3.

REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT

3.1 TRADITIONAL CUSTODIAN/S OF THE LAND ON WHICH CQ UNIVERSITY

CAMPUSES ARE LOCATED
Response Table
The project manager does not think that one single stakeholder is actually adequate in order
to represent both of the different Indigenous communities that are resided at Australia. The
project manager thinks that one stakeholder can only represent briefly about one
Indigenous community, as it is impossible for one stakeholder to gather relevant and
effective information of two different communities while gathering valuable aspects related
with their needs and expectations (López Martín et al., 2012). Therefore, it would be much
more suitable and effective to arrange two different stakeholders who have expertise
regarding the fundamental aspects about two of the different communities’ altogether.
Despite it could take up a huge amount of cost, it has been observed that more reliable,
authentic and valuable information can be gathered while taking the approach. Moreover,
waterfall model has been considered in the project, as it allows managerial control
alongside with departmentalisation. Additionally, it is quite easy and simple to use in project
methods.

3.2.OPENING STATEMENT STYLE

Response Table
From several different instances, it can be described that “Welcome to Country” would be
much more effective as well as influential that the statement “Acknowledgement of
Country”, as it has been observed that the first statement is much more effective and
influential in terms of welcoming different people towards the campus rather than
considering the second statement. In order to acknowledge the international stakeholders,
the project leader needed to arrange some specific programs that can manage the cultural
related needs and expectations of the stakeholders (Tam et al., 2011). Similar importance is
needed to be provided towards different individual stakeholders, so that no one can be
demoralised while entering into the campus.

3.3 REQUIREMENTS GATHERING FOR THE CELEBRATING THE WORLD

INDIGENOUS PEOPLES

Response Table
The project manager of the entire project actually though that is a very good idea to actually
make the entire assignment based in the perfected ideas and concepts, which can be very
good at lowering the overall cost of the entire project. The project manager has made some
positive amendments upon the entire ideology (Heerkens, 2013). In order to take some new
information regarding the local as well as the International Indigenous people, it is essential
to make up some primary data collection and analysis, which could take an extensive
amount of time and cost that, might hinder the entire project outcome in a subsequent
 manner.

3.4 REQUIREMENTS TRACEABILITY

Response Table
RTM matrix can be illustrated as the perfect and subsequent tool that can be used quit
effectively in order to track or even trace the initial requirements of entire project life cycle
(Portz, 2014). Through the help of RTM matrix, it is actually possible for different individual
project managers to all of the different requirements that has been proposed by a client.
The traceability of the client’s documents can be obtained at the end of the project life
cycle.

3.5 REQUIREMENTS PRIORITIZATION PROCESS

Response Table
From several different instances, it has been observed that requirement prioritization has
been used as a specific software product management that can further be used in order to
determine the final requirement candidates of specific software that could be included with
in a specific release. Prioritised requirements are needed to be taken into consideration for
minimising the overall amount of risk in a project method (Campbell, 2018). MoSCoW model
is quite advantageous to be used rather than other requirement prioritization, as it has been
observed that this model can bring in a variety of different stakeholders and it includes
simplistic calculations. One pitfall of the exact method is it cannot make up different reasons
regarding why a specific task is needed to be completed under certain circumstances.

9 LESSONS LEARNT

Response Table

Previous Lessons Learnt Proposed Action to The Work Package

avoid similar and the activity that
problems (In the will cover the
Current Project) proposed action.

Lesson 1 In order to mitigate It would be best to

the issue that has been take effective
In a previous project, the suppliers failed to
obtained from the suggestion from a
consult the traditions of international
previous learnt specific individual
stakeholders and installed exhibits from local
lessons, it has been belonging from a
indigenous cultures as a last-minute measure.
suggested to the specific indigenous
This led to a protest by the representatives of
those international groups and resulted in the community, as by
project sponsors having to formally apologise to doing it the best
all key stakeholders involved. possible suggestions

project management for making them

department to make happy can be

effective consult with accumulated. In

the local people who addition to that, a

have subsequent and separate survey or
effective contact with interview season

the local could also be arranged

communicates. in order to gather
valuable information
in this regards so that
they does not get
dissatisfied in any
given context.

Lesson 2: A continues checking A spell checker can be

and quality control used in an effective
Ceremony programs in a previous project
board can be quite format in order to
contained numerous spelling and grammar
effective from the reduce the overall
mistakes that caused embarrassment to the
perspective of amount of mistakes
organising committee as well as to the sponsors.
reducing the number that could happen
of grammatical and inside of the project.
spelling mistakes that In addition to that,
had been done in a proper quality control
previous assessment. by making a
Furthermore, it can continuous assessment
also describe that the by a teacher or
project manager need lecturer can also be
to take effective effective from the
responsibility in order perspective of
to minimise properly reducing the number
the overall number of of error.
mistakes.
References

Campbell, G Michael. (2014). Project management (Idiot's guides Project management).

Heerkens, G. (2013). Project management (2nd ed., McGraw-Hill's ebook library. Business.

Business skills). New York: McGraw Hill Professional.

López Martín, M., García García, C., García Pérez, J., & Sánchez Granero, M. (2012). An
alternative for robust estimation in Project Management. European Journal of
Operational Research, 220(2), 443-451.

Portz, S. (2014). Project management. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 73(7), 19-23.

Tam, V., Shen, L., & Kong, J. (2011). Impacts of multi-layer chain subcontracting on project
management performance. International Journal of Project Management, 29(1), 108-
116.