary worker for reasonable mileage of the
equivalent, have the free utilization of the considerable number of materials,
apparatuses, handle, or different things which might be on the site, for use whenever
regarding the work to the avoidance of any privilege of the contract based worker over
the equivalent. The Employer will be qualified for hold and apply any balance, which
might be generally due on the agreement by him to the installment of the expense of
executing such work as previously mentioned, and will be qualified for make a case for
the equalization sum, as per law.

18 | P a g e
  Service of notice on Contractor:
Any notice given to the Contractor under the conditions of the contract will be served
by the Engineer or his delegate by enlisted present/dispatch on, or leaving the
equivalent, at the Contractor's told location or at its Registered Office or at the
Contractor's site office.

 Reference of Disputes to Conciliation / Arbitration:

All questions or contrasts emerging out of the agreement, aside from debates or
contrasts for which separate arrangements for their goals have been made in the
Contract ('excepted matters'), will be settled by Conciliation or Arbitration as per the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the arrangements made hereinafter in this
Article. Such debate will initially be alluded to Conciliation by a Conciliator chose
commonly by the gatherings, who will likewise choose the charges/compensation and
the guidelines of Procedure, which will be adaptable.

 Statuary and other Obligation on the part of the Contract

During the time of the agreement, assuming any, Govt. contribution or different duty
under at all Act/Attachment/Notice identified with the contractor might be gotten by
the organization; the equivalent will be acknowledged from the contractor's bill.

Assessments, obligations, demands and so on (aside from administration charge and

instructive cess subsequently) including neighborhood charges whenever forced by the
Panchayat/Municipality/Local Government bodies prior to the date of the delicate will
be borne by and paid by the contractor and these ought to be remembered for his rates.
Any statuary assessments/obligations/demands which are collected after the date of the
delicate will be repaid to the giver on creation of such narrative proof if relevant to
units.

As to assess and instructive cess subsequently, the givers need exclude the equivalent
while presenting their offers. Administration Tax and Educational cess subsequently if
appropriate will be paid on the genuine on generation of narrative confirmations
according to rules.

19 | P a g e
  Terms of Payment:
The installment to the Contractor will be discharged based on the work executed. The
contractor will submit month to month running Account bill properly marked, against
work done according to contract. These will be confirmed by the Operating Authority
through the quality and volume of the work executed and recorded in the estimation
book. The Operating Authority or his approved delegate affirm the bills whenever
found all together for the work executed for the arrival of installment to the contractor.

 Liquidated Damages:
The tenderer will keep the materials and labor required for the fruitful consummation
of the work. The activity requests will be given with explicit consummation period. "On
the off chance that the Contractor neglects to finish the work inside the time
recommended in the work request, the organization will be qualified for recoup
Liquidated Damages charges not by method for punishment, a whole equal to 1% of
the Work Order Value every week by which the contractor is to blame dependent upon
a limit of 10% of the Job Order Value". In the event that the contractor neglects to
execute the Job for full an incentive inside the agreement time frame, the remaining
might be got executed through different gatherings, at his hazard and cost.

 Penalty for Accident:

If there should arise an occurrence of any mishap including any contractor or any
infringement detailed by an approved individual during the legally binding activity in
the manufacturing plant while playing out the agreement a punishment will be charged
on the contractor.

20 | P a g e
 OBJECTIVE BEHIND ENTERING INTO SUCH SUPPLY CONTRACTS

Contracts and services agreements are essential business tools for professional trading and
business relationships. Without defined and agreed contracts, false impressions can create,
desires for client and provider (customer and supplier) neglect to match, and a wide range of
issues can happen. While the custom and soul of settling on a verbal arrangement between two
companions in business is useful in supporting a decent exchanging relationship, it is
reasonable for huge supply game plans to recorded and concurred, typically by marks.

Beside the procedure of plainly concurring and understanding the desires among supplier and
client, contracts or agreements additionally help in the event that either of the first arrangement
creators one day proceed onward, which would then be able to give other individuals the issue
of how to comprehend what may or probably won't host been concurred between the two
gatherings.

The need to utilize formal consented to exchanging arrangements is notably more prominent
when you are overseeing supply in the interest of an organization or business. In the event that
you maintain your very own business, are independently employed or independent, at that point
you have ostensibly more opportunity to work with less proper controls - it's your business all
things considered - and much of the time nitty gritty supply agreements can be a hindrance for
private ventures, so adjust and decipher these rules as indicated by your business measure and
level of obligation.

These rules speak to a judicious and safe methodology. You can lessen the convention and
detail as indicated by your own circumstance, yet know about the dangers on the off chance
that you leave conceivably argumentative issues ambiguous and open to contest.

Formal consented to arrangements or contracts are likewise valuable, and can be basic, for
when service issues or disappointments happen, or for when the customer's or client's
prerequisites change somehow. Appropriate contracts and agreements give a fundamental
reference point whereupon to talk about and arrange viable results at whatever point
circumstances change, as far as the client's necessities and the provider's capacity.

21 | P a g e
Obviously, a point by point contract will once in a while empower the recuperation of a lost
relationship or break of trust, yet in such circumstances it's useful not to confront included
issues of case (arraignment or resistance) without having the back-up of better than average
contract.

Exchanging and services connections can be dubious under the most favorable circumstances,
so it's essential to do everything you can to explain and concur the nitty gritty desires and
commitments for the two sides toward the start of any supply course of action. Suppliers and
customers are each very defenseless against costly and diverting debates if there is no
composed consent to allude to when and if essential.

A well-planned service contract gives a truly helpful stage and consistent reference point for
good positive commonly useful exchanging relations, so it merits considering it and getting it
directly at the beginning. It's regularly said that contracts and agreements are normally closed
away in a cabinet and never took a gander at again after they are marked, and by and large this
is valid, however the supplier's and client's opportunity to continue ahead with the business is
to a great extent empowered on the grounds that they've appropriately thought to be each other's
position, and concurred the premise of supply as a legitimate contract. They've no compelling
reason to take a gander at the understanding in light of the fact that the exchanging relationship
has been appropriately settled, which is empowered by the way toward drawing up and
concurring a sound and reasonable contract.

The way toward concurring a contract is along these lines, beside whatever else, an amazing
method to flush out and make straightforward all parts of the supply or service course of action,
quite a bit of which is generally regularly 'underestimated', ordinarily remembering many off-
base or confounded suppositions for the two sides. A decent exchanging contract empowers
such dangers to be turned away.

Exchanging and supply contracts come in a wide range of shapes and sizes, however basically
they contain a similar crucial components, which are outlined in the posting underneath.

Exchanging contracts are called a wide range of things; including: supply agreements, service
agreements, services agreements, management contracts, service contracts, exchanging
agreements, supply contracts, subtleties of supply, subtleties of services, timetable of services,
services plans, and pretty much some other change of these words that you want to build. What
makes a difference isn't what the contract is called - it is the thing that the contract contains,

22 | P a g e
and how the substance are worded, that tally most. This is the reason for huge significant
contracts, which convey critical lawful duties and potential liabilities, it is reasonable to include
a specialist or legal advisor in creating the contractual archives.

23 | P a g e
 PART 3

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ENETRING INTO SUCH TYPES OF

SUPPLY CONTRACTS

A "liability" in an organization alludes to a legal liability - a circumstance wherein the

organization may be sued or face other legal activity that would expect it to pay out money.
Organizations frequently endeavor to draw up contracts with employees, contractors,
consumers or other to constrain the organization's liability. This procedure has various focal
points, however it likewise conveys certain disadvantages.

Advantages:

 Reduces Risks: The principle bit of advantage of contracts to limit liabilities is that it
decreases the risk that the organization giving the contracts will be sued. By ensuring
that all gatherings concede to the conditions of a specific understanding and making
everybody sign an agreement bearing witness to this, this procedure diminishes the
opportunity that one gathering will have reason for legal activity later on.
 Clarity: In addition of decreasing the risk of lawsuits, contracts can likewise give
lucidity to employees and accomplices in their main goal. Contracts frequently plot
precisely what's anticipated from each gathering. Notwithstanding diminishing the
probability that one gathering will have the option to sue the other party later on, these
contracts can likewise enable each gathering to stay aware of precisely what they've
been contracted to do, along these lines lessening disarray and expanding center.

Disadvantages:

 Time and Money: Maybe the primary detriment to the utilization of contracts to
decrease risk is that drawing up contracts takes both time and money. To build a sealed
shut agreement, an organization needs to utilize the administrations of a legal counselor
to draft the contracts, and legal advisors are only sometimes cheap. What's more,
concentrating on contracts draws time away from different exercises that could help
develop the business.

24 | P a g e
  Litigious Atmosphere: Making each individual who manages an association sign
contracts that are intended to lessen the organization's risk can make an air where
everybody has their temper up. This may breed doubt, yet it can really improve the
probability of a claim, as individuals compelled to sign these contracts may look for the
insight of a legal advisor they wouldn't generally approach.

FUTURE SCOPE

The consumption of steel india has turned into a new peak. India was the world's second-
biggest steel producer with generation remaining at 106.5 MT in 2018. The development in the
Indian steel sector has been driven by domestic accessibility of crude materials, for example,
iron mineral and savvy work. Subsequently, the steel sector has been a significant supporter of
India's manufacturing yield.

The Indian steel industry is exceptionally present day with best in class steel factories. It has
consistently strived for constant modernisation and up-degree of more established plants and
higher vitality effectiveness levels.

So it is very beneficial for other market to enter into contracts with the steel companies like
SAIL so that the production increases and thereby the economy. Also as it is a government
company which will be an added advantage for the supply contractors.

25 | P a g e
 REFERENCES

https://sail.co.in/products

https://sailtenders.co.in/

https://www.businessballs.com/legal-and-
procurement/service-contracts-and-supply-agreements-
template-and-tips/

https://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-
disadvantages-contracts-companies-minimize-liabilities-
13714.html

https://www.ibef.org/industry/steel.aspx

26 | P a g e