Full Factorial DOE with Minitab

leansigmacorporation.com/full-factorial-doe-with-minitab

February 2, 2016

By Denise Coleman | February 2, 2016 |

What is a Full Factorial DOE?

In a full factorial experiment, all of the possible combinations of factors and levels are
created and tested. For example, for two-level design (i.e.each factor has two levels) with k
factors, there are 2k possible scenarios or treatments.

1. Two factors, each with two levels, we have 2 2 = 4 treatments

2. Three factors, each with two levels, we have 2 3 = 8 treatments
3. k factors, each with two levels, we have 2 k treatments

2k Full Factorial DOE

Full factorial DOE is used to discover the cause-and-effect relationship between the
response and both individual factors and the interaction of factors. Generate an equation
to describe the relationship between Y and the important Xs:

Where:

Y is the response and X1, X2 . . . X k are the factors

α0 is the intercept and α1, α2 . . . α p are the coefficients of the factors and interactions
ε is the error of the model

Two-Level Two-Factor Full Factorial

Below is a design pattern of a two-level two-factor full factorial experiment.

2 (level) raised to 2 (factors) = 4 treatment

combinations.

Two-Level Three-Factor Full Factorial

Below is a design pattern of a two-level three-factor full factorial experiment.

1/11
2 (levels) raised to 3 (factors) = 8
treatment combinations.

Two-Level Four-Factor Full Factorial

Below is a design pattern of a two-level four-factor full factorial experiment

2 (levels) raised to 4 (factors) = 16 treatment

combinations

Two-Level Five-Factor Full Factorial

Below is a design pattern of a two-level five-factor full factorial experiment

2/11
2 (levels) raised to 5 (factors) = 32
treatment combinations

Order to Run Experiments

The four design patterns shown earlier are listed in the standard order. Standard order is
used to design the combinations/treatments before experiments start. When actually
running the experiments, randomizing the standard order is recommended to minimize the
noise.

Replication in Experiments
Each treatment can be tested multiple times in an experiment in order to increase the
degrees of freedom and improve the capability of analysis. We call this method replication.
Replicates are the number of repetitions of running an individual treatment, which increase
the power of the experimental responses. The order to run the treatments in an experiment
should be randomized to minimize the noise.
Advantages of replication include: helps to better identify the true sources of variation,
helps estimate the true impacts of the factors on the response, and overall improves the
reliability and validity of the experimental results.

22 Full Factorial DOE

Case study: We are running a 2 2 full factorial DOE to discover the cause-and-effect
relationship between the cake tastiness and two factors: temperature of the oven and time
length of baking. Each factor has two levels and there are four treatments in total.
We decide to run each treatment twice so that we have enough degrees of freedom to
measure the impact of two factors and the interaction between two factors. Therefore,
3/11
there are eight observations in response eventually.

The objective is to understand the

main effects and the interactions of
these factors on the response
variable. After running the four
treatments twice in a random order,
we obtain the following results

There are two factors and two levels, so

there would be 2^2 = 4 treatment
combinations. With replicates, each
treatment combination is repeated once;
therefore, there are in total 8 runs in this
experiment. The experiment results are
consolidated into the following table

The main effect of factor A is computed by averaging the difference between combinations
where A was at its high settings and where A was at its low settings.
Main effect of factor A (temperature of the oven):

Where:

k is the number of factors

r is the number of times individual treatments
are being run

Using the formula provided, the main effect of

increasing the temperature of the oven is to decrease
tastiness of the cake by −6.25.

4/11
The main effect of factor B, similar to A, is
computed by averaging the difference
between combinations where B was at its high
settings and where B was at its low settings.
Main effect of factor B (time length of baking):

Where:

k is the number of factors

r is the number of times individual
treatments are being run

Using the formula provided, the main effect of

increasing the baking time is to decrease the
tastiness of the cake by −1.75

The interaction effect is computed by averaging

the difference between combinations where A and
B were at opposite settings (low and high).

Interaction (i.e. A*B) effect:

Where:

k is the number of factors

r is the number of times individual
treatments are being run

Using the formula provided, the interaction effect

of the temperature and time variables on tastiness was −3.25.

5/11
Sum of squares of factors and
interaction

Where:

k is the number of factors

r is the number of times individual treatments are being run

The sum of squares tells us the relative strength of each main effect and interaction. A has
the strongest effect as indicated by the high SS value. The degrees of freedom are
necessary to determine the mean squares value.

Degrees of freedom of factors and interaction:

Four degrees of freedom are necessary because there are three

effects we are looking to understand: factor A, factor B, and the
interaction between them.

Mean squares of factors and interaction:

6/11
Use Minitab to Run a 2k Full Factorial DOE
Step 1: Initiate the experiment design

1. Click Stat → DOE → Factorial → Create Factorial Design.

2. A new window named “Create Factorial Design” pops up.
3. Select the button of “General full factorial design.”

4. Select “2” as the “Number of factors.”

5. Click the “Design” button and a new window named “Create Factorial Design –
Designs” pops up.
6. Enter the factor name “Temperature” for factor A.
7. Enter the factor name “Time Length” for factor B.
8. Enter the number of levels “2” for both factor A and B.
9. Enter “2” as the “Number of replicates.

7/11
 10. Click “OK” button in the
window “Create Factorial
Design – Designs.”

Step 2: Enter the factors and make

the design

1. Click on the “Factors” button

in the window “Create
Factorial Design”
2. A new window named
“Create Factorial Design –
Factors” pops up.
3. Select “Text” as the “Type”
of both factor A and B.
4. Enter “Low” and “High” as
the two levels for both factor A and B.

5. Click “OK” in the window “Create Factorial Design – Factors.”

6. Click “OK” in the window “Create Factorial Design.”
7. The design table is created in the data table.

Step 3: Run your experiment and record

the response for each run in a new
column named Tastiness within the
table created by Minitab. Because we are
simulating a DOE we have provided the
data for you in the Sample Data.xlsx file.
Use this data to populate your table with
your experiment results

8/11
Step 4: Analyze the experiment results

1. Click Stat → DOE → Factorial → Analyze Factorial Design.

2. A new window named “Analyze Factorial Design” appears.
3. Select “Tastiness” in the list box of “Responses.”

4. Click on the “Storage” button and a new window named “Analyze Factorial Design –
Storage” pops up.
5. Check the boxes “Fits” and “Residuals” in the window “Analyze Factorial Design –
Storage.”

6. Click “OK” in the window “Analyze Factorial Design – Storage.”

9/11
 7. Click “OK” in the window “Analyze Factorial Design.”
8. The DOE analysis results appear in the session window.

These are the results.

Since the p-values of all the independent variables in the model are smaller than the alpha
level (0.05), both factors and their interactions have statistically significant impact on the
response.

High R2 value shows around 98% of the variation in the response can be explained by the
model (very good results).

The fitted response and the residuals of the DOE model are stored in the last two columns
of the data table.

Model summary: These are the software outputs for expected/predicted results, as well as
the residuals for each combination.

← Full Factorial DOE with SigmaXL Full Factorial DOE with JMP →

10/11
About Denise Coleman
View all posts by Denise Coleman →

11/11