Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Behavior and design of transfer girder and deep beam)
..
2
Transfer girder
Transfer girder
4
Tie across top
6
(1)
80 8,+%
*+
,%%#%
d slender beam
Deep beam
l
/
,!$
9*
7
%
Transfer girder ; & <! *
; ; 9*
=>;
<
;
h
ln
(a) (b)
a a
(c)
8
(2)
%$9$
/0
*+
% l/d A 2
Vy
W xy %$9
'
Vx
W xy %$9+
'
Vx
9
C
0.67h h=l/2
0. 4h T
l 10
/%$
% A 0<0 $
*
A0 A0,=F (Beam’s theory)
G'
C
*+
0 ,
1/h = 1 h=l
,+; %>A$G
0.62h ,=F
0. 28h
T
l
11
P ln P
!"#$%%& '%(#)(
*$'%& '(&$ 12
/;
G$
K (Truss model) ;
P P
: Tension chord 13
% %
! 9*
(0 ,> ,+A!
0
)
-A ,,
$%
-
A0A$G<, compression strut
- ;
9*
/ %;
9*
,+
$%
0M
-*
/,,,+
$%
0M
-A$ compression strut A$
-;
9*
/,;
9*
,+
$%
0M
14
STABLE NOT STABLE
DEEP BEAM SLENDER BEAM
15
=>%
a/d > 2.5 - 3 % /%+
$%
3 2
3 4
1
%
/A$/K
(1) % *+
/
(2) % *+
/
(crushing)
compression strut
(3) % *+
/
*+A
(slip) ,+0
K
/0
(end anchorage)
A
(4) % ,+/K
G$
K
17
G%I CEB
ACI
*+
/0
$ ln/d $
% 2.5
#%%/0
$% ln/d $
% 1.25
!,0M 80>82 %//>0 8deep beam
$%
ACI
$
/><
/%$
9
A0 $$
+, ACI AA$
%I,+//><
%
18
*+
//%$9A0 $$8/,;
!$
G'
8*+
,,=F
a = As fy / 0.85 fc b
C
C
T
& CEB
!#$%% G'
8!
19
#K$
,; !$;%>0 >
,+
$ ;
;
G' K M n A s f y ( jd )
*,+$
Mu
As
If y jd
%% G' & CEB
jd 0.2(l 2h ) ;8 1d l/h 2
jd 0.6l ;8 l / h 1
l *
$
%/Y'Y'
&
*
1.15 ,
#%%%
&
20
0 >
;+
0.8 f cc 14bd
A s min % bd
fy fy
! y /<% G y
, y 0.25h 0.05l 0.20h
$
,+
%%
Z+%,,+
0
$% !#$
$
$
%A
/$
,;
,+0
$%
21
%
!
#%%
/
#%% %%#% ln = 3.0 m ;
,K/125 /. %
, 1.80 m
%
, 50 Z. /Y'Y'
&
, 3.45
.
f cc 276 /Z.2 f y 4500 /Z.2
%;
,82400 /
DB10 @
h = 180 cm
12.5 cm c-c
Main flexural
steel 8 DB 28
at 7 cm c-c
6 cm ldh = 42.5 cm
ln = 300 cm
345 cm
24
9*
G%I ACI
25
26
A 9*
!0,+!
0
C
VCZ
Viy (a)
Vix
Vd
Vs (b)
Vd
27
9*
!
G%I ACI
H
A0,+&
GG!#$
compression strut %; ,+ H
,;
support
Vu d IVn I 0.85
Vn Vc Vs
;
9*
K Vn $
A
*+
ln/d < 2 Vn 2.1 f cc b w d
*+
2 < ln/d < 5 Vn 0.18(10 l n ) f cc b w d
d
28
$%; %/
9*
Vc
;G ACI <
strut and tie $%
Mu V d
Vc (3.5 2.5 )(0.5 f cc 176U w u )b w d
Vu d Mu
%> <
;
9*
strut and tie 08Z+0 ;
9*
,+
$%
Mu, Vu 0 G'
9*
0
,+$%
Vc K A$A 1.6 f cc b w d
30
4
3.5-2.5Mu/Vud
3
2
0
0 0.5 1.0 1.5
Mu/Vud
%> K A$A82.5
31
ª Av § 1 l n / d · A vh § 11 l n / d ·º Vu IVc
« ¨ ¸ ¨ ¸»
¬ s © 12 ¹ s 2 © 12 ¹¼ If y d
33
1.00
0.92 11 l n / d
12
Coefficient
0.50
1 ln / d
0.08
12
ln
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
d
/%8,+
q8
/0 ,IH!$
9*
%
+8
$%/#%845
34
$
+%;%> Vs
ACI
A v f wy d
;0 Vs Truss model
s
;
ª A v § 1 l n / d · A vh § 11 l n / d ·º
Vs « ¨ ¸ ¨ ¸» f y d
¬ s © 12 ¹ s 2 © 12 ¹¼
Shear-friction concept
!
,;!$ clamping force *<%
$%
,;!$ ,$, 9*
35
!
,;!$ clamping force *<%
$%0
+ 0 ,IH
$%!$ 9*
Vn
9*
*+
/ dowel
action <%
$%
!
Clamping force
*<%
$%
9*
*+
/ friction
36
%
9*
*+
/;,K0 ; <;+
%/
9*
,+ 0.15ln = 0.15*3.0 = 0.45 . 215.52 /.
Mu
Vu = 215.52*3/2-215.52*0.45 = 226.3
-./ 5;%/
% 9*
0
/$
A IVn I§¨ 2.1 f c' b w d ·¸ 0.45 .Vu
© ¹
IVn I§¨ 2.1 f c' b w d ·¸
© ¹
0.85 2.1 276 u 50.0 u 162.0
= 240.2 > 226.3 OK
215.52 u 3.00 215.52 u (0.45) 2 =123.7 -.
Mu u 0.45
2 2
Mu 123.7
0.337
Vu d 226.3 u 1.62 37
Mu
3.5 2.5 3.5 2.5 u 0.337 2.66 ! 2.5 !#$82.5
Vu d
49.3 Mu Vu d
Uw 0.0061
0.4
Mu
2.50
50.0 u 162.0 Vu d
§ V d·
Vc 2.5¨¨ 0.5 f c' 176U w u ¸¸b w d
© Mu ¹
2.5 0.5 276 176 u 0.0061u 2.5 u 50.0 u 162.0 222.56
Vc max 1.6 f c' b w d 1.6 276 u 50 u 162 215.3
38
-./ 6;
9*
K!#$
DB10 ($<Y'
10 .) %,!
%
%
,+
$
Av = 2*0.785 = 1.57 Z.2 = Avh
Vu 226.3
IVs Vu IVc *
8 Vs Vc 215.3 50.93
I 0.85
§ A v 1 l n / d A vh 11 l n / d ·
Vs ¨ ¸f y d
¨s 12 sh 12 ¸
© v ¹
K!$ sv = sh = s (,, %
%+)
§ 1.57 1 3.00 / 1.620 1.57 11 3.00 / 1.620 ·
50930 ¨ ¸3000 u 162.0
© s 12 s 12 ¹
/A$ s = 14.95 Z. 39
DB10 @
h = 180 cm
12.5 cm c-c
Main flexural
steel 8 DB 28
at 7 cm c-c
6 cm ldh = 42.5 cm
ln = 300 cm
345 cm
!$,;
890 ,+0
!${
$
,
Ldh = 0.7*0.08*4500*2.8/ 276 = 42.5 Z.
41
!$!#$
$ ;
9*
0
42
G%I /;
G$
K
ACI
/!#$%I !A$,,+G$%
K
;
;
$
;!#$%I A|A'
'
8%I strut and
tie
%I truss model
43
-.7
7+
67+81
- <
,+81 0>
*+
/ ACI ;!$ I Vn A I(2.1 2.6) f cc b w d
0>
%q /
I Vn = I(1.6 2.1) f cc b w d
44
,+82 $G
G$
K!$;/
H
A0&
,+83 *+
*
G$
KA$
$%8/;%> H!
# %G$
K8Z+ ,+/82
=>*
*
,+ 4 /
,+A$ !$; %>
compression strut
/ A c C G fce *
;
0
f ce
compression strut Z+;!$
G0>, 0.5-0.6fc
45
h
T
l
, H!
/;
G$
K
46
w l/4 w l/4 w l/4 w l/4
o
15
/;
G$
K,+Z Z$
47
671
. 7<78
7-
,
Compression
Tension
, H!
/;
G$
K
48
/;
G$
K,+Z Z$
49
P P
P1 = P1
P2 + P2
P = P1 + P2
50
P P
P1 = P1
P2 + P2
P = P1 + P2
51
52
,+ 5 %/
compression strut ,+
$ %
/K
A0!H!
A$*
0
$AA$
$
$!$G
53
%
G%I /;
G$
K
/
#%%;,K/ /K8200
;,K%8260 8,+
#%8Z+
;
%/860*60 Z.
DL = 260 T
LL = 200 T
5.0 m
54
5
704 8= 1.4*260+1.7* 200
55
37.2 cm
235
220 250
T
A C
250 Unit : cm
352 T
T= 41.3 56
/>K
,+/K
A
C
Joint equilibrium
41.3
T Csin41.3 = 352 C = 535 T
T = Ccos41.3 = 403 T
V=352 T
! compression strut = 535
! tension tie = 403
57
58
,+84: ;%>0 >
/
As = T/fy = 403*1000/4000 = 100.75 Z.2 !#$ 21 DB25 (As = 103 Z.2)
%
3 # #
7 ,
G%!$/KZ,
',+ 15
cm /<%
,;
& 90 ,+0
(
= 12db)
{$A0!,+
$
, ldh =
0.8*0.08*4000*2.5/ 400 = 32 Z.
32 Z.
59
Note
G%I strut and tie *
/;
G$
K *
,+/ >
9*
A0
!%
%
60
/;
G$
K82 ,; %
,+ 1: compression strut G V CL Symmetrical
aboutCL
,+ 2: !#$
0
% <
Vc Vs
Vs Vc
V !#$8
%%G$
K,
61
/;
G$
K
*+
62
Tie force T 2
G$
KG'
63
G$
KG'%
64
Y=
G!#$%I A|A'
'
$ /;
A|A'
'
A$G
!#$ 2D plane stress element
%K (Constitutive Models)
65
Y=
G%IA|A'
'
!#$%K
0 *K #$
w
Load(KN)
600 Analysis
f cc %31.4 MPa 400 Experiment
f y 387.5 MPa 200
a/d = 0.77 0
0 2 4 6 8
Center span deflection(mm)
67
7@257
7
?, + , / ? 7
-
-6.
Notice
crack 1 is very stable
FEM can simulate crack 2
and crack 3 as well
7@25
, 7
7
,
+
3 3
1
1
2 2
/
+-
7
-
68