CORRELATION OF NCAE RESULT TO THE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL TRACK;

BASIS FOR INSTRUCTION

________________________

A Research

Presented to the

Senior High School Department

Naval National High School

Larrazabal, Naval, Biliran

________________________

In Partial Fulfillment in Practical Research 2

________________________

RICA MARIAE ROSIALDA

JINKY A. ROSAROSO

JULIE ROSE GATO

CARLOS G. ROTILLES

DECEMBER 2019
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

TITLE PAGE……………………………………………………………………………i

APPROVAL SHEET…………………………………………………………………..ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT…………………………………………………………......iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………………iv

LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………..…vi

LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………vii

LIST OF APPENDICES……………………………………………………………...viii

ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………....ix

CHAPTER I- INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………….1

Background of the Study……………………………………………………. 1

Objectives of the Study……………………………………………………… 3

Framework of the Study……………………………………………………... 4

Theoretical Framework…………………………………………….....4

Conceptual Framework……………………………………………… 5

Importance of the Study………………………………………………………6

Scope and Delimitation of the Study………………………………………..7

Definition of Terms……………………………………………………………8

Review of Literature…………………………………………………………..10

iv
CHAPTER II- METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………..12

Research Design……………………………………………………………..12

Research Locale………………………………………………………………12

Research Subject……………………………………………………………..13

Research Instrument………………………………………………………….13

Data Gathering Procedure……………………………………………………13

Statistical Treatment of Data…………………………………………………14

CHAPTER III- RESULTS AND DISCUSSION…………………………………….20

Profile of the respondents……………………………………………………15

Preferred track and track/concentration based on the NCAE result…….15

Factors affecting in choosing the strand/track of the respondents………16

The student’s awareness about their NCAE results………………………17

The alignment and disalignment between the NCAE result and

the chosen track of the respondents………………………………………18

CHAPTER IV- SUMMARY, CONCLUSION. AND RECOMMENDATIONS……21

Summary of Findings………………………………………………………….21

Conclusion……………………………………………………………………...22

Recommendations…………………………………………………………….22

LITERATURE CITED…………………………………………………………………24

APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………….29

CURRICULUM VITAE…………………………………………………….…………..31
 LIST OF TABLES

TABLE

PAGE

1 Profile of the respondents……………………………………………15

2 Preferred track and track/concentration based on the NCAE

result……………………………………………………………………………16

3 Factors affecting in choosing the strand/track of the

respondents………………………………………………………………….17

4 The student’s awareness about their NCAE

results…………………………………………………………………………..18

5 The alignment and disalignment between the NCAE result and

the chosen track of the respondents………………..……………………18

vi
 LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE

PAGE

1 Conceptual Framework of the Study………………….. 5

vii
 LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX

PAGE

A Letter to the School Principal…………………………..30

B Questionnaire to the Student Respondents…………31

viii
 ABSTRACT

GRADE 12- EMERALD, Naval National High School, Larrazabal, Naval,

Biliran, THE ALIGNMENT AND DISALIGNMENT BETWEEN THE NCAE

RESULT AND THE CHOSEN TRACK OF THE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

STUDENTS IN NAVAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL.

Adviser: MR. REYMUND J. ICAIN

This study was conceptualized with main objective of determining the

alignment and disalignment between the NCAE result and the chosen track of the

Senior High School student on Naval National High School.

In terms on their track, Academic track has a frequency of 10 out of 20

respondents and a percentage of 50% while T.V.L track has a frequency of 10 out

of 20 respondents and a percentage of 50%.

Sex. The largest group is male with the frequency of 13 out of 20 respondents and

a percentage of 65%.

Majority of the students are not aligned based on their chosen track according to

their NCAE result.

The Researchers found out that conducting the National Career Assessment

Examination does not influence the student’s choice in choosing their track/strand.

ix
 Chapter I

INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

The K-12 Program implementation started on batch 2011-2012, and the first

batch of students to go through K-12 graduated last March 2018. The K-12

Program is found to be adequate period for learning under basic education and its

distinction requirement of professionals and non-professionals in our country and

in foreign Asian or Non-Asian countries. It offers a balanced approach to learning

that will enable children and students to acquire, know and learn more skills in

different fields of education taking up the vocational and later professional degree

courses. (Ma. Araceli Bello Verjom)

In the study of Ferrer and Dela Cruz (2017), which aim to know if the

students’ performance in the National Career Assessment Examination is

significantly correlated to their academic performance. They found out that among

the subject areas in the NCAE, students from the University of the City of Manila

performed better in Science, followed by Mathematics, then English with an

average percentile ranks of 89.5, 88.4, and 86.8, respectively. Moreover, a

significant relationship was established between these subject areas to their Grade

10 and Grade 11 grades.

Furthermore, the NCAE basically aims to determine the learner’s ability and

occupational interest on any of the Senior High School tracks. Occupational

interest is the learner’s preference in specific vocations and career categories. The
two-day exam also aims to guide the conduct of career guidance at the school

level and to ensure the development of skills and competencies required for the

world of work and career choices. (Santos, 2017).44

House of Representatives approved a measure creating the National

Career Assessment Examination (NCAE) for high-school graduates seeking

admission to post-secondary learning institutions. Nationalist People’s Coalition

Rep. Kimi Cojuangco of Pangasinan, chairman of the House Committee on Basic

Education and Culture, said the passage of House Bill 5895, or the National Career

Assessment Examination Act, will pave the way to a high quality of education in

the Philippines by regulating and monitoring the admission of high-school students

to courses where they have better aptitude and potential. Under the measure, the

created NCAE shall assess and evaluate the aptitude, skill or inclination of a

student in a particular occupational field to pursue a college or university course,

a technical-vocation course, or an entrepreneurial course.

The number of educated is now decreasing because of the different

circumstances that they face during the days that they are trying to step up in their

lives. A survey from the DepEd shows that out of 100 students studying in

elementary, only 80 of them graduated and those 80 students may be deducted

and become 50-60 students to go to high school. In 50 students, there might only

be 30 of them can only proceed to college and only a few of them can finish college

and/or masteral degree courses (Ma. Araceli Bello Verjom)

Being an incoming grade eleven student, students must be ready to choose

and decide for their future. It is very important for the students of what will they
choose for them to have a good life in the near future and if they got it wrong, their

future will be at risk. In the process of choosing of what track they will walk on,

there are factors affecting their decision, it can be human’s influence, things, or

even situation. Those factors have a great impact with their life that it could change

their insights and decisions. A student must know the factors that can affect his/her

decision to be aware and more educated and have a clever decision. The

researchers decided to identify those factors and make it clearer to everyone.

In the study of Susan Yonezawa, Amy Stuart Wells, and Irene Serna (2002),

In this article, the researchers discuss how and why educators’ attempts at

detracting by providing students and parents with greater “freedom of choice” in

track placement often result in little movement of low-and middle-track students

into high-track classes. Using data from six racially mixed high schools undergoing

detracting reform, the authors contend that these schools’ low- and middle-track

students, most of whom were African American and Latino, resisted entering high-

track classes because the relationship between their places in the tracking

hierarchy and their evolving identities and ideologies shaped the way such options

were presented to and perceived by them. The authors conclude that the hidden

institutional barriers within schools, the students’ tracked aspirations, and the

desire of students to learn in “places of respect” thwarted reformers’ efforts to

detract through the mechanism of choice.

Objectives of the study

The study aims to determine the alignment and disalignment between the

NCAE result and the chosen track among the Senior High School students in Naval

National High School.

Specifically, the study sought to know the following objectives:

1. Determine the profile of the students in terms of:

1.1 Track

1.2 Gender

2. Identify the preferred track and track/concentration based on the NCAE

result.

3. Find out the factors affecting in choosing the strand/track

4. Find out if the students are informed about their NCAE result.

5. Determine the awareness of the students in the importance of NCAE result.

6. Determine if there is an alignment and disalignment between the NCAE

result and the chosen track of the respondents.

Review of Related Literature

An article posted by Adecco UK (Adecco UK, 2015), a part of a Swiss

multinational human resource consulting company of the same name, states that

it is worth finding out what type of worker an individual is with the increasing of

employers utilizing personality and psychometric testing procedures to analyze the

employee’s attributes beyond qualifications. It is also stated in the article that

“choosing a job to which an individual is inherently suited –rather than just able to

convince the interviewer that he/she is interested in the position – will make

him/her a happier, more productive employee.”

There are many opportunities that wait for every career that one wants to

pursue. Some people may stumble upon better occupation opportunities, thanks

to the strategies and steps that they follow. Investigating for career opportunities

is well worth taking time (Mind Tools, 2014). By doing this, one can discover

opportunities that are perfectly matched to his/her interests or skills, find out about

promotions and job openings before anyone else, and identify ways of expanding

the knowledge and skills needed for that career.

Jude J. Obiunu 5, No. 2 (2013) said “Personality is a characteristic way of

thinking, feeling and behaving”. The personality can also play an essential role

especially for the students in choosing career. As for as studies concerned that

students, who have a great personality are more likely to major in different fields.

Students with creative personality would select science fields.

 Another study that establishes the influence of personality on career choice

is of Dr. Claudia Harzer and companions of University of Zurich (Harzer, et.al,

2012), which focuses on the character strengths of an individual and how it affects

their career. From interviews of over 1,000 working people, their study shows that

the degree of positive experiences increases with the number of personal

character strengths, or so-called “signature strengths”, applied at work. This would

imply that understanding what roles a person is best suited to base on his/her

personality is what will make him/her the most happy at work.

Students who have interest in social field are usually likely to move in the

social sciences (Porter and Umbach, 2006). As before mentioned that the students

have seen themselves play a role in which personality is a defining factor may

influence the choice of career secondary school students. Some careers demand

that one may have the personality to match the qualities of the profession let

suppose; sales people have to be out- going.

Michael Borchert(December, 2002 )personality plays an important

role in the career selection at the right time have right career The type of

personality of students must be committed, as to find out the career possibilities

from early on in their lives. Students should be sincere to the study make a well

planned decision the role grades play in off-putting opportunities for the bright

future. Splaver wanted to say “It is important for you to have a good understanding

of yourself, your personality, if you are to make intelligent career plans.

 CHAPTER II

METHODOLOGY

This chapter presents the procedures used in conducting the study. It

discusses the research design, research locale, research subjects, research

instruments, data gathering procedures and statistical treatment of data used in

the study.

Research Design

To attain the objectives of the study quantitative survey research design

was used. This research design is necessary since the objective of the study is to

determine the profile, preferred track/concentration, factors affecting in choosing

the strand/track, awareness if they are informed about their NCAE, awareness of

the students on the importance of NCAE result and to determine if there is an

alignment or misalignment between the NCAE result and the chosen track of the

students in Naval National High School, specifically Senior High School.

Technique that uses questionnaires done to achieve the desired results of the

investigation. This is necessary to present possible recommendations for the future

benefit.

Research Locale

The research was conducted in Naval National High School, which in the

specific setting of research subject

Research Subject

The study’s respondents include 70 selected students 35 from General

Academic track and 35 from T.V.L. track who are officially enrolled in Naval

National High School specifically Senior High School Students.

Research Instrument

To achieve the desired objective, the study used a questionnaire (Appendix

A). The instrument is composed of four (4) parts. Part I, determine the profile of

respondents. Part II dealt with the preferred track/concentration, Part III dealt with

the factors affecting in choosing the strand/track, and Part IV focuses on the

awareness of students on the importance of their NCAE result.

Data Collection Procedure

The researchers selected 70 respondents using the SLOVIN’S FORMULA.

Then get the NCAE result of the chosen respondents in the registrar’s office with

consent. Later on, researchers distributed questionnaires to the selected Senior

High School students of Naval National High School.

The data gathering phase took four (4) days. After gathering data. The

researchers analyze and interpret the data.

Treatment of Data

The study employed random sampling to seventy (70) students in the

Grade 12 Senior High School students in Naval National High School.

 Percentage in determining the profile, preferred track and

track/concentration based on the NCAE result, factors affecting in choosing the

strand/track, awareness if the students are informed and the importance of their

NCAE result.

P=(f/n)100

Wherein; f – number of answers

n - number of respondents

P – total percentage
 CHAPTER III

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter presents and interprets the data gathered from the responses

of the students based on the objectives of the study. The first part covers the profile

in terms of Track and Gender of the respondents. The second part shows the

preferred track/concentration based on the NCAE result. The third part shows the

factors affecting in choosing the strand/track. The last part presents the awareness

of the students on the importance of the NCAE results.

Profile of the respondents

The profile of the students includes track and gender. This is presented in

Table 1.

Table 1

Profile of the respondents

1.1 Gender General Academic Technical Vocational

Strand Livelihood

Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage

Male

Female
 Table 2

Preferred Track and Track/Concentration based on the NCAE result

Chosen Track

NCAE Results
General Academic Technical Vocational
Livelihood
Strand
Gender Male Female Male Female Male Female

Academic
Track

Technical
Vocational
Livelihood

As the data presented in Table 1, it shows the frequency and percentage

distribution of the track of the respondents involved. There is an equal number of

students for both T.V.L and Academic track, which only means that among

selected Senior High School students 50% are from T.V.L. and 50% are from

Academic Track.

Also shown in Table 1, data revealed that most of the respondents for

both T.V.L. and Academic Track. Male has the highest percentage of 65% and

Female has the least percentage with 35%.

Preferred track and track/concentration based on the NCAE result.

 The preferred track and track/concentration is based on the NCAE result.

Table 2, shows the different recommended track based on the NCAE

result among selected Senior High School Students it revealed that Arts and

Design has the highest percentage with 35%, T.V.L. with 25% the same with

Academic and finally Sports has the lowest percentage with 15%.

Factors affecting in choosing the strand/track of the respondents.

The factors affecting in choosing the strand/track of the respondents is

based on the factors that influenced them to choose the track that they are

enrolled in.

Table 3

Factors affecting in choosing the strand/track of the respondents.

Factors affecting in choosing the strand/track of the Frequency %

respondents.

Peer Pressure 5 25

Financial Capability 9 45

Undecided 6 30

Distance of school from home 4 20

No choice 1 5

Family Influence 1 5

Personal Interest 7 35
 18

Table 3, shows the Factors affecting students in choosing the

Strand/Track, the table revealed that out seven factors Financial Capability has

the highest percentage with 45% and the lowest percentage is Family Influence

the same as no choice with 5%.

The student’s awareness about their NCAE results.

The student’s awareness about their NCAE results is derived from the

responses of the respondents.

Table 4, shows how well informed the selected Senior High School

students about their NCAE result and the table revealed that 60% says that they

are informed and 40% says no.

The awareness of the students on the importance of the NCAE result.

The awareness of the students on the importance of the NCAE result.

19

Table 4

The awareness of the students on the importance of the NCAE result.

Response Frequency %

Yes 13 65

No 7 35

Total 20 100
 Table 5, shows the awareness of selected Senior High School students on

the importance of NCAE result and the table revealed that 65% say’s yes they

are aware, and 35% says no.

The alignment and disalignment between the NCAE result and the chosen

track of the respondents.

The alignment and disalignment between the NCAE result and the chosen

track of the respondents is based on the track they are enrolled in and the

preferred track/concentration based on their NCAE result.

Frequency %

Aligned 4 20

Disaligned 16 80

Total 20 100

20

Table 6, shows the alignment and disalignment of selected Senior High

School students based on the NCAE result and their preferred track. The table

unveil that most of the student enrolled not based on their NCAE result or

disaligned with 80% and few are aligned with 20%.

 CHAPTER IV

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the summary of the findings, the conclusion drawn from

the findings and the corresponding recommendations.

Summary of Findings
 This study was conceptualized with the main objective of determining the

importance of NCAE results in choosing the track/strand of the Senior High School

students in Naval National High School.

The highlights of the findings are presented below:

Profile of the respondents.

Track. Academic track has a frequency of 10 out of 20 respondents and a

percentage of 50% while T.V.L track has a frequency of 10 out of 20 respondents

and a percentage of 50%.

Sex. The largest group is male with the frequency of 13 out of 20 respondents and

a percentage of 65%.

Majority of the students are not aligned based on their chosen track according to

their NCAE result.

The Researchers found out that conducting the National Career Assessment

Examination does not influence the student’s choice in choosing their track/strand.

22

Conclusion

Based on the findings derived from this study, the following conclusions

were drawn.
 1. There is an equal distribution of number of respondents from both track

offered in Naval National High School. Most of the respondents are male.

2. Majority of the respondents qualified in the field of Arts and Design track.

3. Financial capability gained the highest percentage among the factors.

4. Majority of the respondents are informed about the result of their NCAE.

5. Majority of the respondents are aware on the importance of NCAE.

6. Most of the respondents were dis-aligned between the result of their NCAE

and their chosen track.

Recommendations

Based on the main findings, the study makes a number of

recommendations.

1. There must be an orientation before conducting the examination.

2. The students should be informed of the NCAE result to keep them guided

in choosing their desired track/strand.

3. There must be an equal distribution of the track/strand offered in every

school.

23

4. The school administration should conduct a survey for the Junior High

School about their preferred track/strand to be aware of the strand/track that

they must offer.

24
LITERATURE CITED

25

LITERATURE CITED
Anderson, K. (1995, Summer). The use of a structured career development

group to increase career identity. Journal of Career Development, 21 (4)

(ERIC Document Reproduction No. EJ 504 417)

Basavage, R. (1996). Gender-role stereotyping and how it relates to perceived

future career choices among elementary school children. Unpublished

master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie.

Britannica. (2002). Encyclopedia Britannica online. Retrieved June 18, 2002,

from http://search.eb.com/search?query=environment&x=10&y=9

Cavanagh, S. (2002). CA district: Talk career talk or no graduation walk.

Education Week, 21 (36), 3. Retrieved June 17, 2002, from EBSCOhost

AN 6728703.

Gargaran, et.al (2017)

Germantown, (2002). Welcome to Germantown High School. Retrieved June 21,

2002, from http://germantown.k12.wi.us/gtownhigh/aboutghs.html

Greenberger, M. (2002). Nation’s high schools still operate “separate and

unequal” vocational education for male and female students. Retrieved

June 12, 2002, from

http://www.nwlc.org/details.cfm?id=1135&section=education

Harris, B., & Jones, S. (1997). The parent’s crash course in career planning.
26
Lincolnwood, IL: VGM Career Horizons.
Heyde, M., & Jordaan, J. (1979). Vocational maturity during the high school

years. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.

Imel, S. (1996). Tech prep, trends and issues alert. ERIC/ACVE Publication.
Retrieved
June 18, 2002, from http://www.ericacve.org/docgen.asp?tbl=tia&ID=103
Kerka, S. (1997). Will we all be portfolio workers? ERIC/ACVE Publication.
Retrieved
June 19, 2002, from http://www.ericacve.org/docgen.asp?tbl=tia&ID=111
Kroll, A., Dinklage, L., Lee, J., Morley, E., & Wilson, E. (1970). Career

development. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Laleger, G. (1942). The vocational interests of high school girls. New York, NY:

AMS Press, Inc.

Lankard/Brown, B. (1996a). Acquiring self knowledge for career development

(ERIC
Digest No.175). Retrieved June 18, 2002, from

http://www.eriacve.org/docgen.asp?tbl=digests&ID=28

Lankard/Brown, B. (1996b). Career Resilience (ERIC Digest No.178). Retrieved

June19, 2002, from
http://www.ericacve.org/docgen.asp?tbl=digest&ID=31
Lankard/Brown, B. (1998). What’s happening in school-to-work programs? (ERIC

Digest No. 190). Retrieved June 19, 2002, from

http://www.ericacve.org/docgen.asp?tbl=digest&ID=43

Maze, R. (2002). Parents push college over service. Army Times, 62 (42), 24.

27
 EBSCOhost AN 6639265. Retrieved June 17, 2002, from

wysisyg://bodyframe.40/http://ehostvgw6.e…leanTerm=vocational%20guidance

Miller, J. (1992). National career development guidelines. (ERIC Document

Reproduction No. ED 347 493). Retrieved June 18, 2002, from

http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed347493.html

Milwaukee Area Technical College, (2002). Welcome. Retrieved June 21, 2002,

from http://matc.edu/profile/welc/index.htm

National Commission’s Site (1989). National commission for cooperative

education.
Retrieved June 14, 2002, from http://www.co-op.edu/further.html
O’Brien, T. (1996). A case study of six students in workbound. Unpublished

dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Rawe, J. (2002). Young & jobless. Time.com: Time Magazine, 159 (23).
Retrieved
June 17, 2002, from

www.time.com/time/magazine/printout/0,8816,257139,00.html

Spangler, P. (2000). Identifying the “root cause” of Mukwonago High School

graduates’ inability to make a career choice and form a career plan.

Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie.

Splaver, S. (1977). Your personality and your career. New York, NY: Julian
Messner.
Super, D., & Overstreet, P. (1960). The vocational maturity of ninth-grade boys.

28
 New York, NY: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia

University. Super, D. (1957). The psychology of careers. New York, NY: Harper

and Brothers.

Thout, E. (1969). Preparation for government employment. Unpublished master’s

thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Thuli, K., & Roush/Phelps, B. (1994). Integrating vocational and academic

learning programs. Tech Prep Advocate, 2 (1), 1. Retrieved June 18,

2002, from http://www.cew.wsc.edu/cew/archives/techprep/tp2121.asp

Weiler, N. (1977). Reality and career planning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Publishing Company, Inc.

Wonacott, M. (2002). High schools that work: Best practices for CTE. ERIC
Practical Application Brief No.19. Retrieved June 18, 2002, from
http://www.ericava.org/docgen.asp?tbl=pab&ID=109

29
 Appendix A

LETTER TO THE SCHOOL PRINCIPAL

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Division of Biliran
Region VII- Eastern Visayas
NAVAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Larrazabal, Naval, Biliran
ARNEL C. GABUYA
Principal
Naval National High School
Larrazabal, Naval, Biliran

Sir:

I, Rica Mariae J. Rosialda, on behalf of the research team would like to

inform your good office that we will conduct a research study entitled, THE
ALIGNMENT AND DISALIGNMENT BETWEEN THE NCAE RESULT AND THE
CHOSEN TRACK AMONG THE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN NAVAL
NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL, as one of our requirements in Practical Research 2.

In this connection, may I request your permission to conduct a survey

involving the selected Senior High School students of Naval National High
School.

We are hoping for your positive response on this matter.

Thank you and more power to your administration.
Respectfully Yours,

RICA MARIAE J. ROSIALDA

Researcher
Noted:

REYMUND J. ICAIN, Ed.D

Teacher in PR 1

Approved:

ARNEL C. GABUYA, Ed.D

NNHS- Principal

30
Appendix B
 Questionnaire to the Student Respondents

Direction: Kindly fill in necessary information and check for the blank spaces
according to your answer.

I. Determine the profile of the respondents in terms of:

Strand:

Gender:

II. Identify the preferred track and track/concentration based on the NCAE result.

Track first choice:

III. Find out the factors affecting on choosing the strand/track.

Direction: Check the factors affecting in choosing your strand/track.

Peer Pressure No Choice

Financial Capability Family Influence

Undecided Personal Interest

Distance of school from home

IV. To know if the students are informed about their NCAE result.

Are you informed about the result of your NCAE?

Yes No

V. Determine the awareness of the students on the importance of NCAE result.

Do you know the importance of NCAE?

Yes No

31
CURRICULUM VITAE
 32
CURRICULUM VITAE

Name: Rica Mariae J. Rosialda

Nickname: Icang

Age:18

Birthday: August 09, 2001

Home Address: Sitio Cogon, Brgy. Larrazabal, Naval, Biliran

Name of Mother: Carmelita J. Rosialda

Name of Father: Ricardo S. Rosialda

School Attainment:

 Elementary: Calumpang Elementary School

 Secondary: Naval National High School

 33

Name: Julie Rose Gato

Nickname: Juls

Age: 18

Birthday: October 08, 2001

Home Address: Sitio Cogon, Brgy. Larrazabal, Naval, Biliran

Name of Mother: Aniana D. Gato

Name of Father: Jose E. Pitong

School Attainment:

 Elementary: Larrazabal Elemetary School

 Secondary: Naval National High School

 34

Name: Carlos G. Rotilles

Nickname: Titing

Address: Sto. Nino, Naval, Biliran

Age: 19

Birthday: July 13, 2000

Home Address: Sto. Nino, Naval, Biliran

Name of Mother: Angelisa A. Rotilles

Name of Father: Carlos S. Rotilles Sr.

School Attainment:

 Elementary: Sto. Nino Elementary School

 Secondary: Naval National High School

 35

Name: Jinky Rosaroso

Nickname: Jinks

Address: Sitio Kawayanan, Brgy. Talustusan, Naval Biliran

Age: 17

Birthday: November 25, 2001

Home Address: Sitio Kawayanan, Brgy. Talustusan, Naval Biliran

Name of Mother: Violeta A. Rosaroso

Name of Father: Rafael L. Rosaroso

School Attainment:

 Elementary: Talustusan Elementary School

 Secondary: Naval National High School