Professional Documents
Culture Documents
t007 PDF
t007 PDF
ABSTRACT
Black cotton soil is one of the major soil deposits of India. They exhibit high swelling and shrinking when exposed
to changes in moisture content and hence have been found to be most troublesome from engineering considerations.
Stabilization occurs when lime is added to black cotton soil and a pozzolanic reaction takes place. The hydrated
lime reacts with the clay particles and permanently transforms them into a strong cementitious matrix. Black
cotton soil showing low to medium swelling potential from Latur, Maharashtra was used for determining the basic
properties of the soil. Changes in various soil properties such as Liquid limit, Plastic Limit, Maximum Dry Density,
Optimum Moisture Content, Differential Free Swell, Swelling Pressure and California Bearing Ratio were studied.
Black cotton soil from Latur was used for the determining LL vs. Lime Content
the basic properties of the soil such as wet and dry sieve
analysis, Atterberg Limits, Standard Proctor Test, Differential 61
60
Liquid Limit (%)
accordance with IS 2720 (Part 4)-1985 and were classified in Lime Content (%)
accordance with IS 1498-1970. Fig. 1: Variations in Liquid Limit with Lime Content
Atterberg Limits Although the plastic limit did not change distinctly
The Atterberg Limits of the soil were determined in (range between 32% and 40%) with increase in lime content,
accordance with IS 2720 (Part 5)-1985. The Atterberg Limits the lowest value was reached at a lime content of about 4%
gave the Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit of the soil, from which as seen in Fig. 2. The plastic limit of untreated soil was
the Plasticity Index was determined. determined to be 33%.
The Effect of Lime Stabilization on Properties of Black Cotton Soil 513
30.00
41
39 25.00
Plastic Limit (%)
OMC (%)
37
20.00
35
15.00
33
31 10.00
29
5.00
27
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Lime Content (%)
Lime Content (%)
Fig. 2: Variations in Plastic Limit with Lime Content Fig. 5: Variations in OMC with Lime Content
The plasticity index decreased gradually with increase Differential Free Swell Test
in lime content, see Fig. 3. The plasticity index varies from The differential free swell decreases gradually with increase
25.9% to about15.1%. This shows that the plastic nature of in lime content as seen in Fig. 6. The variation in differential
the soil decreases and the stiffness of the soil increases as free swell was observed between 34.6% and 27.6% whereas
the lime content increases. Based on the sieve analysis and the differential free swell for virgin soil was calculated as
Atterberg Limit test results, the soil under consideration is 39%
classified as MH.
DFS vs. Lime Content
40
Plasticity Index vs. Lime Content
38
30
36
25
34
DFS (%)
Plasticity Index (%)
20 32
30
15
28 .
10 26
24
5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Lime Content (%)
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Fig. 6: Variations in DFS with Lime Content
Lime Content (%)
Swelling Pressure
Fig. 3: Variations in Plasticity Index with Lime Content
The swelling pressure of the untreated soil was calculated
Standard Proctor Test as 1.06 kg/cm2. With the addition of a very small amount of
The Standard Proctor Test results show that the maximum lime (2%), the swelling pressure dropped to 0.42kg/cm2. The
dry density remains constant with variation in lime content swelling pressure decreases with increase in lime content
(Fig. 4) whereas the optimum moisture content (OMC) lies up to 3.5% after which it goes on increasing. The optimum
lime content is observed at about 3.5% where the swelling
2.0
Max. Dry Density vs. Lime Content
pressure was calculated as 0.22kg/cm2. (Fig. 7)
1.9
1.8
1.7
Swelling Pressure vs. Lime Content
MDD (g/cc)
1.2
1.6
1.5
Swelling Pressure (kg/cm2)
1.0
1.4
1.3
0.8
1.2
1.1
0.6
1.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0.4
Lime Content (%)
California Bearing Ratio Test and laboratory assistants of the college, Mr. Pujari and Mr.
The CBR value of the soil decreases with increase in lime Patil who performed the extensive testing for this work.
content up to 3.5% after which it goes on increasing. The REFERENCES
optimum lime content is observed at about 3.5%. (Fig. 8)
Balasubramaniam, A. S., Bergado, D. T., Buensuceso Jr, B. R
CBR Value vs. Lime Content and Yong, W. C. (1989). Strength and deformation
characteristics of lime-treated soft clays. Geotech. Eng.,
20 20, 49-65
18
16 Bell, F.G. (1988). Stabilization and treatment of clay soils with
CBR Value (%)
14
12
lime. Part 1. Basic principles. Ground Engineering, 21,
10 10–15.
8
6 Holtz, W. G., and Gibbs, H. J.(1956). Engineering Properties
4 of Expansive Clays. Transactions, ASCE, Paper No. 2814,
2
0 Vol. 121.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Nagaraj, T. S. (1964). Soil structure and strength
Lime Content (%)
characteristics of compacted clay. Géotechnique, Volume
Fig. 8: Variations in CBR Value with Lime Content 14 (2), 103 –114.
Okumara, T. and Terashi, M. (1975). Deep lime mixing method
4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
of stabilization for marine clay. Proceedings, 5th Asian
An immediate benefit obtained by the addition of lime to Regional Conference on SMFE, Vol. 1, pp. 69–75.
swelling soils is to reduce the potential for swelling upon
Prakesh, K., Sridharan, A. and Rao, S.M. (1989). Lime addition
contact with water. The plastic nature of the soil decreases
and curing effect on the index and compaction
and the stiffness of the soil increases as the lime content
characteristics of a Montmorillonitic soil. Geotech. Eng.,
increases. For improving the properties described in this
20, 39-64
paper, the optimum lime content was found to be within the
range of 3.5% to 4.5% These values are found to be in general Ranganatham (1961). Soil structure and consolidation
agreement with work carried out by other researchers characteristics of black cotton clay. Geotechnique 11.4,
(Ranganatham, 1961, Subba Rao, et. al., 1983). 333-338.
Subba Rao, K.V., Narasimha Rao, S., and Sankaran, K.S.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (1983), Compressibility Behaviour of Lime treated soils,
The authors are grateful to the B.E. students: Salil Jawadekar, Indian Geotech Conf, Madras, (IGC - 8), Vol.1, pp 1-33-
Ajay More, Asar Munaiz, Viral Panani and Sachin shinde 1- 38