Professional Documents
Culture Documents
POSITIVE
Why does the US use about twice as much energy per person as Europe does?
● Each person uses different kinds of energy: heating, materials, food, car engines, ship
engines, jet engines, diet, fertilizer
Energy is this miracle that’s core to the modern lifestyle
THE PROBLEM:
● The primary generation sources, which are coal, natural gas, and liquid gasoline, when
you burn them, they release CO2 into the air, and this clearly causes heating
THE SOLUTION:
● Innovating across all the sectors of emissions
However…
● Technologies such as solar and wind will not singlehandedly shut off any pipes
○ Since they’re intermittent, we must store everything that’s generated
■ But we can’t build enough batteries to store power for the entire world
[ According to NASA, the CO2 that’s being pumped into the atmosphere can linger for
hundreds of years ]
DIFFERENT APPROACHES:
1. Developing porous material that could remove carbon from the air, soaking up CO2 like
a sponge
2. Converting CO2 into chemicals to make recyclable plastics and other products
3. Using highly efficient 3D-printing, creating materials that produce far less carbon
dioxide
4. Building a longer-range, cheaper battery for electric vehicles
It’s necessary that we start deploying a solution and we deploy it unnaturally fast
NUCLEAR ENERGY
- Requires hundreds of millions of dollars and assembling a team of over-qualified
scientists
- Problems include economics and public perception
● When a neutron is shot into an atom, it creates a chain reaction and a massive amount
of heat
○ That heat can generate steam that powers a turbine and makes electricity, all
without emitting CO2
When you have a fission reaction, you get radioactive materials
The difficult part about nuclear power is to make sure that, no matter what, those nuclear
materials are not escaping
- CHERNOBYL: the reactor relied too heavily on its operators
● The fear of, “Is it safe?” Appropriately, the public questions, “Do we need this
technology at all?”
○ How many people have nuclear reactors killed as opposed to how many
the effluent of coal plants?
■ Nuclear power has caused less than a few thousand deaths total
■ Coal kills 800,000 people every year
There hasn’t been real innovation in nuclear technology for 25 years
● How can we actually deploy enough energy to get off of fossil fuels?
- Almost all nuclear power plants currently in existence were not designed with
computers at all
● They were literally slide-rule designed plants
● The nuclear power plant that exploded at Chernobyl is based on a design from
the late 1940s
● Most modern nuclear plants in the US at the present time represent 1960s
designs and 1970s implementation
BREAKTHROUGH:
Instead of using enriched uranium, Teller and Lowell imagined a way to use depleted
uranium, which can’t be used for nuclear weapons
- TerraPower: Could the reactor actually work?
● After 5 years of extensive computer modeling, the idea showed promise
○ The new design greatly reduced the chance of human error
- Fueled by depleted uranium, the traveling wave reactor functions as a slow-burning
candle and required refueling only once every decade
Reactor = clean, efficient, and safe
Fukushima was a slide-rule era plant
● It’s of a type of plant that becomes unsafe if you ever shut the power off
After you take fuel out of a nuclear reactor, it’s called spent fuel
● It’s still hot and it continues to be hot for quite some period of time, so you have to
put it in what’s called a cooling pond
○ There’s only water to cool it if there’s power
When the 9.0 earthquake shook the plant at Fukushima, the reactor shut off
“No worries! We’ll use diesel generators.”
- They were put at the lowest point (right behind the seawall)
● As soon as the tsunami went over the seawall, it destroyed the generators
As the internal temperature skyrocketed, the reactor turned into a pressure cooker and soon
reached its breaking point
Safety features: the reactor vessel stays at atmospheric pressure, no high pressure in the
system
● Result of the type of coolant
Unlike the Fukushima-style reactor, the traveling wave reactor doesn’t use water to cool
itself:
{
● Instead, liquid metal
● Has a very high boiling point, so high that there’s no chance our coolant will ever boil
● Long before it reached a boiling point temperature, the reactor itself shuts off
● All of the heat that happens after you shut the reactor down, can be taken away
through air circulation (passive heat removal)
● Passive heat removal takes the heat directly from the reactor vessel without any
electrical power or operator intervention
● Reactors built to withstand disasters - tidal wave, earthquake, airline crash
○ Worst case is that the reactor stops generating electricity, not that any of the
radioactive materials are released
}
Still one unavoidable byproduct of nuclear power
When uranium is enriched, only 10% of the material can be burned as fuel
● The other 90% is unused byproduct which must be stored carefully
○ Right now, there are 700,000 metric tons just piling up
TerraPower fuel testing pit: fuel bundles, stainless steel tubes wrapped in wire
● Inside tubes = uranium sourced from existing waste will power the reactor
● Waste that everyone is trying to get rid of can now be used to produce clean energy
● In Paducah, Kentucky, there’s this huge government facility that has enough nuclear
waste in it to run the United States for 125 years
ISSUES:
Funding to build a pilot reactor
SOLUTION:
Collaborating with China
The world will have a new way of generating electricity that is zero greenhouse gas, very safe
and very economic
HOWEVER...
The US government disapproved the contract