Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUMMARY
MULTI-BAND, NOT MICROWAVE OR MILLIMETER-WAVE,
IS THE SOLUTION FOR 5G BACKHAUL.
Why? Microwave bands are limited in capacity, particularly in countries and
bands where spectrum is limited due to congestion. Even if you can get additional
frequencies, scaling capacity means aggregating multiple channels that results in
high equipment costs and potentially expensive recurring spectrum fees. E-Band
alone is not sufficient either. With more bandwidth available that enables higher
capacities, E-Band suffers from a number of potential limitations, from short link
distances and high susceptibility to rain outage and pole/tower sway to difficult and
time-consuming installation/antenna alignment.
THROUGHPUT LATENCY
To meet the increasing transport capacity demands, However, as 5G industrial and public safety use cases
networks will evolve to be more meshed to avoid bottlenecks, emerge, transport networks cannot sacrifice availability to
and dynamic to achieve network-wide optimization of achieve capacity, latency, and cost objectives. Link, node, and
resources. In addition, wireless transport networks will network-level reliability will need to improve in an automated
continue to become more spectrally efficient to support the and cost reduced network for 99.999% or better mission-
increasing demand. critical level reliability, and close to 100% coverage.
WIRELESS BACKHAUL REMAINS KEY expects the microwave market (6 to 42 GHz) to remain more
or less flat over the same period.
FOR 5G SUCCESS
Wireless will continue to be a critical element for operators BUT IS E-BAND REALLY SUITABLE FOR 5G
around the globe. Ubiquitous and cost-effective availability BACKHAUL?
of fiber has been expected since the days when 3G was E-Band wireless solutions have been around for several
at the same point as we are today with 5G. But the reality years, but certain aspects may have slowed the take-up in
is that fiber isn’t (and probably never will be) everywhere demand, such as high equipment prices, Regulator imposed
cost-effectively. Far from being an ‘old’ technology, wireless limitations or non-availability of E-Band spectrum in certain
(i.e: 5 to 42 GHz microwave, and 80 GHz millimeter-wave) is countries. But there are other factors that may have made
expected to provide backhaul for 65 percent of the world’s operators think twice about large-scale deployments of this
base stations by 2023 according to Ericsson (excluding China, technology, which become more acute when considering it
Korea, Japan, and Taiwan). for massive-scale 5G backhaul applications:
One critical issue for wireless backhaul for 5G will be • Limited reach – maximum link distances with acceptable
spectrum availability. Most microwave bands in common use availability (99.99% or better) are only up to 2 or 3 km (1
around the world are congested, often severely, and 5G will km or less in high rain rate regions like Asia). This limits
require very large bandwidths to support backhaul capacities the number of applications and rules out using E-Band as
up to and above 1 Gbps, using existing technologies. On top a high capacity replacement for all but the very shortest
of this, frequency bands such as 24, 26, 28, 39 and 42 GHz, microwave links. This issue leads many to seek out high
and 57 to 71 GHz V-Band, are likely to be assigned to 5G system gain E-Band solutions, but unlike traditional
access in various parts of the world, removing them from microwave bands, additional transmitter power at 80
consideration for backhaul. This shortage and congestion GHz buys only a small incremental improvement in link
will drive a significant change in backhaul networks towards availability.
higher frequency bands, where much more spectrum is • Risk of outage – high precipitation can take down a link for
freely available. an extended period. Unlike microwave fading mechanisms,
which can be very short but distributed throughout the year,
E-BAND SUPPORTS 5G CAPACITY E-Band fading and resulting outages are all rain-induced,
NEEDS and can be long in duration, leading to noticeable service
One such band is the 70 to 90 GHz band, also known as disruptions.
E-Band, where latest developments in technology and • Difficult to align antennas – E-Band antenna beam-widths
higher volume production techniques have resulted in link are very narrow (0.5 degrees vs. 2 degrees for a microwave
costs falling dramatically. E-Band is now considered the key 2ft antenna). This makes getting the precise alignment
band for 5G backhaul to take the place of traditional bands, very difficult and time-consuming, raising installation
enabling high bandwidth links up to several kilometers, complexity and costs.
with a high degree of frequency re-use that will support the • Susceptible to pole or tower sway - due to narrow antenna
increased site density required for 5G networks. beam-width any appreciable movement in the antenna
The interest in E-Band from operators is now widespread in mount structure can cause the antennas to move out of
all regions, with many new and mature products available alignment leading to signal loss and outages.
on the market that can support up to 10 Gbps in a single For high capacity links supporting mission-critical
radio channel, to the point that E-Band is expected to see applications, poor availability can’t be accepted. For this
a significant growth curve in 2019 and beyond. Skylight reason, E-Band alone is not a sufficient solution for 5G
Research, in their latest 5-Year forecast, predicts that the Backhaul requirements.
market for E-Band will grow from $296 million in 2018 to over
$1.25 billion in 2023, a CAGR of 34%. In contrast, Skylight
Multi-Band is gaining attention as an alternative for microwave links that are con-
strained by narrow channel bandwidths and lack of spectrum to support multi-
Gigabit links of longer distances than E-Band alone can support, up to as much as 8
to 10km.
MICROWAVE* MULTI-BAND*
Capacity Outage Time Capacity Outage Time
MOD Mbps HH:MM:SS MOD Mbps DAY HH:MM:SS
QPSK : 75 00:00:19 QPSK : 75 00:00:19 Multi-Band
16QAM : 150
32QAM : 200
00:00:46
00:01:14
16QAM :
32QAM :
150
200
00:00:47
00:01:16
7hrs
More uptime
64QAM : 249 00:01:33 64QAM : 249 00:01:35
128QAM : 319 00:02:46 128QAM : 319 00:02:51
256QAM : 369 00:04:33 256QAM : 369 00:04:41
512QAM : 415 00:07:47 512QAM : 415 00:08:01
1024QAM : 458 00:13:03 1024QAM : 458 00:13:30 E-BAND*
2048QAM : 500 00:30:08 2048QAM : 500 00:31:39
Capacity Outage Time
4096QAM : 531 01:40:09 4096QAM : 531 01:49:01 MOD Mbps DAY HH:MM:SS
QPSK / 4096QAM : 3231 07:13:03 QPSK : 2700 07:45:28
*Microwave @ 15GHz, 56MHz channel 16QAM / 4096QAM : 5931 14;49:40 16QAM : 5400 14:29:10
32QAM / 4096QAM : 7331 001 02:26:51 32QAM : 6800 001 01:30:36
64QAM / 4096QAM : 8731 002 04:51:48 64QAM : 8200 002 02:40:43
128QAM / 4096QAM : 10000 005 02:16:11 128QAM : 9900 004 18:31:01
Multi-Band
>400 Mbit/s capacity at
99.999%
Capacity more capacity
at EACH STEP
availability
Figure 2. Comparing E-Band and Multi-Band link performance for 7.45 km path with 0.6m antennas
The Multi-Band link has a similar availability at the high end, and hitlessly load balanced/switched between each link
since this is dictated largely by the E-Band portion, but once using Layer 1 Link Aggregation. The overall throughput on
the E-Band channel drops out of service due to rain fade you the Multi-Band link is also higher by about 10% at each step,
the additional protection of the microwave channel available thanks to the additional capacity supported on the microwave
to maintain the high priority traffic, which is automatically channel.
In Figure 3, up to 531 Mbit/s of high priority traffic can be maintained on the microwave channel, and at least 415 Mbit/s with
99.999% availability (the minimum for critical traffic), all of which would be lost on the E-Band only link. ACM on the microwave
link reduces capacity and maintains the link operation for all but just 19 seconds annually. Overall, the Multi-Band links would
remain in service for more than 7 hours more than the E-Band link throughout the course of the year – a significant difference.
Using wider microwave channels (112 MHz), and by combining two channels, it is possible to boost the bandwidth available to
higher priority traffic on the microwave link up to as much as 2.5 Gbit/s.
Figure 3. Comparing E-Band and Multi-Band link capacity and outage, per modulation step
Figure 4. Single-Box Multi-Band – fewer boxes means reduced complexity and lower costs
Aviat’s new WTM 4800 Multi-Band radio provides reliable, high capacity connec-
tions up to 10 Gbit/s, over link distances up to 10 km, in a single and easy to deploy
all-outdoor unit. Combined with the only available cloud-based Multi-Band design
tool and convenient online ordering and rapid delivery, the perfect backhaul solu-
tion for mission-critical 5G networks is here and available now.