PHB-10883; No of Pages 6

Physiology & Behavior xxx (2015) xxx–xxx

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Physiology & Behavior

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/phb

1Q1 The biology of appetite control: Do resting metabolic rate and fat-free
2 mass drive energy intake?

F
3Q2 J.E. Blundell a,⁎, G. Finlayson a, C. Gibbons a, P. Caudwell b, M. Hopkins c

O
4 a
Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
5 b
Medical and Healthcare Affairs, AstraZeneca, Horizon Place, 600 Capability Green, Luton LU1 3LU, UK
6 c
Academy of Sport and Physical Activity, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S10 2BP, UK

O
7

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

R
9
8
10 Article history: The prevailing model of homeostatic appetite control envisages two major inputs; signals from adipose tissue 21

P
11 Received 12 March 2015 and from peptide hormones in the gastrointestinal tract. This model is based on the presumed major influence 22
12 Received in revised form 25 May 2015 of adipose tissue on food intake. However, recent studies have indicated that in obese people fat-free mass 23
13 Accepted 28 May 2015
(FFM) is strongly positively associated with daily energy intake and with meal size. This effect has been replicated 24
14 Available online xxxx
in several independent groups varying in cultural and ethnic backgrounds, and appears to be a robust phenom-
D 25
15 Keywords:
enon. In contrast fat mass (FM) is weakly, or mildly negatively associated with food intake in obese people. In ad- 26
16 Energy intake dition resting metabolic rate (RMR), a major component of total daily energy expenditure, is also associated with 27
28
E
17 Resting metabolic rate food intake. This effect has been replicated in different groups and is robust. This action is consistent with the pro-
18 Fat-free mass posal that energy requirements — reflected in RMR (and other aspects of energy expenditure) constitute a bio- 29
19 Fat mass logical drive to eat. Consistent with its storage function, FM has a strong inhibitory effect on food intake in lean 30
T

20 Energy balance subjects, but this effect appears to weaken dramatically as adipose tissue increases. This formulation can account 31
for several features of the development and maintenance of obesity and provides an alternative, and transparent, 32
C

approach to the biology of appetite control. 33

Q3
34 © 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc.
38
36
35
E

37

39 1. Background: current views on the biology of appetite control 1 (GLP-1), peptide tyrosine–tyrosine (PYY), amylin and oxyntomodulin 58
R

[4]. This 2 component approach apparently summarises current think- 59

40 Over the course of 50 years scientific thinking about the mechanisms ing. However, the history of the physiology of appetite control illus- 60
R

41 of appetite control has changed dramatically. In the 1950s and 1960s trates that any model can be improved by new findings and that some 61
42 the hypothalamic ‘dual centre’ hypothesis was believed to provide a models have to be completely replaced following the advent of new 62
43 comprehensive account of the initiation and inhibition of food intake knowledge. Commenting on the regulation of body fat in an editorial 63
O

44 e.g. [1]. Following technological advances in the identification of neuro- in American Journal of Physiology (2004) Wade commented that ‘a fac- 64
45 transmitter pathways in the brain, the 2-centre hypothesis was replaced ile explanation has the potential to set back progress in a field by years, 65
C

46 by a model which was based on catecholaminergic and serotonergic because the problem has been thought to have been solved’ (when it 66
47 aminergic systems [2]. At the time this approach was understood to pro- has not)[5]. Therefore the current conceptualisations should not be 67
48 vide a modern and powerful explanation of appetite. Later, with the dis- regarded as permanent fixtures; they are transient representations of 68
N

49 covery of families of neuropeptides, the peptide hypothesis of central the current state of knowledge. 69
50 control of appetite replaced the ‘somewhat dated’ aminergic ideas. Cur- An important component of the homeostatic approach to appetite 70
U

51 rent neural models propose complex networks of transmitter pathways and body weight has focussed on the identification of key signals that 71
52 and receptors that receive both stimulatory and inhibitory inputs from could inform the brain about the nature of body stores. During the 72
53 the periphery [3]. Important peripheral agents have been incorporated 1950s three basic postulates promoted different signals for ‘body weight 73
54 into a recent conceptualisation that has proposed a theory of appetite regulation’; these were the glucostatic [6], aminostatic [7] and lipostatic 74
55 control based on an interaction between adipose tissue (and prominent hypotheses [8]. These simple ideas exerted a mild but pervasive influ- 75
56 adipokines) and peripheral episodic signals from intestinal peptides ence on thinking about a complex problem. The discovery of leptin in 76
57 such as ghrelin, cholecystokinin (CCK), Insulin, glucagon-like peptide- 1994 by Zhang et al. [9] seemed to provide conclusive proof of the au- 77
thenticity of the lipostatic hypothesis (which was based on a particular 78
interpretation of the classic rat studies of Kennedy [8]), and leptin was 79
⁎ Corresponding author at: Institute of Psychological Science, Faculty of Medicine and
Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. construed as ‘the lipostatic signal’ that was an essential component re- 80
E-mail address: j.e.blundell@leeds.ac.uk (J.E. Blundell). quired in a negative feedback process for the regulation of adipose 81

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.031
0031-9384/© 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Please cite this article as: J.E. Blundell, et al., The biology of appetite control: Do resting metabolic rate and fat-free mass drive energy intake?,
Physiol Behav (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.031
 2 J.E. Blundell et al. / Physiology & Behavior xxx (2015) xxx–xxx

82 tissue. This idea has been incorporated into models of appetite control This has been referred to as ‘passive overconsumption’ [25,26] and is 148
83 in which leptin is depicted as the major signal (the missing link) that in- regarded as a salient feature of the obesogenic environment [26]. Conse- 149
84 forms the brain about the state of the body's energy stores [4,10]. Inter- quently there are a number of aspects of the aetiology and management 150
85 pretations of this view have positioned adipose tissue at the centre of of obesity, and the obesity epidemic, that are difficult for the 151
86 appetite control [11]. In addition, it has been asserted that adipose tis- adipocentric theory to explain. 152
87 sues are critical integrators of energy balance through the regulation
88 of food intake and energy expenditure [12]. These arguments have con- 2. An alternative approach: human energy balance and 153
89 tributed to the view that adipose tissue is the main driver of food intake, appetite control 154
90 with day to day food intake controlled in the interests of regulating body
91 weight (and especially adipose tissue); this view appears to have been Not since the work done by Edholm [27,28] and Mayer [29] in the 155
92 widely accepted. In addition, leptin is understood to play a key role in 1950s has thinking about appetite control taken account of evidence 156
93 the control of appetite by adipose tissue. Although it is beyond doubt in the field of human energy balance research. Therefore it is worth con- 157
94 that leptin exerts a critical influence in many biochemical pathways sidering whether or not any light can be shed on the expression of 158
95 concerning physiological regulation [3,13] it has been argued that the human appetite from an energy balance approach. A recent approach 159

F
96 role of leptin in the aetiology of obesity is confined to very rare situa- to the study of exercise on appetite control within an energy balance 160
97 tions in which there is an absence of a leptin signal [14]. Others have framework has used a multi-level experimental platform in obese 161

O
98 also argued that the role of leptin signalling is not concerned with sati- humans [30]; relationships among body composition, resting metabo- 162
99 ety but is mainly involved in the maintenance of adequate energy stores lism, substrate oxidation, gastrointestinal peptides, sensations of appe- 163
100 for survival during periods of energy deficit [15]. This is why leptin may tite and objective measures of daily energy intake and meal sizes, 164

O
101 be critical in the resistance to weight loss with dieting. However, it has have been examined. Such a multi-level approach has not previously 165
102 been noted that the results following exogenous leptin administration been explicitly undertaken. An important feature of the approach is 166
103 in ‘typical’ obesity have been disappointing [12]. Indeed, neither leptin

R
that all variables have been objectively measured and quantified. This 167
104 nor adipose tissue itself has not been shown to exert an influence over is particularly important in the case of daily energy intake for which 168
105 the parameters of hunger and meal size which are key elements in self-report or self-recall does not provide data of sufficient accuracy to 169

P
106 day to day control of appetite in humans. be used in assessments of the energy balance budget [31,32]. 170
107 The second issue that appears to influence thinking is the notion
108 called ‘energy homeostasis’. This idea has been proposed to account
3. Body composition and energy intake 171
109 for the accuracy in which energy balance is maintained over time in nor-
D
110 mal individuals. For example, some commentaries suggest that for a
111 healthy adult weighing 75 kg who typically consumes approximately Using a multi-level systems approach [30] in several cohorts of 172
E
112 one million kcal each year, then a mismatch of just 1% (expending obese (men and women), the relationship between meal sizes, daily en- 173
113 27 kcal per day fewer than consumed) will yield a body fat increase of ergy intakes and aspects of body composition (fat mass [FM] and fat- 174
175
T

114 1.1 kg after 1 year [16]. This type of calculation which uses the 1 kg of free mass [FFM]) have been measured simultaneously in the same indi-
115 fat for 7700 kcal rule has recently been shown by Hall [17] and others viduals at different time intervals several months apart [33]. Contrary to 176
what many would have expected, a positive association was observed 177
C

116 [18] to be simplistic and to produce implausible predictions. Moreover,

117 given the worldwide epidemic of obesity, and the apparent ease with between FFM and daily energy intake (EI), and also with meal size 178
118 which many human beings appear to gain weight, it seems implausible (see Fig. 1). In other words, the greater the amount of FFM in a person, 179
E

119 that some privileged physiological mechanism is regulating body the greater was the daily energy consumed and the larger the individual 180
120 weight with exquisite precision. If such a mechanism existed it would meal size (in self-determined, objectively measured eating occasions). 181
R

121 surely operate to correct weight gain once it began to occur. As In order to enhance ecological validity, the study incorporated a sched- 182
ule of eating opportunities that was representative of real life in the 183
122 Speakman has pointed out ‘If body fatness is under physiological con-
123 trol, then how come we have an obesity epidemic?’ [19]. local culture. The relationships between FFM and EI were conserved 184
R

over time (measures 12 weeks apart) and under quite distinctive die- 185
124 The compelling phenomenon of dietary-induced obesity (DIO) in
125 rats also suggests that physiology can be overcome by a ‘weight-induc- tary challenges (high and low energy dense foods). There was no rela- 186
tionship with body mass index (BMI) nor with the amount of adipose 187
O

126 ing’ nutritional environment, and that ‘energy homeostasis’ cannot pre-
127 vent this. The phenomenon of DIO in rats questions the notion of an all tissue (FM) suggesting that, in a free-running situation (with partici- 188
pants not subject to coercive weight loss or dietary restriction), FM 189
128 powerful biological regulatory system. Moreover, this experimental
C

129 ‘fact’ strongly resonates with the proposal of a human ‘obesogenic envi- did not exert control over the amount of food selected in a meal, nor 190
130 ronment’ that promotes weight gain in almost every technologically ad- consumed over a whole day [33]. This outcome is clearly not consistent 191
with an adipocentric view of appetite control. Moreover the relation- 192
N

131 vanced country on the planet [20]. The analogy with DIO in rats is quite
132 compelling, and is usually not denied. ships were independent of sex. This means that sex does not explain 193
133 The argument for body weight stability is not convincing. The exis- the association of FFM with EI. On the contrary FFM can explain the 194
U

134 tence of worldwide obesity suggests that body weight is not tightly reg- sex effect; men (in general) eat more than women because they have 195
135 ulated. Moreover, overfeeding does not lead to any significant greater amounts of FFM. 196
136 downregulation of energy intake [21,22]. An alternative view that has
137 been discussed for decades is that regulation is asymmetrical [23]. 4. Confirmation of the relationship between body composition and 197
138 Whilst the reduction in body weight is strongly defended, physiological energy intake: the importance of replication in science 198
139 compensatory mechanisms do not resist an increase in fat mass [24]. In-
140 deed the physiological system appears to permit fat deposition when One of the most valuable but unpopular aspects of scientific investi- 199
141 nutritional conditions are favourable (such as exposure to a high energy gations is the importance of replication. With the emphasis in publica- 200
142 dense diet). This means that the role of culture in determining food se- tions on novelty and originality, it is common to find many findings 201
143 lection is critical. In many societies the prevailing ideology of consumer- reported on a single occasion only, with the implication that one dem- 202
144 ism encourages overconsumption. This applies not only to foods but to onstration of an effect establishes that effect for ever [34]. Authors are 203
145 all varieties of material goods. The body is not well protected from the not keen to perform the same study more than once, and grant 204
146 behavioural habit of overconsuming food; processes of satiety can be awarding bodies are not enthusiastic about funding repetitions. How- 205
147 over-ridden to allow the development of a positive energy balance. ever, for any new finding that may run counter to the currently accepted 206

Please cite this article as: J.E. Blundell, et al., The biology of appetite control: Do resting metabolic rate and fat-free mass drive energy intake?,
Physiol Behav (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.031
 J.E. Blundell et al. / Physiology & Behavior xxx (2015) xxx–xxx 3

F
O
O
R
Fig. 1. Scatter plot for a group of 46 overweight and obese individuals showing the relationship between fat free mass and self determined total energy intake measured objectively and
quantitatively under laboratory conditions for one ad-libitum dinner meal (upper panel) and over the whole day (lower panel). Measurements were made at the beginning, after 6 weeks

P
and at the end (post-intervention) of a 12 week programme to improve physical activity. Participants were given 3 ad-libitum meals and one fixed size meal (lunch) at each measurement
point, and the daily intakes were averages of days in which participants were offered high energy dense or low energy dense foods. The relationship between FFM and EI is present at
individual meals and for the total day energy intake. This positive relationship is quite consistent with the data reported in papers by [35] and [36].
D
207 dogma, it is essential that it is replicated in order to demonstrate its concluded that FFM and FM have opposing effects on energy 244
E
208 robustness. homeostasis. 245
209 Interestingly, our attention has recently been drawn to a study pub-
T

210 lished in 1989 that produced results in all aspects similar to those we re- 5. Fat-free mass and energy intake — what is the mechanism? 246
211 ported in 2010 and published in 2011. The study by Lissner et al. [35]
C

212 was designed to investigate whether overweight women might overeat In order to establish biological explanations for behaviour it is first 247
213 whilst reporting undereating. Participants were observed for periods of necessary to demonstrate clear and unambiguous relationships be- 248
214 14 to 63 days and all measurements were carried out in a metabolic unit tween the biological and behavioural variables. This establishes a valid 249
E

215 that incorporated measures of body composition using densitometry. relationship and provides at least prima facie evidence that biology is 250
216 Body composition, weight change and energy intake were precisely causing the behaviour. In turn this poses a question about the mecha- 251
R

217 and objectively measured by the investigators. The outcome showed nism (or mechanisms) that embodies the causal link. Our research has 252
218 that the energy requirement for the maintenance of body weight was demonstrated that some signal associated with FFM exerts a determin- 253
219 not correlated with adiposity expressed as a percentage of body fat. In ing effect over the amount of food consumed. One possibility is that 254
R

220 a regression analysis energy requirement was positively associated some privileged biochemical molecule associated with skeletal muscle 255
221 with lean mass (p b 0.0001), whereas fat mass added no predictive (or some other organ that comprises FFM) could act as a signal to the 256
O

222 value to the model. The authors concluded that ‘lean mass was shown central nervous system networks controlling EI. This is a possibility 257
223 to be a significant predictor of energy requirement and fat mass was
224 not’ (p 324). A further relevant comment was that ‘The emphasis of re-
C

225 search that focuses on the relationship between energy intake and obe-
226 sity is misplaced because energy requirement appears to be a direct
N

227 function of lean mass rather than adiposity’ (p 324).

228 This article and its outcome appear to have been completely
229 overlooked for over 20 years, possibly because the findings were discor-
U

230 dant with the prevailing interest in the lipostatic hypothesis and the role
231 of fat in appetite control. The similarity between Fig. 2 in the study by
232 Lissner et al. [35] – showing a relationship between EI and lean body
233 mass – and Fig. 1 in our more recent paper [33] is compelling. In addi-
234 tion the relationship of FFM and EI has been more recently demon-
235 strated in a large group of obese ethnically diverse individuals from a
236 quite different geographical and cultural environment [36]. This sample
237 (n = 184) included Asian, African Americans, Caucasians, Hispanics and
238 Native Americans. The main outcome demonstrated that FFM (and the
239 fat-free mass index (FFMI)–FFM divided by height squared) was corre- Fig. 2. This figure shows a scatter plot of the relationship between daily energy intake and
240 lated positively with objectively measured EI. Moreover in this sample resting metabolic rate (RMR) for a group of 30 normal weight and 29 overweight men and
women. The daily self determined food intake was measured objectively for a period of
241 there was a weaker but negative association of FM with daily EI. The au- 11 days in a nutrition research unit. Subjects were free to make choices between food
242 thors concluded that food intake could be predicted by FFM (and FFMI) items but all items consumed were quantitatively recorded. These data formed part of a
243 and to a lesser extent by FM. As proposed earlier [33,37] these authors study on actual and reported food intakes under energy balance conditions [42].

Please cite this article as: J.E. Blundell, et al., The biology of appetite control: Do resting metabolic rate and fat-free mass drive energy intake?,
Physiol Behav (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.031
 4 J.E. Blundell et al. / Physiology & Behavior xxx (2015) xxx–xxx

258 but there are many candidate molecules since skeletal muscle tissue Table 1 t1:1
259 produces large numbers of myokines and related entities that could em- This table shows the degree of association between the variables of body composition (left t1:2
hand column) and energy intake (EI) at breakfast (BFEI), lunch (EI lunch) and the total in- t1:3
260 body signalling properties [38]. take for the two meals. The figures in the body of the table are correlation coefficients t1:4
261 However, an alternative hypothesis arises from the known influence (r) for 47 participants (24 males and 23 females) with mean BMI = 22 and age = 20. t1:5
262 of FFM on energy expenditure and energy balance. In our studies, and These participants were lean, healthy active people who took part in sports. Lean body t1:6
263 those of others, FFM is highly correlated with the energy expended in mass was 60.9 kg and fat mass 10.2 kg. FFM-I = Fat-free Mass Index; FM-I = Fat Mass t1:7
Index. t1:8
264 resting metabolism i.e. resting metabolic rate (RMR) (FFM-RMR: r
265 values = 0.51–0.85, p b 0.0001). Consequently one possibility is that EI breakfast EI lunch Total t1:9
266 the association between FFM and EI is generated by the energy demand BMI (kg/m2) −.005 .015 .009 t1:10
267 from FFM and reflected in RMR. In other words the energy required to Body fat (%) −.548⁎⁎ −.509⁎⁎ −.624⁎⁎ t1:11
268 maintain the body's lean tissues (including all vital organs) determines Fat mass (kg) −.483⁎⁎ −.418⁎⁎ −.529⁎⁎ t1:12
269 a minimum level of EI at meals and over the whole day. Fat-free mass (kg) .541⁎⁎ .516⁎⁎ .628⁎⁎ t1:13
RMR (kcal/day) .425⁎⁎ .436⁎⁎ .519⁎⁎ t1:14
FM-I −.519⁎⁎ −.471⁎⁎ −.583⁎⁎ t1:15
270 6. Fat-free mass, resting metabolic rate and appetite control FFM-I .447⁎⁎ .429⁎⁎ .522⁎⁎ t1:16

F
⁎⁎ p b .001. See text for details. t1:17
271 This association between FFM and eating behaviour has implications

O
272 for an energy balance approach to appetite control, and for the relation-
273 ship between energy expenditure and EI as described by Edholm [27,
274 28]. It is well established that FFM is the primary determinant of RMR, participants. As shown in Table 1, and in keeping with previous data, 320

O
275 and that RMR is the largest component of total daily energy expenditure FFM and FFMI were strongly positively correlated with meal size and 321
276 [39]. From a homeostatic standpoint, an ongoing and recurring drive to total energy intake (sum of 2 meals). However, in contrast to the finding 322
277 323

R
eat arising from the physiological demand for energy (e.g. RMR) ap- in obese people, FM and FMI were significantly negatively associated
278 pears logical, as this energy demand would remain relatively stable be- with EI. These associations remained highly significant even after 324
279 tween days and would ensure the maintenance and execution of key conducting partial correlations controlling for sex (FFMI and EI, r = 325

P
280 biological and behavioural processes. Consequently it might be pre- 0.35; FMI and EI, r = −0.37). This observation that FM is negatively as- 326
281 dicted that RMR, the major component of daily energy expenditure sociated with EI implies that in lean individuals with low levels of body 327
282 (60–70%) could be associated with the quantitative aspect of eating be- fat (average fat mass and % body fat — 10 kg and 14.9%, respectively),
D 328
283 haviour and with daily EI. When this was examined [40], it was demon- the adipose tissue is exerting an inhibitory effect on food intake. 329
284 strated that RMR was a significant determinant of the size of a self It can be deduced that this observation is in keeping with the role of 330
285 determined meal, and of daily energy consumed (when measured ob- fat as a store of energy, and adipose tissue as a generator of negative 331
E
286 jectively and quantified). This effect has been demonstrated in several feedback indicating adequate energy reserves in the body. It also sug- 332
287 cohorts of obese and lean individuals and is a robust finding (see Fig. gests that the feedback signals engage with highly sensitive receptor 333
T

288 2). In addition, RMR was associated with the intensity of hunger objec- mechanisms. We envisage that both insulin and leptin would operate 334
289 tively rated on hand held electronic data capture instruments [41]. Con- as feedback signals (but the strength of their effect is mediated by adi- 335
C

290 sequently, these findings – that are broadly consistent with the early posity levels). Since leptin and insulin resistance increase as adiposity 336
291 predictions of Edholm – have demonstrated an association between increases this implies that the inhibitory action of FM on EI would 337
292 the major components of daily energy expenditure and daily EI. In weaken with increasing FM. In obesity the dampening effect of the 338
E

293 other words, they demonstrate that appetite control could be a function large amount of energy stored in adipose tissue would be mild. 339
294 of energy balance.
R

295 Importantly the relationship between RMR and daily EI has been
296 replicated in a completely independent large data set from participants 8. A new formulation for the biology of appetite control 340
297 of variable BMIs allowed to freely select their own diet under meticu-
R

298 lously controlled semi-free living conditions [42]. This study was actu- It is often inferred that food intake is a function of energy require- 341
299 ally conducted to assess the degree of dietary under-reporting that ments, but this assumption lacks empirical support, and until recently, 342
O

300 would occur under strictly controlled scientific conditions. Significantly, it has not been convincingly demonstrated that energy expenditure in- 343
301 in this investigation, which included measurements of all aspects of fluences within-day appetite control. Indeed, current theoretical models 344
302 body composition and the energy balance budget, RMR emerged as used to explain that appetite control does not incorporate energy ex- 345
C

303 the strongest determinant of daily EI. These reports indicate that the as- penditure (or metabolic signals relating to fat-free mass or resting met- 346
304 sociation between RMR and EI is robust and is not restricted to a partic- abolic rate) as putative signals of food intake. Rather, appetite is thought 347
N

305 ular group of people measured in a specific geographical location. Since to be a function of signals arising from adipose tissue and the gastroin- 348
306 FFM and RMR are both strongly associated with EI, the question arises testinal tract. In contrast to the prevailing ‘adipocentric’ view of appetite 349
307 whether or not the effect of FFM on EI is explained by its impact on control, our data (and that of others) indicate that in addition to signals 350
U

308 RMR. We have investigated this issue using mathematical modelling from adipose tissue and gastrointestinal peptides, there is input from 351
309 and the outcomes suggest that the influence of FFM on EI can be metabolism associated with FFM and the energy requirement associ- 352
310 accounted for by the mediation of RMR. ated with RMR. Consequently, the conventional adipocentric model 353
should be revised to allow for an influence of FFM — in addition to FM. 354
311 7. Effects in lean individuals The role of FFM in determining food intake can also be interpreted in 355
the light of the re-analysis of the Keys' human starvation studies carried 356
312 The studies described above have been carried out mainly on over- out by Dulloo et al. [43]. The post-starvation recovery period has been 357
313 weight and obese individuals (men and women). The number of lean analysed in detail and indicates that weight is regained until a certain 358
314 (and young) individuals was small. However, associations among FFM, level of FFM has been reached (while there is an overshoot in the resto- 359
315 FM and EI in obese people may not be typical for people of normal or ration of FM). This suggests a relationship between EI and FFM during 360
316 low body mass. We have therefore measured the relationship between recovery from a huge weight loss. In addition, the association of FFM 361
317 body composition and EI in a group of young lean male and female sub- and EI is in keeping with the amino-static hypothesis put forward 362
318 jects with an average BMI of 22 kg/m2 and an average age of 20 years. more than 60 years ago by Mellinkoff [7] and the more sophisticated 363
319 The outcome was clear but different from the effects seen in obese proposal for a protein-stat described by Millward [44]. 364

Please cite this article as: J.E. Blundell, et al., The biology of appetite control: Do resting metabolic rate and fat-free mass drive energy intake?,
Physiol Behav (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.031
 J.E. Blundell et al. / Physiology & Behavior xxx (2015) xxx–xxx 5

365 Our findings do not imply that FM does not play a role in appetite con- 9. Implications 392
366 trol. Our interpretation is that, under normal weight conditions, FM has an
367 inhibitory influence on food intake but the strength of this tonic inhibition Do findings set out above, together with the new formula for the 393
368 is moderated by insulin and leptin sensitivity [37]. As people overcon- basic biology of appetite control, offer any explanations for the puzzling 394
369 sume (due to cultural obesogenic influences), FM increases and the problems that confront the study of weight regulation and obesity? 395
370 consequential increase in leptin and insulin resistance weaken the inhib- Many accounts of appetite control would benefit from the recognition 396
371 itory influence of FM on appetite. This amounts to a ‘dis-inhibition’, so that that there exists a tonic drive for energy that emanates from the contin- 397
372 accumulating FM fails to suppress food intake and permits more eating uous demand for energy to match energy expenditure from skeletal tis- 398
373 (over-consumption). Indeed there is good evidence that low insulin sen- sue and the body's vital organs (heart, liver, gastro-intestinal tract and 399
374 sitivity reduces post-prandial satiety and weakens meal to meal appetite brain). 400
375 control [45]. Therefore, on the basis of these recent findings we have pro- One question that is rarely answered, partly because the question is 401
376 posed a conjoint influence of FFM and FM on appetite control [33]. This is rarely posed, is why obese people continue to feel hungry and are driven 402
377 set out in Fig. 3. This model provides a different theoretical approach to to eat in the presence of large amounts of stored energy in the body. 403
378 the biology of appetite control, with the influence of FFM and RMR, in ad- Since obese individuals possess not only large amounts of adipose tissue 404

F
379 dition to signals stemming from adipose tissue and GI peptides, providing but also additional FFM, it would be expected that obese people would 405
380 a more comprehensive account of appetite. have a persistent drive to eat (from the large FFM and higher RMR) 406

O
381 It should be noted that the state of energy balance and changes in that would be stronger than that of smaller and more lean individuals 407
382 body composition may alter the relationship between FFM, RMR and of the same age. This explanation can also account for people feeling pe- 408
383 EI. Under conditions of significant energy deficit and weight loss other riodically hungry in the absence of any obvious deficit or self depriva- 409

O
384 regulatory signals (such as leptin) may feature more predominantly in tion. The uniform demand from RMR would be expected to generate a 410
385 the control of appetite [46]. Therefore, its needs to be established how drive to eat that would be episodically suppressed by the action of the 411

R
386 FM and FFM operate (independently or conjointly) in the regulation of stomach and gastrointestinal (GI) peptides following the consumption 412
387 appetite during periods of significant weight loss. Developing clearer of food. Therefore the pattern of eating would arise from an interaction 413
388 models concerning the relationship between changes in body between the tonic drive to eat and episodic inhibitory actions. In con- 414

P
389 composition and signalling systems associated with energy balance trast to the episodic inhibitory action of most of the GI peptides, adipose 415
390 and imbalance has considerable implications for weight management tissues are envisaged to exert a tonic inhibition (that depends on recep- 416
391 in both health and disease. tor sensitivity — see above).
D 417
E
T
C
E
R
R
O
C
N
U

Fig. 3. This diagram shows a formulation for appetite control in which a proposed tonic signal for the drive to eat that reflects the body's demand for energy arises (mainly) from fat free
mass and RMR. In turn this drive is under tonic inhibition from leptin whose action reflects the amount of stored energy reserves in the body. As adipose tissue increases, leptin insensitivity
occurs and this tonic inhibition is reduced. The drive to eat is periodically interrupted and suppressed by episodic signals in the form of peptides released from the GI tract in response to
food consumption. The resultant pattern of eating is a consequence of the interactions among tonic and episodic physiological signals. See text for further description.

Please cite this article as: J.E. Blundell, et al., The biology of appetite control: Do resting metabolic rate and fat-free mass drive energy intake?,
Physiol Behav (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.031
 6 J.E. Blundell et al. / Physiology & Behavior xxx (2015) xxx–xxx

418 Athletes competing in sports that require a high body mass (field [16] M.W. Schwartz, An inconvenient truth about obesity, Molecular Metabolism 1 (1–2) 478
(2012) 2. 479
419 events in athletics, American football, rugby etc.) with very high levels [17] K.D. Hall, et al., Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight, 480
420 of skeletal muscle, would consume large amounts food and display vo- Lancet 378 (9793) (2011) 826–837. 481
421 racious appetites. In contrast elderly people with sarcopenia often suffer [18] Thomas, D., et al., Why do individuals not lose more weight from an exercise inter- 482
vention at a defined dose? An energy balance analysis. Obesity Reviews, 2012. 483
422 from a loss of appetite. Our explanation would be that the loss of FFM [19] J.R. Speakman, If body fatness is under physiological regulation, then how come we 484
423 results in a weakening of hunger and a reduced food intake. Manage- have an obesity epidemic? Physiology 29 (2) (2014) 88–98. 485
424 ment of this condition may need to involve the gentle use of exercise [20] G. Egger, B. Swinburn, An “ecological” approach to the obesity pandemic, BMJ: Brit- 486
ish Medical Journal 315 (7106) (1997) 477. 487
425 to stimulate lean mass. Such a mechanism may involve the activation [21] R. Stubbs, et al., A decrease in physical activity affects appetite, energy, and nutrient 488
426 of stem cells as proposed by Gutin [47]. balance in lean men feeding ad libitum, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 79 (1) (2004) 62. 489
427 A model of appetite control that incorporates separate roles for FFM [22] M. Schlögl, et al., Overfeeding over 24 hours does not activate brown adipose tissue 490
428 and FM can also help to explain the inexorable progress of accumulating in humans, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 98 (12) (2013) E1956–E1960. 491
[23] J. Blundell, A. Hill, Analysis of hunger: inter-relationships with palatability, nutrient 492
429 fatness as people progress from leanness to obesity. As fat is gained the composition and eating, Recent Advances in Obesity Research, Libbey, London 1985, 493
430 inhibitory effect of fat on appetite weakens (due to increasing receptor pp. 118–129. 494
431 insensitivity) whilst at the same time any incremental increase in FFM [24] N.R. Lenard, H.R. Berthoud, Central and peripheral regulation of food intake and 495
496

F
physical activity: pathways and genes, Obesity 16 (S3) (2012) S11–S22.
432 would augment the drive to eat. Consequently as people become fatter [25] J.E. Blundell, J.I. MacDiarmid, Passive overconsumption fat intake and short‐term en- 497
433 it becomes easier to overeat, not more difficult. It follows that obese ergy balance, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 827 (1) (1997) 392–407. 498

O
434 people do not get any help from their stored fat to help them to resist [26] J. Blundell, J. Macdiarmid, Fat as a risk factor for overconsumption: satiation, satiety, 499
and patterns of eating, J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 97 (7) (1997) S63–S69. 500
435 the drive to eat; in fact it makes it harder. [27] O.G. Edholm, et al., The energy expenditure and food intake of individual men, Br. J. 501
Nutr. 9 (03) (1955) 286–300. 502

O
436
Q4 Conflict of interest statement [28] O. Edholm, Energy balance in man. Studies carried out by the Division of Human 503
Physiology, National Institute for Medical Research, J. Hum. Nutr. 31 (6) (1977) 504
413–431 UK. 505
437

R
The authors declare no conflict of interests. [29] J. Mayer, P. Roy, K. Mitra, Relation between caloric intake, body weight, and physical 506
work: studies in an industrial male population in West Bengal, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 4 507
(2) (1956) 169. 508
438 Acknowledgements [30] P. Caudwell, et al., The influence of physical activity on appetite control: an experi- 509

P
mental system to understand the relationship between exercise-induced energy ex- 510
439 The research reported was funded by the Biotechnology and Biolog- penditure and energy intake, Proc. Nutr. Soc. 70 (02) (2011) 171–180. 511
440 ical Research Council (BBSRC) grants BBS/B/05079 and BB/G005524/1, [31] J.E. Blundell, What foods do people habitually eat? A dilemma for nutrition, an 512
enigma for psychology, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 71 (1) (2000) 3–5.
D 513
441 and by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7 [32] E. Archer, G.A. Hand, S.N. Blair, Validity of US nutritional surveillance: National 514
442 2007–2013) under grant agreement number 266408. The authors Health and Nutrition Examination Survey caloric energy intake data, 1971–2010, 515
443 would like to thank Dr. James Stubbs, Dr. Stephen Whybrow and Dr. PLoS One 8 (10) (2013) e76632. 516
E
[33] J.E. Blundell, et al., Body composition and appetite: fat-free mass (but not fat mass or 517
444 Graham Horgan for scholarly support. BMI) is positively associated with self-determined meal size and daily energy intake 518
in humans, Br. J. Nutr. 107 (03) (2012) 445–449. 519
T

445 References [34] R. Smith, The ethics of ignorance, J. Med. Ethics 18 (3) (1992) 117. 520
[35] L. Lissner, et al., Body composition and energy intake: do overweight women over- 521
446 [1] B.K. Anand, J.R. Brobeck, Hypothalamic control of food intake in rats and cats, Yale J. eat and underreport? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 49 (2) (1989) 320–325. 522
C

447 Biol. Med. 24 (2) (1951) 123. [36] C. Weise, et al., Body composition and energy expenditure predict ad-libitum food 523
448 [2] J. Blundell, Is there a role for serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) in feeding? Int. J. and macronutrient intake in humans, Int. J. Obes. (Lond) (2013), http://dx.doi.org/ 524
449 Obes. (Lond) 1 (1) (1976) 15–42. 10.1038/ijo.2013.85. 525
526
E

450 [3] A. Sainsbury, L. Zhang, Role of the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus in regulation [37] Blundell, J.E. et al., Role of resting metabolic rate and energy expenditure in hunger
451 of body weight during energy deficit, Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 316 (2) (2010) 109–119. and appetite control: a new formulation. Dis. Model. Mech., 2012. 5(5): p. 608–613. 527
452 [4] M.K. Badman, J.S. Flier, The gut and energy balance: visceral allies in the obesity [38] Pedersen, B.K. and M.A. Febbraio, Muscles, exercise and obesity: skeletal muscle as a 528
529
R

453 wars, Science 307 (5717) (2005) 1909. secretory organ. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol., 2012. 8(8): p. 457–465.
454 [5] G.N. Wade, Regulation of body fat content? Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. [39] E. Ravussin, et al., Determinants of 24-hour energy expenditure in man. Methods 530
455 Physiol. 286 (1) (2004) R14–R15. and results using a respiratory chamber, J. Clin. Investig. 78 (6) (1986) 1568–1578. 531
456 [40] P. Caudwell, et al., Resting metabolic rate is associated with hunger, self-determined 532
R

[6] J. Mayer, Glucostatic mechanism of regulation of food intake, N. Engl. J. Med. 249 (1)
457 (1953) 13. meal size, and daily energy intake and may represent a marker for appetite, Am. J. 533
458 [7] S.M. Mellinkoff, et al., Relationship between serum amino acid concentration and Clin. Nutr. 97 (1) (2013) 7–14. 534
459 fluctuations in appetite, J. Appl. Physiol. 8 (5) (1956) 535. [41] C. Gibbons, et al., Validation of a new hand-held electronic data capture method for 535
O

460 [8] G. Kennedy, The role of depot fat in the hypothalamic control of food intake in the continuous monitoring of subjective appetite sensations, Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. 536
461 rat, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B-Biological Sciences, 140 Act. 8 (1) (2011) 57–64. 537
462 1953, p. 578. [42] R.J. Stubbs, et al., Measuring the difference between actual and reported food intakes 538
in the context of energy balance under laboratory conditions, Br. J. Nutr. 111 (11) 539
C

463 [9] Y. Zhang, et al., Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homo-
464 logue, Nature 372 (6505) (1994) 425–432. (2014) 2032–2043. 540
465 [10] G. Morton, et al., Central nervous system control of food intake and body weight, [43] A.G. Dulloo, J. Jacquet, L. Girardier, Poststarvation hyperphagia and body fat over- 541
466 Nature 443 (7109) (2006) 289–295. shooting in humans: a role for feedback signals from lean and fat tissues, Am. J. 542
N

467 [11] S.C. Woods, D.S. Ramsay, Food intake, metabolism and homeostasis, Physiol. Behav. Clin. Nutr. 65 (3) (1997) 717–723. 543
468 104 (1) (2011) 4–7. [44] D.J. Millward, A protein-stat mechanism for regulation of growth and maintenance 544
469 [12] E.D. Rosen, B.M. Spiegelman, Adipocytes as regulators of energy balance and glucose of the lean body mass, Nutr. Res. Rev. 8 (01) (1995) 93–120. 545
U

470 homeostasis, Nature 444 (7121) (2006) 847–853. [45] A. Flint, et al., Associations between postprandial insulin and blood glucose re- 546
471 [13] R.L. Leibel, The role of leptin in the control of body weight, Nutr. Rev. 60 (s10) sponses, appetite sensations and energy intake in normal weight and overweight 547
472 (2002) S15–S19. individuals: a meta-analysis of test meal studies, Br. J. Nutr. 98 (1) (2007) 17–25. 548
473 [14] E. Jequier, L. Tappy, Regulation of body weight in humans, Physiol. Rev. 79 (2) [46] M. Rosenbaum, et al., Energy intake in weight-reduced humans, Brain Res. 1350 549
474 (1999) 451. (2010) 95–102. 550
475 [15] J.L. Chan, et al., The role of falling leptin levels in the neuroendocrine and metabolic [47] B. Gutin, Diet vs exercise for the prevention of pediatric obesity: the role of exercise, 551
476 adaptation to short-term starvation in healthy men, J. Clin. Investig. 111 (9) (2003) Int. J. Obes. (Lond) 35 (1) (2011) 29–32. 552
477 1409–1421.
553

Please cite this article as: J.E. Blundell, et al., The biology of appetite control: Do resting metabolic rate and fat-free mass drive energy intake?,
Physiol Behav (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.031