Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Release 2019 R1
1
Introduction
Lecture Theme:
Heat transfer has broad applications across all industries. All modes of heat transfer
(conduction, convection – forced and natural, radiation) can be modeled in Fluent
Learning Aims:
You will learn:
• How to treat conduction, convection (forced and natural) and radiation heat
transfer in Fluent
• How to set wall thermal boundary conditions
Learning Objectives:
You will be familiar with Fluent’s heat transfer modeling capabilities and be able to set
up and solve problems involving all modes of heat transfer
2
Heat Transfer Modeling in Fluent
• All modes of heat transfer can be taken into account with CFD simulation:
– Conduction
– Convection (forced and natural)
– Radiation
• Numerous processes can be included as appropriate
– Interphase energy source (phase change)
– Fluid-solid conjugate heat transfer
– Viscous dissipation
– Species diffusion
• To model heat transfer, activate the energy equation
– Select Energy in the Models group of the Physics tab
3
Convection Heat Transfer
4
Conduction Heat Transfer
• Mathematically, qconduction = −k T
5
Review: Thermal Wall Boundary Conditions
6
Modeling Heat Transfer in Walls
• It is often important to model the thermal effects of the wall bounding the fluid
but it may not be necessary to mesh it.
– Option 1 Fluid
▪ Mesh the wall in the pre-processor
Solid
▪ Assign it as a solid cell zone
Heat can flow in all directions
▪ This is the most thorough approach
– Option 2: Fluid
▪ Just mesh the fluid region
Solid
▪ Specify a wall thickness Heat transfer normal to wall
▪ Wall conduction will be accounted for
Fluid
– Option 3:
▪ As option 2, but enable ‘Shell Conduction’ Solid
▪ 1 or more layers of ‘virtual cells’ will be created Heat can flow in all directions
Introduction Overview Wall BCs Applications Summary
7
Managing Shell Conduction Walls
8
Conjugate Heat Transfer (CHT)
• At a wall between a fluid and a solid zone or a wall with fluid on both sides, a wall /
wall_shadow is created automatically by Fluent while reading the mesh file
– By default, the Coupled boundary condition automatically balances energy on the two sides of the walls
– Possible, but uncommon, to uncouple and to specify different thermal conditions on each side
Grid
Velocity Vectors
Temperature Contours
Introduction Overview Wall BCs Applications Summary
9
Natural Convection
with
10
User Inputs for Natural Convection
11
Radiation
• Radiative heat transfer is a mode of energy transfer where the energy is transported via
electromagnetic waves
− Thermal radiation covers the portion of the electromagnetic spectrum from 0.1 to 100 mm
Visible
Ultraviolet Infrared
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
log10 (Wavelength), mm
12
When to Include Radiation?
13
Optical Thickness and Radiation Modeling
• The optical thickness should be determined
before choosing a radiation model
Optical Thickness (a+s)L
a= absorption coefficient
s=scattering coefficient (often=0)
L= mean beam length
– a: absorption coefficient (m-1)
(Note: ≠Absorptivity of a Surface)
– L: mean beam length (m)
(a typical distance between 2 opposing walls)
• Optically thin means that the fluid is transparent to the
radiation at wavelengths where the heat transfer occurs
– The radiation only interacts with the boundaries of the domain
• Optically thick/dense means that the fluid absorbs and re-emits the radiation
Introduction Overview Wall BCs Applications Summary
14
Choosing a Radiation Model
• The radiation model selected must be appropriate for the optical thickness of the
system being simulated
Model Optical Thickness Computational Expense
Surface to surface model (S2S) 0 When optical thickness = 0, S2S has comparable accuracy with DO and
MC at less computational expense
Solar load model 0 (except window panes) Very low computational expense for solar radiation problems
compared to the DO model
Rosseland >5 Very inexpensive but limited in applicability
P-1 >1 Reasonable accuracy for moderate cost
Discrete ordinates model (DO) All Very comprehensive and accurate model but more computationally
expensive than S2S for optically thin systems and more expensive than
P1 and Rosseland for optically thick systems
Discrete transfer method (DTRM) All Cheaper then DO but not available in parallel so rarely used
Monte Carlo model (MC) All The most accurate model but also the most computationally expensive
• In terms of accuracy, DO and MC are most accurate (S2S is accurate for optical thickness = 0)
Introduction Overview Wall BCs Applications Summary
15
Post-Processing Heat Transfer
16
Summary
17