Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course & Cat.#: Psych 213 Time: MWF 5:00-6:00PM Teacher: Jeric Anthony S. Arnado, MAGC, RGC Date: April 29, 2020
Type of Activity:
⎕ Concept Notes ⎕ Laboratory ⎕ Individual ⎕ Quiz ⎕ Formative ⎕ Summative
Drawing out the best
in you! ⎕Exercise/Drill ⎕ Art/Drawing ⎕Pair/Group ⎕Others, specify_____________________________
Lesson/Topic : Leadership
Learning Target(s) : (1) To understand the theories of leadership
Reference(s) : Aamodt, M. (2010). Industrial – organizational psychology (6th edition). Cengage learning
Concept/Digest
THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP
FIEDLER’s CONTINGENCY MODEL
- Individual’s leadership style is the result of a lifetime of experiences and thus extremely
difficult to change.
- Holds that any individual’s leadership style is effective only in a certain situation.
Leader position and power – the greater the position, the more favorable the situation.
Leader-member relations – the more subordinates like the leader, the more favorable the situation.
IMPACT THEORY
A leader has one of the six behavioral style:
1. Informational style – provides information in a climate of ignorance, where important information
is missing from the group.
2. Magnetic style – Leads through energy and optimism and effective only in the climate of despair,
which is characterized by low morale.
3. Position style – leads by virtue of the power inherent in that position. Effective only in climates of
instability- when people are not sure what actions to take.
4. Affiliation style – leads by liking and caring about others.
5. Coercive style – leads by controlling reward and punishment and is most effective in climate of
crisis.
6. Tactical style- leads through the use of strategy and is not effective in a climate of disorganization.
3. Participant Style – shares information with employees and lets them participate in decision making.
VERTICAL DYAD LINKAGE (VDL) Theory (Dansereav, Graen, & Haga, 1975)
Concentrates on the interaction between leaders and subordinates where leaders develop different
roles with different subordinates and thus act differently with different subordinates.
Subordinates fall into TWO CATEGORIES:
In-group – Those who have developed trusting, friendly relationship with leaders. As a result,
leaders deal with them by allowing them to participate in decisions and rarely disciplining them.
Out-group – treated differently and are more likely to be given direct orders and to have less say
about how affairs are conducted.