Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cover
Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3
Text 2: The Guardian article: ‘Why teaching table manners can do more harm than good’ 20
Lesson 1 ........................................................................................................................... 22
Lesson 2 ........................................................................................................................... 26
Text 3: Excerpt taken from The Elephant Man and Other Reminiscences by Sir Frederick
Treves .............................................................................................................................. 30
Lesson 1 ........................................................................................................................... 33
Lesson 2 ........................................................................................................................... 41
Text 7: Excerpt from Henry Morley, Household Words, ‘Our Phantom Ship: China’ ............ 82
Lesson 1 ........................................................................................................................... 84
Lesson 2 ........................................................................................................................... 88
Text 9: Excerpt from Charles Darwin The Voyage of the Beagle .......................................... 105
Lesson 1 ......................................................................................................................... 107
Lesson 2 ......................................................................................................................... 112
Text 10: Excerpt from Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence ........................................................... 120
Lesson 1 ......................................................................................................................... 122
Lesson 2 ......................................................................................................................... 126
In addition to the non-fiction texts, the pack includes 20 lesson plans, accompanying
resources and suggestions for differentiation.
The pack has been devised for use with the English Language AQA, Edexcel, OCR and
WJEC Eduqas specifications. There are specific resources and exam practice questions
for each of these specifications included within the pack. The activities and ideas will help
students to: read and evaluate texts critically, compare ideas and perspectives across two
or more texts and analyse the use of language and structure to achieve effects and
influence the reader.
Which texts and activities you choose to study, and how many you use, will depend on the
nature of your classes and how much time you have available. The intention is that you
pick the activities that are best suited to your students’ needs.
Our thanks go to our contributor, Helen Millman Jones who wrote this pack.
We hope you enjoy using this pack. If you have any questions, please get in touch: email
support@teachit.co.uk or call us on 01225 788850. Alternatively, you might like to give
some feedback for other Teachit members – you can do this by adding a comment on the
resource page on Teachit. (Please log in to access this.)
XXXIII
MY DEAR CASSANDRA,
J. A.
1. Quick quiz. Put students into teams and give them five minutes (timing them
with the Teachit Timer) to write down as many facts as possible about Jane
Austen, such as when she lived, which books she wrote, where she lived etc.
2. Alternatively, give the Jane Austen: true or false quiz resource to each team.
Based on their findings, ask students to predict what information a letter from
Jane Austen to her sister might contain.
Main activities
1. The name game. While you read the letter to your students, ask them to
underline or highlight all of the proper nouns in the letter. They do not need to
know all of these references, but the most significant ones are included as
footnotes in the text.
Ask students to consider the high frequency of proper nouns – people and
places – and what that might suggest about Jane Austen’s life and her letters.
2. Uncovering context: What was life like in 1805? Get students to consider the
lifestyle presented in the letter by completing the Uncovering context activity
sheet. This is a useful activity for context, but also addresses Assessment
Objective 1: Identify and interpret explicit and implicit information and ideas and
Select and synthesise evidence from different texts.
Find a quotation from Jane Austen’s letter to support each of the following
statements about society in the early 19th century.
1. The postal service took a long time and was often unreliable.
4. Letter writing was the main method of communication between family members who
lived a distance away.
Match up the following statements about society in the early 19th century with a
quotation from Jane Austen’s letter
3. Items of clothing were expensive and C. ‘How do you do; and how is Harriot’s
not easily replaced. cold?’
6. The upper classes were invited to F. ‘The two Edwards went to Canterbury
many social events. in the chaise …’
1. Picture clues quiz. Put students into teams and show them the Picture clues.
The idea is that they find a quotation from the letter to illustrate each of the
pictures.
Main activities
AO2
Explain, comment on and analyse how writers use language and structure to
achieve effects and influence readers, using relevant subject terminology to
support their views
AO4
Evaluate texts critically and support this with appropriate textual references.
Ask students to write a plan for one of the following exam-style questions,
according to the specification you are following. (Note: All of the points on
students’ plans should be supported with a relevant quotation.)
How does Jane Austen use language to explain and describe her
experiences?
OCR-style question
Explore how Jane Austen uses language and structure to explain and describe
her experiences.
Support your ideas by referring to the text, using relevant subject terminology.
Edexcel-style question
Analyse how Jane Austen uses language and structure to interest and engage
her reader.
Support your views with detailed reference to the text.
Eduqas/WJEC-style question
Jane Austen sets out to explain and describe her experiences to her sister.
How does she do this?
You should comment on:
what she says about her experiences
her use of language and tone
the way she structures her ideas.
Plenary activity
1. Discuss and evaluate. Share examples from students’ plans and discuss the
ways in which they are effective.
Exam practice. Ask students to write the answer which they have planned.
C D
E F
G H
B. ‘I was so tired to feel no envy of those who were at Ly. Yates’ ball.’
E. ‘The two Edwards went to Canterbury in the chaise.’ or ‘‘He was just getting into talk
with Elizabeth as the carriage was ordered.’
G. ‘Her eloquence lies in her fingers; they were most fluently harmonious.’
Feature of
Text 1 Text 2
text
Content and
ideas – what is
the text about?
Audience – who
is the text aimed
at?
Purpose – why
might the text
have been
written?
What do you
notice about the
writer’s
perspective
and/or
attitudes?
What do you
notice about:
a. the text’s
style and
b. the text’s
language?
What do you
notice about the
text’s
organisation and
structure?
1. Discussing the topic. Share and translate the following table manners written
by the six-year-old son of Chris Cleave, a Guardian writer.
What order would they place the statements in (working from most to
least important)?
Extension
You may wish to share The Guardian article by Chris Cleave at Down with the
kids: table manners | Life and style | The Guardian
Main activities
1. Summary skills (AO1, AO4). Once you’ve read the article with the class, ask
students to complete the Summarise and attack worksheet. This involves
getting students to put the writer’s main points in the order in which they appear.
It also draws a distinction between arguments and anecdotes or personal
experiences, which are used alongside each other in this article. (Note: This is
also available as an interactive sequencing activity) The counter argument
activity will also prepare students for the writing task which follows.
2. Letter to The Guardian. The next task addresses the following writing
assessment objectives:
AO5
AO6
Use a range of vocabulary and sentence structures for clarity, purpose and
effect with accurate spelling and punctuation.
Then ask students to write a letter to The Guardian, arguing that teaching table
manners to children is important. They should counter the arguments in the
article and develop at least two new ideas of their own.
topic sentences
connectives.
Plenary activity
1. Right to reply. Ask students to consider how the writer would respond to their
letter if it was printed in The Guardian. What might she say to demolish their
counter arguments?
Collect a few examples on the board and try to demolish these as a class.
Lesson 1 resources
Summarise and attack
Number these summary statements in the order in which they appear in the article:
q Parental control around food can cause children to be phobic about food.
q My eldest child is not a fussy eater. He still enjoys the sensory aspect of food
but understands society’s expectations.
q I allow my child to play with her food because she understands in which
situations it is appropriate and in which it isn’t.
q Failure to allow children to explore food can often turn them into fussy eaters.
Which of the above statements are arguments? Highlight these in one colour.
Which of the above statements are anecdotes or personal opinion? Highlight these in a
different colour to the one used for question 2.
Now look at the arguments. Underneath each one, write down a counter argument to
challenge it.
Write up your counter argument. You may wish to use the following structure for your
points:
I strongly disagree with the view that … ; on the contrary, I believe that …
Interactive resources
1. Text features. Ask students to identify the features of this text which make it fit
the purpose of argue and persuade. Share the following checklist of features
and ask students to find an example of each:
facts
opinions
rhetorical devices
circular structure
Ask students if they can identify a secondary purpose for the text from this list:
explain
inform
describe
entertain
advise
Main activities
How do the two writers use language and structure to engage and interest
their readers?
If you are preparing students for the Edexcel specification, you may wish to find
a 20th century text to pair up with the 21st century Guardian article or give
students the Text analysis grid so that they can work on this single text.
If you are using the single text approach, then you can ask students to ‘zoom in’
on one aspect of the grid for detailed analysis.
Plenary activity
1. Advice for Parents. Tell students that they have been asked to write an advice
sheet for parents who want to know how best to introduce their toddler to food.
Get them into groups and ask them to write down about five or so examples of
advice that they’d give. Then share the suggestions as a class.
Lesson 2 resources
Exploring food, exploring language
1. Complete the following grid:
pattern of three
‘slurpy, finger-licking,
metaphor
face-smearing chimps’
compound adjectives
How does the writer use language to engage the reader with her opinions about
table manners?
Choose at least three of the examples from your grid to write about.
Reading non-fiction, Text 3: The Elephant Man
The shop was empty and grey with dust. Some old tins and a few
refuse the window. The light of the place was dim, being obscured by
the painted placard outside. The far end of the shop – where I expect
the late proprietor sat at a desk – was cut off by a curtain or rather by
a red tablecloth suspended from a cord by a few rings. The room was
cold and dank, for it was the month of November. The year, I might
The showman pulled back the curtain and revealed a bent figure
a tripod, was a large brick heated by a Bunsen burner. Over this the
creature was huddled to warm itself. It never moved when the curtain
was drawn back. Locked up in an empty shop and lit by the faint blue
light of the gas jet, this hunched-up figure was the embodiment of
sun was shining and one could hear the footsteps of the passers-by,
road.
up!” The thing arose slowly and let the blanket that covered its head
and back fall to the ground. There stood revealed the most disgusting
depending upon like causes; but at no time had I met with such a
displayed. He was naked to the waist, his feet were bare, he wore a
below the average height and made to look shorter by the bowing of
his back. The most striking feature about him was his enormous and
mass like a loaf, while from the back of the head hung a bag of
to a brown cauliflower. On the top of the skull were a few long lank
hairs. The osseous growth on the forehead almost occluded one eye.
The circumference of the head was no less than that of the man’s
waist. From the upper jaw there projected another mass of bone. It
protruded from the mouth like a pink stump, turning the upper lip
inside out and making of the mouth a mere slobbering aperture. This
lump of flesh, only recognizable as a nose from its position. The face
The back was horrible, because from it hung, as far down as the
large and clumsy – a fin or paddle rather than a hand. There was no
distinction between the palm and the back. The thumb had the
tuberous roots. As a limb it was almost useless. The other arm was
delicately shaped limb covered with fine skin and provided with a
beautiful hand which any woman might have envied. From the chest
suspended from the neck of a lizard. The lower limbs had the
To add a further burden to his trouble the wretched man, when a boy,
developed hip disease, which had left him permanently lame, so that
he could only walk with a stick. He was thus denied all means of
there arose from the fungous skin-growth with which he was almost
covered a very sickening stench which was hard to tolerate. From the
was English, that his name was John Merrick and that he was
1. Complete the Pre-reading activity which compares an extract from this text
with an extract from The War of the Worlds by H. G. Wells.
After students have completed the task, let them know the following:
Text 1 is an extract from the science fiction novel The War Of The Worlds by H.
G. Wells. This novel – which was first published in 1897 – describes the effects
of a Martian invasion. In this extract, the narrator describes his first sighting of
the Martian.
Main activities
1. First impressions. Read the first three paragraphs of the text and ask students
to answer the following questions:
What are the writer’s first impressions of The Elephant Man and the
way in which he is treated?
How would you describe the writer’s attitude towards The Elephant
Man in paragraph three?
Reading non-fiction, Text 3: The Elephant Man
2. Unpicking imagery. Read the description of The Elephant Man in paragraphs
four and five and ask students to complete the Unpicking imagery grid,
finding an example of imagery to match each body part. (Differentiation – a
simpler matching activity is also available as an interactive matching activity.)
Students should then be encouraged to consider why the writer has used such
comparisons and explain the effects of the comparisons chosen by the writer. It
might be helpful to share ideas about which comparison is most vivid or most
unpleasant.
3. Introducing exam skills (AO2, AO4). Give students the following shorter AQA-
style question:
AQA-style question
How does the writer use language to describe The Elephant Man?
Plenary activity
Task 1
Read (or listen to your teacher read) the two extracts below. As you read/listen, try to
work out what might be being described.
Extract 1
A big greyish rounded bulk, the size, perhaps, of a bear, was rising slowly and
painfully … As it bulged up and caught the light, it glistened like wet leather.
Two large dark-coloured eyes were regarding me steadfastly. The mass that
framed them, the head of the thing, was rounded, and had, one might say, a
face. There was a mouth under the eyes, the lipless brim of which quivered and
panted, and dropped saliva. The whole creature heaved and pulsated
convulsively… There was something fungoid in the oily brown skin… Even at
this first encounter, this first glimpse, I was overcome with disgust and dread.
Extract 2
The thing arose slowly and let the blanket that covered its head fall back to the
ground. There stood revealed the most disgusting specimen of humanity that I
have ever seen … The most striking feature about him was his enormous and
misshapened head. From the brow there projected a huge bony mass like a
loaf, while from the back of the head hung a bag of spongy, fungous-looking
skin, the surface of which was comparable to a brown cauliflower … From the
upper jaw there projected another mass of bone. It protruded from the mouth
like a pink stump, turning the upper lip inside out and making of the mouth a
mere slobbering aperture.
Task 2
Your teacher will now give you some contextual (background) information on the texts.
Does this information surprise you? Does it cause you to view the subjects that are
described any differently? If so, why?
Task 3
Reading non-fiction, Text 3: The Elephant Man
Extract 1 Extract 2
the creature
or subject
how
language is
used to
create
description
attitudes
similarities
differences
Reading non-fiction, Text 3: The Elephant Man
Unpicking imagery
Task 1
Complete the following grid by doing a ‘close reading’ of paragraphs four and five of the
text in which The Elephant Man is described in detail.
Part of
Comparison Effect of comparison
body
the face
the hand
the skin
the brow
the thumb
the chest
the fingers
Reading non-fiction, Text 3: The Elephant Man
Task 2
Choose the comparison you think is most effective / works best. What effect does the
language have? What feelings or response does it create in you, as a reader?
Task 3
Now think about why the writer has chosen to use such comparisons. Discuss this with
your partner.
Reading non-fiction, Text 3: The Elephant Man
Interactive resources
1. Whizzy wiki. Give out the Wikipedia factsheet on The Elephant Man and
Frederick Treves. Split the class into two halves and see how many facts they
can pick out about their key person in five minutes. Use the Teachit Timer to
introduce an element of competition. Share facts on the board.
Discuss what new information students have learned about The Elephant Man
and the writer of this text.
Main activities
1. Elephant Man attitudes. Consider the attitudes and perspective of the writer
by completing the resource on Frederick Treves: Attitudes towards The
Elephant Man. (There are differentiated versions of this task and the tasks
build towards answering an exam-style question. The first resource is aimed at
middle to lower ability students while the second resource is aimed at higher
ability students and contains a less scaffolded approach.)
2. A doctor’s viewpoint. Share ideas with the class and gather a consensus
about Treves’ overall attitude. Ask students to consider his medical perspective
– how did this affect his attitude/perspective on his subject?
Reading non-fiction, Text 3: The Elephant Man
Plenary activities
1. More on Merrick. Share these statements which appear later in Treves’ journal
as he recounts his regular visits to Merrick once he was given a ‘home’ in the
London Hospital. Ask students whether these alter their perceptions of The
Elephant Man?
‘He had a passion for conversation, yet all his life had had no one to
talk to.’
The above discussion will lead into Text 4 which deals with the experiences of
the writer and painter Christy Brown. You might wish to bridge the two
resources by asking students to complete some research about Christy Brown’s
life.
Reading non-fiction, Text 3: The Elephant Man
Lesson 2 resources
Whizzy wiki: Factsheet on The Elephant Man and Frederick Treves
Joseph Carey Merrick (5 August 1862 – 11 April 1890), sometimes
incorrectly referred to as John Merrick, was an English man with severe
deformities who was exhibited as a human curiosity named the Elephant
Man. He became well known in London society after he went to live at
the London Hospital. Merrick was born in Leicester, Leicestershire and
began to develop abnormally during the first few years of his life. His skin
appeared thick and lumpy, he developed enlarged lips, and a bony lump
grew on his forehead. One of his arms and both of his feet became
enlarged and at some point during his childhood he fell and damaged his
hip, resulting in permanent lameness. When he was 10, his mother died,
and his father soon remarried. Merrick left school at 13 and had difficulty
finding employment. Rejected by his father and stepmother, he left
home. In late 1879, Merrick, aged 17, entered the Leicester Union
Workhouse.
In Belgium, Merrick was robbed by his road manager and abandoned in Brussels. He eventually
made his way back to London; unable to communicate, he was found by the police to have Dr.
Treves’ card on him. Treves came and took Merrick back to the London Hospital. Although his
condition was incurable, Merrick was allowed to stay at the hospital for the remainder of his life.
Treves visited him daily, and the pair developed quite a close friendship. Merrick also received
visits from the wealthy ladies and gentlemen of London society, including Alexandra, Princess of
Wales.
Aged 27, Merrick died on 11 April 1890. The official cause of death was asphyxia, although
Treves, who dissected the body, said that Merrick had died of a dislocated neck. He believed that
Merrick—who had to sleep sitting up because of the weight of his head—had been attempting to
sleep lying down, to ‘be like other people’.
The exact cause of Merrick’s deformities is unclear. The dominant theory throughout much of the
20th century was that Merrick suffered from neurofibromatosis type I. In 1986, a new theory
emerged that he had Proteus syndrome. In 2001, it was proposed that Merrick had suffered from a
combination of neurofibromatosis type I and Proteus syndrome. DNA tests conducted on his hair
and bones have proven inconclusive. In 1979, Bernard Pomerance’s play about Merrick called
The Elephant Man debuted, and David Lynch’s film, also called The Elephant Man, was released
the following year.
Reading non-fiction, Text 3: The Elephant Man
Attitudes towards the Elephant Man – version 1
Task one
3. ‘at no time had I met with such a degraded or perverted version of a human being.’
4. ‘To add a further burden to his trouble the wretched man, when a boy, developed hip
disease.’
Task two
Now try to match the above quotations with each of the attitude words given in the first
column of the table below. (If you can’t fit each quotation in the table, simply record the
relevant number instead.)
Task three
In the ‘effect’ box, make a specific comment on the effect of the highlighted words or
phrase in the quotation.
Reading non-fiction, Text 3: The Elephant Man
Word(s) to
describe Quotation Effect of word(s) used
attitude
pitying
repulsed and
horrified
sympathetic
angry
Task four
AQA-style question
How does the writer use language to convey his attitudes towards John
Merrick?
Edexcel-style question
How does the writer present his ideas and perspectives about John Merrick?
Support your answer with detailed reference to the text.
Answer in PEE paragraphs, using the ideas you put down in the grid above.
Reading non-fiction, Text 3: The Elephant Man
Attitudes towards the Elephant Man – version 2
Which of the following statements support Treves’s attitude towards John Merrick?
1. Working with a partner, tick the statements that you agree with.
(NB Here you are being asked to write about one text only; in the exam you will be
comparing how two writers convey their different attitudes to a subject.)
AQA-style question
Edexcel-style question
How does the writer present his ideas and perspectives about John Merrick?
Support your answer with detailed reference to the text.
Reading non-fiction, Text 4: My Left Foot
Very worried by this, mother told father her fears, and they
decided to seek medical advice without any further delay. I
was a little over a year old when they began to take me to
hospitals and clinics, convinced that there was something
definitely wrong with me, something which they could not
understand or name, but which was very real and
disturbing.
Finding that the doctors could not help in any way beyond
telling her not to place her trust in me, or, in other words,
to forget I was a human creature, rather to regard me as
just something to be fed and washed and then put away
again, mother decided there and then to take matters into
her own hands. I was her child, and therefore part of the
family. No matter how dull and incapable I might grow up
to be, she was determined to treat me on the same plane
as the others, and not as ‘queer one’ in the back room
who was never spoken of when visitors were present.
1. Artistic challenge. Ask students to take off their shoes and socks and try to
draw a picture using only the toes of their left foot. You might specify what you
want them to draw or give them freedom of choice.
Alternatively they might work in groups with one person volunteering to do the
drawing or you might ask students to complete the task as homework prior to
the lesson.
Students should be encouraged to display their pictures and discuss the merits
of the pictures produced and the difficulties which they encountered whilst doing
them.
Main activities
1. Getting going (AO1). Read the first three paragraphs of the article and ask
students to share their first impressions of this autobiography. What information
do you learn about Christy’s beginnings in life?
As you read the text, ask students to find and highlight or underline each of the
following words or phrases, representing the views of the medical profession
about Christy.
Reading non-fiction, Text 4: My Left Foot
hopeless case
mentally defective
beyond hope
imbecile
crippled
dull
incapable
idiot
Ask students to challenge all of those words by replacing them with an antonym
or other near equivalent.
3. Role play. Ask students to work in pairs and role play a conversation between
Christy’s mother and a doctor. During the conversation, the doctor outlines
Christy’s prognosis in negative terms, using some of the words from the text and
Christy’s mother challenges those views.
(Students should use some of the pairs of words which they came up with in
task 3 above.)
Plenary activity
1. Attitudes and prejudices. Bring up these BBC news links to Ellie Simmonds
and Cerrie Burnell. (You could also link students to images of Stephen
Hawking, Warwick Davis or Stevie Wonder.) Ask students to identify the people
presented and discuss their contribution to society.
What sort of attitudes and prejudices might they face in their lives on
account of their disabilities?
Main activities
AO2
Explain, comment on and analyse how writers use language and structure to
achieve effects and influence readers, using relevant subject terminology to
support their views.
AO3
Compare writers’ ideas and perspectives, as well as how these are conveyed
across two or more texts.
Reading non-fiction, Text 4: My Left Foot
Give students the worksheet on Exploring and comparing attitudes in this
text. This is aimed at preparing students to tackle a comparative question
which forms a key part of the assessment criteria for all exam boards. It is
important to note that this task asks students to compare ideas and perspectives
within one text.
2. Linked writing (AO5, AO6). Give students a choice of writing tasks which
reflect the style of tasks on the writing exam papers, along these lines:
Write a speech in which you argue that disabled people are positive
role models in society.
Plenary activity
1. Drawing links between the writing of Christy Brown and Frederick Treves.
Give students the following statement, which is modelled on an OCR exam-style
question:
2. Planning task. You may wish to take this further with your class and ask them
to plan an exam answer in response to the above statement. If so, the following
bullet points will be useful at providing them with a structure. This is modelled
on an OCR exam-style question, but the bullet points will support all students to
consider what they learn from these texts:
Discuss what you learn about prejudice and disability from the texts
Explain the impact of these ideas on you
Compare the ways ideas about prejudice and disability are presented. (Look
at structure and language.)
Use quotations from both texts to support your answer.
Reading non-fiction, Text 4: My Left Foot
Lesson 2 resource
Exploring and comparing attitudes
Christy’s mother and the medical profession view Christy’s condition very differently. Use
the following grid to explore those differences.
Believes that, despite his physical Believes that Christy is mentally deficient.
disabilities, he is intelligent.
Loves her son and wants him to be a part Believes that Christy should be ignored.
of her family.
Reading non-fiction, Text 4: My Left Foot
2. Now write up your ideas as an answer this question:
Note that this type of question will normally require you to gather information from two
separate sources. Here you are using the material from one text to show that you can
make comparisons between the different attitudes shown.
It is important to address the ‘how’ part of the question by exploring the effects
of the words in the quotations that you use.
Here is an example:
In the extract from My Left Foot the writer tells us that his mother was optimistic
about his prospects, despite his physical disabilities. He writes that ‘mother’s
suggests that his mother’s belief in him was very strong, despite the opposition
from the doctors. The word ‘faith’ is a hopeful word, suggesting that Christy’s
mother had an instinctive and deep conviction that her son could have a future.
However… Whilst …
TO REV. P. BRONTË
‘C. BRONTË.’
Reading non-fiction, Text 5: Charlotte Brontë’s letter
1. Make predictions. Give students the word sort activity sheet to encourage
students to make predictions about this text. This activity uses a crunched
extract of the text about the Great Exhibition to encourage students to
investigate vocabulary choices, group words according to categories and make
predictions about the text.
2. Creative extension. You might ask students to produce their own creative
response or text using some of the words in this extract. Suggestions might be:
a poem, a collage or a short piece of narrative writing.
Main activities
1. Read/reflect. Read the letter to your class and reflect on the predictions made
by students in the starter activity.
www.victorianschool.co.uk/Gt_exhib.html
You might also like to give students the Whizzy wiki factsheet and ask them to
complete the Great Exhibition quiz in teams.
Reading non-fiction, Text 5: Charlotte Brontë’s letter
3. Information retrieval (AO1). Ask students to consider the wider content of
Charlotte Brontë’s letter and retrieve information and ideas from it by completing
the Letter writing lingo sheet.
Plenary activity
1. Reflect on the main purpose of the letter by asking students to consider the
following question:
How successfully has the writer conveyed her experience of visiting the Great
Exhibition?
Reading non-fiction, Text 5: Charlotte Brontë’s letter
Lesson 1 resources
Word sort activity
The following words are all taken from this text and re-arranged here in alphabetical order
and frequency:
a a a a a all all all and and and and and and and and arranged as as as assemblage
bazaar bazaar be blaze boilers but but but called carefully carriages caskets colours
compartments consist contrast could could created created describe description diamonds
does earth eastern effect ends engines every fair fair filled find from from full full gathered
genii glass-covered goldsmith gorgeous grandeur great guarded hands harness has have
have have human hundreds if if impossible in in in industry is is it it it it it its kinds loaded
machinery magic marvellous mass may might mill most new none not of of of of of of of of
of of of one only or or pearls place pounds power railway real seems silversmith splendid
stands strange such such supernatural the the the the the the the the there thing things
this this thousands to to unique vast velvet-spread wealth whatever with with with with with
with wonderful work work worth you
The Great Exhibition of the Works of Industry of all Nations or The Great Exhibition, was an
international exhibition that took place in Hyde Park, London, from May 1st to October 11th, 1851.
It was the first in a series of World’s Fair
exhibitions of culture and industry that were to
become a popular 19th-century feature. The
Great Exhibition was organized by Henry Cole and
Prince Albert, husband of the reigning monarch,
Queen Victoria. It was attended by numerous
notable figures of the time, including Charles
Darwin, Samuel Colt, members of the Orléanist
Royal Family and the writers Charlotte Brontë,
Charles Dickens, Lewis Carroll, George Eliot and
Alfred Tennyson.
Manufactures and Commerce as a celebration of modern industrial technology and design. It was
arguably a response to the highly successful French Industrial Exposition of 1844: indeed, its prime
motive was for “Great Britain [to make] clear to the world its role as industrial leader.” Prince Albert,
Queen Victoria’s consort, was an enthusiastic promoter of the self-financing exhibition. Queen
Victoria and her family visited three times. Although the Great Exhibition was a platform on which
countries from around the world could display their achievements, Great Britain sought to prove its
own superiority. The British exhibits at the Great Exhibition “held the lead in almost every field
where strength, durability, utility and quality were concerned, whether in iron and steel, machinery
or textiles.”
Sophie Forgan says of the Exhibition that “Large, piled-up ‘trophy’ exhibits in the central avenue
revealed the organisers’ priorities; they generally put art or colonial raw materials in the most
prestigious place. Technology and moving machinery were popular, especially working exhibits.”
She also notes that visitors “could watch the entire process of cotton production from spinning to
finished cloth. Scientific instruments were found in class X, and included electric telegraphs,
microscopes, air pumps and barometers, as well as musical, horological and surgical instruments.”
A special building, nicknamed The Crystal Palace, or “The Great Shalimar”, was built to house the
show. It was designed by Joseph Paxton with support from structural engineer Charles Fox, the
committee overseeing its construction including Isambard Kingdom Brunel, and went from its
organisation to the grand opening in just nine months. The building took the form of a massive
glass house, 1851 feet (about 564 metres) long by 454 feet (about 138 metres) wide and was
constructed from cast iron-frame components and glass made almost exclusively in Birmingham
and Smethwick. From the interior, the building’s large size was emphasized with trees and
statues. The building was later moved and re-erected in an enlarged form at Sydenham in south
London, an area that was renamed Crystal Palace. It was destroyed by fire on 30 November 1936.
Six million people—equivalent to a third of the entire population of Britain at the time—visited the
Great Exhibition. The average daily attendance was 42,831 with a peak attendance of 109,915 on
7 October. The event made a surplus of £186,000 (£17,770,000 in 2015), which was used to
found the Victoria and Albert Museum, the Science Museum and the Natural History Museum.
Reading non-fiction, Text 5: Charlotte Brontë’s letter
Great Exhibition quiz
3. Which member of the royal family was jointly responsible for organising it?
8. Who built the Crystal Palace in which the exhibition was held?
conveying
personal news
enquiring about
family members
conveying news of
national
importance
giving opinions
sharing trivial
news or gossip
about people
giving
condolences
describing a
special or
noteworthy
experience
Reading non-fiction, Text 5: Charlotte Brontë’s letter
1. Matching task. Ask students to complete the What was the Great Exhibition
like? matching activity in pairs. This will consolidate their ideas about Charlotte
Brontë’s visit to the Great Exhibition and provide them with quotations for
analysis later in the lesson.
Main activities
1. Discuss or debate. Ask for feedback about the word and quotation pairings.
Invite discussion about the best choice of quotations to illustrate the words.
There is likely to be some debate about the pairings, but this is to be
encouraged.
2. Language zoom. Ask students to select at least five word and quotation
pairings and highlight or annotate the quotation, highlighting interesting
vocabulary choices and considering their effect.
Ask students to identify the technique used, and its effect, in these examples:
3. ‘… the living tide rolls on quietly, with a deep hum like the sea heard
from the distance.’
Reading non-fiction, Text 5: Charlotte Brontë’s letter
4. Exam skills. Ask students to draw their work on language together and write an
answer to this exam-style question:
How does Brontë use language to describe her experiences of visiting the
Great Exhibition? (AO2, AO4)
Plenary activity
1. A modern exhibition. As a way of connecting this text to the next one, ask
students to write down what 10 features they might include if they were staging
an exhibition to celebrate the 21st century.
Reading non-fiction, Text 5: Charlotte Brontë’s letter
Lesson 2 resources
What was the Great Exhibition like?
All of the following words could describe Brontë’s view of the exhibition. Match up the
words with the quotations which follow. Cut out the 12 words so that you can move them
around as separate cards.
‘carefully guarded
caskets full of real
‘vast, strange, new and ‘the thirty thousand souls
diamonds and pearls
impossible to describe.’ that peopled it’
worth hundreds of
thousands of pounds.’
Reading non-fiction, Text 6: A History of Modern Britain
But other historic changes went ahead. Both devolution and the Irish
peace process reshaped the country and produced clear results. So
did other constitutional initiatives, such as the expulsion of most
hereditary peers from the Lords, ending its huge inbuilt Conservative
majority, and the incorporation of the European human rights
convention into British law, allowing cases to come to court here.
Neither produced the outcomes ministers expected. The Lords
became more assertive and more of a problem for Blair, not less of
one. British judges’ interpretation of the human rights of asylum
seekers and suspected terrorists caused much anguish to
successive home secretaries; and the ‘human rights culture’ was
widely criticized by newspapers. But at least, in each case, serious
shifts in the balance of power were made, changes intended to make
Britain fairer and more open.
Other early initiatives would crumble to dust and ashes. One of the
most interesting examples is the Dome, centrepiece of millennium
celebrations inherited from the Conservatives. Blair was initially
unsure about whether to forge ahead with the £1 bn gamble. He was
argued into the Dome project by Peter Mandelson who wanted to be
its impresario, and by John Prescott, who liked the new money it
would bring to a blighted part of east London. Prescott suggested
New Labour wouldn’t be much of a government if it could not make a
success of this. Blair agreed, though had the Dome ever come to a
cabinet vote he would have lost. Architecturally the Dome was
striking and elegant, a landmark for London which can be seen by
almost every air passenger arriving in the capital. Public money was
spent on cleaning up a poisoned semicircle of derelict land and
brining new Tube and road links. The millennium was certainly worth
celebrating. But the problem ministers and their advisers could not
Reading non-fiction, Text 6: A History of Modern Britain
solve was what their pleasure Dome should contain. Should it be for
a great national party? Should it be educational? Beautiful? Thought-
provoking? A fun park? Nobody could decide. The instinct of the
British towards satire was irresistible as the project continued
surrounded by cranes and political hullabaloo. The Dome would be
magnificent, unique, a tribute to daring and can-do. Blair himself said
it would provide the first paragraph of his next election manifesto.
Show students the following promotional video about the Millennium Experience.
Ask them to write down some words to convey its aims and aspirations as they
are watching the clip. They will refer back to these words after reading the
extract written by Andrew Marr.
Main activities
1. Ways in. Read paragraph one of the text and ask students to highlight any
words which they do not understand. Discuss the words selected and explain
their meaning.
What can they predict about the writer’s perspective from the language
that is used?
2. Comprehension questions. Read the rest of the text with your class and give
students a copy of the task sheet Comprehending the text which provides
questions to be answered during the reading of this text.
The questions are designed to be answered in stages, so that you can discuss
and check students’ understanding after each paragraph.
Reading non-fiction, Text 6: A History of Modern Britain
Plenary
1. Key facts. Ask students, ‘What have you learned about the Millennium Dome?’
Working in pairs or small groups, get students to compile a list of key ideas or
facts based upon their reading.
Reading non-fiction, Text 6: A History of Modern Britain
Lesson 1 resources
Comprehending the text
1. Which political changes in the 1990s brought positive results, according to Andrew
Marr?
2. Which political changes in the 1990s brought negative results, according to Andrew
Marr?
3. What does he say was the overall benefit of the changes that were made in politics?
1. How does Andrew Marr suggest that the Millennium Dome project was a failure?
3. Which two politicians persuaded Tony Blair to go ahead with the project?
4. Which three reasons does Andrew Marr put forward in favour of the Dome project?
5. How does Andrew Marr suggest that the government was uncertain about the project?
6. What does Andrew Marr mean when he says: ‘The instinct of the British towards satire
was irresistible as the project continued surrounded by cranes and political hullabaloo’?
1. What two reasons does the writer give for the failure of the New Year’s opening for
VIPs?
2. What two reasons does the writer give for the failure of the opening to the public?
3. Who, according to the writer, suffered the most from its failure?
5. How does the writer use language to link the failure of the Dome project to problems
with the government (New Labour)?
Reading non-fiction, Text 6: A History of Modern Britain
1. Caption competition. Show students the photograph of the Queen and Tony
Blair at the opening night of the Dome. Ask them to come up with two captions for
the photograph:
Main activities
AO3
Compare writers’ ideas and perspectives, as well as how these are conveyed
across two or more texts.
1. Prepare to compare. Give students the What was the Millennium Dome
like? matching activity in pairs. Once they have completed the activity, they
should reflect on the words chosen and consider links between this text and
Charlotte Brontë’s letter.
Students can complete the paragraphs by filling in the missing details. They can
then use this framework to write another comparative paragraph about this pair
of texts. The chain of comparison model can be used with other texts in the
pack.
Reading non-fiction, Text 6: A History of Modern Britain
3. Debating the Dome. As a class, complete a grid of reasons for and against the
Dome. Hold a class debate, along the lines of a debate in the House of
Commons. Divide the class into two factions – one in favour of the Dome
project and one against and prompt each side to question the other.
Plenary activity
1. Dome or no Dome? Hold a class vote to decide whether the Dome project
should go ahead.
Reading non-fiction, Text 6: A History of Modern Britain
Lesson 2 resources
Caption competition
All of the following words could describe views of the Millennium Dome expressed in
Andrew Marr’s account. Match up the words with the quotations which follow. Cut out the
12 words so that you can move them around as separate cards.
1. Point of similarity
Both writers express the view that the exhibition that they are writing about was impressive.
Point about Text 1
Charlotte Bronte describes the Great Exhibition as impressive when she writes:
Quotation from Text 1
‘Its grandeur does not consist in one thing, but in the unique assemblage of all things.’
Analysis/comment on language
The word ‘grandeur’ is very effective at conveying both size and elegance, and the contrast
between ‘one thing’ and ‘all things’ makes the exhibition seem hugely impressive.
Link to Text 2
In contrast, Andrew Marr writes that the Millennium Dome was …
Quotation from Text 2
Analysis/comment on language
Effect of difference
The writers give different views about the popularity of the exhibitions that they are writing about.
Point about Text 1
Charlotte Bronte describes the Great Exhibition as popular
Quotation from Text 1
when she describes ‘the thirty thousand souls that peopled it.’
Analysis/comment on language
The huge number ‘thirty thousand’ helps to convey the sheer size and scale of the exhibition,
and the word ‘souls’ suggests that visiting the Great Exhibition was a spiritual experience.
Link to Text 2
In contrast, Andrew Marr writes that the Millennium Dome was …
Quotation from Text 2
Analysis/comment on language
Effect of difference
OUR Phantom Ship has deposited our friend, Henry Rubley, Esquire, at
Adelaide, and has now returned to China.
oftener than once in about three can do to see each other. Now the
years, it would be odd if we should wind howls and tears the water up,
sail immediately into one; but we are as if it would extract the waves by
fairly in the China seas, which are their roots, like so many Ocean’s
the typhoon’s own peculiar sporting teeth; but he kicks sadly at the
and those clouds are full of night blast that snaps our voices short off
and lightning, to say nothing of a at the lips and carries them away;
fitful gale and angry sea. Look out! no words are audible. We are
There is the coast of China. Now for among a mass of spars and men
telescope to see the barren, dingy wild as the storm on drifting broken
hills, with clay and granite peeping junks; a vessel founders in our sight,
out, with a few miserable trees and and we are cast, with dead and
stunted firs. That is our first sight of living, upon half a dozen wrecks
the flowery land, and we shall not entangled in a mass, upon the shore
get another yet, for the spray begins of Hong Kong; — ourselves safe, of
could be bruised upon the journey. of our cannonading in the pure and
How many houses have been blown holy Chinese war; and as for the
away like hats, how many rivers new town of Victoria, we shall walk
have been driven back to swell out of it at once, for we have not
canals and flood the fields, (whose travelled all this way to look at
cropped on the first warning of the or ten miles long, and sometimes
very wild, and we were last night region on a scale of two inches to
under the typhoon at sea; to-night, the foot. There are crags, ravines,
are in the new town of Victoria, and wild torrents, fern-hills; but the
will be phantom bed-fellows to any highest mountain does not rise two
pork for supper. The Chinese are now. Quite the contrary to our usual
causes oiliness in man. A lean man the richest flowers at the greatest
estimation; for they say, “He must the air below, where the sun’s rays
pleasant shade.
1. Chinese wisdom. Show your students a range of Chinese proverbs and ask
them to translate them into a clear moral message. For example:
He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool
forever.
It is always better to ask if you don’t understand something.
He that takes medicine and neglects diet, wastes the skills of the
physician.
You cannot prevent the birds of sorrow from flying over your head, but
you can prevent them from building nests in your hair.
Share this one from the text you are about to read. See if any of the class can
work it out:
You can return to this once you have read the article with your class and ask
them again to work it out in context.
2. Look out! There’s a typhoon. In order to prepare students for the main focus
of this text, show them a video of a typhoon in China or Hong Kong. The
following link of typhoon Kalmegi might be useful, but others are available on
YouTube:
Main activities
1. Read the text with your class and ask them to decide the purpose of the writing.
Can they find evidence for any of these purposes? Get them to highlight any
evidence they find in the text.
to inform
to explain
to describe
to persuade
to argue
to entertain
2. Zooming in. Ask students to complete The typhoon unravelled activity sheet
using an extract from the whole text.
Once they’ve done this, take feedback from the activity and lead students
towards answering the following question which addresses AO2 and AO4:
How does the writer use language to describe his experiences of a typhoon?
3. It’s on the news. Put students into groups of three or four and ask them to
script a television news report for the 10pm news about this typhoon. They will
need to interview the writer as an eye-witness and at least one other survivor.
Answers should reflect the language of the text.
Plenary activity
1. Fit for purpose? Listen to some of the news broadcasts and discuss how
successful students have been at capturing the authenticity of the language and
using relevant detail from the text.
Lesson 1 resources
The typhoon unravelled
Annotate the following extract from the text, labelling the following features:
sensory details – sight, sound, smell, taste, touch
That is our first sight of the flowery land, and we shall not get another yet, for
the spray begins to blind us; it is quite as much as we can do to see each other.
Now the wind howls and tears the water up, as if it would extract the waves by
their roots, like so many Ocean’s teeth; but he kicks sadly at the operation. We
are driven by the wild blast that snaps our voices short off at the lips and carries
them away; no words are audible. We are among a mass of spars and men wild
as the storm on drifting broken junks; a vessel founders in our sight, and we are
cast, with dead and living, upon half a dozen wrecks entangled in a mass, upon
the shore of Hong Kong; — ourselves safe, of course, for left at home whatever
could be bruised upon the journey. How many houses have been blown away
like hats, how many rivers have been driven back to swell canals and flood the
fields, (whose harvest has been prematurely cropped on the first warning of the
Now answer the following question in PEE paragraphs. Aim to use at least four quotations
in your answer.
How does the writer use language to describe his experiences of a typhoon?
Text 7: Excerpt from Henry Morley: Household
Words, ‘Our Phantom Ship: China’
Lesson 2
Starter activity
Now ask them to re-write the final paragraph of the text for inclusion in a tourist
brochure.
Before they write, you may wish to show them this example and discuss its
persuasive features.
Hong Kong has many sides to its complex personality and not every visitor takes
the time to explore these to their fullest. Come and discover a different side to
the city with this series of tours that reveal Hong Kong’s local foodie secrets or
show you what cultural artefacts exist on its doorstep. These one-off special
interest adventures will make your holiday unforgettable!
Main activities
1. Exploring point of view. Ask students to complete the activity sheet Views
about visiting China. This will enable them to consider attitudes and
perspectives in this text, prior to comparing it to the one written by Colin
Thubron.
2. Venn diagram. Give pairs of students the Comparing attitudes about China
Venn diagram resource sheet or draw/display one on the board. Now give each
pair the Attitude adjectives sheet and ask them to decide which words they
would use to describe the feelings and attitude of the writer. They must justify
their choices.
Extension
Decide on some additional words to add to the adjectives sheet. Students can
put the chosen words on the left hand side of the Venn diagram.
Lesson 2 resources
Views about visiting China
1. True or False? Decide whether you think that these statements about the attitude of
the writer are true or false.
He is very concerned about the destruction that he sees around him. TRUE / FALSE
2. Prove it! Provide evidence for your view of the statements by finding a quotation to
support each of them and writing it underneath.
Identify examples of specific techniques which have been used e.g. imagery,
repetition, use of pronouns, vocabulary choices etc.
1. True or False? Decide whether you think that these statements about the attitude of
the writer are true or false.
True or false
A. He is surprised that that the ship sails into a typhoon.
2. Prove it! Provide evidence for your view of the statements by finding a quotation to
support each of them.
C. He is very concerned about 3. ‘We shall walk out of it at once, for we have
the destruction that he sees not travelled all this way to look at
around him. Englishmen.’
Find and highlight or underline one example of each of the following techniques:
inclusive pronouns ‘we’
embarrassed intrigued
Beneath us now, where the last hills tilted south-eastward out of Inner
Mongolia into the huge alluvial basin of the Yellow River, I could see
the divide between plateau and plain, agricultural hardship and
sufficiency, drawn vertically down the earth’s atlas with the precision of
a pencil-stroke. To the west brown, to the east green.
© www.teachit.co.uk 2015 24747 95
Reading non-fiction, Text 8: Behind the Wall
Within half an hour we would be landing in Beijing – old Peking – and
as if these last airborne minutes might liberate us from inhibitions, I
started talking with the woman about the Cultural Revolution. She
turned quizzically to me and asked: ‘What do you think of Mao Zedong
in the West?’
She went quiet and stared somewhere beyond me. The fact did not
seem to have occurred to her before. Then she said simply: ‘Yes.’
For some reason I felt ashamed. Whatever she meant by her ‘Yes’, its
tone – distant, as if admitting something irrelevant – signalled that I did
not understand. She fastened her seat-belt. I said: ‘Of course it’s hard
for us in the West to imagine …’
‘Yes.’
‘What?’
‘Oh!’ She plunged her face into her hands in a sudden paroxysm of
giggles. ‘Smell. I thought you said smile!’ The tinkle and confusion of
her laughter sabotaged the next few sentences, then she said: ‘Only in
the summer. Westerners sweat more than Chinese. That’s all, that’s all.
No, you don’t … smell. No, really … no …’
Main activities
1. Understanding the text. Read the text with your class and give them the
Comprehending the text questions to answer either individually or in pairs.
There are some extension questions included, designed to encourage students
to probe the language of the text in some more detail.
2. Cross purposes talk. Ask pairs to read out the dialogue between the narrator
and the woman on the aeroplane without any narrative. Alternatively, choose
one pair of students to read it in front of the class.
Plenary activity
1. What does the narrative do? Ask students to consider the impact of leaving
out the narrative sections. Does it still manage to create humour? How
important is Colin Thubron’s narrative at conveying the reactions of the tourist
and the Chinese woman?
1. How many people does the writer claim were affected by the Chinese Cultural
Revolution?
2. What does the writer find most shocking about the events which took place?
4. What do you think is the ‘foreigner’s obsession in China’ according to the writer?
5. When the writer looks out of the aeroplane window he uses a series of contrasts to
describe what he sees. Write down one of these contrasts. What might it suggest
about China?
6. How does the writer feel about the woman’s comment that Mao Zedong (also known as
Mao Tse-tung) ‘made mistakes?’
7. Which question does the writer ask the woman about western habits?
8. Which question does the woman think the writer has asked?
9. How does the woman’s confusion and misunderstanding create humour at the end of
the article?
10. The writer describes the Chinese as a ‘people of exquisite poetry and refined brush-
strokes and pitilessness.’ Which techniques has he used in this sentence to make his
point more powerful?
11. What does the writer mean when he writes, ‘We must seem outlandish … with our
garish self-centredness, our coarse opulence, our sentimentality’. What do you notice
about the writer’s use of language in this quotation?
12. How does the end of the excerpt contrast with the beginning of the excerpt? Consider
content, tone and language.
1. Images of the revolution. Show the class the images of the Chinese
Cultural Revolution. Ask students to discuss these in light of the text they
have read. Do they reflect the information given by the writer? Why or why not?
This might lead into some interesting discussion about the role of propaganda in
communist dictatorships.
Main activities
Words can be placed in the remaining sections of the Venn diagram. This
should lead to some discussion about the similarities and differences between
these writers.
2. Exam pic’n’mix. Ask students to plan and write an answer for an exam
question. The following questions are worded to reflect the longer comparative
question across different specifications:
Compare how the two writers convey their different attitudes to visiting China.
In your answer you should:
compare their attitudes
compare the methods they use to compare their attitudes
support your answer with quotations from both texts.
16 marks
OCR-style question
Edexcel-style question
Compare how the writers of Text 1 and Text 2 present their ideas and
perspectives about visiting China.
Both of these texts are about visiting China. Compare the following:
the writer’s attitude towards their visit
how they get their experiences across to the reader.
10 marks
This might take the form of a comparison table, a mind-map with different
colours for each text, a continuum from positive to negative etc.
The summary should consider the what (what attitudes are shown) and the how
(how they are conveyed through methods and language).
For Education Use Only. This and millions of other educational images are available through Britannica Image Quest.
For a free trial, please visit www.britannica.co.uk/trial
1. Who was Charles Darwin? Put students into groups and ask them to share
their knowledge. Compile information as a class.
Main activities
1. Quick quiz. After a first reading of the text, ask pairs to take part in the Quick
recall quiz.
2. Feelings about the Fuegians. Give out the Attitudes towards the native
tribes card sort activity to groups of students. After deciding which five words
best describe Darwin’s feelings, they should scan the text for evidence to
support each of them.
3. Modelling PEE. Before students answer the exam question which is relevant to
the exam board that they are studying, it is worth modelling PEE style
paragraphs. Here are two examples in answer to the AQA-style question:
How does Charles Darwin use language to convey his feelings about the
Fuegians?
Students can be asked to compare the paragraphs below and discuss the
difference between them.
Ask them where each example answer pinpoints specific comments about
language.
Darwin dislikes the appearance of the Fuegians when he first sees them in the
canoe. He describes them as ‘the most abject and miserable creatures’. The
words ‘abject’ and ‘miserable’ suggest that Darwin finds them horrible to look at
and could imply that he feels a bit sorry for them.
Example paragraph 2
AQA-style question
How does Charles Darwin use language to convey his feelings about the
Fuegians?
Support your answer with close reference to the text.
What do you think and feel about Charles Darwin’s attitude towards the
Fuegians?
You should comment on:
what is said
how it is said.
Charles Darwin attempts to engage the reader through the description of his first
encounter with the Fuegians.
Evaluate how successfully this is achieved.
Support your views with detailed reference to the text.
OCR-style question
Explore how Charles Darwin presents his feelings about the Fuegians.
Support your ideas by referring to the text, using relevant subject terminology.
Plenary activity
1. What is the name of the ship which Charles Darwin travelled in?
2. On which island in Tierra del Fuego was Charles Darwin near when he went on
shore?
In groups agree on the five that best illustrate the writer’s view.
1. Formal and informal vocabulary. Give students the Formal and informal
vocabulary grid and ask them to find informal alternatives to Charles Darwin’s
choices. A differentiated version of this activity is available as an interactive
matching activity.
Main activities
2. Animal vs. human. Ask students to highlight or underline all of the places in
which humans are compared to animals. Imagine that Charles Darwin has to
put forward a case to people who are sceptical about evolution. He uses the
Fuegians to illustrate his theory that man is descended from apes. Write a short
speech in which Charles Darwin makes his case. (AO5, AO6). Remember to
use a range of rhetorical devices.
abject
beheld
sufficient
mere
bedaubed
entangled
discordant
conjecture
tempestuous
putrid
lofty
unceasingly
laborious
deed
perpetrated
mercilessly
ingenious
adjectives
exclamatory
sentences
opinion
fact
lists
adverbs
rhetorical
questions
pattern of
three
simile or
metaphor
emotive
language
Molly and Gracie finished their breakfast and decided to take all their
dirty clothes and wash them in the soak further down the river. They
returned to camp looking clean and refreshed and joined the rest of
the family in the shade for lunch of tinned corned beef, damper and
tea. The family had just finished eating when all the camp dogs
began barking, making a terrible din.
“Shut up,” yelled the owners, throwing stones at them. The dogs
whinged and skulked away.
Then all eyes turned to the cause of the commotion. A tall, rugged
white man stood on the bank above them. He could easily have been
mistaken for a pastoralist or a grazier with his tanned complexion
except that he was wearing khaki clothing. Fear and anxiety swept
over them when they realised that the fateful day they had been
dreading had come at last. They always knew that it would only be a
matter of time before the government would track them down. When
Constable Riggs, Protector of Aborigines, finally spoke his voice was
full of authority and purpose. They knew without a doubt that he was
the one who took their children in broad daylight – not like the evil
spirits who came into their camps in the night.
“I’ve come to take Molly, Gracie and Daisy, the three half-caste girls,
with me to go to school at the Moore River Native Settlement,” he
informed the family.
The old man nodded to show that he understood what Riggs was
saying. The rest of the family just hung their heads refusing to face
the man who was taking their daughters away from them. Silent tears
welled in their eyes and trickled down their cheeks.
When the two girls stood up, he noticed that the third girl was
missing. “Where’s the other one, Daisy?” he asked anxiously.
“She’s with her mummy and daddy at Murra Munda station,” the old
man informed him.
Molly and Gracie sat silently on the horse, tears streaming down their
cheeks as Constable Riggs turned the big bay stallion and led the
way back to the depot. A high pitched wail broke out. The cries of
agonised mothers and the women, and the deep sobs of
grandfathers, uncles and cousins filled the air. Molly and Gracie
looked back just once before they disappeared through the river
gums. Behind them, those remaining in the camp found strong sharp
objects and gashed themselves and inflicted wounds to their heads
and bodies as an expression of their sorrow.
Main activities
1. Getting to grips with the text. Read the rest of the text and ask students to
underline the reactions of the children and their families. Now give out the
resource on the The language of pain and suffering (AO2) which also asks
students to consider the writer’s perspective (AO3). Write an exam-style
answer.
2. White vs. aboriginal. Compare the presentation of the aboriginals with the
white man in this text. Identify the language used to present Constable Riggs –
his appearance, his actions and his language. Does this fit with or challenge our
view of the writer’s perspective?
Plenary activity
1. Uncovering context. Watch the video about the Stolen Generation at this link:
This also includes extracts from the 2008 apology by the Australian Prime
Minister, Kevin Rudd.
Where is it set?
What predictions can you make about the rest of the text?
‘Silent tears
welled in their
eyes and trickled verbs
down their
cheeks.’
‘tears streaming
down their present participle verb
cheeks ...’
‘A high pitched
adjective and noun
wail …’
‘Cries of
agonised adjective
mothers …’
‘gashed
themselves and
inflicted wounds
verbs
… as an
expression of
their sorrow’
‘The two
frightened and
miserable girls adjective
began to cry adverb
uncontrollably
…’
What does the language used by the writer suggest about her attitude towards the events
that are being described?
1. What does this extract teach us about Aboriginal culture? Think about the
following things:
lifestyle
treatment of animals
Main activities
1. Filming the extract. Ask students to prepare a 10 shot storyboard for this
scene. Compare with the film version of the scene. The link can be found at:
2. Comparing with Darwin (AO3). Return to the card sort activity relating to the
writer’s attitude towards native tribes. Put students into groups and ask them to
choose words which best describe this writer’s attitude towards the aboriginals.
What similarities and differences are there between this writer’s perspective on
native tribes and Darwin’s?
3. Exam pic’n’mix. Ask students to plan and write an answer for an exam
question. The following questions are worded to reflect the longer, comparative
question across different specifications:
Compare how the two writers convey their different attitudes and perspectives to
native tribes.
In your answer you should:
compare their different attitudes.
compare the methods they use to compare their attitudes.
support your ideas with quotations from both texts.
16 marks
OCR-style question
‘In these texts the writers present negative attitudes towards native tribes.’
How far do you agree with this statement?
In your answer you should:
discuss what you learn about their attitudes
explain the impact of their attitudes on you
compare how their views are presented.
Support your response with quotations from both texts.
18 marks
Edexcel-style question
Compare how the writers of Text 1 and Text 2 present their ideas and
perspectives about native tribes.
Support your answer with detailed reference to the texts.
14 marks
Both of these texts are about native tribes. Compare the following:
the writers’ attitudes towards the native tribes
how they get their attitudes across to the reader.
10 marks
1. Nana Fejo’s story. Direct students to the following apology speech, given by
Kevin Rudd, Australian Prime Minister in 2008. Share the story of Nana Fejo as
explained by Kevin Rudd in his speech. You might also find the following links
useful:
2. What similarities are there between her experiences and those of Molly and
Gracie? What can we learn from her story?
Acknowledgements
Extracts
Text 2: Claire Potter, ‘Why teaching table manners can do more harm than good’,
The Guardian. Copyright Guardian News & Media Ltd 2013, reprinted by
permission
Text 6: From A History of Modern Britain by Andrew Marr, published by Pan Books.
Copyright © Andrew Marr, 2007. Reprinted by permission of Pan Macmillan
UK
Text 8: From Behind the Wall by Colin Thubron, published by Secker. Reprinted by
permission of The Random House Group Ltd
Text 10: From Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence by Doris Pilkington/Nugi Garamara,
published by University of Queensland Press. Reprinted by permission of
University of Queensland Press
Images
Cover: Typewriter image adapted from the original image, shared freely by Florian
Klauer on Unsplash
Page 103-4: From Britannica Image Quest. For Education Use Only. This and millions of
other educational images are available through Britannica Image Quest. For
a free trial, please visit www.britannica.co.uk/trial
Exploring context
Extract from Kevin Rudd’s 2008 Apology speech: Nana Fejo’s story
Let me begin to answer by telling the parliament just a little of one person’s story –
an elegant, eloquent and wonderful woman in her 80s, full of life, full of funny
stories, despite what has happened in her life's journey. Nanna Nungala Fejo, as
she prefers to be called, was born in the late 1920s.
She remembers her earliest childhood days living with her family and her
community in a bush camp just outside Tennant Creek. She remembers the love
and the warmth and the kinship of those days long ago, including traditional dancing
around the camp fire at night.
She loved the dancing. She remembers once getting into strife when, as a four-
year-old girl, she insisted on dancing with the male tribal elders rather than just
sitting and watching the men, as the girls were supposed to do.
But then, sometime around 1932, when she was about four, she remembers the
coming of the welfare men. Her family had feared that day and had dug holes in
the creek bank where the children could run and hide.
What they had not expected was that the white welfare men did not come alone.
They brought a truck, two white men and an Aboriginal stockman on horseback
cracking his stockwhip.
The kids were found; they ran for their mothers, screaming, but they could not get
away. They were herded and piled onto the back of the truck. Tears flowing, her
mum tried clinging to the sides of the truck as her children were taken away to the
Bungalow in Alice, all in the name of protection. A few years later, government
policy changed. Now the children would be handed over to the missions to be
cared for by the churches. But which church would care for them?
The kids were simply told to line up in three lines. Nanna Fejo and her sister stood
in the middle line, her older brother and cousin on her left. Those on the left were
told that they had become Catholics, those in the middle Methodists and those on
the right Church of England.
She and her sister were sent to a Methodist mission on Goulburn Island and then
Croker Island. Her Catholic brother was sent to work at a cattle station and her
cousin to a Catholic mission.
Nanna Fejo’s family had been broken up for a second time. She stayed at the
mission until after the war, when she was allowed to leave for a prearranged job as
a domestic in Darwin. She was 16. Nanna Fejo never saw her mum again. After
she left the mission, her brother let her know that her mum had died years before, a
broken woman fretting for the children that had literally been ripped away from her.
I asked Nanna Fejo what she would have me say today about her story. She
thought for a few moments then said that what I should say today was that all
mothers are important. And she added: Families – keeping them together is very
important. It’s a good thing that you are surrounded by love and that love is passed
down the generations. That’s what gives you happiness.
Nanna Fejo’s is just one story. There are thousands, tens of thousands of them:
stories of forced separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from
their mums and dads over the better part of a century.
The 2008 Kevin Rudd apology speech was reproduced from the Parliament of Australia website with the kind permission of
the Commonwealth of Australia (Department of Parliamentary Services). The Hansards can be downloaded for free from
parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22chamber%2Fhansardr%2F2008-02-
13%2F0003%22 subject to copyright conditions.