APA ANALYSIS

CITA LITERAL CITA CITA CITA CITA DE CITA Tablas REFERENCIAS

texto LITERAL PARAFRASEA PARAFRASEA
AUTOR DA TEXTO DA AUTOR
“English has One of the According Similarly, The Las referencias no tienen la
become the “Limitatio most to Creswell Cullingford table sangria desde la segunda
dominant ns are important (2012), (1997) number línea sino como si fuera parte
means of potential aspects to when stated that 2 has the del texto.
international weakness take into conducting assessment title
communicati es or account qualitative is what the bellow it Ginther, A. (2013).
on” (Fiedler, problems before research, it student is and the Assessment of speaking. The
2011). No with the developing is important expected to descripti Encyclopedia of Applied
está en la study a research to consider accomplish on is on Linguistics. DOI:
referencias identified study is to some in academic the top 10.1002/9781405198431.wb
by the think about ethical performanc and not eal0052
researcher ethical issues that e. (Cited in bellow
“quantifying ” consideratio guarantee Hosseini & as it has
the amount (Creswell, ns the Azarnoosh, to be.
of” (Green & 2012, highlighting protection 2014).
Sinker, p199). that this is a of the
2000). qualitative participants. Cooperative
Brown research learning
Moreover, (2007) which According activities
Little, D define the follows to the that present
(2007) stated assessmen some Glossary of students
that the t as “an standards of education with
CEFR ongoing conduct reform opportunitie
describes in process that covers (2015), s to use oral
general “the that the assessment language to
communicati encompas following is a term interact
ve functions ses a areas: that refers with others
that learners much honesty and to the wide —whether
should be wider integrity, variety of for social or
able to domain” objectivity, methods or academic
perform at (p, 445). carefulness, tools that purposes—
different openness, educators are optimal
proficiency Brindley respect for use to for
levels” and (2011), intellectual evaluate, assessing
“it assumes states that property, measure, oral
that any “assessme confidential and language”
communicati nt at the ity, legalitydocument (O’Malley
ve task end of a and human the and Valdez
requires a course, subjects academic p,61 as
comparable term or protection readiness, cited in
level of school ( Resnick, learning Pineda).
proficiency year-often D.B., progress, (MAL
from for 2015 ) skill CITADO,
language to purposes acquisition, DEBERIA
language”. of The or IR AL
providing sociocultura educational PRINCIPIO
Pineda aggregate l theory by needs of Y SIN EL
(2014) “the d Vigostky is students. NUMERO
context in informati viewed as DE
which the on on the way to Brown PAGINA
assessment program improve (2007) POR NO
takes place, outcomes cognitive affirmed SER DEL
the students’ to skills that it exists TEXTO
ages, their education through five ORIGINAL
cognitive and al interaction. principles )
linguistic authoritie It includes a that
levels, the s- is concept teachers can
Besides,
characteristic referred to which is use as a speaking is
s and as called the guide for the most
appropriaten summativ Zone of designing adifficult
ess of the e Proximal test and the
skill to
assessment assessmen Developme criteria for
assess
task and, in t”. nt (ZPT) or assessment.because it
general, the (FALTA in words of requires that
entire LA Wood et al. Principles teachers
process that PAGINA) (1976) as …… focus their
assessing the scaffolding. (Brown, attention on
oral skill FALTA EL 2007, p, usage
implies, from AÑO 446-451). language
its planning Mal por el (range,
to its The CEFR número de variety,
implementati is the página complexity
on” (le falta content of or accuracy)
la pag) standardizin One of the rather than
g levels that most how people
serves as a relevant of interact.
model to the last (Hugues,
command years have 2002, p, 77
the been the and Luoma,
teaching, communicat 2004: 170
learning ive as cited in
and approach Varela &
assessment that is Palacios,
process. It developed 2013).
provides a in two
common ways: first, procedures
basis for the a notional- in which the
elaboration functional examinee is
of language approach, it asked to
syllabuses, means not engage in
curriculum only to face-to-face
guidelines, teach communicat
examinatio grammar ive
ns, but extend exchanges
textbooks, it to with one or
etc. across interactiona more
Europe l notions; human
(Council of second, a interlocutor
Europe, learner- s”
2001). centered (Clark,1979
approach , p. 36 as
. that made cited
emphasis to Ginther).
 learn the
meaning of
what the
student
wants to
communicat
e and learn
how to
express
them
(Bygate,
2011, p.15).
(NO DEBE
IR LA
PÁGINA)