Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Few things supervisors do are fraught with more perils than appraising subordinates
performance. Employees send to be overly optimistic about what their ratings will be.
They also know their raises, career and peace of mind may hinge on how them rate them.
Its not enough few appraisal process are as fair as employers thinknthey are.
Hundreds of obvious and not so obvious problems occur such as bias, tendency for the
supervisor to rate everyone average and also distort the process. However the perils
notwithstanding the performance appraisal plays a central role of human resource
management.
Before appraising performance, managers should understand the basic concepts in
performance management and appraisal. Stripped to its essential s, performance
appraisal involves setting work standards, assessing the employees actual performance
relative to those standards and also providing feedback to the employee. Managers should
also appraise employees based on the criteria and the actual standards and should be
SMART- specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and timely.
OBJECTIVES
DISCUSSION
What is Performance Appraisal?
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Evaluating an employees current performance relative to his/ her performance standards
PERFORMANCE PROCESS
1. Setting the work standards.
2. Assessing the employees actual performance relative to the standards.
3.Providing feedback to the employee and aim to eliminate performance
deficiencies or to continue to perform above par.
Page1|5
BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Accountancy, Business Economics and International Hospitality Management
GRADUATE SCHOOL
• PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
The continuous process of identifying , measuring and developing the
performance of individual and teams and aligning their performance with the
organization’s goals.
• S- pecific ( desired result of the goal )
• M –easurable ( put goals quantitative, answer how much )
• A- ttainable ( how to reach the goal)
• R –elevant (clearly what the company want to achieve)
• T-imebound ( reflect deadlines and target dates)
Page2|5
BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Accountancy, Business Economics and International Hospitality Management
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Supervisor Appraisal
• Performance appraisal done by an employee’s manager and often reviewed by a
manager one level higher.
Self-Appraisal / Ratings
Performance appraisal done by the employee being evaluated, generally on an
appraisal form completed by the employee prior to the performance review.
Subordinate Appraisal
• Performance appraisal of a superior by an employee, which is more appropriate
for developmental than for administrative purposes. Upward feedback can
improved a manager’s performance.
Peer Appraisal
• Performance appraisal done by one’s fellow employees, generally on forms that
are complied into a single profile for use in the performance interview conducted
by the employee’s manager. Firms uses in self- managing teams can be effective.
Team Appraisal
• Performance appraisal, based on TQM concepts, that recognizes team
accomplishment rather than individual performance.
Page3|5
BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Accountancy, Business Economics and International Hospitality Management
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Appraisal Methods
• Rating Scales
• Forced Choice Statements
• Essay
• Critical Incident Method
• Management by Objectives
• Alteration Ranking of Employees
• Paired Comparison Method
Forced-Choice Method
• A trait approach to performance appraisal that requires the rater to choose from
statements designed to distinguish between successful and unsuccessful
performance.
Essay Method
• A trait approach to performance appraisal that requires the rater to compose a
statement describing employee behavior.
• Write a Behavioral Statement
• Strengths versus Weaknesses
• Describe Selected Traits
• Evaluate Performance
Page4|5
BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Accountancy, Business Economics and International Hospitality Management
GRADUATE SCHOOL
REFERENCES
Aquinis, Herman. Performance Management (Upper Saddle River, N.J.) Pearson (2009)
pp.3-4
Craig,S. Bartolomew & Facteu J. “Performance Appraisal Rating from different Rating
Scores” Journal of Applied Psychology 86 no.2(2001)pp.213-227
Glendinning ,Peter”Performance Management Parish or Messiah” Public Personnel
Management 31,no,2(Summer 2002)pp.161-178.
Page5|5