Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Alex Hong
24 April 2020
Abstract
unconventional filmmaking techniques that greatly differ from the expectations of mainstream
film. Because experimental films include a very broad net of work, this research mostly focuses
on symbolic films that have at least some resemblance of a plot. The research consisted of heavy
background information, searching for different experimental films and reading various
interpretations of those films’ imagery. All of this research was intended to discover why
experimental filmmakers use experimental films, and whether or not the presence of a
Table of Contents
Abstract...page 1
Introduction…page 2
Literature Review...page 2
Data Collection...page 5
Conclusions...page 9
Works Cited...page 11
Hong 2
I. Introduction
The experimental film genre has existed for as long as the art of film itself. It pushes and
explores all of the possibilities that film is capable of, opening up many opportunities to diversify
universal forms of storytelling. It is so diverse, in fact, that for the purposes of this research, the
definition of experimental film will be limited to symbolic films that have a plot. The research
various experimental filmmakers. The data collection saw the production of two identical films,
both of them original and of the experimental genre. The two films are the same in every way,
except that one has a protagonist and the other does not. The two films were then screened for a
Literature Review
filmmaking, veering away from traditional Hollywood storytelling by using abstract imagery and
unique sound design (“Experimental Film”). Anything goes in experimental film. The genre has
seen a wide variety of different kinds of films, from complex narratives with heavy symbolism to
plot-less films that are nothing more than rotating shapes. The exploratory nature of these films
allows filmmakers and audiences to discover how different editing techniques may alter the
influence of the film. Even the simplest cut can affect the way an audience perceives a movie.
For example, a phenomenon known as the Kuleshov Effect demonstrates how the addition of an
isolated image changes the meaning of a sequence (Aitken). This idea suggests that if there are
two shots of a person’s blank facial expression, with the image of a sandwich cut between those
two shots, the audience may perceive the subject as hungry. Replace the sandwich with a cup of
Hong 3
water and now that same person is suddenly thought to be thirsty. This idea can be applied to
With so many options for film editing, experimental filmmakers do not have to stay
within the bounds of realism and can edit absolutely whatever they want. They are often inflated
with abstract imagery and may lack characters, a setting or even a plot. The appeal of this style
is that each viewer in the audience can interpret and perceive the images however they want,
without the limits of a strict plot or explicit realism that tells the audience what to think. In fact,
abstract imagery specifically allows the brain to discover new, indescribable emotions in
complex ways. Abstract art frees space for the mind to consider concepts outside of familiar
reality, which allows the brain to form new cognitive and emotional associations, accessing areas
in the brain that would usually be difficult to access (Aviv). These reactions, though prompted
by the same imagery, can evoke different feelings from each viewer, as no brain is exactly the
same, emphasizing the experimental genre’s ability of diversifying film analysis (Kim, Jang-
Hyeon, et al.) Experimental film do not only see a manipulation of visuals, but of sound too.
Sound design is a major contributing factor to a movie’s influence, and can be just as effective as
the images if altered in certain ways. Some filmmakers have even observed an advantage to
lacking any sound at all, as it gives viewers even more space to imagine a world of sound unique
to themselves (Turim).
Experimental films give imaginative freedom to the audience, but are also very liberating
for creators as well. Experimental films allow filmmakers to make what they want to make, not
what society wants or expects them to produce. If a plot gets in the way of what the filmmaker
wants to achieve, they can forget about the plot. If they simply want to experiment with shapes
and color, they do not have to waste time developing characters. They can focus on the things
Hong 4
they want to, without having to limit their creativity or waste time and money on things that do
not interest them (Deren). Filmmakers have so many different opportunities in the experimental
film director David Lynch believes that a filmmaker’s freedom of expression is a very unique
experience that can be shared with the audience in a way that no other genre can. He often talks
about his distinct style, which tends to use dreams as a major part of his films because it allows
him to depart from reality and use bizarre imagery in a context where it would be appropriate, if
the story so requires a level of realism (Bulkeley). However, when asked about the meaning
behind certain images in his films, Lynch refused to explicitly assign a message to his work. He
completely believes in letting audiences find their own meaning in a movie without their
opinions being influenced by the director, a value upheld by many other experimental
filmmakers and artists in the avant-garde (“Eraserhead: Is There Life After Birth?”).
Experimental films have a great power behind them, but do not reach a very wide variety
of audiences. This means that the majority of casual moviegoers miss out on the uniquities of
the avant-garde genre. If more audiences are aware of and interested in experimental films, art
culture could be greatly expanded, diversifying the way artists express themselves. Art is not
just a way to pass the time, but a real way to teach people about culture in order to build empathy
between people and communities (Caldwell). Since viewers are drawn to stories about
sympathetic people with whom they can relate to (Snyder), if an experimental film has a main
character for the audience to follow, the audience will be more engaged in that film than one
without a protagonist.
a Likert scale. Subjects could rate their emotional engagement with the two films on a scale of 1
to 5, 1 being not engaged and 5 being very engaged. The method of this data collection was
audience’s emotional engagement. Whether or not the film had a protagonist was the
independent variable, the level to which the audience felt engaged with the movie was the
dependent variable. The control group was the film without a protagonist.
The two films could not have any explicit direction with one specific meaning, as the
experimental filmmakers in the literature review insist that the best experimental films are those
that simply present imagery to an audience and allow the audience to make their own
interpretations of the content. Though the films had an intended meaning, there was also some
abstract imagery inserted into the film for no describable reason to broaden the web of what the
The tool used for this data collection was a brief survey that was sent to subjects,
containing the two films with a Likert scale for each of them, as well as some extra questions
allowing the subjects to describe the emotions they felt during the film’s progression. This tool
was appropriate because it allowed the research to reach the target audience of experimental
films, the viewers. Subjects found out about the survey through a social media link and
attachment.
Some limitations of that data collection was that it can be very hard to judge and describe
human emotions as accurately as they feel. Additionally, some people claimed that they thought
one version of the movie was more engaging, but they still enjoyed the other movie better
Hong 6
overall. The research could have had more of a distinction between emotionally engaging and
The thesis claimed that the film with a protagonist would be more emotionally engaging
to the audience than the one without a protagonist. This is supported by the data collection,
which shows Version A (the film with the protagonist) receiving much higher scores indicating
stronger engagement, with an average score of 3.947, a median of 4 and a mode of 4. Version B
(the film without the protagonist) received lower scores, with an average of 3.105, a median of 3
and a mode of 2 and 3. A question asking the subject which film they preferred found that
Hong 7
63.2% preferred Version A, 26.3% preferred Version B, and 10.5% had no preference. This data
supports the thesis, providing evidence that audiences are more engaged in films with a
A final question provided a text box for subjects to describe the different emotions felt in
the movie and what they believed the film was about. Though not without some recurring
themes, the responses yielded a wide range of different interpretations, saying that the film was
These findings give evidence to support the thesis, which claimed that experimental films
with a protagonist to follow would be more emotionally engaging than experimental films
Hong 8
without a protagonist. With this in mind, experimental filmmakers can use the protagonist figure
to their advantage. There are endless possibilities in a genre so boundless. The filmmakers
could make the protagonist more sympathetic for the audience to connect to, or they can
manipulate the audience by having a unique protagonist that one may not normally relate to.
They could even go the opposite direction and, if they want the audience to feel disconnected
from the world of the movie, reduce the role of the main character in the film’s progression.
Of course, this research was not perfect and had its limitations. It can be hard for people
to describe their own emotions, so the Likert scale may not have been the best way to measure
something that can only be understood by feeling the emotion itself. Additionally, the subject
can only watch one film at a time, and it is possible for many subjects that the film they preferred
was only chosen because it was watched with fresh eyes. It is possible that this issue could be
resolved by having a larger sample participate in the research. The sample would be equally
divided, with each subject randomly assigned to just one film to watch. The results would then
be compared between two groups of people, instead of one group where a subject’s response was
This research contributes to the world of visual arts by emphasizing the influence a film
can have and how that influence can change if such a simple element as the presence of a
protagonist is altered. With a better understanding of what experimental films have to offer,
experimental filmmakers can expand their artistic palettes and express themselves in unique
Conclusions
Hong 9
Experimental film is a very unique genre of film that allows filmmakers to explore the
bizarre, expanding possibilities of self expression for creators everywhere. Notable filmmakers
like David Lynch, Andy Warhol and Maya Deren assert that experimental filmmaking’s purpose
is to have no purpose other than to satisfy the creator’s artistic vision. Any themes presented in
the film cannot be explicit, since experimental films must also allow their audiences to interpret
the film personally for themselves. According to the data, experimental films with a protagonist
are more effective in engaging the audience than films without a protagonist. With this
engagement, audiences can more easily experience the emotions evoked by the film,
Works Cited
Aviv, Vered. "What Does the Brain Tell as about Abstract Art?" Frontiers in
Human Neuroscience, Feb. 2014, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00085. Accessed
13 Nov. 2019.
Bulkeley, Kelly. "Dreaming and the Cinema of David Lynch." Dreaming, vol. 13,
no. 1, Mar. 2003, doi:10.1023/A:1022190318612. Accessed 12 Dec. 2019.
Caldwell, Ellen C. "Can Art Help People Develop Empathy?" JSTOR Daily, 16 Jan.
2018, daily.jstor.org/can-art-help-people-develop-empathy/. Accessed 13 Dec. 2019.
"Eraserhead: Is There Life after Birth?" David Lynch Interviews, edited by Richard A.
Barney, UP of Mississippi, 2009.
"Experimental Film." Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film, edited by Barry Keith Grant, vol.
2, Schirmer Reference, 2007, pp. 149-162. Gale Virtual Reference Library,
http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CX2587600077/GVRL?
u=glen20233&sid=GVRL&xid=412ba457. Accessed 16 July 2019.
Hong 10
Keller, Sarah. "Teaching Meshes of the Afternoon." The Cine-Files, no. 9, Fall
2015.
Snyder, Blake. Save the Cat! The Last Book on Screenwriting You'll Ever Need. Michael
Wiese Productions, 2005.
Turim, Maureen Cheryn. Abstraction in Avant-Garde Films. Ann Arbor, UMI Research
Press, 1978.