Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Orca Share Media1574903932386
Orca Share Media1574903932386
An Introduction to the Moral Theories of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill
Ethical Judgments
Ethical philosophy differs from the sciences because it is normative or prescriptive,
rather than descriptive.
In other words, ethics tell us how we ought to act or what we should do, while the
sciences are more likely to observe how things are in nature or society.
Utilitarianism says that the Result or the Consequence of an Act is the real measure of
whether it is good or bad.
This theory emphasizes Ends over Means.
Theories, like this one, that emphasize the results or consequences are called
teleological or consequentialist.
Bentham’s Formulation of Utilitarianism
Criticisms of Utilitarianism
If I am to bring the greatest happiness to the greatest number, not putting my own
happiness above others, that may lead to a dilemma. I live in a neighborhood where
83% of my neighbors use drugs. I could make them most happy by helping supply them
with cheap drugs, but I feel uncomfortable doing that. What should a utilitarian do?
Utilitarianism plays fast and loose with God’s commandments. If lying, stealing, or
killing could lead to an increase of happiness for the greatest number, we are told we
should lie, steal or kill. Isn’t that a rejection of God’s commands?Mill’s Answer to the
“Godless Theory” Criticism
“If it be a true belief that God desires, above all things, the happiness of his creatures, and that
this was his purpose in their creation, utility is not a godless doctrine, but more profoundly
religious than any other. . . . .whatever God has though fit to reveal on the subject of morals
must fulfill the requirements of utility in a supreme degree.”
If one must decide the probable outcome of an act before knowing whether it is good or
bad, how can children learn to evaluate acts, since they know so little of what
consequences might arise from their actions?
“ . . . Mankind must by this time have acquired positive beliefs as to the effects of some
actions on their happiness; and the beliefs which have thus come down are the rules of
morality for the multitude, and for the philosopher until he has succeeded in finding
better.” Mill concludes, however, that we should always seek improvements.
Many philosophers hold that we have certain rights, either from God, nature, or from a
social contract
If ignoring rights brings about more happiness to the greatest number, should we ignore
so-called rights?
Mill’s rule-based view in On Liberty; having a right to liberty will bring the greatest
happiness