Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Visuals N
Visuals for overhead projector.
Copy to transparent paper for overhead.
Lessons 2
Copy and handout to students.
Defined
the difference in value between the buyer and seller, the trade will
not take place. In this case a transaction cost greater than $5,000
will eliminate the sale, and remove mutual gains from trade.
Concepts
1. Trade
2. Transaction cost
3. Mutual benefits from trade
Objectives
1. Understand there are mutual gains from trade.
2. Realize there are transaction costs when trading.
3. Recognize that middlemen can help reduce the transaction costs
of trade.
Content Standards
Time Required
1-3 class periods
Materials Needed
Overhead projector
Transparency pen
Visuals for overhead projector: Copy to transparency.
NVisual-1: Trade defined
NVisual-2: Trading game
NVisual-3: Trade and TC
NVisual-4A: PPF with trade
NVisual-4B: PPF with trade
Lesson worksheets: Copy for each student.
2Lesson-I: Vegetables for beef
2Lesson-II: Lost jobs
2Lesson assessment
Additional items for trading game:
Variety pack of Jolly Ranchers, pens, or dollar toys, one per student—
you must be able to see the variety without opening (leftover Hal-
loween, Christmas, and Easter candy work well).
Small paper bag
Procedure
1. Display NVisual-1: Trade defined and discuss why we trade. Help
students recognize that there are mutual benefits to voluntary trade.
(Note: There may be third parties that are not voluntarily engaged in
the trade but are affected positively or negatively by an exchange.
For example, when a neighbor plants a beautiful garden you may
benefit without negotiating trade. Alternatively, a manufacturing
plant may release chemicals into the air without negotiating with
those downwind. These external effects will be discussed in Mod-
ule-14: Externalities.)
2. Have students imagine what life would be like if there were no trade.
Discuss what this would mean and how most of them would not have
time for school if their families were forced to produce everything
they consumed. Though usually a story of the past, you can imagine
being dropped by plane into a remote Alaskan area with no roads,
transportation, or communication with the outside world. The bulk
of time would be spent producing the necessities for life.
Lesson outline
Materials:
2Lesson-I: Vegetables for beef
NVisual-4A: PPF with trade
NVisual-4B: PPF with trade
resources used in production remain the same, Val and Max cannot
produce beyond their PPF. Discuss with students that consumption
is limited to a single point on or below the PPF if technology and
resources are constant, and there is no trade. Have students think
about what would happen if Val and Max combine their efforts.
Together, if Max and Val both specialize in producing vegetables,
they can produce up to 750 bushels (Val’s 500 bushels plus Max’s
250 bushels). Using NVisual-4B: PPF with trade (production pos-
sibilities frontier for Val and Max with Trade), plot the point, 750
bushels of vegetables and zero cows. Have students do the same on
their handout. Working on their own, have students determine where
the intercept would be if both Val and Max produced cows and no
vegetables. Tell students not to connect the points. Mark the point,
zero bushels of vegetables and 35 cows on the graph.
The combined PPF that includes trade is not a linear line between
these two points, rather it has a kink. If Val and Max both specialize
where they have the lower opportunity cost to produce, Val produc-
ing 500 bushels of vegetables and Max producing 25 cows, we can
find a point on the combined PPF that allows for trade and sits be-
yond the original PPF for either Val or Max. Connecting this point
to the intercepts where both specialize in the same good, produces
the new PPF. Max and Val can now consume well beyond what they
can each produce alone.
Have students plot the third point on the PPF with trade. Have them
draw a line between each intercept point and the third point. This is the
new PPF allowing for trade. The new PPF sits above the PPFs for both
Val and Max. As a result, the two families can consume more when they
combine their efforts and allow for trade than when they produce for
their own consumption. This is shown in NVisual-4B: PPF with trade:
Production possibilities frontier for Val and Max with Trade.
Materials:
2Lesson-II: Lost jobs
NVisual-4A: PPF with trade
Some students may find this article myopic in that it does not dis-
cuss other issues of globalization, like child labor and environmental
stewardship. It is important here to keep the focus on the gains from
trade. Further analysis on these issues will be provided in future
modules. Nonetheless, when imposing our ideals on other people
it is important to understand their perspective. People in countries
that allow child labor are generally very poor. Many of these fami-
lies might be worse off if their children did not work. In fact, many
sweatshops throughout the world pay wages substantially higher than
the regional average. Similarly, most individuals have few concerns
about the environment until they have sufficient income to clothe,
feed, and provide shelter for themselves and their family.
Close this lesson by reminding students that trade increases income.
Whether within a family, state, region, or across countries, producing
goods in which we have the lower opportunity cost and trading for the
rest of the commodities we desire is the best use of resources.
Closure
Lesson review
Assessment
Multiple-choice questions
Answers:
1. c
2. a
3. c
4. a
5. b
Discussion/Essay Questions
1. LQuestion: Middlemen, like grocers and car salesmen, create wealth.
Is this statement true or false? Explain.
Answer: True. Middlemen provide a valuable service, information
and product location. People are willing to trade with middlemen
because they perceive there are gains from the trade. Otherwise they
would not trade with a middleman, instead foregoing the purchase
altogether or buying directly from the producer.
NOTES
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
C___________________________________________________
opyright © 2008 by MCEE (www.econedmontana.org) Economics: The Study of Choices
77
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
Exchange and Trade
Module-3 The exchange of one
Teacher commodity for another
NOTES
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
O ve r h e a d
visuals
Exchange and Trade
Exchange and Trade
Module-3 The exchange of one
Visual commodity for another
N80
Exchange and Trade
Module-3 The exchange of one
Visual commodity for another
N81
Exchange and Trade
Module-3 The exchange of one
Visual commodity for another
a d e Is Mutually
Tr Beneficial
N82
Exchange and Trade
Module-3 The exchange of one
Visual commodity for another
N83
Exchange and Trade
Module-3 The exchange of one
Visual commodity for another
N84
Module-3
L e ss o n
w orksh eet s
Exchange and Trade
Exchange and Trade
Module-3 The exchange of one
Lesson commodity for another
A ssume that veggie lovin’ Val can produce the 500 bushels of vegetables or
ten cows as shown in the vegan or meat eater lessons from the previous
modules. Val has a large family that prefers some beef in their diet. Her produc-
tion possibilities frontier (PPF) is the same as before and is shown below. Meat
eatin’ Max lives next door. Max also has ten acres of productive farm land. But
Max is slightly better at producing cattle than vegetables. Max can produce as
many as 25 cattle on his ten acres or he can produce up to 250 bushels of veg-
etables. He too has a large family and he realizes the importance of including
vegetables and beef in his family’s diet. Draw in the production possibilities
frontier (PPF) for Max on the bottom right graph.
Remember, the opportunity cost is how much of one good must be given up
to produce another.
Questions:
3. LQuestion: How many cows and vegetables could Max and Val produce if
they combined their resources? On the figure below draw in the combined
Production possibilities frontier for Max and Val.
4. LQuestion: If Val and Max work together and allow for trade, they can pro-
duce on the new Production possibilities frontier. If they allow for trade can
they consume more than if they each produce everything they consume?
Lost jobs
showed him a shelf with several hun- their trade. He noted that since Lost
dred of the little pieces. David asked Valley was Jerry and Sarah’s sover-
if he could buy a dozen of them. He eign country, they would have com-
offered a good price, but Jerry and plete control over who could use the
Sarah had no use for money. So David road.
suggested he simply leave them some Jerry said yes, and soon he was
as a sign of his good faith, promising making monthly deliveries, in ex-
to return later with other goods that change for more supplies. The family
they could use. now had enough free time that the
When David returned in a month, children could concentrate on their
he had two more fellows with him. education. David and his friends had
They were all carrying heavy packs brought another computer, and the
filled with seeds, new tools, medicine kids used it to surf the Internet, learn-
kits, silverware, clothing, soap, and ing more about the outside world.
other household goods. The man told Soon, they created a web site adver-
Jerry he’d like to take one hundred tising Jerry’s statues.
more of the carvings. Orders flooded in. The next time
Jerry was happy to sell his carvings David arrived, Jerry told him he want-
to David. The new goods made his ed to set up his own company, using
family’s life significantly easier. Em- David as his distributor and as a mar-
ploying them to boost their productiv- keting consultant. David was happy to
ity, the rest of Jerry’s family could raise oblige. Sarah became interested in the
enough food for all of them, leaving details of fulfilling orders. She also be-
him more time to work on his art. The gan keeping books for the company,
more he specialized in that one task an activity that made sense now that
the more his skill improved. they were using money.
David and his two friends returned Within a few years, there was a
in the winter, riding three snowmo- thriving business in the woodcarvings
biles that were full of goods. Besides located just over the mountains from
staples, they also brought a computer Jerry and Sarah’s valley. It included
and a satellite dish. They taught Jerry sales, marketing, and distribution
how to retrieve e-mail, and told him departments. There was also a manu-
they would send him custom orders. facturing division producing copies of
In the spring they arrived again. Jerry’s work, since many people liked
Jerry’s carvings were a fantastic suc- it but could not afford originals. Sarah
cess. David asked Jerry if they could was the CEO of the company, travel-
cut a road in to his cabin, to facilitate ing out of the valley three days a week
he still did not quite get the profes- same time period. Apparel imports
sor’s drift. Mercantilio sensed this have gone from 1% to 97%. Obvious-
and explained further. ly, this trend can’t continue. Without
“Didn’t you once have dozens any production, how will you pay for
of different jobs performed in this your imports? Your economic role as
valley? Farmer, weaver, carpenter, consumers is undermining your role
soap maker, cook, lumberjack, as producers.”
butter manufacturer, herder, shoe- Jerry thought these remarks over.
maker, hunter, fisherman, butcher, It was strange to think that his fami-
and more?” ly’s newfound prosperity was merely
“Well... sure. We sure did.” an illusion. But he knew little about
“And where have those jobs economics, and, after all, this was
gone?” the area Professor Mercantilio had
This was a perplexing question. studied for many years. He must
Just where had they gone, Jerry know what he was talking about.
wondered. “Well,” Jerry asked, “how do we
fix the problem?”
The professor told him: “It’s not going to be easy,” the
professor confessed. “Initially, it will
“To foreigners! They’re all still be- require some sacrifice: Your level of
ing done, just not within this valley consumption will have to drop for a
any more. Why today, you are down while. But better some sacrifice now
to your last two jobs—company di- than a complete economic collapse
rector and sculptor. Tell me, how can later. In the long run, your economy
an economy thrive with only two will be much healthier for it.”
jobs in it, without any manufactur-
ing or agricultural base?” The professor’s program
Jerry said, “Gee, I don’t know.
But we seem to be doing OK!” Over the next several days, Pro-
“Trust me, that’s just an illusion. fessor Mercantilio developed some
Your economy is being hollowed out. sophisticated mathematical models
Your percentage of your agricultural of Lost Valley’s economy, and worked
consumption that you import has out a program of import substitu-
soared from 0% to 98% over the last tion that would get it back on its feet
five years. Your imports of manufac- again. The labor and manufacturing
tured products have gone from 2% to sectors, the heart of any flourishing
99% of total consumption over the economy, would be revitalized. It
the domestic products they had previ- the time of Professor Mercantilio’s
ously disdained. With fewer imported second visit to the valley, is largely
tools to aid the family members in drawn from his ground breaking
their work, it took more and more paper, “The Disappearance of Work
time for them to produce the neces- in the Late Capitalist Economy: The
sities of life. Case of Lost Valley,” published in
A year later, the company selling Sociological Perspectives on Labor
Jerry’s woodcarvings went into bank- Rights, Vol. XII, No. 3. Just last year,
ruptcy and was purchased for a song Professor Mercantilio returned to the
by Warren Buffett. Soon enough, the valley to perform some econometric
money Jerry and Sarah had received studies to help determine the success
from the sale was gone. The road into of his program. Unfortunately, we
Lost Valley gradually became impass- can’t report on the outcome of this
able. Jerry and Sarah’s SUV broke most recent visit, as he has not been
down, and they had no idea how to heard from since.
repair it. Over time, the house be-
gan to fall apart, the hot tub stopped
working, and the computers became
useless. The children abandoned
their plans to attend college. Jerry Jr.
stopped painting, as he had no time
for it. Anyway, the family could no
longer afford paint or canvas for him.
One day, while cutting wood, Jerry Sr.
lopped off a finger from his right hand
with an errant axe blow. He could no
longer carve wood as he used to, and
he lost his interest in the art.
Eventually, the medicine kits were
empty. Doctors could no longer reach
Lost Valley by road and Jerry and
Sarah could not afford to fly them in.
When their daughter caught pneu-
monia, there was little they could do
but watch in sorrow as her condition This article The Nation That Lost Its Jobs, But Got Them Back
by Gene Callahan was posted on the web at www.mises.
worsened and she eventually died. org. Cited Thursday, November 20, 2003. Gene Callahan
The above information, up to is author of Economics for Real People.
Lesson assessment
Multiple-choice questions
Lesson Assessment
Discussion/essay questions
2. LQuestion: The exchange of goods and services is zero sum, that is one
party wins while the other loses. Is this statement true or false? Explain.
Assume that veggie lovin’ Val can produce the 500 bushels of vegetables or
ten cows as shown in the Vegan or meat eater lessons from the previous mod-
ules. Val has a large family that prefers some beef in their diet. Her production
possibilities frontier (PPF) is the same as before. Meat eatin’ Max lives next
door. Max also has ten acres of productive farm land. But Max is slightly better
at producing cattle than vegetables. Max can produce as many as 25 cattle on
his ten acres or he can produce up to 250 bushels of vegetables. He too has a
large family and he realizes the importance of including vegetables and beef in
his family’s diet. Draw in the production possibilities frontier (PPF) for Max on
the figure below.
Remember, the opportunity cost is how much of one good must be given up
to produce another.
Answer
Questions:
3. LQuestion: How many cows and vegetables could Max and Val produce if
they combined their resources? On the figure below draw in the combined
production possibilities frontier for Max and Val.
Answer figure below on the right.
4. LQuestion: If Val and Max work together and allow for trade, they can
produce on the combined production possibilities frontier. If they allow for
trade can they consume more than if they each produce everything they
consume?
Answer: Yes. The combined PPF sits above the PPF of both Val and Max. Their
total consumption can increase because their production has increased.
NOTES
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________