Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effect of CaO On Oxidation Resistance and Microstructure of Pure MG PDF
Effect of CaO On Oxidation Resistance and Microstructure of Pure MG PDF
1081 to 1083
Special Issue on Platform Science and Technology for Advanced Magnesium Alloys, IV
#2008 The Japan Institute of Metals
This study was carried out to examine reduction mechanism of CaO and to investigate behaviors of CaO in pure Mg in terms of
microstructure, oxidation resistance and phase formation. Pure Mg was used instead of Mg alloys to minimize the effects of other elements. With
respect to CaO content, microstructures of the alloys showed prominent grain refinement. Mg2 Ca phase was formed even in 0.07CaO added pure
Mg by reduction, while Mg2 Ca phase was formed over 1.35Ca added pure Mg. With respect to CaO content, the hardness of CaO added pure Mg
was increased by grain refinement. From oxidation test by TGA, the oxidation behavior of CaO added Mg was similar to that of Ca added Mg.
From AES result, there was the thin oxide layer mixed with MgO and CaO in CaO added Mg. [doi:10.2320/matertrans.MC200786]
(Received October 10, 2007; Accepted January 30, 2008; Published March 19, 2008)
Keywords: magnesium, calcium oxide, Mg2 Ca phase, reduction
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
60
55
Fig. 1 As-cast microstructures of (a) Mg-0.07CaO, (b) Mg-0.28CaO,
Hardness(HR15T)
(c) Mg-0.66CaO and (d) Mg-1.34CaO alloys.
50
45
(a) (b) 40
35
Pure Mg
30
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
wt%CaO
for sputtering time. In CaO added Mg, there was the thin
oxide layer mixed with MgO and CaO. The oxidation
behavior of CaO added Mg was similar to that of Ca added
Mg studied by B. S. You et al.3)
Generally, MgO oxide layer exhibits protective behavior
below about 673 K, while weight gain by oxidation is
accelerated with respect to temperature above 673 K because
of porous MgO surface oxide film at high temperature. It
could be explained though Pilling-Bedworth ratio, R.10)
Pilling-Bedworth ratio means the ratio of oxide volume
to metal volume. Al is greater than 1, which explains the
protective effect of the Al oxide. Because the Pilling-
Bedworth ratio for Mg is 0.81, MgO oxide film on surface
Fig. 5 Weight gain curves of pure Mg and various CaO and added Mg of molten Mg could not act as a protective layer to prevent
during TGA at 773 K for 5 hrs.
ignition and oxidation of molten Mg. Although it could not
be explained by Pilling-Bedworth theory, it has been reported
that ignition and oxidation of Ca added Mg was suppressed
(a) 100
O due to the dense film which consisted of porous CaO (0.78)
and MgO.11) Further study should be performed to examine
Atomic Concentration, %
Mg
80
the ignition suppression mechanism by Ca addition.
60
4. Conclusion
40
20
It was confirmed that CaO was reduced to Ca through
phase analysis. Mg2 Ca phase was formed even in 0.07CaO
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
added pure Mg by reduction, while Mg2 Ca phase was formed
Sputtering Time, min over 1.35% in Ca added Mg. With respect to CaO content, the
hardness of CaO added pure Mg increased by grain refine-
(b) 100
O
ment. From oxidation test by TGA, the oxidation behavior of
Mg CaO added Mg was similar to that of Ca added Mg for the
Atomic Concentration, %
80 Ca
previous study. And also, from AES result, there was the thin
60
oxide layer mixed with MgO and CaO in CaO added Mg.
40
REFERENCES
20
1) R. Schmid-Fetzer and J. Grobner: Adv. Eng. Mater. 3 (2001) 947–961.
0 2) W. Ha and Y. J. Kim: J. Alloys Comp. 422 (2006) 208–213.
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
3) X. Zeng, Q. Wang, Y. Lu, W. Ding, Y. Zhu, C. Zhai, C. Lu and X. Xu:
Sputtering Time, min
Mater. Sci. Eng. A 301 (2001) 154–161.
Fig. 6 AES depth profiles sputtered from the surface of (a) pure Mg and 4) B. S. You, M. H. Kim, W. W. Park and I. S. Chung: J. Kor. Inst. Met. &
(b) CaO added Mg oxidized during TGA at 773 K for 5 hrs. Mater. 39 (2001) 446–450.
5) S. K. Kim, J. K. Lee, H. Cho, H. H. Jo, W. Ha and Y. J. Kim: Proc.
Magnesium Technology 2005, ed. By Neale R. Neelameggham,
Howard I. Kaplan and Bob R. Powell, (The Minerals, Metals and
The hardness value of pure Mg was, as a hidden line, about Materials Society 2005) pp. 285–289.
34 HR15T. The increase of hardness was more prominent 6) J. K. Lee, Y. Y. Yoon and S. K. Kim: Proc. Magnesium Technology
over 0.28CaO addition. 2006, ed. By Alan A. Luo, Neale R. Neelameggham and Randy S.
Figure 5 shows the weight gain of pure Mg and CaO added Beals, (The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 2006) pp. 185–189.
7) S. K. Kim: Proc. Magnesium Technology 2006, ed. By Alan A. Luo,
Mg as a function of oxidation time at 773 K. The results Neale R. Neelameggham and Randy S. Beals, (The Minerals, Metals
indicate that pure Mg showed a parabolic law due to the loose and Materials Society 2006) pp. 517–521.
and porous structure of MgO. On the contrary, the oxidation 8) T. B. Massalski: Binary Alloy Phase Diagram, (American Society for
rate was reduced with respect to CaO content for CaO added Metals, Ohio, 1986) pp. 618–621.
9) Malcolm W. Chase, Jr: NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables, (Jour-
Mg at the same temperature. Figure 6 shows the AES depth
mal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, Monograph No. 9).
profile sputtered form the surface. In pure Mg, it was 10) N. B. Pilling and R. E. Bedworth: J. Inst. Metals 29 (1923) 529–582.
confirmed that there was a thick MgO oxide layer on the 11) B. S. You, W. W. Park and I. S. Chung: Scripta mater. 42 (2000) 1089–
surface because the concentration of Mg and O were constant 1094.