0648-LMSDistTransfHandbk 0 PDF

Distribution Transformer
HANDBOOK
Copyright © 2009
International Copper Association Southeast Asia Ltd
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or

distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or
retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Foreword|
I t is hard to expect that energy prices will not continue to

increase in the next few decades. Climate change mitigation
will play an increasingly important role in the development of
power sector favouring renewable energy systems, energy
conservation and energy efficiency. Thus more and more
attention should be paid to energy losses.
According to our studies (“Global energy savings potential from high efficiency
distribution transformers”, ECI 2004) technical energy losses in all of the world’s
electrical distribution networks are at the level of one thousand TWh. About 30% of
these losses occur in distribution transformers which are one of the two largest loss
making components in electricity networks.
Although typical distribution transformers seem very efficient, the reduction of

losses in transformers may have almost no limits. However there is a certain
technological and economical optimum at which existing losses in distribution
transformers may be roughly halved reaching life cycle cost minimum at the same
time.
Replacing distribution transformers is relatively easy compared to lines or cables

and in the event, of highly inefficient units it is worthwhile to do it even before they
reach their technical lifetime. In the purchase decision process relating to newer
equipment, it is imperative to include the cost of losses in the investment
calculation.
As already stated, distribution transformers can bring economic benefits to users but
also environmental benefits for the society. The economic benefits will not always
remain in the investors’ hands as energy regulators may try to interfere in the
balance of capital and operating cost of distribution companies in order to protect
customers against rapid price increases. The customers will pay the cost of losses
for the entire transformer life, but will not see any rapid change in their electricity
bill.
A good practice, in the purchase decision criteria, is to perform a lifetime cost
analysis based on the capitalization formula. The relative data for this formula is:
energy prices projections, interest rates, transformer lifetime, transformer loading
and anticipated change in future loading. The other side of the equation presents the
transformer price and its dependence on the level of rated losses.
The analysis is not extremely difficult but may be sensitive to a number of

parameters, the most relevant of which may be interest rates, and lifetime but also
changes in commodity prices. Planning on a broad scale is a key component to
optimization. Large distribution companies quite often use procurement efficiency
standards to specify transformers. Such practices help manufacturers so that they
have prior knowledge of requirements and thus they know what they can expect
from buyers. In this case, a well prepared procurement procedure may prove useful
and will help to avoid misunderstandings between a buyer and a seller and should
lead to optimum purchasing decision with losses kept sufficiently in focus. We
think the rationale of this Handbook was to facilitate such a process.
Hans de Keulenaer Roman Targosz

Electrical Programme Manager Project Manager
European Copper Institute European Copper Institute
Introduction|
The Lower Mekong Subregion (LMS)
Harmonisation Programme
C ambodia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR),

Thailand and Vietnam have achieved different levels of
economic development. These countries in the Lower Mekong
Subregion (LMS) have strong economic inter-dependence.
Being developing countries, their power distribution systems, an

essential infrastructure, play a significant role in the economic
development. Energy end-users are dependent on the availability,
reliability, and quality of electricity from the power distribution
systems. The level of development and advancement of power
distribution systems has direct impact on the developmental
potential and economic growth, especially in urban cities.
The power distribution systems in the urban areas of these LMS countries, however,
do not have the same level of development. It is widely acknowledged that
harmonisation in the development of power distribution systems can benefit these
countries and accelerate their economic growth.
In 2005, six power partners entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

to share the intent of working together towards harmonisation of power distribution
systems in the following four LMS countries: Cambodia, Lao PDR, Thailand and
Vietnam. The founding partners are:
• Electricité du Cambodge (EDC), Cambodia

• Electricité du Laos (EDL), Lao PDR
• Ho Chi Minh City Power Company (HCMC PC), Vietnam
• Hanoi Power Company (HNPC), Vietnam
• Metropolitan Electricity Authority (MEA), Thailand
• International Copper Association Southeast Asia (ICASEA) [formerly known
as Copper Development Centre • Southeast Asia]
This led to a study of power distribution systems of the power partners in
Cambodia, Lao PDR and Vietnam; and the preparation of a regional cooperation
roadmap and action plan.
Building on the success of the first MOU, ICASEA and MEA inked a second MOU
to continue their strategic partnership in conducting further studies and facilitating
programmes as outlined in phase 2 of the road map and action plan. This impetus is
to enable the LMS countries to make further progress towards harmonisation and
the realisation of the objectives as set out in the MOU with all the power partners.
The study of power distribution systems in the LMS countries under the first MOU
had revealed that there are many differences in the power distribution systems in
this region. The objective of this second MOU was to narrow down the differences
in six key areas and enable the LMS countries to move towards greater
harmonization of their power distribution systems.
Preface|
Loss in the Power Distribution System is a common and
pressing concern expressed by Utilities in the LMS. Reducing
loss is the priority given the energy shortage arising from rapid
economic growth and high oil prices.
A Regional Loss Reduction Workshop for LMS Utilities was held in Phnom Penh,
Cambodia on 18 & 19 March 2008. It concluded with a consensus to, amongst
other areas of collaboration, reduce losses in the Power Distribution Systems of
EDC, EDL, HCMC PC and HNPC by harmonising technical specifications and
developing a best practices handbook for energy efficient equipment based on
international standards.
The views of and input from participating Utilities were crucial in the development
of technical specifications for the harmonisation of power equipment in the LMS.
Only with acceptance and implementation of the technical specifications can LMS
Utilities reduce losses associated with inefficient power equipment. Hence, a 6-
member Technical Working Group (TWG) comprising a senior technical
representative from each Utility and ICASEA was formed to participate and
contribute in discussions and meetings.
The objective of the TWG was to start with the development of technical
specifications to harmonise low loss power transformers in the LMS. This step-by-
step approach was to enable the participating Utilities to review and evaluate the
result of this Technical Working Group before collectively moving to the next step
of harmonising other equipment.
This handbook was developed to help LMS Utilities implement low loss
transformers. Reduction will only come when the minimum performance
guidelines are followed and implemented by all associated with the design of the
electricity grid, specifying the standards of equipment for procurement and
subsequently operating or maintaining them.
Members of the Technical Working Group:
Chairman
Mr.Surapon Soponkanaporn
Director of Research and Development Department, MEA
Electricite Du Cambodge (EDC), Cambodia
Mr. Lim Sisophuon
Deputy Chief, Dispatching Control Centre
Electricite Du Laos (EDL), Lao People’s Democratic Republic

Mr. Xanaphone Phonekeo
Deputy Manager, Technical Standards Office
Ho Chi Minh City Power Company (HCMC PC), Vietnam

Mr. Nguyen Duy Hoang
Electrical Engineer, Technical Department
Hanoi Power Company (HNPC), Vietnam

Mr. Vu Quang Hung / Mr Trinh Xuan Nguyen
Vice Director, Technical / Manager, Technical Department
Metropolitan Electricity Authority (MEA), Thailand

Mr. Werawat Buathong
Deputy Director, Power System Planning Division
Mr. Somchai Homklinkaew
Senior Electrical Engineer
Mr. Sompong Sittichaiyanan
Electrical Engineer
International Copper Association Southeast Asia (ICASEA)

Mr. Louis Koh
Project Leader, Power Distribution
Mr. Piyadith Lamaisathien
Country Manager, Thailand
MEA Project Support Team

Ms. Sutida Sindhvananda, Director of Int’l Services, Business Div.
Ms. Sasianong Vacharasikorn, Electrical Engineer
Ms. Suthiluck Wannadit, Executive Secretary
Acknowledgements|
T he harmonisation of power distribution systems in the

LMS will contribute to the expansion of the ASEAN
Power Grid. However, harmonisation requires a robust
partnership and sustained effort over many years.
The harmonisation of technical specifications together with the development of this
handbook is taking the process a step closer towards the realisation of the objectives
as set out in the strategic roadmap for the harmonisation of power distribution
systems in the LMS.
Strengthening regional cooperation to build the capacity of both technical and

functional staff would not have been possible without the endorsement and support
of:
Electricité du Cambodge, Cambodia

Mr. Keo Rottanak, Managing Director
Mr. Chan Sodavath, Deputy Managing Director
Electricité du Laos, Lao People’s Democratic Republic

Mr. Khammany Inthirath, Managing Director
Mr. Sisavath Thiravong, Deputy Managing Director
Mr. Boun Oum Syvanpheng, Deputy Managing Director
Ho Chi Minh City Power Company, Vietnam

Mr. Le Van Phuoc, Director
Mr. Tran Khiem Tuan, Deputy Director
Hanoi Power Company, Vietnam

Mr. Tran Duc Hung, Director
Mr. Vu Quang Hung, Vice Director, Technical
Mr. Nguyen Anh Tuan, Vice Director, Business
Metropolitan Electricity Authority, Thailand

Mr. Pornthape Thunyapongchai, Governor
Mr. Surapon Soponkanaporn, Director, Research & Development
Department
International Copper Association Southeast Asia

Mr. Steven Sim, Chief Executive Officer
Contents|
Chapter 1
Preparation of National Normative Technical Specification of Distribution
Transformer
1. Introduction
2. Objective
3. Principle specification
4. Electricité du Cambodge - Additional Specification
5. Electricité du Laos - Additional Specifications
6. Ho Chi Minh City Power Company - Additional Specification
7. Hanoi Power Company - Additional Specification
8. References
Chapter 2
Bidding Evaluation
1. Introduction
2. Objective
3. Formula Analysis
4. How to Evaluate The Best Choice
5. Excess Losses and Penalty
6. The Low Loss Limitation Table
7. Conclusion
8. Appendices
Chapter 3
Transformer Production Inspection
1. Introduction
2. Objective
3. Inspection committee management
4. Inspection Process
5. Conclusion
Chapter 4
Contract Acceptance
1. Introduction
2. Objective
3. Acceptance Committee Management
4. Acceptance Process
5. Conclusion
Chapter 5
Installation and Operation
1. Introduction
2. Objective
3. Construction Standard
4. Loading Guide
5. Conclusion
Chapter 6
Maintenance and Asset Management
1. Introduction
2. Transformer Load Monitoring (TLM)
3. Maintenance and Inspection
4. Conclusion
Figures
Figure 1: Expenses generated by transformer price and cost of electricity losses
Figure 2: Calculation of the present value of no-load loss
Figure 3: Calculation of the present value of no-load loss in actual costs
Figure 4: Calculation of the present value of load loss
Figure 5: Calculation of the present value of load loss in actual costs
Figure 6: Evaluation formula analysis
Figure 7: Production Process Flow
Figure 8: Silicon Steel Core Loss Curve
Figure 9: Test circuit & Apparatus Configuration for No-load Loss Measurement
Figure 10: Test Circuit & Apparatus Configuration for Load Loss Measurement
Figure 11: Punch List Form
Figure 12: List of approval drawings
Figure 13: Sample Drawing of Technical and Guaranteed Data
Figure 14: Supplier’s routine test report
Figure 15: Acceptance routine test report
Figure 16: Penalty Calculation without raising the Guarantee Value
Figure 17: Penalty Calculation with Raising the Guarantee Values
Figure 18: Construction drawing for transformer installation (single concrete pole)
Figure 19: Bill of material for transformer installation (single concrete pole)
Figure 20: Construction drawing for transformer installation (platform)
Figure 21: Bill of material for transformer installation (platform)
Figure 22: Transformer load monitoring (TLM) system configuration
Tables
Table 1: The low loss limitation of no-load & load loss for each transformer rating
Table 2: Table of power efficiency for low losses transformer
Table 3: Example of standard loss transformers
Table 4: Temperature condition of transformer
Table 5: Minimum permissible insulation resistance measurement
Chapter 1
Preparation of National Normative Technical
Specification of Distribution Transformer
1. Introduction
This is the first normative specification for distribution transformers. It is prepared
for the Lower Mekong Sub-region (LMS) utilities which are: Electricité du
Cambodge (EDC) Cambodia, Electricité du Laos (EDL), Lao People’s Democratic
Republic, Hanoi Power Company (HNPC), Ho Chi Minh City Power Company
(HCMCPC) Vietnam, and the Metropolitan Electricity Authority (MEA), Thailand.
The specifications refer to the latest edition of international and national standards.
Single-phase, three-phase and oil-immersed transformers are covered in the
discussion. The scope also includes transformers with maximum voltages of 36 kV,
off-circuit tap changing, frequency of 50 Hz and those of neutral solidly grounded at
the distribution substation and as well as outdoor application.
2. Objective
The Primary goal is to help to reduce losses caused by the ineffective use of
transformers, and minimize the need for new investment, through teaching the
utilities' about loss reduction programs and minimizing negative environmental
impact on our tomorrow.
The secondary goals are to: encourage greater energy efficiency in low loss energy
consuming transformers, create new national standards, start cost effective savings
programs in both utilities and customers, reduce losses from utility-owned
transformers and minimize life cycle costs. In addition, this will provide not only
more energy, but also decrease the investment cost of constructing new distribution
substations, while meeting the customers demand.
3. Principle Specification
Scope: This specification is created for power utility companies in LMS.
1

Transformers shall be connected to the system with neutral solidly grounded at the
distribution substations and fault level values in normal distribution status between
20kA and 25kA.
Site and Service Condition: LMS utilities operate in a tropical climate. The altitude
ranges from 0 meters to 1,800 meters above sea level, ambient temperature ranges
from 30°C to 45°C and relative humidity measures mostly 100%.
Reference Standard: International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) is the

common reference standard for all LMS utilities and a majority of countries around
the world. For transformers, IEC 60076 series is the key reference. Some utilities
also refer to their National standards which correspond to IEC except special
requirements such as temperature, installation, etc.
Test, Inspection and Test Report: There will be two main test reports, specifically
Type Test and Routine Test reports. Because the transformer is a very critical and
expensive piece of equipment, the type test report is a key source of information for
purchase assessment and decision.
Type Test contains data that validate factors such as design, raw material,
workmanship and quality control during the manufacturing process are well within
standard limits. The Routine Test certifies that all units pass limited values
according to the reference standards before installation for service. The Utility
reserves the right to send representatives to invigilate all required tests on the
manufacturer’s site. Thus, sampling of the first batch of the transformers lies in the
responsibility of the Utility’s representatives.
Drawings and Instructions: The supplier shall furnish six copies of all significant
details of the transformer to the Utility for response in approval within a stipulated
timeframe.
To protect mutual interest in cases of delayed or late submission, compensation

terms shall be specified in the contract. Special installation instructions,
characteristic curves, installation instructions and instruction manuals with the
contract number marked thereon, in the metric system, shall be machine printed or
typed and delivered prior to the first shipment.
Ratings and Features: The major characteristic of the transformer must be properly
specified, such as suggested in the following:
Type Overhead, outdoor type, three phase, mineral-oil-filled
Frequency 50 Hz
Cooling method ONAN
kVA ratings To be specified during bid

Temperature rise
60 degree (winding), 55 degree (oil)
(winding, Top oil)
2

High-voltage rating 6 kV, 10 kV, 22 kV or 35 kV
Low-voltage rating 400 V
Tap ±2 x 2.5 % or +4x2.5%
Vector group Dyn11 or Dyn1
Insulation level
Voltage Rating 400V, 6kV, 10kV 15kV 22kV 35kV

BIL Full Wave (kV
N/A 50 70 125 170
crest)
Power Frequency
N/A 28 38 50 70
Test Voltage (kV)
Impedance voltage
kVA Range from 50 to 3200
Nominal value Range from 4% to 7%
General Requirements
The transformer shall be self-cooled and/or designed with sealed-tank to ensure that
forced cooling is not required. The transformer installation methods such as single
concrete pole or platform concrete pole shall also be included. To protect the
transformer from damage caused by lightning, it will be the most efficient and
practical to install three lightning arresters on the transformer tank cover.
The lightning arrester shall be of the distribution class with a ground lead
disconnector, gapless or gapped with metal oxide as main elements.
The gaskets shall be specified to withstand hot oil of extremely high temperatures
and have a life span of more than 20 years.
One of the plans included to reduce system losses, is to up-rate the distribution
voltage; the dual voltage switch type shall be required such as 12/24 kV,
The kVA rating value should be visibly specified and easy to locate for field
workers. The information regarding the centre of gravity (CG) of the transformer is
essential for the installation and to improve safety for the field workers.
The concrete poles need to be designed to withstand the bending moment which is
calculated by accounting for the weight of the transformer, associated equipment,
cables, and wind speed. Hence, all transformers are recommended to have weight
limits. Transformers installed in close proximity to public facilities such as
3

hospitals, schools, etc shall also be designed to keep noise level within 58 to 68
decibels. Transformers installed near hospitals, schools and important places should
also be designed to generate audible noise within the limit of 58 to 68 decibels.
Tank and Cover
The material for fabricating the tank side walls and bottom shall be corrosion
resistant. Rust-preventive finishing shall be strongly recommended for units with
more than 20 years of service life. The paint coat shall depend on utilities’
requirement in preferred colours.
Core
It is necessary to mention the quality of the core material, such as high permeability
silicon steel, because no-load loss is mainly caused by the core material. The core
construction shall be firmly fixed in the tank and designed to avoid the occurrence
of loosened core strips due to vibration from road traffic. Adequate cooling
facilities shall also be provided at the oil ducts.
The magnetic circuit shall be grounded in accordance with practices mentioned in

the specification. The different maximum flux density is designed to meet 1.55 to
1.65 Tesla to prevent harmonic behaviour.
Windings
The winding or coil shall be made of copper for better performance based on
technical and economic comparisons. To cater to the physical characteristic, the
winding shall be designed to withstand thermal and mechanical effects caused by
external short circuits. The coil clamping arrangement and clamping rings shall be
designed to withstand force due to short circuit. To cater to the electrical
characteristic, the winding shall be designed and assembled to handle temperature
increase specified in the tender specification. The insulation of winding and
connections shall not be likely to soften, loose, shrink or collapse during service.
Insulating Oil
As mineral oil is used as the insulation and cooling mechanism; it should be well
filtered and tested to meet the dielectric strength (which is not less than 30kV)
before filling in the transformer tank. The insulating oil dielectric taken from a new
transformer shall not be less than 26 kV as tested by the method specified by ASTM
D877.
Bushings and Terminals
The requirements for bushings and terminals should be specified for different
applications such as platform transformer or pole mounted transformer to facilitate
installation, monitoring and maintenance. To maintain the current integrity
throughout the equipment’s useful lifecycle, the connectors shall be made with
solderless tin-plated copper; two belleville spring washer, coned-disk types shall be
supplied to provide adequate pressure on the conductor during thermal-cycling. The
4

size of the terminals or connectors, both high voltage and low voltage, shall be
subjected to the transformer capacity. The bushing cover shall be made of ultra-
violet radiation resistant and track resistant plastic or rubber to protect equipment
from impairments caused by animals such as birds, squirrels and snakes, etc.
Accessory Equipment
The transformers will be equipped with standard accessories, at least with lifting
lugs, tap changer, manual pressure relief fitting, nameplate, tank grounding pad or
stud, etc. Other accessories will be also specified depending on the size and
application.
3.1. Transformer Evaluated Cost
Typically, the transformer price depends on core and winding loss i.e. high loss
transformers have a lower cost, and the low loss transformer a higher one.
Thus, Utilities work out an “evaluation formula” which takes into
consideration many factors such as: transformer service life, load factor,
operation and maintenance cost, interest rate and inflation rate, etc. Each
utility should compute the cost estimate based on updated data. This shall
eventually be used in the bid comparison for the evaluation of unit costs and
losses. The following is an example of cost evaluation.
A = B + XC + YD
Where
A = Evaluated cost of transformer in any currency
B = Unit cost of transformer converted into US Dollars according to the
evaluation clause specified in the bid condition
C = No-load loss at room temperature not more than 30°C in kW
D = Load loss in kW
X = Constant value for No-load condition
Y = Constant value for Loading condition
Excess Losses and Penalty
The excess loss and penalty will concentrate on transformer losses which are higher
than guaranteed no-load and load losses including allowable tolerances stated in the
reference standards. It will be divided into the following two cases:
a. The individual transformer loss is higher than tolerance: Individual transformer

with losses beyond the limits will be rejected unless the supplier agrees to
increase the guaranteed value of average losses of all transformers,
compensated at 1.5 times (arbitrary value) of the evaluation formula.
b. The total number of transformers: In the event that the supplier’s report shows
that the no-load and load loss values conform to the guaranteed values within
the tolerance limit, the utility shall conduct sampling on the transformers for
their individual loss measurement (i.e. the number of transformers depends on
utilities’ facility, but normally 5% of the contracted quantity or at least one unit
5

for small quantity order).
If the average values of no-load loss and load losses are higher than average
losses from the manufacturer test report by 2.5% (arbitrary value), the
manufacturer measured value will be adjusted by the ratio of difference
between both sets of measurements, and use the adjusted losses for the
calculation of loss compensation. Otherwise the losses from the manufacturer’s
report will be used.
Additional Requirements for Marking and Packing
Consideration shall be given to facilitate convenient clearing from the port customs.
The transformers shall be shipped oil-ed with the serial number properly indicated
in the invoice. All spare parts shall be delivered with the first shipment to ensure
that spares are available in the event of need. . Equipment or instruments packed in
the cartons shall be firmly attached on pallets for easy handling.
Additional Requirements for Responsibility
In the event of breakdown within the period of warranty, the manufacturer shall
promptly investigate, repair or replace the unit. All replacement shall be made with
60 days from the first notice, or risk forfeiting equipment performance and security.
4. Electricité du Cambodge - Additional

Specification
This section discusses about the additional specifications specially collated for
Electricité du Cambodge of Cambodia (EDC).
4.1. For Reliable Performance of the Transformer
EDC should consider adding technical information as follows:

a. Short circuit test reports that prove that the design, raw materials and
workmanship of the manufactures are adequate, and that they possess a
high level of quality control management.
b. The lightning arresters should be specified to be installed on the
transformer tank’s cover to effectively protect the transformer itself. The
lightning arrester ground lead isolator operation test is required to be
submitted with the quotation.
c. The transformers shall not produce audible noise exceeding the specified
limits due to environmental disturbance, especially when installed near
hospitals, temples and schools, etc.
4.2. For Loss Reduction:
It has been reported that the EDC’s total losses are approximately of 10% of
6

those in the year 2007. The utility has begun many activities to aid in reducing
losses, including hosting conferences which invited papers and research from
different experienced utilities. EDC plans to reduce the loss to 7% by the year
2012. One of the programs suggested in this Handbook is to acquire and/or
increase the use of low loss transformers in EDC’s system.
It is better to start by using an evaluation formula for a specific time period, for
example 5 years. After this period, the EDC will have learned about the
advanced transformer technology efficiency improvement by compiling
records of the best values of no-load loss and load loss for each rating and
applying it to the guaranteed low loss transformer table, included in the
transformer specification for implementation.
a. In the basic loss evaluation process, three transformer figures are:

purchase price, no-load loss and load loss. For the purposes of bid
comparison, the transformer unit cost and losses shall be evaluated to
obtain the evaluated transformer’s cost according to the formula below:
A = B +7,121C +2,939D
Where
A = Evaluated cost of transformer in US Dollars.
B = Unit cost of transformer converted into US Dollars according to the
evaluation clause specified in the bid condition.
C = No-load loss at room temperature not more than 30°C in kW.
b. No-load Loss: Typically, it is called core loss or iron loss. The no-load
loss is a constant value varying for each designed transformer rating and
is present no matter if the load is connected or not.
There are two types of core losses: hysteresis loss and eddy current loss.
The core material development progressed from hot-rolled steel to the
cold-rolled grain oriented silicon steels (CGO) to reduce the core losses. It
has since advanced to the new technology of high permeability grain
oriented steel (HiB) that controls the domains of the iron crystals by laser
etching.
Finally, another technology of amorphous iron has been gradually applied

in some countries. Its deployment is limited because of the limited
number of manufacturers and sophisticated production lines which need
highly skilled workers and non-typical instruments. Nowadays, the low
loss transformers are more often used in large cities in order to reduce the
total system losses and to avoid construction of new substations in
expensive locations in attractive city centres. HiB grain oriented steels
together with experienced design, advanced core cutting and slitting
machine, high skilled fabrication and assembly, may exhibit transformer
efficiencies of up to 99.7%.
c. Load Loss: When the load is connected, the transformer will supply the
power to that load and produce resistive losses in windings as well as
eddy current losses in windings, structural steelwork and tank. These load
7

losses increase proportionally to the square of the load current. To reduce
the load losses, the designer may increase the cross section of the
windings. The designer must keep in mind, however, how it will affect
flux density and core losses.
Most of the transformer windings will be made of copper due to its high
conductivity and subsequent effect on energy efficiency, size reduction
and energy saving. The technology of the copper windings is remarkably
developed to withstand the short circuit strength, to prolong the service
life and safety by using copper foil instead of windings which can also
reduce eddy current loss from non-linear loads. There is another solution
to improve the load loss reduction by upgrading the copper windings to
super-conducting windings, but unfortunately, this new technology of
super-conducting transformers is not ready for market deployment due to
a number of technical obstacles and high construction cost.
d. Extra losses due to harmonics: Harmonics can be caused by the

source and the loads. The transformer is a component with a magnetizing
circuit which is sensitive to the harmonic distortion when it is designed to
perform near to the yield point of the steel characteristics. Some
components of the transformer’s non-linear loads are: TV sets, computers,
UPS systems, variable speed drives, inverters and other instruments which
convert alternating current (AC) to direct current (DC) supply. Harmonics
not only present an extra load loss, but also de-rate the transformer
capacity and affect the transformers’ service life. To prevent this
harmonic effect, the utility must set harmonic restrictions both voltage and
current generated to the industries which are the major contributors to
power distortion in the distribution system.
4.3. Transformer Loss Reduction Benefits
Transformer losses are one of the main losses in the distribution system.
However, more research is necessary to predict and design a typical model that
takes into account items such as: the detailed loading patterns, types of
transformer, operation, and loading guides. When achieved, this will aid in
achieving: energy cost savings, greenhouse gas reduction, CO2 reduction and
increased ability for emissions trading. Nowadays, the trend of both the
manufacturers and the utilities is to try to meet high efficiency transformer
performance while maximizing production capability and minimizing
investment costs.
• Reduce total energy loss:
Eloss[kWh] = (P0 + Pk * I ² ) * 8,760

Where:
Eloss is total energy loss
P0 is the no-load loss [kW].
Pk is the load loss [kW].
I is the rms-average load of the transformer.
8,760 is the number of hours in a year
8

• Increase power efficiency of a transformer:
EP = Load power/ [Load power + Power loss]

= PL / [PL + PC + PW]
Where:
The real power delivered to the load is: PL watts
The No-load core loss is: PC watts
The Load Loss is: PW watts
• Increase life cycle cost
TCCloss = Eloss * C * (1 + r) ⁿ - 1/ r * (1 + r) ⁿ
Where:
TCCloss = Total Capitalized Cost of the losses
C = the estimated average electricity cost per kWh
r = the cost of capital
n = the life time of the transformer in years
ELoss = Total energy loss
• Environmental and Health Costs
These environmental and health costs originate from the various types of
emissions resulting from the combustion of fossil fuels. Apart from CO2,
the main offenders are SO2 and NOx which contribute to the acidification
of the environment. According to the Kyoto Protocol, the use of low loss
energy transformers can show a positive effect on carbon credits and can
balance the global warming effect. This will support the country’s policy
of the installation of more clean energy systems such as solar energy,
wind turbines, energy from waste energy, etc.
5. Electricité du Laos - Additional Specifications
This section discusses about the additional specifications specially collated for
Electricité du Laos of Lao PDR (EDL).
5.1. For Reliable Performance of the Transformer:
EDL should consider adding technical information as follows:

• Short circuit test reports to prove that the design, raw material and
workmanship of the manufactures are adequate experienced and represent
high level of quality control management.
• The lightning arresters should be specified to be installed on the
9

• The transformers shall not produce audible noise exceeding the specified
limits due to environment disturbance especially, when installed near
It has been reported that the EDL’s total losses are approximately 17.5% of
those in the year 2007. The utility has begun many activities to aid in reducing
different experienced utilities. EDL plans to reduce the total system losses. One
of the programs suggested in this Handbook is to acquire and/or increase the
use of low loss transformers in EDL’s system.
example 5 years. After this period, EDC will have learned about the advanced
transformer technology efficiency improvement by compiling records of the
best values of no-load loss and load loss for each rating and applying it to the
guaranteed low loss transformer table, included in the transformer specification
for implementation.

purchase price, no-load loss and load loss. For the purpose of bid
obtain the evaluated transformer cost according to the formula below:
A = B +5,000C +3,500D
Where
B = Unit cost of transformer converted to US Dollars according to the
is present no matter if the load is connected or not.
There are two types of core losses: hysteresis loss and eddy current loss.
has advanced to the new technology of high permeability grain oriented
steel (HiB) that controls the domains of the iron crystals by laser etching.

loss transformers are more often used in the capital or large cities in order
to reduce the total system losses and to avoid construction of new
substations in expensive locations in attractive city centres. HiB grain
oriented steels together with experienced design, advanced core cutting
10

and slitting machine, high skilled fabrication and assembly, may exhibit
transformer efficiencies of up to 99.7%.
windings. He must keep in mind, however, how it will affect flux density
and core losses.
and energy savings. The technology of the copper windings is remarkably

source and the loads. The transformer is a component of the magnetizing
harmonic effect, the utility must set harmonic restrictions both voltage
and current generated to the industries which are the major contributors to
However, more research is necessary to predict and design a typical model that
takes into account items such as: the detailed loading patterns, types of
transformer, operation, and loading guides. When obtained, this will aid in
achieving: energy cost savings, greenhouse gas reduction, CO2 reduction and
increased ability for emissions trading. Nowadays, the trend of both the
manufacturers and the utilities is to try to meet high efficiency transformer
performance while maximizing production capability and minimizing
investment costs.
Eloss[kWh] = (P0 + Pk * I ² ) * 8,760
11

Where:
I is the rms-average load of the transformer

= PL / [PL + PC + PW]
Where:
Where:
C = the estimated average cost per kWh
energy transformers can show positive effect on carbon credits and can
6. Ho Chi Minh City Power Company - Additional

Specification
This section discusses about the additional specifications specially collated for Ho
Chi Minh City Power Company (HCMCPC).
6.1. For Reliable Performance of the Transformer
HCMC PC should consider adding the following technical information:
12

• Short circuit test reports to prove that the design, raw material and
workmanship of the manufactures are adequate and represent a high level
of quality control management.
limits due to environment disturbance especially, when installed near
It has been reported that the HCMC PC’s total losses are approximately 7.07%
of those in 2007. The utility has begun many activities to aid in reducing
different experienced utilities. HCMCPC plans to reduce the total system
losses. One of the programs suggested in this Handbook is to acquire and/or
increase the use of low loss transformers in HCMC PC’s system.
example 5 years. After this period, EDC will have learned about the advanced
transformer technology efficiency improvement by compiling records of the
best values of no-load loss and load loss for each rating and applying it to the
guaranteed low loss transformer table, included in the transformer specification
for implementation.

purchase price, no-load loss and load loss. For the purpose of bid
obtain the evaluated transformer cost according to the formula below:
A = B +4,080C +2,220D
Where
B = Unit cost of transformer converted in US Dollars according to
the evaluation clause specified in the bid condition.
is present no matter if the load is connected or not. There are two types of
core losses: hysteresis loss and eddy current loss.

13

transformer efficiencies of up to 99.7%.
and core losses.

harmonic effect, the utility must set harmonic restrictions both voltage
and current generated to the industries which are the major contributors to
However, more cases or research to predict and design a typical model taking
into account the detailed loading patterns, types of transformer, operation, and
loading guides are needed. This will result in energy cost savings, greenhouse
gas reduction, CO2 reduction and emission trading. Nowadays, the trend of
both the manufacturer and the utility is to try to meet high efficiency
14

transformer performance while maximizing production capability and the
minimizing the investment cost.
Eloss[kWh] = (P0 + Pk * I ² ) * 8,760

Where:
• Increase power efficiency of a transformer

= PL / [PL + PC + PW]
Where:
Where:
15

7. Hanoi Power Company - Additional
Specification
This section discusses the additional specifications specially collated for Hanoi
Power Company, Vietnam (HNPC).
7.1. For reliable performance of the transformer:
HNPC should consider adding technical information as follows:

• Short circuit test reports to prove that the design, raw materials and
workmanship of the manufactures are adequate and they have a high level
of quality control management.
limits due to environmental disturbance, especially when installed near
It has been reported that the HNPC’s total losses are approximately of 8.85%
of those in the year 2007. The utility has begun many activities to aid in
reducing losses, including hosting conferences which invited papers and
research from different experienced utilities. HNPC plans to reduce the loss to
7% by the year 2012. One of the programs suggested in this Handbook is to
acquire and/or increase the use of low loss transformers in HNPC’s s system.
example 5 years. After this period, the HNPC’s will have learned about the
advanced transformer technology efficiency improvement by compiling
records of the best values of no-load loss and load loss for each rating and
applying it to the guaranteed low loss transformer table, included in the
transformer specification for implementation
a. In the basic loss evaluation process, three transformer figures are purchase
price, no-load loss and load loss. For the purpose of bid comparison, the
transformer unit cost and losses shall be evaluated to get the transformer
evaluated cost according to the formula below:
A = B +6,300C +1,300D
Where
B = Unit cost of transformer converted in US Dollars according to the
16

is present no matter if the load is connected or not. There are two types of
core losses: hysteresis loss and eddy current loss.


transformer efficiencies of up to 99.7%
and core losses.

harmonic effect, the utility must set harmonic restrictions both voltage and
17

current generated to the industries which are the major contributors to
However, more cases or research to predict and design a typical model taking
into account the detailed loading patterns, types of transformer, operation, and
loading guides are needed. This will result in energy cost savings, greenhouse
gas reduction, CO2 reduction and emission trading. Nowadays, the trend of
both the manufacturer and the utility is to try to meet high efficiency
transformer performance while maximizing production capability and the
minimizing the investment cost.

Eloss[kWh] = (P0 + Pk * I ² ) * 8,760
Where:

= PL / [PL + PC + PW]
Where:

Where:
18

8. References
• Energy saving in industrial distribution transformers transformer
losses, May 2002, W.T.J. Hulshorst and J.F. Groeman (KEMA)
• The Potential for Global Energy Savings from High Efficiency
Distribution Transformers, February, 2005, (Roman Targosz, editor ;
Main authors and reviewers: Ronnie Belmans, Jan Declercq, Hans de
Keulenaer, Katsuaki Furuya, Mayur Karmarkar, Manuel Martinez,
Mike McDermott, Ivo Pinkiewicz)
• Technical Report, Distribution Transformers : Proposal to Increase
MEPS Levels, October 2007, T R Blackburn
19

Chapter 2
Bidding Evaluation
1. Introduction
This chapter is to guide and assist the utility to learn about the solution, and from
what criteria it is derived. Only distribution transformers will be discussed in this
handbook. Therefore, there will three factors: purchase price of the transformer,
load losses and no-load losses which shall be considered.
The lowest evaluated cost including losses will be the criteria utilized to choose the
initial proposal that the utility will study before making a contract. It will affect the
utility investment cost, paying a little more for low loss transformers, but in return it
can save more money than the cumulated value of losses during transformer
operation. The penalty values should be specified as well in the bid documents.
2. Objective
The trade off between the transformer’s price and the losses of the transformer is
simplified in the tender specification. It is accomplished by adding the evaluation
formula where the purchase cost minus the loss, which reflects the utilities’ true
investment cost.
The manufacturers should offer their best design capability and highest quality of
raw materials and workmanship in order to convince the utilities to invest in energy
efficient transformers.
3. Formula Analysis
There are many factors to be taken into account in the evaluation formula which are:
no-load loss, load loss, interest rate, inflation rate, electricity unit cost, operation &
maintenance cost and transformer service life. All these values differ due to
fluctuations in the economy and government policies which each utility operates in.
20

3.1. Interest Rate
Interest rates are an important part of a loan; they help determine its total cost.
Each utility has to apply for a loan in both local and foreign countries. It is
typical that the local loan will be less advantageous in terms of interest rate,
grace period and repayment terms than a foreign one. It is recommended that
one ask for all of this information, from the Finance Department or the
Department which responds to the loan application.
3.2. Inflation Rate
The purpose of this factor is to show the effect of the inflation rate on the real
value of the money. In fact, a substantial increase in the price of transformers
is related to an increase in the inflation rate which means a decrease in the
value of money. As inflation rate increases, the price of goods increases. As
with the interest rate analysis, the finance department will analyze and provide
the real figures. These figures will differ from country to country.
3.3. Electricity Price Purchased
Some countries have divided the generation utility and distribution utility; in
this case it is common for distribution utility to get the average electricity unit
purchased from the generation utility. But some countries have an organization
who owns both power generation and distribution. In this case, the electricity
unit purchase will be calculated on the basis of the investment cost of
electricity unit production at the point of the terminal station where electricity
is sold to customers.
3.4. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Expenses in Distribution

System
This cost (USD/kW/Year) must be calculated from the accumulated actual

expenses as follows:
- Transformer and distribution cost
- Customs accounting and collections cost
- Administrative and general costs
- Depreciation cost
As shown, this figure is obtained and calculated from information from many
disparate groups and/or different departments, the more realistic the expenses,
the more accurate the operating & maintenance costs.
3.5. Distribution Transformer Life
This is understood as the average service life of the transformer in number of

years. Some transformers may still be in service after 25 years, while others
21

may only reach the age of 15. After discussions with reputable transformer
manufacturers, all confirm that the recommend service life of the transformers
is typically to be 20 years for regular loading according to the international
standards.
The evaluation formula analysis starts from the no-load loss calculation. Once
the transformer is energized, the utility has to pay both the transformer cost and
the cost of electricity losses or energy losses consists of no-load loss (core loss)
and load loss (winding loss) throughout the life of the transformer as shown in
Figure 1.
Price of
Transformer
Cost of
Electricity Losses
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year N

Figure 1: Expenses generated by transformer price and cost of electricity losses
a. Criteria for calculation of no-load loss used in this case

• Distribution transformer life = 20 years
• Interest rate = 6.26%
• Inflation rate = 1.56%
• Electricity unit purchased = 0.0597 $/kWh
• O&M expenses in distribution system = 29.29 $/kW/Year
The cost of no-load loss will be generated by the transformer core which
means that once the transformer is energized, this loss is present
throughout the transformers life and calculated back to present value as
shown in Figure 2.
Cost of
No-Load Losses
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year N
Computation of
Present Value
Year 0
Figure 2: Calculation of the present value of no-load loss
22

The result is calculated from the values of criteria as shown in clause a.,
using the formula of present value and is shown in Figure 3.
No-load expenses = (0.0597 x 8,760) + 29.29

= 552.3 $/kW/Year
Present Value calculation result

= 552.3 (1-(1.0156/1.0626)20) (1.0156) / (1+0.0626) (1-
(1.0156/1.0626))
= 7,109.29 $/kW (see Figure 3)
$552.30/kW/year
Computation of
Present Value
$7,109.29/kW
Year 0
Figure 3: Calculation of the present value of no-load loss in actual costs
b. Criteria for calculation of load loss used in this case.

• Distribution transformer life 20 years
• Interest rate = 6.26%
• Inflation rate = 1.56%
• Electricity unit purchased = 0.0597 $/kWh
• O&M expenses in distribution system = 29.29 $/kW/Year
• Loss factor 0.3803 (see more detailed below)
Loss factor = 0.84(Load factor)2 + 0.16(Load factor)

= 0.84(0.5843)2 + 0.16(0.5843)
= 0.3803
Remark: Load factor (distribution system) = 0.5843

(Formula from REA Bulletin 160-1)
The cost of load loss will reflect resistive losses in the windings and leads,
and losses generated by eddy currents in the windings, the structural
steelwork, and the tank, throughout the transformer life and calculated
back to present value as shown in Figure 4.
23

Cost of
Load Losses
Computation of
Present Value
Year 0
Figure 4: Calculation of the present value of load loss
The result is calculated from the values of criteria as shown in clause b.,
using the formula of present value and is shown in Figure 5.
Load loss expenses = (0.0597 x 8,760 x 0.3803) + 29.29

= 228.18 $/kW/Year
Present value of Load loss expense = 2,936.95 $/kW (20 years) (see
Figure 5)
$228.18/kW/year
Computation of
Present Value
$2,936.95/kW
Year 0
Figure 5: Calculation of the present value of load loss in actual costs
A = B + 7,109C + 2,936D (see Figure 6)

Where
A = Evaluated cost in USD
B = Transformer price in USD
24

C = No-load loss of transformer in kW
D = Load loss of transformer in kW
The evaluation formula analysis is shown in Figure 6 consisting of the components:

the price of transformer, the no-load loss and the load loss at the present values
calculated for the entire 20 year service life of transformer.
Price of
Transformer ($)
7,109C
2,936D
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2

Figure 6: Evaluation formula analysis
4. How to Evaluate The Best Choice

Often, engineers are asked to choose the best transformer with a suitable price (as
low as possible). Best choice means utilizing many factors from which to decide
upon the best transformer for the money. As discussed, engineers will not only
analyze the price or cost of the transformer, but will also consider quality which
leads to loss issues as well. In this case that typically means total losses of the
transformer. Of course, its characteristics must conform to the reference standards.
The following example will show the Least Cost Analysis for the two transformers
having ratings of 24 kV 3-phase 500 kVA capacity and conform to the same
reference standards or specification, but the transformer price, no load loss and load
loss are different as shown below.
After applying the evaluation formula A = B + 7,109C + 2,936D, it can be seen

that in this case, the transformer with the price of UDS 24,533.- will be selected
because its evaluated cost is cheaper which means it will return more profit in the
future within 20 years. In fact, it can be less than 20 years if there is an increase in
the cost of raw materials, workmanship, interest rates and/or cost of living. The
benefit will be realized earlier than shown in the formula.
Transformer X Transformer Y
[Low Loss] [Standard Loss]
kVA 500 500
Price($) 24,533 15,758
No load(kW) 0.67 0.97
Load loss(kW) 3.030 5.500
Evaluated cost($) 38,192 38,801
Preferred Selection
25

5. Excess Losses and Penalty
Transformers will always have losses. It cannot be avoided. The amount of the loss
depends on the quality of workmanship of each crew and the factory’s experience.
Therefore, international standards limit the tolerances which the utilities will refer to
in accepting a transformer. The process to deal with the acceptance of the
transformers which are in excess of the guaranteed values will be explained,
including a discussion of the penalty clause which has been used for over twenty
years.
After the supplier delivers the transformers to the utility together with the routine
test report, all units of the transformers technical information will be reported,
according to the contract. The testing values of no-load loss and load loss will be
calculated and declared for each unit with its separate serial number. The acceptance
process is explained as follows:
a. Limits of tolerance:-
No-load loss: not more than +10%
No-load loss + Load loss: not more than +6%
b. The individual transformer having losses beyond the limits of tolerance will be
rejected immediately
c. If average losses of all transformers of the same kVA rating exceeds the
guaranteed value but remains within the limits of tolerance, the penalty will
be:
No-load loss at USD 10,697 / kW x N.
Load loss at USD 4,424 / kW x N.
Where N = Number of transformers.
In the event of negotiation and/or dispute over loss tolerance, the maximum
value of the transformer shall be used to compute tolerance limits relating to
higher guaranteed values. In this case, the supplier shall bear all penalties
rightful of total purchase made.
6. The Low Loss Limitation Table

Some utilities have applied the evaluation formula for more than 20 years. Finally,
the low loss values of the transformer will be reached to maximize profits to the
utility. These low loss values will be adjusted and arranged in the table for each
rating. The transformers losses in the table are the lowest losses that most of the
reputable manufacturers can design and keep to meet the contract values which all
transformers shall not exceed.
26

Transformer Rating Transformer Loss (Watt)
(kVA) No Load Loss Load Loss
15 70 160
45 160 360
75 220 580
112.5 255 840
150 300 1,000
225 420 1,530
300 480 1,860
500 670 3,030
750 840 4,370
1,000 1,000 6,400
1,500 1,200 10,000
Table 1: The low loss limitation of no-load & load loss for each transformer rating
• All transformer losses shall be within the limits without any tolerance.
For each transformer rating, and each lot of shipment, the utility will sample
the transformers for their own loss measurement purposes, at quantity specified
by the contract. The transformers will be accepted if the measured losses for
the sample are within the limits.
In the event that one of the samples has loss(es) higher than the limits in Table
1, the Utility will resample the transformers from the same lot in the same
quantity as the first sampling. All transformers in that lot will be rejected, if
one of the second sample of transformers has loss(es) higher than the limits. In
case the quantity of the sample is equal to the total number of the purchase, no
second test will be performed. The utility will reject only the transformer(s)
which loss(es) is (are) over the limit.
Based on the above conditions, the supplier shall repair and replace ALL failed
units. No penalty shall be negotiated. The supplier must design and assemble
transformers with care and accuracy without further provision of tolerances.
7. Conclusion
The evaluation formula in this chapter has been well proven to be the best practice
for distribution system of the capital city with lowest loss. Many factors such as
O&M expenses, electricity unit cost, interest rate, inflation rate, etc are part of the
evaluation process though some utilities may decide to use balance emphasis on
different factors, e.g. in USA, they will use the cost of installation for generation
and transmission system; while in some European countries, only electricity unit
cost is applied for loss evaluation.
The illustrated evaluation was an example of a standard procurement practice. The
27

users should exercise judgment in the evaluation.
Finally, the utilities are recommended to develop their own evaluation formula by
harnessing the information in the course of making a purchase decision. The
evaluation method also reinstates the need for manufacturers to design and deliver
the most economic transformer with ideal quality standards.
28

Chapter 3
Transformer Production Inspection
1. Introduction
After the procurement contract for transformers is signed, there are several
processes to verify that the equipment fulfils the specifications and conditions
specified in the agreement.
Approval drawings shall be provided for the benefit of common understanding of

specification between both the utility and the supplier.
Representatives from the utilities, who are likely appointed based on experience in
various aspects such as specification handling, installation, testing, maintenance and
purchasing, shall inspect the manufacturing of the equipment on site.
Acceptance is another process to ensure quality compliance to the contract and

specification before actual installation, and delivery of electricity to end-users.
The contract will be fulfilled once the utility receives all goods purchased in
operational condition and payment is transferred to the seller. After which, the
service guarantee for a period of one year (standard practice) will commence.
In this chapter, only the manufacturing inspection will be discussed with reference
to a real-life example as illustration.
2. Objective
This production inspection is very important because if any process or raw material
is found non-conforming to the specification, the inspection committee shall reserve
the right to suspend the production line and resolve all issues before restarting the
production line.
This chapter details low loss verification which includes no-load loss and load loss.
A careful production inspection is fundamental to a transformer of satisfactory
quality that is operational for at least 20 years.
29

3. Inspection Committee Management
Each utility may have different practices and regulations depending on
governmental policies. This practice is used in the utility which distributes
electricity in the capital city and has a proven track record of success in the lowest
loss transformer selection and also suits this country’s economic background.
The inspection committee should be approved by the top management who is

responsible for the technical knowledge, after the contract is signed. The inspection
members will be selected from the related department which verifies the
transformer specifications at a minimum, as follows:
i. Electrical engineering department which takes care of the specification or

term of reference (TOR)
ii. District service department which maintains records of the transformer’s data
characteristics and performance monitoring.
iii. Testing division or Maintenance department which is experienced in testing
and preventive maintenance on the transformers which aids in prolonging the
service life.
iv. Purchasing or Contract department which controls the related document
starting from the quotation, technical and commercial condition agreement
and the approval drawings.
All engineers and technicians who are represented in the production inspection
committee will be given the approval drawings and related correspondence for their
references when witnessing the transformer production line and testing. The
supplier shall provide free access to the facilities where the transformers are being
manufactured and shall satisfy the representatives that the raw material and finished
transformers are in accordance with this specification and the purchase contract.
In the event of disagreement or dispute, either the contract’s details are not clear or
the supplier would like that an exception be made (for example, the value of the
guaranteed loss), these issues should be presented at a meeting with the top
management. The meeting should discuss the disadvantages and advantages to the
utility as the main focus. This convention should remain and be considered the
standard practice.
4. Inspection Process
There will be two main issues to discuss in this clause, the production process flow
of the transformer manufacturing which shows each step of production line and
inspection, and the second part which will explain some principal practical
inspection trips.
In Figure 7, the production process flow shows the process of manufacturing,

beginning from the incoming raw material, thru each step of production line and
inspection activities, testing facility, until packing and delivery to the customers.
30

There will be 11 processes of production line which are:
• In-coming materials
• Silicon steel cutting
• Core stacking process
• HV, LV Coil Winding
• Insulation preparation
• Tank, Cover, Equipment and Accessory Preparation
• Core & coil assembly , Tap changer installation , Wire connection
• Drying, Vacuum and Oil Filling
• Accessory assembly, colour paint
• Packing
• Customer delivery
Figure 7: Production Process Flow
31

For the purpose of low loss transformer verification, the production inspection
committee should scrutinize some main process concerns. Let’s start with the in-
coming material process which primarily is the silicon steel as most of the low loss
transformers shall be manufactured from high permeability grain oriented steel.
Figure 8: Silicon Steel Core Loss Curve
As can be seen from Figure 8: core loss can be reduced in two ways: firstly,
the standard technology of silicone steel can be upgraded to a silicone steel
core which is called the Laser –Irradiated Hi B silicone steel. Secondly, it can
be achieved via a thickness decrease, utilizing a less thick piece of silicon steel.
This will also have a lower no load loss. In the factory, the inspectors can
clearly identify Laser Hi-B silicone steel because its surface has a dotted line
where the Cold Grain Oriented silicone steel is plainly visible.
The load loss is generated from the copper windings in both high voltage and
low voltage sides. For low load loss transformers, the copper winding having a
‘high temperature class’ shall be selected in order to avoid the risk of
deformation of the enamel coat on the copper material.
Secondly, the core stacking process requires more skilled workers with many
years of experience. In this process there usually are two workers, one will
32

insert the silicon steel sheet while the other will compactly assemble. The fact
is that lower no loss is obtained by decreasing the gaps in each layer of the
steel sheet.
Thirdly, the welding of winding to make tapping and connections is also

important. Here, care must be taken in the welding quality and highest
working area cleanliness and orderliness is of utmost importance. The utility’s
report always shows the extra loss of the transformer and the failure records of
short circuit caused by the scrap in the welding process
Fourthly, there will be testing prior to the production of the core staking and
winding process. Samples of core staking with some designed turns of copper
winding assembly will be taken to be tested to verify the no load loss value. If
the value is over the guaranteed no load loss the core shall be investigated and
redesigned to meet the contract agreement. This will be done in order to
convince the inspection committees that the low loss transformers will be able
to meet the contract guarantee values.
Finally, the finished transformer is ready to undergo routine, and other special
tests required by the utility or customers. The inspection committee will
randomly test some transformers by themselves to run no-load loss and load
loss tests during routine testing. The testing circuit and apparatus configuration
for no-load loss and load loss measurement has shown in Figure 9 and 10
respectively.
Figure 9: Test circuit & Apparatus Configuration for No-load Loss Measurement
Figure 10: Test Circuit & Apparatus Configuration for Load Loss Measurement
33

4.1. Measurement of No-Load Loss
a. Purpose and Test Method

No-load losses (also referred to as excitation losses, core losses and
iron losses) are a very small part of the power rating of the
transformer, usually less than 1%. Since these losses are essentially
constant over the lifetime of the transformer (do not vary with load),
they generally represent a sizable operating expense especially when
energy costs are high. Therefore, accurate measurements are
essential in order to evaluate individual transformer performance.
Requirements, as stated in IEEE Std.C57.12.90-1993 and C57.12.91-

1979, for reporting no-load loss/excitation current measurements,
are:
• Voltage is equal to rated voltage unless specified otherwise.
• Frequency is equal to the rated frequency.
• Measurements are reported at the reference temperature.
• The voltage applied to the voltmeters is proportional to that
across the energized winding.
• Whenever applied waveform is distorted, measurement must be
corrected to a sinusoidal voltage waveform.
The no-load loss and current can be measured on one of the winding
at rated frequency and voltage on principle tapping. The remaining
winding shall be left open-circuited. Measuring no-load losses of a
transformer when subjected to a sinusoidal voltage wave form can be
achieved simply as per Figure 9. Transformers may be subjected to a
distorted sine-wave voltage. In order to achieve the required
measuring accuracy, the instrumentation used should accurately
respond to the power frequency harmonics encountered in these
measurements. Also, measured values need to be corrected to
account for the effect of the voltage harmonics on the magnetic flux
in the core and hence on both the hysteresis and eddy current loss
components of iron losses.
The hysteresis loss component is a function of the maximum flux

density in the core, practically independent of the waveform of the
flux. The maximum flux density corresponds to the average value of
the voltage (not the rms value), and, therefore, if the test voltage is
adjusted to be the same as the average value of the desired sine wave
of the voltage the hysteresis loss component will be equal to the
desired sine wave value.
The eddy-current loss component of the core loss varies

approximately with the square of the rms value of the core flux.
When the test voltage is held at rated voltage with the average-
voltage voltmeter, the actual rms value of the test voltage is generally
not equal to the rated value. The eddy-current loss in this case will be
related to the correct eddy-current loss at rated voltage by a factor k
34

given in Equation 8.2, Clause 8 of the IEEE Std. C57.12.90-1993and
C57.12.91-1979 Standard. This is only correct for a reasonably
distorted voltage wave.
b. Reference standard
IEC publication 60076-1: Power transformer Part 1: General
ANSI C57.12.90-1999: Standard Test Code for Liquid-Immersed
Distribution, Power, and Regulating Transformers: Sub-Clause 8
c. List of equipment and instrument

Current transformer refers to IEC standard, Accuracy 1%
Potential transformer refers to IEC standard, Accuracy 1%
Power meter refers to IEC standard, Accuracy 0.5%
d. Acceptance Criterion
The acceptance of transformer no-load loss and current shall be
lower than guarantee values or within tolerance of +15% of no-load
loss guarantee values and +30% of no-load current guarantee values.
4.2. Measurement of Load Loss
a. Purpose and Test Method

Transformer load losses, often called copper losses, include I2R losses in
windings due to load current, stray losses due to stray fluxes in the
windings, core clamps, magnetic shields, tank wall, etc. and losses due to
circulating current in parallel windings and parallel conductors within
windings.
Load losses are normally measured by short circuiting one winding of a

transformer, usually the low voltage winding, and impressing sufficient
voltage (referred to as impedance voltage) on the high voltage winding to
cause rated current to circulate in the high voltage winding. Input voltage,
current, and power are then measured.
The short-circuit impedance and load loss of winding shall be measured at

rated frequency and relevant rated current (tapping current) not less than
50% with approximately sinusoidal voltage applied to one winding. The
temperature of the winding shall be record to rated current and reference
temperature of 75°C or 85°C.
Special precautions
i. Measurement at a lower than rated current: According to IEEE Std
C57.12.90-1993, load losses should be measured at a load current
equal to the rated current for the corresponding tapping position.
However, if it is not exactly equal to the rated current, the measured
load loss value will need to be corrected by the square of the ratio of
the rated current to the test current (average of the measured phase
current in three-phase transformers).
ii. Duration of the load loss measurement test:
35

During load loss measurement, the current in the winding increases
winding temperature and hence increases winding I2R losses. To
minimize the magnitude of this effect, it is the manufacturer’s
responsibility to keep the test time as short as possible.
iii. Optimizations of measuring range of instrumentation:
Transformer manufacturers are encouraged to use the instruments at
their optimum operating range to minimize the errors. Phase angle
corrections of voltage instrument transformers and current
instrument transformers that have magnetic core materials are
generally significantly higher when they are operated at lower than
about 70% of their rated operating voltage/current. Also, these
corrections can vary significantly with the turns-ratio setting of the
instrument transformer.
iv. Other precautions with the use of instrument transformers:
Using the proper burden, clean connections, and demagnetizing the
current transformer after every use are measures that would help
achieve a better measuring accuracy.
b. Reference standard
IEC publication 60076-1: Power transformer Part 1: General
ANSI C57.12.90-1999: Standard Test Code for Liquid-Immersed
Distribution, Power, and Regulating Transformers: Sub-Clause 9
c. List of equipment and instrument

Current transformer refers to IEC standard, Accuracy 1%
Potential transformer refers to IEC standard, Accuracy 1%
Power meter refers to IEC standard, Accuracy 0.5%
d. Acceptance criteria
The acceptance of transformer load loss shall be lower than the guarantee
values or within tolerance of +15% of guarantee values and voltage
impedance shall be ±10% of guarantee values.
4.3. Traceability and Calibration
A measurement possesses traceability if it can be compared, directly or

indirectly, through a series of calibrations to the value established by higher
level standards, national or international. Obtaining direct traceability for
transformers is generally difficult because of the large physical size of the test
object and the large voltage and power requirements.
An alternative is to have a “portable” loss measuring system that can be used

for on-site calibration. Indirect traceability is obtained by calibrating this loss
measuring system on a regular basis using a standard measuring system.
Calibration of a multi-component measuring system requires calibration of
each of the components as well as the total system. In a loss measuring system,
it is necessary to calibrate both the magnitudes and phase angle.
36

5. Conclusion
Some utilities may have their own inspection form or special document to process
the comments and some corrections during the inspection such as witness tests,
discussion, dimension and facilities, etc. One of the most practical forms used in the
production process inspection is called “Punch List” and shown in Figure 11. Punch
List. The inspection committee can give the notices and make pictures to compare
the status before and after modification or corrections are made on it.
Figure 11: Punch List Form
37

Chapter 4
Contract Acceptance
1. Introduction
The commercial and technical conditions are all specified in the purchasing
contract. It is commonplace for utilities to make special requests in order to assure
the quality of the transformers fulfil the contract requirements. This step is also
important in that the utility must manage the delivery of the transformers as it can
delay the installation plans. This step is also important for the utility to manage
the delivery time of the transformers to avoid the delaying installation plans such
as to install the transformers before the contract can be completely settled to reach
both the utilities and supplier’ satisfaction.
The contract acceptance is difficult when the delivered transformers do not conform
to the contract specification which has many classifications such as: physical
characteristic, exceeding the guaranteed loss, etc. It is the intention of this chapter to
guide the utilities to learn and share experiences in solving these problems by
sample analysis and conclusion.
2. Objective
Experience shows that there are three main factors to discuss in the process of
transformer contract acceptance. One is a detailed specification with approval
drawings, the second is routine test reports with guaranteed loss verification and the
third is the final sampling test of the transformers before energizing and put in
service. Various scenarios are given and explained to be used as a problem solving
guide. It shows the process from top management’s policy viewpoint regarding
practical standards in the procurement system.
3. Acceptance Committee Management

This follows the same procedure as mentioned above in the production inspection
committee. The acceptance committees should be approved by upper management
after the contract is signed. The acceptance committee members who cover the
technical information will be selected from the related department which is
38

knowledgeable about transformer specification and testing at a minimum, as
follows:
i. Research and development department which takes care of the transformer

failure analysis
ii. Distribution equipment department which maintains records of the
transformer’s data characteristic and performance evaluation.
iii. Testing division which has experience in transformer testing procedures.
iv. Purchasing or Contract department which controls the relevant
documentation starting from the quotation, technical and commercial
condition agreement and the approval drawings.
All engineers and technicians who are represented as the contract acceptance
committee will be given the approval drawings as shown in Figure 12: List of
approval drawings and related accessories for their reference during sampling of the
delivered transformers for testing. Samples of technical and guaranteed data of the
transformer are shown in Figure 13. The supplier shall submit the routine test report
of all the transformers together with the transformers apart from the commercial
document.
In the event of disagreement or dispute, either the contract’s details are not clear or
the supplier would like that an exception be made (for example, the value of the
guaranteed loss) these issues should be presented at a meeting with the upper
management. The meeting should discuss the disadvantages and advantages to the
utility as the main focus. This convention should remain and be considered the
standard practice.
4. Acceptance Process
The acceptance committee will make a visual inspection for the quantity of the
delivered transformers according to the invoice of the supplier, after scrutinizing all
transformers and documents such as the instruction manual, spare parts, etc. The
acceptance committee will then randomly select a quantity of transformers per that
which is stated in the contract. This amount typically does not exceed 10 sets due to
the expense and time.
It is recommended that even though the supplier performs the entire routine test for
all transformers as shown in Figure 14: Supplier’s routine test report, the utility
should perform sampling for its own re-verification before installation on site. The
utility should implement a detailed step by step, pre-verification laboratory in order
to assure that the transformers conform to the specification, especially with respect
to guaranteed losses; otherwise, the supplier may try to deliver cheap transformers
with high losses.
In the event that the utility has budgetary constraints, it is strongly recommended
that a third party be employed to witness the tests and approve all contract
documents at the factory. This may require a monetary investment, but the value
outweighs the cost due to the high cost of equipment.
39

At a minimum, the following acceptance tests should be done at the utility’s
laboratory:
4.1. Routine Test

• Insulation Resistance Test
• Winding Resistance Measurement
• Oil Dielectric Test
• Applied Voltage Test
• Induced Voltage Test
• Ratio And Vector Group Test
• No-load Loss Test
• Load Loss Test
4.2. Type Test

• Temperature Rise Test - The sample of the utility’s acceptance test report
is shown in Figure 15: Acceptance routine test report: as can be seen, the
no-load loss and load loss are measured and calculated to verify that the
sampling transformers’ losses conform to the guarantee values per the
contract. The payment shall then occur and the file will close and include
a guarantee of performance for one year after delivery.
4.3. Excess Loss Management
4.3.1. Case No. 1 - Utility randomly selects some transformers to compare

with the supplier’s report.
i. If the utility’s values are greater than the supplier’s report by

2.5%, the utility will increase the supplier’s values of all
transformers with the following consecutive procedures.
ii. The utility has to investigate which transformer’s values exceed
the guaranteed values including the tolerance limits, the
transformer(s) should be rejected and the remainder are considered
for penalty by calculating the average values of the total number
of transformers.
iii. The compensation penalty is calculated by using penalty values
which are 2.0 times of the formula constants x values of loss
exceeding x Total number of transformers, as shown in Figure 16
Penalty Calculation Without Raising the Guarantee Values.
iv. Some suppliers may ask the utility to accept the rejected
transformer(s) considering clause 3 above, provided the average
value of that transformer is:
• Guarantee load loss = 5,600 W
• The different average value between the utility and supplier =
5.61%
• Average supplier’s report value = 5,481.33 W
• New guarantee load loss is raised to = 5,481x1.0561 =
5,788.83 W
40

• The penalty is calculated to = (5,788.83 – 5,600)x penalty
values (normally is 2.0 times of the formula constant) x Total
number of transformers
This is illustrated in Figure 17 Penalty Calculation with Raising
the Guarantee Values
4.3.2. Case No. 2 - Utility does not have the requisite facility for making
acceptance tests and is dependent on the routine test report of all
transformers in computing excess losses. The process will be the same
as mentioned in case no. 1 above, by using tolerance limit instead of the
different values between the utility and supplier.
i. In case of increased no-load loss, provided the supplier’s routine

test report shows the following values:
• Guarantee no-load loss = 5,000 kW.
• Tolerance limit specified in the contract = 15 %
• Supplier report shows no-load loss = 6,000 kW > 5,000+15
%
• Increased no-load loss guarantee = 6,000/1.15 = 5,217.39 kW
• The penalty is calculated to = (5,217.39 – 5,000) x penalty
ii. In case of total loss exceeds the tolerance but with no-load loss
within the limit, the increase in load loss to the new guarantee
value is equal to (total loss)/( 1+%tolerance/100) – no-load as
shown below:
• Guarantee no-load loss = 5,000 kW
• Guarantee load loss = 10,000 kW
• Tolerance of no-load loss = 15 %
• Tolerance of total loss = 10 %
• Supplier report shows no-load loss = 4,500 kW < 5,000 kW
• Supplier report shows load loss = 13,000 kW
• Supplier report shows total loss = 13,000+5,000 = 18,000 >
(5,000+10,000)+10% kW
• Raised load loss guarantee = (18,000/1.10) – 5,000 =
11,363.64 kW
• The penalty is calculated to = (11,363.64 – 10,000) x penalty
• Check again if the average supplier’s load loss is lower than
the new guaranteed load loss value
41

LIST OF DRAWING
NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE
1 OUTLINE DRAWING Tr. 6300 kVA, 3 Ph. Dyn 11 11000 - 6900/3984 V.
TYPE : CONSERVATOR 3-6
2 TRANSFORMER BASE 7
3 CABLE BOX TYPE 1 8
4 HV. LV. BUSHING WITH EXTENSION BAR 9
5 NAMEPLATE WITH CONNECTION DIAGRAM CONNECTION Dyn11 10
6 NAMEPLATE BUSHING CURRENT TRANSFORMER SPECIFICATION 11
7 NAMEPLATE TAG. NO. 12
8 CONTROL BOX 13
9 WIRING DIAGRAM OF INSTRUMENT 14
LIST OF ACCESSORIES
NO. DESCRIPTION MODEL/TYPE CATALOGUE NO.
1 HIGH AND LOW VOLTAGE BUSHING DT 10 Nf 630 DIN 42532
2 HV. TERMINAL CONNECTOR 630 A.
3 LV. TERMINAL CONNECTOR 630 A.
4 OIL LEVEL INDICATION SO-HE-6
5 LIQUID FILLED THERMOMETER 1187/S
6 TAP CHANGER NO. 3
7 DEHYDRATING BREATHER SILICAGEL SIZE 3 KG.
8 GROUNDING PAD For cable 50 sq.mm.
GLOBE VALVE, oil sampling and drain valve

2"
9 Upper filter valve
Oil sampling valve 1/2"
10 BUTTERFLY VALVE FOR RADIATOR FIN EE-W80
11 BUTTERFLY VALVE (For buchholz relay) DN 50
12 PRESSURE RELIEF DEVICE WITH CONTACTS COMEM/80T
13 BUCHHOLZ RELAY BR50
14 WINDING TEMPERATURE INDICATOR Messko (MT-ST160W)
15 RUBBER AIR CELL AIR CELL
NAME TITLE EFF. DATE :
Symbol ISO
DRN. BY LIST OF DRWAING
Dimension in millimet res
CHK. BY SCALE : N.T.S. PAGE 2

A
APP. BY NAM E OF M ANUFACTURER 4
DWG. NO. REV. 0
Figure 12: List of approval drawings
42

Logo and Name of the manufacturer
TECHNICAL DATA
CAPACITY 6300 kVA FREQUENCY 50 Hz.
PHASE 3 % TAPPING ± 2 x 2.5
COOLING TYPE ONAN CONNECTION Dyn11
PRI. VOLT. 11000 V. SEC. VOLT. 6900 / 3984 V.

PRI. AMP. 330.66 A. SEC. AMP. 527.15 A.
GUARANTEED DATA
TOLERANCE
IEEE C57.12.00 GUARANTEED

7 IEC 60076 OTHER
IEEE C57.12.90
+ 15 % + 10 % NO LOAD LOSS 6400 W.
+ 15 % - LOAD LOSS AT 75 °C 54000 W.
± 10 % ± 7.5 % IMPEDANCE AT 75 °C 11.00 %

+ 10 % +6% TOTAL LOSS 60400 W.
OIL TEMP. RISE 55 K
WINDING TEMP. RISE 60 K
In order to keep the product's delivery schedule,

please return the approval drawing before ……………………
FOR APPROVAL DRAWING
EFF. DATE REMARK DRN. BY CHK. BY APP. BY
TITLE OUTLINE DRAWINGS

DRAWING FOR S/O 51320093
Tr. 6300 kVA, 3 Ph. Dyn11
11000 - 6900 / 3984 V. DESIGN NO. 51463011101
TYPE: CONSERVATION SCALE: N.T.S. PAGE 1
NAME OF MANUFACTURER A 4 DWG. NO. REV. 0
Figure 13: Sample Drawing of Technical and Guaranteed Data
43

MANUFACTURER NAME AND LOGO
ROUTINE TEST REPORT

S/N W/O
Customer Design No.
Object Distribution Transformer Doc No.
Type Oil-immersed BIL (HV) 125 kV
Rated Power 100 kVA BIL (LV) - kV
Rated HV 22000 V I - HV 2.62 A
Rated LV 400 V I - HL 144.34 A
Frequency 50 Hz Tapping ± 2 x 2.5%
Phase 3 Vector group Dyn11
Cooling ONAN Standard IEC 60076
VOLTAGE RATIO & VECTOR (DEV.) Dyn11 CALCULATION 30.3 °C 75 °C
Tap. 1 2 3 4 5
Voltage 23100 22550 22000 21450 20900 % No-load current 0.43 - %
Ratio 100.03 97.64 95.26 92.88 90.5 % Load test current 99.49 - %
A-B +0.15 +0.15 +0.08 +0.1 +0.12 RH (Average) 103.415 120.8392 Ohm
B-C +0.15 +0.15 +0.08 +0.1 +0.12 RL (Average) 8.6444 10.1009 mOhm
2
C-A +0.15 +0.15 +0.08 +0.1 +0.12 I RH 712 832 W
2
RESISTANCE RH (Ohm) Test tap : 3 30.3 °C I RL 540 631 W
2
Tap. 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL I R 1253 1464 W
A-B 72.680 70.690 68.760 66.830 64.770 Stray loss 34 29 W
B-C 72.760 70.940 68.980 67.020 65.020 Load loss 1286 1492 W
C-A 72.990 71.050 69.090 67.290 65.120 Impedance voltage 3.80 3.87 %
RESISTANCE RL (mOhm) 30.4 °C Total loss (TL) - 1722 W
a-b 17.2870 RPL 30 °C RPH 30 °C Eff. 100% PF = 1 - 98.31 %
b-c 17.2280 8.6346 103.298 Reg. 100% PF = 1 - 1.56 %
c-a 17.3710 Correction factor (% deviation) -0.100 - %
NO-LOAD LOSS (NLL) LOAD LOSS (LL) 30.3 °C
(Vrms) (Vmean) (A) (W) (V) (A) (W) APPROVAL
400.4 400 0.617 229.7 831.5 2.611 1273.0
SEPEARATE VOLTAGE 50 Hz - 1 min. Passed
HV 50 kV
LV 3 kV Checked By Date
INDUCTED VOLTAGE 400 Hz - 15 sec. Passed
HV 44 kV Test Supervisor
MEGGER 2500 V- 1 min. Passed
HV - LV 13400 Mohm Approved By Date
HV - G 14000 Mohm
LV - G 4900 Mohm Quality Assurance Manager
OIL BREAKDOWN IEC 60156 Passed
Gap 2.5 mm. 59 kV
TANK LEAKAGE (Hemetically seal type / Corrugate)
3 psi - 1 Hr. Passed
TEST RESULT Status Passed and
Concern Signature
Declared Min. Max. Tested
NLL 250 - 250 229.5 Passed
LL 1550 - 1550 1492 Passed
TL 1800 - 1800 1722 Passed
%Imp 4.00 3.60 4.40 3.87 Passed
Figure 14: Supplier’s routine test report
44

TEST REPORT
DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER
Customer: Standard: IEC 60076

Contract No.: Manufacturer: Serial No.: 960932 MEA No.: 4D-2044
TECHNICAL DATA
Capacity: 50 kVA HT. Voltage: 24000 V. LT. Voltage: 480 / 240 V.
Phase: 1 Phase HT. Current: 2.1 A. LT. Current: 104.2 A.
Frequency: 50 Hz Tap: -4 x 2.5 Impedance at: 75.0 °C 1.53 %
Insulation Class: - Vector Group: Subtractive NO Load Loss - W.
Type: Conventional Cooling: ONAN Load Loss at: 75.0 °C - W.
INSULATION RESISTANCE TEST at: 1000 V.DC Amb. Temp. 28.0 °C Humidity: 77 %
H.T.-L.T.: 69.00 G-Ohms H.T. Ground: 43.00 G-Ohms L.T. Ground: 27.60 G-Ohms
DIELECTRIC TEST Complied
Applied voltage test: 75% Amb. Temp. 28.0 °C Humidity: 76 %

H.T.-L.T.+Ground: 30.0 kV Frequency: 50 Hz Time: 60 Sec.
L.T.-H.T.+Ground: 7.5 kV Frequency: 50 Hz Time: 60 Sec.
Inducted voltage test: 75% Amb. Temp. 28.0 °C Humidity: 76 %

Supply: 36.000 kV Frequency: 200 Hz Time: 30 Sec.
MEASUREMENT OF OIL DIELECTRIC STRENGHT Amb. Temp. 28.0 °C Humidity: 77 % Complied

Standard: ASTM D877 Oil breakdown voltage: 31.2 kV Breakdown voltage not less than 26 kV
MEASUREMENT OF WINDING RESISTANCE Amb. Temp. 27.0 °C Humidity: 66 % Complied
HT. Winding resistance (Ohm) LT. Winding resistance (Ohm)

Tap H1-H2 X1-X2
1 33.1760 13.2470
MEASUREMENT OF VOLTAGE RATIO AND VECTOR GROUP Amb. Temp. 28 °C Humidity: 76 % Complied
Tap position 1 2 3 4 5
Standard ratio 100.00 50.00 97.50 48.75 95.00 47.50 92.50 46.25 90.00 45.00
Ratio error 1-3 (% ) 0.05 N/A 0.06 N/A 0.07 N/A 0.10 N/A 0.12 N/A
Ratio error 2-4 (% ) 0.05 N/A 0.06 N/A 0.07 N/A 0.10 N/A 0.12 N/A
Polarity test: Subtractive
MEASUREMENT OF NOLOAD LOSS And EXCITING CURRENT Amb. Temp. 27.5 °C Humidity: 67 %
Voltage test: 240.0 V. Current: 8.7 A. No-load loss : 184.2 W. at reference temp. 20 °C
MEASUREMENT OF LOAD LOSS AND IMPEDANCE VOLTAGE Humidity: 69 % Complied

LT. Short circuit ; Apply HT. at: 24 kV System Tap 1 Voltage: 446.3 V. Current: 2.1 A.
At temp.: 29.0 °C Impedance: 1.86 % Load loss : 293.9 W.
At temp.: 75.0 °C Impedance: 1.89 % Load loss : 343.9 W. Total loss: 528.1 W.
Efficiency: 98.96 % Voltage regulation: 0.70 % (at PF = 1.0)
Figure 15: Acceptance routine test report
45

MA4-7552-AGA
12/24 kV 750 kVA THREE PHASE
GUARANTEE VALUE
NO LOAD LOSS 880.00 W
LOAD LOSS 4300.00 W
TOTAL LOSSES 5180.00 W
* Total 1 set REP.NO. 01-31

DATE: SEP. 3, 2001
Supplier's Report MEA's Report
NO Serial NO LOAD LOAD TOTAL NO Serial NO LOAD LOAD TOTAL

Number LOSS (W.) LOSS (W.) LOSS (W.) Number LOSS (W.) LOSS (W.) LOSS (W.)
1 10108 864.00 4197.00 5061.00 1 10108 861.00 4383.30 5244.30
Percent Deviation of Losses between both results
No load Loss -0.35% %

Load Loss 4.44% %
Total Loss 3.62% %
SUMMARY :
The above table shows that no load loss from MEA's report is not over the guarantee value but the load loss from MEA's report is
greater than that from supplier's report more than 2.5% and over the guarantee value. Therefore, results from MEA's report are
used in calculating compensation as follows:
penalty compensation of load loss = (load loss-guarantee load load) x (106.5 baht / W) x (total set)
= (43.83.3-4300) x (106.5) x 1
= 8871.45 Baht
Figure 16: Penalty Calculation without raising the Guarantee Value
46

MA4-7553-AGA
12/24 kV 750 kVA THREE PHASE
DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER CONVENTIONAL TYPE
GUARANTEE VALUE
NO LOAD LOSS 1060.00 W
LOAD LOSS 5600.00 W
TOTAL LOSSES 6660.00 W
* Total 3 sets REP.NO. 01-32

DATE: SEP. 3, 2001
Supplier's Report

1 10109 1008.00 5484.00 6492.00 3 10111 1017.00 5540.00 6557.00

2 10110 1018.00 5420.00 6438.00
Average 1014.33 5481.33 6495.67
Samples from Supplier's Report Samples from MEA's Report

1 10109 1008.00 5484.00 6492.00 1 10109 1008.00 5821.20 6829.20

2 10111 1017.00 5540.00 6557.00 2 10111 1019.00 5821.50 6840.50
Average 1012.50 5512.00 6524.50 Average 1013.50 5821.35 6834.85
Percent Deviation of Losses between both results
No load Loss 0.10% %

Load Loss 5.61% %
Total Loss 4.76% %
SUMMARY :
The above table shows that load loss from MEA's report is greater than that from supplier's report more than 2.5% and over the
guarantee value. Therefore, load loss from supplier's report will be raised up 5.61% to used in calculating compensation as follows:
average load loss = 5481.33 W.
raised up = 5.61 %
adjusted average load loss = (5481.33) x (1.0561) x 1
= 5788.83 W.
penalty compensation of load loss = (adj. average load loss-guarantee load load) x (106.5 baht / W) x (total set)
= (5788.83-5600) x (106.5) x 3
= 60331.19 Baht
Figure 17: Penalty Calculation with Raising the Guarantee Values
47

5. Conclusion
As mentioned earlier, the purpose of this chapter is to explain the practical
acceptance test process and exceeding transformer losses management which have
been utilized for more than 40 years and have been approved by the Asian
Development Bank (ADB) and World Bank (WB).
In reality, there may be many different opinions or arguments due to various

political or customary practices. The aforementioned, does solve typical problems,
however, based on the mutual benefits between the utility and the suppliers. The
penalty values, while appearing to be high in nominal amounts, represent fairness in
the evaluation of all suppliers and are beneficial for implementation by the utilities.
48

Chapter 5
Installation and Operation
1. Introduction
As the utility accepts the transformers delivered by the supplier, some transformers
shall be installed at the destination, but the balance will be kept in the warehouse as
stock. The suppliers’ transformer manual will be submitted with the transformer for
utility’s field workers to perform installation and operation. Therefore, all
instruction and caution will be completely utilized in order to assure quality for at
least twenty years.
The information provided in this transformer handbook on the proper installation

and operation of oil filled transformers, is provided as a guide. This is a brief outline
for the proper procedures and requirements for the general and required care that
must be followed. Neglect of these fundamental requirements may lead to serious
problems, if not the loss of the transformer or other vital equipment.
The installation and operation in this chapter will be explained based on application
from well known utility having at least 50 years experience in the installation and
operation of the low losses transformers.
2. Objective
The transformers having low losses or standard transformers shall utilize the same
process of installation and operation. There are two main installation configurations
which are installed at the station: concrete or wooden pole type, and pad-mount
type. The construction standards will be shown to guide the utility to set up the
transformers and also other equipment in order to facilitate installation by the field
workers. The loading guide will be discussed to keep the high efficiency for the low
losses transformers.
49

3. Construction Standard
Firstly, the characteristics of the transformer have to be obtained from the
nameplate which shall be affixed to the transformer tank as per the requirement of
the relevant standards. The nameplate shall provide the necessary information for
transformer energizing, installation and operation. The nameplate shall include all
relevant information. Secondly, the transformers will be separated, and warehoused
for future extension power distribution planning. Various recommendations will be
briefly discussed, and an explanation of the other transformers will be clarified in
detail, according to the utility’s construction standards.
3.1. Name Plate
a. Serial number: To identify each and every transformer manufactured by

the manufacturer, the utility has to refer to this serial number when
service is required. For the utility’s transformer management’s utilization,
items such as: rated capacity monitoring, maintenance services, etc.
should be noted and utilized. The utility should mention in the contract
that they wish to obtain another running serial number which belongs to
the utility’s references.
b. kVA: To signify transformer capacity or kilovolt ampere capacity.
c. Phase: This is the phase at which transformers are designed to operate.
d. Frequency: This is the design of the transformer to meet the frequency of

the electricity supply.
e. Voltage & Ampere: To signify the primary and secondary voltages,

whereas the displayed ampere is the rated normal electricity current on
primary and secondary side.
f. Type: This is the method of cooling system used to cool the system from
the heat generated during the transformer operation.
g. Insulation class: This is the classification of the insulated materials at

which the transformers can withstand either the electricity current or the
temperature rise.
h. Temperature rise: This is the average of oil temperature rise and

winding temperature rise above ambient temperature at the rated kVA.
i. Percentage of impedance: The real figure is obtained from testing which

will affect the transformer losses.
j. Oil quantity: To signify the quantity of transformer oil to be used in each

unit of the transformer.
k. The total weight (kg): This is the total weight of the complete set of
transformer.
50

l. Winding connection diagram: This is provided to show the relevant
location of bushings and internal terminals. The winding connection
diagram will be designed to meet the utility’s system configuration.
m. Vector group: Follows the international standard per the specification

mentioned by the utilities’ system designer.
3.2. Storage Management
It is recommended that if the transformer is not to be put into service

immediately, the unit be placed in its permanent location and be filled with oil.
The foundation should include: that it be placed on a solid level foundation in
the storage area (as soon as possible), it should be dry and protected from the
effects of weather, or preferably stored indoors. This will contribute to keeping
transformer dry and the paint in good condition.
If the event that two or more transformers are stored together, there must be
sufficient space between the transformers to prevent collision on any projecting
attachments and also allow space for routine visual inspection.
If the transformer is stored longer than twelve months, it should be checked

before installation. Check the condition of all the safety gauges; manually turn
the tap changer to all positions till smooth turning occurs. An oil sample should
be taken for analysis; the result should not be lower than 30kV/2.5mm. The
tests results should be verified with the original results from the factory to
assure they are still within acceptable limits.
3.3. Installation Management
a. Transportation
The Transformer must be properly secured to prevent shifting and

movement during transportation and handling. Jolting and vibration
should be avoided. No pressure should be exerted on the radiator or
corrugated fin.
The transformer must be handled in the normal upright position and

lifting from the lifting lugs on the tank (if provided) or lifting on the cover
in the event that no lifting lug can be utilized. Likewise, the jacking pads
are to be used for jacking purposes.
Note: Do not attempt to lift/jack the transformer other than the fitting
parts provided for this purpose.
The liquid immersed transformers, hermetically sealed type, are suitable

for indoor and outdoor installation. It can be moved to the designated
position utilizing wheels, roller, crowbar or pulley and must be levelled
51

when installed at the designated location.
b. Indoor Installation
Transformers with natural cooling depend on the surrounding air to

dissipate its heat. There must be sufficient ventilation for the transformer.
Warm air will rise to the top and cool air flows down. A good ventilation
transformer room should have an opening on top to dissipate the warm air
and a bottom air inlet to intake the cool air. Both must locate diagonally
across the room.
As a guide, losses of 1 kW require an air flow of 5.2 m3/min, with air

intake temperature at 30°C and air temperature rise of 10°C. The noise
level measurement should be monitored according to the reference
standards.
For the air to circulate freely around the transformer and access
maintenance facilities there must be a distance of at least 0.5 meter
between the transformer and the wall of partition, the same precaution
must be taken should there be several transformers in a room.
c. Outdoor Installation
It is recommended that transformers to be utilized for for outdoor

installation, be installed on a solid plinth. However, if plinth is not
available, the base shall be strong enough to support the transformer. The
weight of the transformer is stated on the transformer rating plate. The
samples of the construction standards has shown the single concrete pole
installation and the two concrete pole or plat-form type in Figure 18 & 19
in Figure 20 & 21 respectively.
d. Cabling
The cables connected to the transformer must be properly supported and

clamped to prevent unnecessary strain on the HV bushings and LV bus
bars. If the cable boxes are supplied, the cable gland plate and cable must
be properly tightened.
e. Bolt Tightening Torque

• Torque Setting for various bushing and bolt sizes.
Bushing Bolt Size Tightening Torque (Nm)
1/250 M12 14
1/630 M20 24
1/1000 M30 36
1/2000 M42 70
1/3150 M48 70
• Torque Setting for various bolt sizes used in bus bar Connections -
Steel
52

Bolt Size Tightening Torque (Nm)
M6 6-9
M8 15-22
M10 35-44
M12 70-75
M16 120-150
f. Energizing the transformer
When the voltage is first applied to the transformer, if possible, it should

be brought up slowly to its full value so that any incorrect connection or
other problem may be diagnosed before damage can occur. If this is not
possible, then energize without load.
It is recommended, especially if the excitation is through cables or fuses,

that the output voltage be measured to ensure that all three phases are
energized. After full voltage has been applied, the transformer should
remain energized at full voltage for a few hours without load. It should be
kept under observation during this time and also during the first hours that
it delivers electricity to the loads.
g. Check the transformer after energizing
The transformer should be checked after energizing to ensure that it is in

normal operating condition before loading as follows:
• Check the LV voltage. If the voltage is insufficient, then de-
energize the transformer to reset the tap changer to the correct
voltage level.
• Check the phase sequence. If the phase sequence is incorrect, then
de-energize the transformer to re arrange the cable connection.
• Check the transformer noise. If the humming sound is abnormal,
then de-energize the transformer and notify the manufacturers.
4. Loading Guide
4.1. Loading in Normal Operation
Transformers are suitable for full-load operation at rated temperature rise

without loss of life, providing the following conditions are met:
• Ambient temperature does not exceed 40°C; or average more than 30°C;
in one 24 hour period, the transformer may be used in over 40°C ambient
for very short intervals. Unless it is a specially designed unit with the
properly upgraded insulation level which can be operated at a higher
temperature rating.
53

• Installed elevation does not exceed 3,300 feet (1,000 meters) above sea
level, otherwise the transformer capacity will be de-rating due to the air
density and the cooling efficiency of the transformer is reduced, the
factors that can be calculated refer to ANSI standard C57.
• Overloading should be in accordance with ANSI standard C57 Loading

Guide or IEC standards.
• A schedule should be made for periodic checks of the load applied to the
transformer to verify that an excessive load is not being applied to the
unit.
4.2. Loading According to Optimization of Power Efficiency of The

Transformer
As noted in Chapter 1, the most important consideration for low losses

transformers, when high investment of the low losses transformers concerned,
is the power efficiency of the transformer operation as can be seen in Table 2
Power efficiency of transformer loading. Maximum efficiency will occur at a
load when the no-load loss and load loss of transformer are equal.
Transformer Transformer Loss (Watt) % Load Factor

rating - Highest
No-load Loss Load Loss
(kVA) Efficiency
15 70 160 66.14%
45 160 360 66.67%
75 220 580 61.59%
112.5 255 840 55.10%
150 300 1000 54.77%
225 420 1530 52.39%
300 480 1860 50.80%
500 670 3030 47.02%
750 840 4370 43.84%
1000 1,000 6400 39.53%
1500 1200 10000 34.64%
Table 2: Table of power efficiency for low losses transformer
The power efficiency of the transformer is the best method of specifying the
lowest losses during operation or loading the transformer as designed
approximately 40% of the transformer capacity. In fact the power efficiency of
transformers serviced in rural areas are s skewed by the continual presence of
no-load losses so that the transformer represents an energy drain on the system
when unloaded and when loaded at light loads (below about 15%), the
efficiency is very poor.
In contrast, in transformers which are serviced in the urban area or large cities,
it was found that the loading capacity is approximately 50%, which is still
54

defined as low loss energy.
4.3. The Timeline of the Differing Sizes in Transformers
First stage, 40 years ago, Metropolitan Electricity Authority (MEA) started

using many sizes ranging from 5 kVA, 20 kVA, 50 kVA to 500 kVA. At least
20 ranges. Most of the transformers were single phase. The energy supplies to
the loads were located in different places with a small increase in customers.
When a transformer reached full capacity due to the increasing customers’

demands, the utility would either replace the transformer with a larger one, or
would bank three single phase transformers into a three phase system to
increase the power capacity.
Second stage, 10 years later MEA started to buy three phase and single phase
transformers with the same sizes and many ranges in capacity, to accommodate
the increase in customers. MEA made a decision to utilize the transformers as
efficiently as possible by considering the load curve of each type of customers,
load growth per annum and five year expansion consumption plan. The result
was that the need to replace transformers due to overcapacity was not reached
as frequently as had previously been the case.
Final stage. Currently, with the advanced power distribution designed software,
MEA is trying to reduce costs concerning the transformer management such as
inventory cost, warehouse’s facilities, low loss transformers, also, they decided
to minimize the sizes of transformers. They are only considering 8 ranges or
sizes which are 75 kVA, 150 kVA, 225 kVA, 500 kVA, 750 kVA, 1,000 kVA,
1,500 kVA and 2,000 kVA.
MEA had reduced costs considerably after the above mentioned changes.
They have also realized avoidance of heavy traffic, and lessened environmental
impact.
For other LMS utilities, the sizing of the transformers shall be considered by
using power distribution software and load forecasting, in some cases, it is
recommended to separate the urban and rural area’s sizing transformer
solutions due to different load characteristics, inventory cost, heavy traffic
impact, etc.
55

Figure 18: Construction drawing for transformer installation (single concrete pole)
56

Figure 19: Bill of material for transformer installation (single concrete pole)
57

Figure 20: Construction drawing for transformer installation (platform)
58

Figure 21: Bill of material for transformer installation (platform)
5. Conclusion
As stated, low cost - high losses transformers but high cost - low losses transformer
are both available. The recommendation is to reach and optimal financial decision
between the cost and the low losses of the transformer. Both the standard loss
transformers and the low loss transformers should be implemented for rural usage
and urban area respectively. The example of the standard loss transformer table has
59

shown in Table 3.
The loading guide of those types of transformers which are standard loss and
low loss applications should be carefully studied and practiced to reach the
most efficiency of transformer utilization.
Table 3: Example of standard loss transformers
60

Chapter 6
Maintenance and Asset Management
1. Introduction
The information provided in this chapter on maintenance and asset management of
oil filled transformers, is provided as a guide. This is a brief outline for the proper
procedures and requirements for the general and required practices that must be
followed.
This is an addition to the international standard ANSI and IEC requirements for the
maintenance and asset management for low losses transformers. Best practices
should be followed to lead to the best solution for the utility to prolong the
transformer‘s service life and maximize its operating efficiency.
2. Transformer Load Monitoring (TLM)

The power distribution system in large cities which services a large supply system,
consists of a variety of electrical equipment, the transformers is one of the main
pieces of electrical equipment having installed at the pole more than 40,000 sets.
Each district office or branch that has to manage the units individually, will send
field workers or technicians to inspect general characteristics and measure or update
the load capacity of each transformer periodically, this is time consuming and a
waste of manpower.
Measurement of transformer loading by the Utility can take a few years to

complete. This data is therefore not current compared to real time monitoring
which is explained in another chapter.
The Transformer Load Monitoring (TLM) system is designed to obtain basic data
from the transformer. It includes information such as: voltage, current, etc. It then
sends the data remotely to the control centre so that they may monitor the results
and send it to the operators for transformer management.
Thanks to the TLM system, the transformer management operator can make use of
this data for preventive maintenance, up-rated transformer replacement, and
electrical system planning and emergency mal-function management.
61

2.1 The TLM system consists of three main parts as follows:
a. Remote terminal units (RTU)

b. Master Station
c. Communication protocol
2.2 Principal Concept
The Transformer Load Monitoring project will be first designed as a trial

project having the objective of developing and building up operator units or
sections to manage via remote control and metering for 5 sets with one master
station and the communication protocol having system configuration shown in
Figure 22 below.
Figure 22: Transformer load monitoring (TLM) system configuration
a) Master station
This is a computer server which will be installed at each district office or
branch as the centre for collecting all transformer data from Remote
Terminal Unit (RTU) and convert to the data base having three main
functions which are:
i) Database Server: It serves as a data collector of the transformers

from RTU and keeps this data for investigation; the facilities are
briefly explained as follows:
• Acquire the transformer data, using the Protocol given in the
specification or TOR of the project
• Database capacity should be large enough to keep the electrical
62

data such as voltage, current , etc. of all transformers in each
district office at least one year having three values (maximum,
minimum and average) a day including the system event of fault
or mal-function.
• Searching criteria favour to the utility such as Transformer
manufacturer name, date-month-year of the malfunction.
ii) Human-machine interface (HMI) station: HMI is a modification of

the original term MMI (Man-Machine Interface) which allows the
users to manipulate a system and allow the system to indicate the
effects of the users' manipulation, showing the status and transformer
data in different patterns such as graphs, tables and reports detailed
as follows:
• To assess the preliminary data such as voltage, current, resistive
power, reactive power, power factor, etc.
• To display the characteristic data in form of graphic mode, table
mode with designed specific criteria
• To display all transformers installed in the system showing all
status of ampere, voltages, etc. having full options of searching
facility.
NOTE: Special options for the advanced program which shows the
transformers in the form of a single line diagram of the distribution
system located in different district offices. The monitor displays an
alarm when any event occurs, and also displays the communication
between master station and each RTU.
It is capable to increase/decrease or relocate the transformer

locations and setting of each RTU, the report can be managed in
various formats such as loading report of each transformer, loading
report of transformer each day, each transformer electrical data and
error message, etc.
iii) Historical Database Server: Storing all transformers characteristics in

electronic format for searching, displaying, retrieval and data
comparison
b. Remote Terminal Unit (RTU)

RTU is an instrument installed near or at each transformer to gather and
deliver all transformer data such as current, voltages, etc. to the Master
Station through wireless communication or fiber optic to alert when
malfunction occurs, this includes the following capabilities:
• Measuring electrical characteristic of transformer such as voltages,

current, etc.
• Calculating the power factor of the transformers
• Transferring the data in form of Protocol as specified in the
specification
• Warning message to alert users in case of sudden abnormal situation
63

• Withstanding to outdoor application such as Ultra violet (UV), direct
sunlight, pollution, etc.
c. Communication
The communication between Master Station and RTU should be via high
speed internet fiber optic communication wireless communication.
d. Protocol
Protocol for communication between the Master Station and RTU is
capable of:
• Sending important information such as RTU ID, electrical
characteristics and emergency case.
• Support for extension of installation of RTU more than 5,000 sets
• Verify the accuracy of information
• Support transmitting of data of “Polling” form
• Support transmitting of data in the form of Message (once an
emergency is found)
3 Maintenance and Inspection
3.1 Remarks on Making Maintenance and Inspection
• While working adjacent to live parts: Be sure to check that the apparatus
is disconnected from the live circuit. The work should begin only after
ascertaining that the apparatus is not live.
• In case of regularly maintenance and inspection: Try to identify any
abnormal conditions or problems with the transformer as early as possible
by comparing such indication with the operation records carefully.
3.2 Regularly Inspection
• Check the top oil temperature of the transformer: The top oil temperature
of transformer is specified to be not more than in Table 4. Make certain
that oil temperature rise is not more than Table 4. The Dial thermometer is
set to close the supervisory contacts at the temperature specified in Table
4. (See column Alarm) for alarm status and Table 4. (See column
Tripping) for tripping purpose.
64

Temperature of transformer (°C) Dial thermometer
At 40°C ambient temp. Contacts closed at (°C)
Oil Temperature Top Oil Alarm Tripping
Rise Temperature
50 90 85 95
55 95 90 100
60 100 95 105
Table 4: Temperature condition of transformer
• Looseness on locking or binding points: In case of any looseness being

found on various binding bolts along the outside surface, please tighten all
the loose parts as necessary.
• Oil leakage: Carefully check the parts to which gaskets are applied.
Note: While operating, transformer will generate heat and will effectively
remove condensation and moisture on the transformer.
3.3. Periodical Maintenance and Inspection
The transformer should be properly installed and maintained. Maintenance

should be performed regularly and when there is an indication of irregularities
or problems. Inspection should typically be performed when the transformer is
out of operation. The inspection should be done as follows:
• Check the protective devices such as dial thermometer and oil level for
proper functioning. If it is out of order, replace it with a new one. The
replacement of dial thermometer does not require draining the oil out,
because the thermo-scope is inserted in the thermometer pocket which is
separated from the oil.
• Check all bushings if the following damages have occurred:
- Dirty spots, cracks and traces of discharge on porcelain insulator.
- Loosened bolts, nuts and irregular tightness on fixing terminals or studs.
• Measurement of insulation resistance for each winding and ground, and
between windings. Insulation resistance is subjected to wide variation
with temperature, humidity and cleanliness of insulators. When the
insulation resistance falls below the minimum permissible value, it can, in
most cases of good design and where no defects exist, be brought up to
the required standard by cleaning and drying the transformer. A tentative
minimum value for operation is shown in Table 5 below:
Temperature °C 20 30 50 60
Insulation resistance MΩ 800 400 100 50
Table 5: Minimum permissible insulation resistance measurement
65

3.4. Recommended Maintenance Schedule
Description One month after initial Once a year

energizing after energizing
Gauge readings
Tank leakage
Control wiring & circuits
Point finish
Liquid dielectric test
Bushing terminal
Insulator cleanliness inspection
Note: indicator the applicable one
4. Conclusion
The asset management of the transformer begins with the specification preparation.
Reference standard design, raw materials and workmanship are used to manufacture
the transformer. The lifetime of transformers is determined by the lifetime of the
electrical insulation which is mainly organic in its chemical nature (being composed
of mineral oil, impregnated paper, cellulose materials, etc.) and the stability of such
materials is very susceptible to the operational temperature. Thus, the operating
temperature must be very closely specified and controlled in operation. If the
maximum temperature is exceeded for any length of time, the insulation lifetime
may be reduced from the nominal level.
Any overloading of the transformer, harmonic influences, faults by treeing and

animals are present, will affect the insulation temperature above its permissible
level as designed or mentioned in the nameplate and will reduce the life of the
transformer.
The usual rule of thumb is that continuous operation above the rated temperature by
only 6°C will halve the effective life of the insulation: this is the life reduction
factor used in most international Standards such as the Australian Transformer
loading Standard AS2374.7 [11].
Finally, the main purpose of this Handbook is to encourage the utilities to begin
using the low loss transformer by implementing the evaluation formula. Then it will
lead to the specified values of low loss figures for each rating of transformers which
are suitable for their own system. It will result in the electrical reduction of losses
by improved transformer efficiency and will thus extend the life of transformers and
is an additional justification for the introduction of new high efficiency levels for
transformers.
Applying the new technology of the transformer load monitoring (TLM) will aid the
utility to keep the service transformer’s capacity to be in the limit of the loading
66

guide, and to reach the generated lowest loss energy. Another key is that the
insulation need be maintained within the appropriate temperature limits to reach and
surpass the service life at least twenty years as mentioned in the evaluation formula.
67

Notes
68

Notes
69

Notes
70

71

72

0648-LMSDistTransfHandbk 0 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

0648-LMSDistTransfHandbk 0 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Distribution Transformer

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or

I t is hard to expect that energy prices will not continue to

Although typical distribution transformers seem very efficient, the reduction of

Replacing distribution transformers is relatively easy compared to lines or cables

The analysis is not extremely difficult but may be sensitive to a number of

Hans de Keulenaer Roman Targosz

C ambodia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR),

Being developing countries, their power distribution systems, an

In 2005, six power partners entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

• Electricité du Cambodge (EDC), Cambodia

Members of the Technical Working Group:

Electricite Du Laos (EDL), Lao People’s Democratic Republic

Ho Chi Minh City Power Company (HCMC PC), Vietnam

Hanoi Power Company (HNPC), Vietnam

Metropolitan Electricity Authority (MEA), Thailand

International Copper Association Southeast Asia (ICASEA)

MEA Project Support Team

T he harmonisation of power distribution systems in the

Strengthening regional cooperation to build the capacity of both technical and

Electricité du Cambodge, Cambodia

Electricité du Laos, Lao People’s Democratic Republic

Ho Chi Minh City Power Company, Vietnam

Hanoi Power Company, Vietnam

Metropolitan Electricity Authority, Thailand

International Copper Association Southeast Asia

Reference Standard: International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) is the

To protect mutual interest in cases of delayed or late submission, compensation

Type Overhead, outdoor type, three phase, mineral-oil-filled

Cooling method ONAN

kVA ratings To be specified during bid

Low-voltage rating 400 V

Tap ±2 x 2.5 % or +4x2.5%

Vector group Dyn11 or Dyn1

Voltage Rating 400V, 6kV, 10kV 15kV 22kV 35kV

kVA Range from 50 to 3200

Nominal value Range from 4% to 7%

Tank and Cover

The magnetic circuit shall be grounded in accordance with practices mentioned in

Bushings and Terminals

3.1. Transformer Evaluated Cost

Excess Losses and Penalty

a. The individual transformer loss is higher than tolerance: Individual transformer

Additional Requirements for Marking and Packing

Additional Requirements for Responsibility

4. Electricité du Cambodge - Additional

4.1. For Reliable Performance of the Transformer

EDC should consider adding technical information as follows:

4.2. For Loss Reduction:

a. In the basic loss evaluation process, three transformer figures are:

Finally, another technology of amorphous iron has been gradually applied

d. Extra losses due to harmonics: Harmonics can be caused by the

4.3. Transformer Loss Reduction Benefits

• Reduce total energy loss:

Eloss[kWh] = (P0 + Pk * I ² ) * 8,760

EP = Load power/ [Load power + Power loss]

• Increase life cycle cost

• Environmental and Health Costs

5. Electricité du Laos - Additional Specifications

5.1. For Reliable Performance of the Transformer:

EDL should consider adding technical information as follows:

5.2. For Loss Reduction:

a. In the basic loss evaluation process, three transformer figures are: