Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Numbe
Type of the
Individual ☒ Collaborative ☒ r of 4
activity:
weeks
Unit
Moment of
Initial ☐ Intermediate ☒ Final ☐
evaluation
:
Delivery Environment of the
Evaluative score of the activity: Collaborative Learning and
activity: 90 Monitoring and Evaluation
Environment
Starting date of the activity: Deadline of the activity:
26/10/2019 22/11/2019
Competence to develop:
Topics to develop:
Activities to develop
Individual:
Based on the readings, using the online fee tool Genially, draft
an infographic explaining:
The preparation
The discussion
The proposing
The bargaining
Based on the readings, using the online free tool GoConqr, draft
two mind maps (it is no required a concept map), one for each
reading, including all main topics explained, make sure you
include images.
Name
Date
Type of research
Phases of the methodology
References (Use APA)
7. Based on the reading and taking into account the proposals posted
by each student, each group must define a research methodology
according to the following chart:
Research Methodology
Group number 212032_Group number
Problem of How to promote digital
study transformation in Colombian
enterprises?
Type of
research
Phases of the Describe each phase including the
methodology information collection and the final
presentation of results.
References Use APA guidelines
Environment
for the Collaborative Learning, Monitoring and Evaluation
developmen Environment
t
Products to Individual:
deliver by
Each student submits to the Monitoring and Evaluation
student
Environment a PowerPoint presentation named
VNT_Step 3_Student Name including:
Cover
Introduction
Negotiation process and tactics infographic
(Activity 1)
Technology license and contracts mind
maps (Activity 2)
PATENSCOPE search chart (Activity 3)
YouTube link of student conclusions
(Activity 4)
References (Use APA guidelines)
Collaborative:
Each group, through the student that chooses the role
Deliveries, posts on the Collaborative Learning
Environment forum a PDF document, using APA
guidelines for references, named VNT_Step 3_Group
number, including:
● Cover
● Introduction
● Objectives
● Table of contents
● Research methodology mind map per student
(Activity 6)
● Research methodology chart (Activity 7)
Roles to ● Compiler
perform by ● Reviewer
the student ● Evaluator
in the ● Deliveries
collaborative ● Alerts
group
Compiler: Consolidate the document constituted as
the final product of the debate, taking into account
that the contributions of all the participants have been
included and that only the participants who
participated in the process are included.
Roles and
responsibilit Evaluator: Ensure that the document contains the
y for the criteria present in the rubric. You must inform the
delivery of person in charge of the alerts so that you inform the
products by other members of the team in case any adjustments
students have to be made on the subject.
Deliveries: Notify delivery times of the products and
send the document in the stipulated times, using the
resources destined for the shipment, and indicate to
the other partners that the delivery has been made.
9. Evaluation rubric
Evaluation rubric
Collabora
Activity
Individual Activity ☒ tive ☒
type:
Activity
Moment of Unit
the Initial ☐ Intermed ☒ Final ☐
evaluation iate:
Performance levels of the individual
Assessed activity Scor
Aspects Low e
High score Media score
score
The student The student
The
submits to the submits to the
student
Monitoring and Monitoring and
does not
Evaluation Evaluation
submit any
Environment a Environment a
file to the
PowerPoint PowerPoint
Monitoring
presentation presentation
and
including a describing just
Plan and Evaluation
creative a general
develop Environme
infographic information 15
successful nt,
describing the related to the
negotiations describing
negotiation negotiation
the
process along process or
negotiatio
the four phases, tactics, missing
n process
evidencing the some of the
and its
top ten tactics to given
tactics
succeed guidelines
(up to 15 (up to 8 (up to 0
points) points) points)
Understand The student The student The 20
submits to the submits a
Monitoring and document
Evaluation including just
Environment a part of the student
PowerPoint topics to be does not
the mains presentation, summarized, to submit any
aspects of including two have an infographic
intangible mind maps understanding describing
assets evidencing a of licensing and licensing
negotiation synthesis of the technologic and
main topics to contracts, or, it technologi
understand is missing c contracts
licensing and some of the
technologic given
contracts guidelines
(up to 20 (up to 10 (up to 0
points) points) points)
The student
submits to the
The student
Monitoring and
submits a The
Evaluation
document student
Environment a
including just does not
Understand PowerPoint
part of the submit any
technology s presentation,
PATENSCOPE finding
urveillance including the
search chart from the 15
mechanisms PATENSCOPE
or, it is missing PATENTSC
search chart
some of the OPE
evidencing five
given search
patents and its
guidelines
relation to the
problem of study
(up to 15 (up to 8 (up to 0
points) points) points)
Understand The student The student The 15
the submits a 2 - 3 submits a video student
valuation minutes video explaining does not
and through a himself, its submit any
negotiation YouTube link, conclusions in video
of including its relation to the proposing
name and date, importance of its
explaining
himself, its conclusion
technology findings and the valuation s in
and the conclusions and negotiation relation to
relevance of answering all of technology valuation
the study of four questions, and the and
digital in relation to the relevance of negotiatio
transformati importance of the study of n of
on in the valuation digital technology
companies and negotiation transformation and the
of technology missing some study of
to face the
and the of the given digital
challenge of
relevance of the guidelines transforma
real market study of digital tion
competition transformation
(up to 15 (up to 8 (up to 0
points) points) points)
Performance levels of the collaborative
Assessed activity Scor
Aspect Low e
High score Media score
score
The student
The student
posts in the
posts in the
Collaborative
Collaborative
Learning forum
Learning forum
a research The
a mind map that
Design a methodology student
includes student
research proposal does not
´s name, and
methodology date, evidencing forgetting the post any
to solve the mind map, or research 15
a clear research
digital the proposed methodolo
methodology to
transformati methodology is gy
research the
on problem not clear or
digital
appropriate for
transformation
a diagnosis
problem
research
(Up to 15 (Up to 8 (Up to 0
points) points) points)