Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 6
REINFORCEMENT, METAL AGCESSORIES, AND ANGHOR BOLTS
6.1.2.5 The nominal bar diameter shall not 6.1.2.5 This requirement is based on the
exceed one-eighth of the least nominal member dimension. research conducted by Soric and Tulin (1987).
: :,
'::;',:: :.: .:'::1. :,:
,:', :
,:
:..
t|it,
.ll .ffi,iii11lj, ffi.!,fr|,iffifil,,,,: ',,sifl'(?1.0J' 1',1?g {29,9f i
ir Wffit$l,ttti;ii:
't:/friilr/!ffi
d:l?+ilit) Slzo (]79), 1.57t (39,9,j
liffi#EtffiEn i,lli , *#,a#"h:l
','jl l/li, :;itr.:t, ,,!'fi"[fi.L(2CI0*,, , : \,i9,1t61,,,1"$,,Pr:"9,I., t,,
ti'Wilfiitillf.##.t'Wli:, rffii,rotfi, i r
,.,$94 (2$4, ,: 2,frii*i6(59i8 ,:
i,,:ffiiffl, i:i, tfi,i:l#)ls fri#,:|i offi
0
(3s7) 2.74i9 (69.8),
Er, i#,i?W|$,\rtitt ii*;iuspi{? ,$}, {f r0}; ?, .t,;;, 2 (79.8).
11ffi;ffiiiffi,lW,Wntt i:*,llfrfl'{ ;.Y.1' ,I ,(645), 3;fri:M (90.0;,:',
',',t270'(30,-;fi) ,t,2? (g\g) 3.9e0 (r01)
':Noi;t ;,ffi3?I,, :l;410 (3$:r8) tr:.55 (1006) 4,$A (113)
.,,No1; ,,(tr1{#}6). :
BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES AND COMMENTARY c-65
6.1.4.2 Longitudinal wires ofjoint reinforcement 6.1.4.2 Because masonry cover protection for
shall be fully embedded in mortar or grout with a minimum joint reinforcement is minimal, the protection of joint
cover of s/s in. (15.9 mm) when exposed to earth or weather reinforcement in masonry is required in accordance with
and I lz in. (12.7 mm) when not exposed to earth or weather. the Specification. Examples of interior walls exposed to a
Joint reinforcement shall be stainless steel or protected from mean relative humidity exceeding 75 percent are natatoria
corrosion by hotdipped galvanized coating or epoxy coating and food processing plants.
when used in masonry exposed to earth or weather and in
interior walls exposed to a mean relative humidity exceeding
75 percent. All other joint reinforcement shall be mill
galvanized, hot-dip galvanized, or stainless steel.
la =
o.Bdl f ,y (Equation 6-l)
effect of increased reinforcing bar cover and spacing in
KE delaying the onset of spliuing of the masonry leading to
pull out of the reinforcing bar. The 9dt limit on K is based
on studies by Schultz (2004,2005) as well as testing and
K shall not exceed the smallest of the following: the
subsequent analysis by the National Concrete Masonry
minimum masonry cover, the clear spacing between
Association (2009). NCMA (2009) recommended that K
adjacent reinforcement splices , and 9dt .
be limited to 8.8da, which is rounded to the cunent 9du
y : 1.0 for No. 3 (M#10) through No. 5 (M#16) bars; limit. When cover and spacing exceeds this amount,
splitting is not expected to occur and there is no benefit
y : 1.3 for No. 6 (M#19) through No. 7 (M#22)bars;
from additional cover or spacing.
and
The 50 percent increase in development length for
y : 1.5 for No. 8 (M#25) and larger bars. epoxy-coated bars does not apply to the t2 in. (305 mm)
minimum.
Development length of epoxy-coated bars shall be taken
as 150 percent ofthe length determined by Equation 6-1.
6.1.6 Splices
6.1.6.1 Splices of bar reinforcement
Reinforcement splices shall comply with Section 6.1.6.1.1,
6.1.6.1.2, 6.1.6.1.3, or 6. 1 .6.1.4.
EE
SE
$E
aE
EO
F(J
(b) For No. 5 bar (M #16) and D3l (MD200) wire and (b) U-stimrps that enclose a longitudinal bar have
smaller, bending around longitudinal reinforcement sufficient pullout resistance in the tension zone of the
through at least 135 degrees plus an embedment of masonry.
0.33 la. The 0.33 la embedment of a stimrp leg shall
be taken as the distance between middepth of
member, dl2, and start of hook (point of tangency).
COMMENTARY
0.33
Figure CC-6.1-1 * Anehorage ofU-stiy.1rq,1 {deforrned reinfurcing bars ond deformed wire)
(b) One longitudinal wire located not more than dl4 from
the compression face and a second wire closer to the
compression face and spaced at least 2 in. (50.8 mm)
from the first wire. The second wire shall be located on
the stimrp leg beyond a bend, or on a bend with an inside
diameter of bend at least 8da
6.1.9 Emb edment offl exural reinforcement ' 6Jr9 ,' Embedment of Jlexural reinforcement
,:
:F;{*x+##r6,
-
illu$Sates the embedment requirements of
I -2'
fleiural reinforCement in a typical continuous beam. Figure
CC-6.1-3 illusffates the embedment requirements in a
rypical continuous wall that is not part of the lateral-force-
resisting system.
6.1.9.1.1Tension reinforcement is
permitted to be developed by bending across the neutral
axis ofthe member to be anchored or made continuous with
reinforcement on the opposite face of the member.
6.1.9.1.2 Critical sections for development 6,1.9.1.2 Critical sections for a typical
of reinforcement in flexural members are at points of continuous beam are indicated with a"c" or an 'ox" in Figure
maximum steel stress and at points within the span where CC-6.LA. Critical sections for a typical continuous wall are
adjacent reinforcement terminates or is bent. indicated with a "c" in Figure CC-6.1-3.
BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES AND COMMENTARY c-73
Table 6.1.8 Standard Hooks Geometry and Minimum lnside Bend Diameters for Reinforcing Bars,
Stirrups & Ties
Standard Bar Grade Bar Size Min. Extension Standard Hook Figures
Hook Type Inside
and Use Bend
Diameter
40 No.3 - No. 7 5dt 12 dt
90 Degree (M280) (M#10 -#22)
Hook - 50 or 60 No.3-No.8 6du 12 dt
Reinforcing (M#10 -#2s)
(M350 or
Bars
420)
50 or 60 No.9-No. 11 E
.9
(M350 or (M#29 - #36) 8dt 12 dt o
E
o)
420) x
I.IJ
COMMENTARY
sI Moment Capacity
of Bars a
SE
sE
oE Points of lnflection (P.1.)
EO
F(J
Moment Capacity
of Bars b
Moment
>/a-*
> d,1
Anchor bolts placed in the top of grouted cells and bond Research at Portland State University (Rad et al
beams shall be positioned to maintain a minimum of % in. (6.4 (1998)) and at Washington State University (Tubbs et al
mm) of fine grout between the bolts and the mrlsonry unit or (2000) has esablishe&that'thep is no difference in the
% in. (12.7 mm) of coarse grout between the bolts and the prformance of an anchor bolt installed through a tight-
masonry unit. Anchor bolts placed in drilled holes in the face frtting hote in the face shell of a grouted hollow masonry
shells of hollow masonry units shall be permitted to contact unit aqd iq.$.oy,er;[iz# hole in tJre face shell of a grouted
the masonry unit where the bolt passes through the face shell, ksllow ,u* ',rlliif;,l,,,Therefore, the clear distance
but the portion of the bolt that is within the grouted cell shall rcq*fue ,fe,' Gs surround an anchor bolt is not
be positioned to maintaina minimum of %in. (6.a mm) offine nded,w,kr,e.. g bk passes through the face shell. See
grout between the head or bent leg of each bolt and the Fignre CG6.3-2.
masonry unit or Yz in. (12.7 mm) of coarse grout between the
head or bent leg of each bolt and the masonry unit. Quatit5r assuranee/quality control (QA/QC) procedures
should ensure that there is sufficient clearance around the
The clear distance between parallel anchor bolts shall bolts prior to grout placement. These procedures should
not be less than the nominal diameter of the anchor bolt, nor also require observation during grout placement to ensure
less than I in. (25.4 mm). that grout completely swrounds the bolts, as required by
Table 4 in TMS 602.
COMMENTARY
"L'Bolts
Hex Head
'J" Bolls
squareHead
o 8T
(a) Headed Anchor Bolts (b) Bent-Bar Anchor Bolts
COMMENTARY
EP
5o
E'i
6E
$E
oE
EO
F(,
Figure CC-6.3-2 Anchor bolt clearanie requirements for headed anchor bolts - bent-bars are similar
-
6.3.2 Projected areafor axial tension 6.3.2 Projected oreafor axial tension
The projected area ofheaded and bent-bar anchor bolts Results of tests (Brown and Whitlock (1983); Allen et
loaded in axial tension, Apt, shall be determined by Equation al (2000)) on headed anchor bolts in tension showed that
6-5. anchor bolts often failed by breakout of a conically shaped
section of masonry. The area, Ap,, is the projected arei of
Ar, = nli (Equation 6-5) the assumed failure cone. The cone originates at the
compression bearing point of the embedment and radiates
The portion of projected area overlapping an open cell, at 45 degrees in the direction of the pull (See Figure
or open head joint, or that lies outside the masonry shall CC-6.3-3). Other modes of tensile failure are possible.
be deducted from the value of Ap, calculated using These modes include pullout (straightening of J- or L-bolts)
Equation 6-5. Where the projected areas of anchor bolts and yield / fracture of the anchor steel.
overlap, the value of Ap, calculated using Equation 6-5
shall be adjusted so that no portion of masonry is When anchor bolts are closely spaced, stresses within
included more than once. the masonry begin to become additive, as shown in Figure
CC-6.34. The Code requires that when projected areas of
anchor bolts overlap, an adjustment be rnade so that the
masonry is not overloaded. When the projected areas of two
or more anchors overlap, the anchors with overlapping
projected areas should be treated as an anchor group. The
projected areas ofthe anchors in the group are summed, this
area is adjusted for overlapping areas, and the capacity of
the anchor group is calculated using the adjusted area in
place of Ap. See Figure CC-6.3-5 for examples of
calculating adjusted values of Ap,. The equations given in
Figure CC-6.3-5 are valid only when the projected areas of
the bolts overlap.
BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES AND COMMENTARY c-79
COMMENTARY ER
[6
EE
,Tension Force Force
I lTension $E
n"sumed Conefor aE
Calculation of A*, =o
F(J
EquationGl
Conical
Failure
Surface
Overlapping
:COMIil.EilITARY
EO
EO
Apl at Top of Wall for Uplift
5o
tt>
6E
SE
rts
oE
Eo
F(J
For/6 Sz<2X
1-
x=;rlq(lu)' -,'
. A .(tt\
:. Apt =(2x +:zl-.,;(#-si,p) where0 = zarminl
. I
i" degrees
\tt )
;, a ot=
(lx + zI. {#[# * sm#], ,-h :,**{ffi}*,!sw
Tension Force
t/r'
'/.F FrictionalResistane
&i-r+r..-**
.Normal
$treesm
Bolt Diameter,d6
BoltDiameter,d6
E, -f
E@
5c,i
rc, This page intentionally left blank
Oi-
o.9
SE
rt
aE
F(J
=o