Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Statutory Requirements For Reporting and Record Keeping
Statutory Requirements For Reporting and Record Keeping
Collection of records is critical for care managers and their employees, although time-
consuming and sometimes unpleasant. We need to maintain a lot of documents that relate in
some way to the well-being of users, but not always necessarily. Because it cannot be
prevented, an effective program meeting all legal specifications is useful. This includes record
keeping to be viewed as a complete program that is designed, controlled, analyzed and
enhanced in its totality. This is to the advantage of service customers in a variety of respects.
For example, good documentation will explain the needs of the clinicians and service users, and
misunderstandings and mistakes will be less likely. Good equipment would ensure that
maintenance recorder and service users know they maintain their devices and equipment in an
appropriate way and thus are less likely to break up and jeopardize their health.
Task 1
Statutory requirements for reporting and record keeping
Common requirements
All controlled services are protected by the guidelines given in Prompt 21A. The following
specifications are laid down by Prompt 21A.
Care records
Care services must be able to show that:
The records are used to prepare and explain the person's care and treatment according
to his needs.
They hold that record updated
The recording takes the privacy and security needs of the victim into account, i.e. never
will it be violent, judgmental or reproachful.
The records provide information on the patient in relation to his or her background, care
and treatment from other professions and agencies in a confidential manner.
They record all information about care and treatment of service users, including word of
mouth information, eg telephone calls.
Access to records
The service recipient or his legal agent involved with his diagnosis and recovery will have
information available, for example when someone has no intellectual ability to make judgments
about his or her care and treatment and the staff. Therefore, everybody should know where the
documents are kept and how they can be obtained, and, if possible, should be able to help. Any
request for the record of a person should be answered in compliance with the provisions of the
1998 Data Protection Act.
De Minimis – The least severe form of breach is a technical violation, which has no
lead to serious injury or death. An example is an employer that does not bring required
safety records into a job. Up to $12,934 in fines may be levied per violation.
Serious – When a worker has knowledge that the health or safety of his workers is
compromised by an environmental threat, he does little to fix it. Up to $12,934 in fines
may be levied per breach.
Willful – Given for a deliberate lack of quality. The offense, with fines up to $129,336
per violation and potential prison for people, becomes a criminal offense if an employee
is killed.
Repeat – Provided for a violation similar to or equivalent to a violation previously
reported by an employer.
Failure to Abate – Released if a situation about which it was quoted was not addressed
by an employer. Employers have a limited time to fix items. Failure to do so would result
in a fine of up to $12,934 a day.
Employers may face legal bills to cover lawsuits brought by injured workers, the properties of
employees killed due to a crime, and other potential fines other than penalties. In an notorious
example, British Petroleum (BP) has to date run up over $13 billion in lawsuits, advances and
damages in the explosion of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil plant and its consequent
environmental catastrophe. However, maybe the greatest cost is reputational harm. If the
health and safety requirements of a business are not met, customers, partners and the general
public are justified in getting them looked down on. This can lead to reduced revenue, firing,
bankruptcy or even company decline. Reputational damage, sometimes years to recover from,
if ever, can be serious. A recent survey of executives by the American Society of Safety
Engineers showed that there was about $3-5 in indirect costs for any direct costs incurred on
injuries, which places the total costs of an incident at some between $45,000 and $75,000 (with
a direct health costs and a $15,000 insurance costs).
Task 2
There are several reasons to keep medical records, but above all two are outstanding:
To allow continuity of care both within and between services for the patient and the
client.
We have to be transparent, precise, truthful and timely about the reports in healthcare (that they
should be published so near the time they occur). In healthcare environments, various record-
keeping techniques are used. Many places of work use hand-written documents, others have
switched to computer-based systems. You would have to be able to comply with any record
keeping standards, hand written or electronic, set by your employer. This means that you must:
Make it easier for illegal individuals to see written papers in public areas not to be left
and for any computer device to be safe before signing up.
In this section we will look at the principles of record-keeping, including the need to maintain
confidentiality between patients and clients. The RCN issued guidance on record keeping known
as delegating records and countersigning. However, before we start to discuss these concepts, we
need to be mindful that we have to be vigilant, apart from being direct, precise, truthful and
timely about what we write. That means that we will make sure that nothing we write is or can be
interpreted as:
Insulting or abusive
Prejudiced
Patient record computerization is moderately growing and the trend will likely continue,
particularly with improving the technology and making it more accessible and increasing
demand for knowledge about healthcare. However, if potential medical records are just digital
copies of most current records a opportunity to improve a vital tool for healthcare has been
lost. The committee, for example, aims to include easy access in the medical report of the
future to a list of current concerns, a clinical rationale map, and a health record of the medical
and latest details about the different care options to address the patient's condition.
Automation of patient records may provide quick access and sound management of data
elements, but the quality of data elements depends on how the practitioners actually collect
and archive the data. In addition, modern apps that are not associated with conventional
patient records would require access to bibliographic and information repositories. Therefore it
is, but not appropriate, necessary to automate patient record recovery, repair, and use to
enhance records. The Committee believes that the patients' record can, must and will develop
to meet the increasing health-care needs given existing and emerging computer technologies.
The chapter outlines the features of potential patient records that will fulfill these needs, and
examines others extensively to underline the nature and complexity of the problems to be dealt
with.
Democratic principles
In deciding priority and rationed health services (such as the NHS), even users should
encourage:
- participatory democracy
- public accountability
- transparency.
User engagement acknowledges the self-determination potential of citizens and allows
them a say in managing their treatment. The Alma Ata WHO Statement notes that
"people have a right and a responsibility to take part in the preparation and
implementation of their health care, individually and collectively" (WHO, 1978);
Implicating consumers in the preparation of programs enhances their understanding
engagement and helps to affect their concerns.
Service improvement
Engagement with consumers will enhance the efficiency of activities in public health. For
example, long-term patients may have experiences that healthcare providers and
politicians lack in their treatment.
Patients and providers may not face the same conflicts of interest as physicians and
policy-makers who may have a financial interest in healthcare services.
The creation of a public-technical relationship with experts.
Involving service users potentially means making health care more available and
appropriate, enhancing the efficiency and clinical value of health studies and increasing
results use.
Policy statement
The Trust trusts that the Health & Social Care Documents include information to be accurately
documented, updated on a regular basis, concise, accurate and readily available.
Such principles promote the safe diagnosis and medical treatment of patients with the inclusion
of data on clinical results, decision-making, prescription medication, evaluation, treatment and
knowledge Higher-grade documents provide accurate clinical evaluations, encourage continuity
of care and risk identification and allow early detection of the problems involved.
Record keeping policies
The record keeping policy, including data security and access to information, will extend to all
care facilities. The strategy will explain its main record keeping principles and how it complies
with existing regulations. Providers of treatment should have clear policies and procedures on
all documents available and maintaining documents. To ensure they comply with all
specifications, they will use the following checklist.
To create, use, track, and analyze specific protocols for all personal records such as
needs evaluations, risk assessments, treatment plans, medical reports and reviews.
Make sure that the records are suitable, correct, up to date and clearly structured for
any person who uses the service.
Instruct the staff to ensure that record entries are held up-to-date and correct as soon
as possible.
Instruct staff to document written correspondence on the correct personal record
about a person's diagnosis, care and assistance as soon as possible.
Regularly check the documents are transparent, truthful and reliable and protect their
integrity and confidentiality for the people who are using the service.
Have a secure record storage device.
Consistent protocols to allow people to access all documents, both inside and outside
the facility, when necessary, in accordance with the relevant legislation.
Have specific protocols for safe knowledge sharing with all external practitioners,
agencies or organizations which will, in general, obey the principles of 'need to learn.'
Although the criteria are different from one another in successive regulations and standards
guidelines, they are not a significant change in the regulatory framework towards fairly
constant recordkeeping requirements. Confirmation of good record records on mental illness
decision-making, as well as in relation to the demands for directors of fit persons, may alter
particular criteria.
Confidentiality Policies
Confidentiality policies explain the overall approach to managing access to and confidentiality
of information on the organizations 'risk management can also be presented so that readers
can appreciate the value of such activities and practices. Organizations also have multiple
sensitive datasets: patient records, financial details, business plans, employee reports, research
results and so on. Each of these data sets may be viewed as business assets and their disclosure
may cause the company financial disadvantage or loss (Howie et al., 2019). While this may offer
strong motivation to protect health information, health data is qualitatively different from
corporate proprietary information and carries specific risks and responsibilities, confidentiality
policies are most successful if they identify particular health information issues and provide
sufficient security. As a matter of policy, most service organizations provide doctors with access
to all medical data within the agency; ensuring information is accessible for treatment if
appropriate and is theoretically easier than restrictive approaches. Members of the Committee
have identified alternate methods that, while maybe not universal or scalable, limit access to
health information more restrictively. Some organizations require unlimited access to all
patient files for all staff and physicians, but limit the access rights of referring doctors to their
registered patients. This method allows an entity to limit the access to a program for doctors
only rarely, but also does not restrict the vast number of doctors’ routinely receiving or seeing
patients. Many organizations give doctors unlimited access to their current patients 'records,
but allow access to certain data only when clear and recorded requirements occur (Mwila et al.,
2019). In these instances, the caregiver may type in the reason for access or to choose the
reason from the list. Common motivations such as "primary care provider consultation
required" or the "emergency service" are given on the screen, along with a blank fill-in option.
An access notice can be forwarded to the primary care physician automatically for review.
Inadequate access is avoided if device users know their activities are registered and checked
and penalties for infringements of patient privacy can be enforced. This program combines the
need for restricted rights with emergency or unforeseen access needs without burdensome or
time-consuming actions.
Policies to Protect Sensitive Information
Many institutions in health care have procedures that have specific protections for confidential
details, such as records in mental well-being, HIV status, medication, drugs and alcohol, health
records of celebrities and other commonly known individuals. The protection of such
information is regulated by state or federal law; individual entities voluntarily provide certain
protection. And other places accessed by members of the committee held confidential details
apart.
"Access Notification e-mail" is just an audit trail system feature that documents information
access data.
Organizations that monitor patient information releases by holding a signed authorization form
(where necessary) in their permanent health record, records of what information was
published, the day the information was released and the individual who released the data and
the signature of the employee. This recording provides a trail of audit if unauthorized
divulgation is suspected.
Conclusion
It is crucial to maintain proper records when caring for a patient in order to facilitate the
treatment of patients and enhance communication. Effective record keeping is a vital tool to
establish good healthcare and to improve integrity in nursing services and a strong teamwork.