Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EndoWorld
OSM 36-2-E/03-2009
2 3
Advantages
• Fully compatible with the instruments normally used for
cruciate ligament reconstruction
• Easy handling
• Developed using anatomical specimens and clinical
testing
• Variability in spacing of tunnels
EW OSM-36-2-E_03-2009:EW_OSM_30-D_2005-11-02.qxd 19.03.2009 15:08 Seite 4
Surgical procedure
Advantages
• Anatomical surgical procedure
• Only semitendonosus tendon required for graft preparation
• Greater freedom when selecting the femoral tunnel position as both tunnels
are drilled via the medial portal.
• Excellent visualization of lateral condyle wall and ACL insertion via antero-
medial portal.
• Reproducible femoral landmarks: intercondylar line and transition between
cartilage and bone
Indications
• Symptomatic anterior instability with anterior cruciate ligament rupture
Contraindications
• Children who have not reached skeletal maturity
• Multi-ligament interventions
• Osseous defects found during revision situations
Technique
4 5
6 7
AM PL
EW OSM-36-2-E_03-2009:EW_OSM_30-D_2005-11-02.qxd 19.03.2009 15:08 Seite 8
Instruments
8 9
28729 WT Tibial Aimer for double bundle, exit point on tibia plateau
adjustable between 8 – 10 mm
10 11
12 13
MegaFix®-B
MegaFix®-P
MegaFix®-C
MegaFix®-CP
14 15
EndoWorld®
www.karlstorz.com
Literature
1. PETERSEN, W.; ZANTOP, T.:
Technik der Doppelbündelrekonstruktion.
Arthroskopie 2, 2007: 132-138