Professional Documents
Culture Documents
tc1 Viml 3cd
tc1 Viml 3cd
OIML Vocabulary
Vocabulaire de OIML
International Vocabulary of Terms In Legal Metrology (VIML2). 3rd Committee Draft (VIML2 2CD)
NOTE
1. OIML V2-200:2008, 2.2is the ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007. International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms
(VIM)
2. In column “Source”, references are given for the terms which have been quoted from the ISO and /or IEC standards and guides.
0. Introduction. Basic Terms
No. Term Definition Notes and examples Source
0.01 metrology science of measurement and its NOTE Metrology includes all theoretical OIML V2-
application and practical aspects of measurement, 200:2008, 2.2
whatever the measurement uncertainty and
field of application.
0. Introduction. Basic Terms
No. Term Definition Notes and examples Source
0.02 International system of units, based on the NOTE 1 The SI is founded on the seven OIML V2-
System of Units, International System of Quantities, base quantities of the ISQ … etc. [ ISQ: 200:2008, 1.16
SI their names and symbols, including International System of Quantities. For
a series of prefixes and their names the details on the names and symbols of
and symbols, together with rules for the corresponding base units refer to
their use, adopted by the General OIML V2-200:2008 (ISO/IEC Guide
Conference on Weights and 99:2007) International vocabulary of
Measures (CGPM) metrology – Basic and general concepts
and associated terms (VIM]).
0.03 error (of value of the indication of a NOTE 1 This reference value is sometimes
indication) measuring instrument minus a referred to as a (conventional) true
reference quantity value quantity value.
0.04 maximum extreme value of measurement NOTE 1 Usually the term “maximum OIML V2-
permissible error, with respect to a known permissible errors” or “limits of error” are 200:2008, 4.26
measurement reference quantity value, used, where there are two extreme values.
error permitted by specifications or
regulations for a given NOTE 2 The term “tolerance” should not
maximum measurement, measuring be used to designate ‘maximum
permissible error instrument, or measuring system permissible error’.
limit of error
0.07 influence quantity that, in a direct EXAMPLE 1 Frequency in the direct OIML V2-
quantity measurement, does not affect the measurement with an ammeter of the 200:2008, 2.52
quantity that is actually measured, constant amplitude of an alternating
but affects the relation between the current.
indication and the measurement
result EXAMPLE 2 Amount-of-substance
concentration of bilirubin in a direct
measurement of haemoglobin amount-of
substance concentration in human blood
plasma.
EXAMPLE 3 Temperature of a
micrometer used for measurement of
length of a rod, but not the temperature of
the rod itself, which can enter into the
definition of the measurand.
0.08 rated operating operating condition that must be NOTE Rated operating conditions OIML V2-
condition fulfilled during measurement in generally specify intervals of values for a 200:2008, 4.8
order that a measuring quantity being measured and for any
instrument or measuring system influence quantity.
perform as designed
0.09 reference operating condition prescribed for NOTE 1 Reference operating conditions OIML V2-
operating evaluating the performance of a specify intervals of values of the 200:2008, 4.11
condition measuring instrument or measurand and of the influence
measuring system or for quantities.
reference comparison of measurement
condition results NOTE 2 In IEC 60050-300, item 311-06-
02, the term “reference condition” refers
to an operating condition under which the
specified instrumental measurement
uncertainty is the smallest possible.
0.10 measuring device used for making NOTE 1A measuring instrument that can be OIML V2-
instrument measurements, alone or in used alone is a measuring system. 200:2008, 3.1
conjunction with one or more
supplementary devices NOTE 2 A measuring instrument may be
an indicating measuring instrument or a
material measure.
0.11 measurement device, used in measurement, that EXAMPLE Thermocouple, electric current OIML V2-
transducer provides an output quantity having transformer, strain gauge, pH electrode, 200:2008, 3.7
a specified relation to the input Bourdon tube, bimetallic strip.
quantity
0.12 measuring set of one or more measuring NOTE A measuring system may consist of OIML V2-
system instruments and often other devices, only one measuring instrument. 200:2008, 3.2
including any reagent and supply,
assembled and adapted to give
information used to generate
measured quantity values within
specified intervals for quantities of
specified kinds
0. Introduction. Basic Terms
No. Term Definition Notes and examples Source
0.14 indication quantity value provided by a NOTE 1 An indication may be presented OIML V2-
measuring instrument or a in visual or acoustic form or may be 200:2008, 4.1
measuring system transferred to another device.
An indication is often given by the
position of a pointer on the display for
analog outputs, a displayed or printed
number for digital outputs, a code pattern
for code outputs, or an assigned
quantity value for material measures.
1.01 legal metrology practice and process of applying NOTE 1 The scope of legal metrology
statutory and regulatory structure may be different from country to country.
and enforcement to metrology (see
0.01) NOTE 2 Legal metrology includes:
• Setting up legal requirements;
• Control/conformity assessment of
regulated products and regulated activities;
• Supervision of regulated products and of
regulated activities; and
• Providing the necessary infrastructure for
the traceability of regulated measurements
and measuring instruments.
1.02 law on metrology legal acts and secondary legislation NOTE Legal acts and secondary
that provide the statutory structure legislation in particular specify the legal
to metrology units of measurement, prescribe
- requirements with respect to the
properties of measuring
instruments,
- accuracy of measurement in cases
specified by law,
- a system of legal control of
measuring instruments and
metrological supervision
1. Metrology and Its Legal Aspects
No. Term Definition Notes and examples Source
1.03 legal metrology technical regulations in the field of NOTE 1 These regulations shall, when
regulations legal metrology applicable, be compatible with the
International Recommendations of the
OIML and make use of their requirements.
1.05 metrological legal entity designated by law or by NOTE The legal entity may be a central or
authority the government to be responsible local government body, or a non –
for specified legal metrology governmental body empowered by the
activities government.
1.06 legal units of units of measurement required or NOTE 1 Legal units may be:
measurement permitted by regulations - SI units,
- their decimal multiples and submultiples
as indicated by the use of SI prefixes,
- non-SI units specified by relevant
regulations.
2.01 legal the whole of legal metrology NOTE Legal metrological control
metrological activities includes:
control - legal control of measuring instruments,
- metrological supervision,
- metrological expertise.
2.05 type (pattern) conformity assessment procedure NOTE 1 “Pattern” is used in legal
evaluation on one or more specimens of an metrology with the same meaning as
identified type (pattern) of “type”; in the entries below, only “type” is
measuring instruments which used.
results in an evaluation report
and/or an evaluation certificate NOTE 2 There are countries and
economies where conformity assessment
procedures are employed for type
evaluation.
2.06 type approval decision of legal relevance, based NOTE See also A1.26
on the review of the type evaluation
report, that the type of a measuring
instrument complies with the
relevant statutory requirements and
results in the issuance of the type
approval certificate
2.08 recognition of legal decision taken by a party NOTE See also A1.34
type approval either voluntarily or based on a bi-
or multilateral arrangement
whereby a type approved by
another party is recognized as
complying with the relevant
statutory requirements, without
issuing a new type approval
certificate
2.09 withdrawal of a decision of legal relevance NOTE The withdrawal is justified in case
type approval canceling a type approval of:
- alterations of the type,
- modification of its vital parts,
- circumstances that affect metrological
durability and/or reliability,
- effects altering the metrological
performance of the instrument required by
law and coming to light only after the
official type approval was granted.
2.10 verification of a conformity assessment procedure See also OIML V2-200:2008, 2.44
measuring (other than type evaluation) which
instrument results in the affixing of a
verification mark and/or issuing of
a verification certificate
2.18 inspection by inspection of a homogeneous batch NOTE ISO 3534-2 gives the following
sampling of measuring instruments based on definition :
the results of evaluation of a “4.1.6 sampling inspection
statistically appropriate number of inspection (4.1.2) of selected items
specimens selected at random from (1.2.11) in the group under consideration”
an identified lot
2.19 marking affixing of one or more of the NOTE 1 Verification and sealing marks
marks such as verification, may be combined.
rejection, sealing and type approval
marks (as described in 3.05, 3.06, NOTE 2 The manufacturer may be
3.07 and 3.08) authorized to apply other marks.
2.22 placing on the the first making available of a NOTE This may refer to the market of a
market measuring instrument or a single country or a group of countries
prepackage on the market (region).
3.05 verification mark applied to a measuring NOTE The verification mark may identify
mark instrument certifying that the the body responsible for verification
verification of the measuring and/or indicate the year or date of
instrument was carried out and verification or its expiry date.
compliance with statutory
reqirements was confirmed
4.10 legally relevant parameter of a measuring NOTE The following types of legally
parameter instrument, (electronic) device, sub- relevant parameters can be distinguished:
assembly, software or a module type-specific parameters and device-
subject to legal control specific parameters.”
4. Classification of Measuring Instruments
No. Term Definition Notes and examples Source
4.11 type-specific legally relevant parameter with a NOTE Type-specific parameters are part
parameter value that depends on the type of of the legally relevant software.
instrument only
5.02 verification scale value, expressed in units of mass, NOTE This term applies to the weighing
interval used for the classification and instruments.
verification of an instrument
5.03 number of quotient of th e m aximum c apacity NOTE This term applies to the weighing
verification scale and the verification scale interval: instruments.
intervals
n = Max / e
5.04 indicating device part of the measuring instrument NOTE A printing device is not an
which displays the measurement indicating device, although printed
results either continuously or on measurement result is considered to be an
demand indication.
5. Construction and Operation of Measuring Instruments
No. Term Definition Notes and examples Source
5.05 ancillary device device intended to perform a NOTE 1. An ancillary device may or may
particular function, directly not be subject to legal metrology control
involved in elaborating, according to its function in the measuring
transmitting or displaying system or to national regulations.
measurement results
NOTE 2. Main ancillary devices are:
• zero setting device;
• repeating indicating device;
• printing device;
• memory device;
• price indicating device;
• totalizing indicating device;
• pre-setting device;
• self-service device.
5.06 checking facility facility that is incorporated in a NOTE «Acted upon» refers to any
measuring instrument and which adequate response by the measuring
enables significant faults to be instrument (luminous signal, acoustic
detected and acted upon. signal, prevention of the measurement
process, etc.).
5.07 control weighing instrument used to NOTE 1 Control instruments used for
instrument determine the conventional true testing may be:
value of the mass of the test load(s) • separate from the instrument being
tested; or
• integral, when a static weighing mode is
provided by the instrument being tested
5.09 terminal digital device that has one or more NOTE In particular this term is applied to
keys (or mouse, touch-screen, etc.) non-automatic weighing instruments.
to operate the instrument, and a
display to provide the measurement
results transmitted via the digital
interface or an analog data
processing device
5.11 fault difference between the error of NOTE 1 Principally, a fault is the result of
indication and the intrinsic error of an undesired change of data contained in
a measuring instrument or flowing through an electronic
measuring instrument.
5.12 significant fault fault greater than the value NOTE The relevant Recommendation
specified in the relevant may specify that the following faults are
recommendation not significant, even when they exceed the
value defined in 3.10:
a) Faults arising from simultaneous
and mutually independent causes (e.g.
EM fields and discharges) originating
in a measuring instrument or in its
checking facilities;
b) Faults implying the impossibility to
perform any measurement;
c) Transitory faults being momentary
variations in the indication, which
cannot be interpreted, memorized or
transmitted as a measurement result;
d) Faults giving rise to variations in the
measurement result that are serious
enough to be noticed by all those
interested in the measurement result;
the relevant Recommendation may
specify the nature of these variations.
5.14 significant durability error greater than the NOTE The relevant recommendation
durability error value specified in the relevant may specify that durability errors are not
recommendation significant, even when they exceed the
value defined in 3.12, in the following
cases:
a) The indication cannot be
interpreted, memorized or transmitted
as a measurement result;
b) The indication implies the
impossibility to perform any
measurement;
c) The indication is so obviously
wrong that it is bound to be noticed by
all those interested in the result of the
measurement; or
d) A durability error cannot be
detected and acted upon due to a
breakdown of the appropriate
durability protection facility.
6.02 software separation of the software in NOTE These parts communicate via a
separation measuring instruments, which can software interface.
be divided into a legally relevant
part and a legally non-relevant part
6.03 software securing of measuring instrument NOTE The seal must be removed,
protection software or data domain by a damaged or broken to obtain access to
hardware or software implemented change software.
seal
6.05 cryptographic data set containing the public key NOTE The data set is signed by a
certificate belonging to a measuring trustworthy institution with an electronic
instrument or a person plus a signature. 2.The assignment of a public
unique identification of the subject, key to a subject can be verified by using
e.g. serial number of the measuring the public key of the trustworthy
instrument or name or Personal institution and decrypting the signature of
Identification Number (PIN) of the the certificate.
person
6. Software in Legal Metrology
No. Term Definition Notes and examples Source
6.06 cryptographic encryption of data by the sender NOTE 1. For electronic signing a public
means (storing or transmitting program) key system is used in general, i.e. the
and decryption by the receiver algorithm needs a pair of keys where only
(reading program) with the purpose one has to be kept secret; the other may be
of hiding information from public.
unauthorized persons or electronic
signing of data with the purpose of NOTE 2. The sender (the sending or
enabling the receiver or user of the storing program) generates a hash code of
data to verify the origin of the data, the data and encrypts it with his secret key.
i.e. to prove their authenticity The result is the signature. The receiver
(the receiving or reading program)
decrypts the signature with the public key
of the sender and compares the result with
the actual hash code of the data. In case of
equality, the data are authenticated. The
receiver may require a cryptographic
certificate of the sender to be sure of the
authenticity of the public key.
6.07 data domain location in memory that each NOTE 1. The location is defined by
program needs for processing data hardware addresses or by symbolic names
6.08 error log continuous data file containing an NOTE This especially applies to volatile
information record of failures/faults failures that are not recognizable
that have an influence on the afterwards when the measurement values
metrological characteristics are used.
6.12 sealing means intended to protect the NOTE It can be achieved by hardware,
measuring instrument against any software or a combination of both.
unauthorized modification,
readjustment, removal of parts,
software, etc.
A1.1 conformity demonstration that specified NOTE 1 The subject field of conformity ISO/IEC 17000,
assessment requirements (3.1) relating to a assessment includes activities defined 2.1
product (3.3), process, system, elsewhere in this International Standard,
person or body are fulfilled such as testing (4.2), inspection (4.3) and
certification (5.5), as well as the
accreditation (5.6) of conformity
assessment bodies (2.5).
A1.2 conformity body that performs conformity NOTE An accreditation body (2.6) is not a ISO/IEC 17000,
assessment body assessment services conformity assessment body. 2.5
A1.3 accreditation authoritative body that performs NOTE The authority of an accreditation ISO/IEC 17000,
body accreditation (5.6) body is generally derived from 2.6
government.
A1.4 conformity rules, procedures (3.2) and NOTE Conformity assessment systems ISO/IEC 17000,
assessment management for carrying out may be operated at international, regional, 2.7
system conformity assessment (2.1) national or sub-national level.
A1.5 conformity conformity assessment system (2.7) NOTE Conformity assessment schemes ISO/IEC 17000,
assessment related to specified objects of may be operated at international, regional, 2.8
scheme, conformity assessment, to which national or sub-national level.
conformity the same specified requirements
assessment (3.1), specific rules and procedures
program (3.2) apply
A1.6 (specified) need or expectation that is stated NOTE Specified requirements may be ISO/IEC 17000,
requirement stated in normative documents such as 3.1
regulations, standards and technical
specifications.
A1.11 testing determination of one or more NOTE “Testing” typically applies to ISO/IEC 17000,
characteristics of an object of materials, products or processes. 4.2
conformity assessment, according
to a procedure (3.2)
A1.12 inspection examination of a product design, NOTE Inspection of a process may include ISO/IEC 17000,
product (3.3), process or installation inspection of persons, facilities, 4.3
and determination of its conformity technology and methodology.
with specific requirements or, on
the basis of professional judgement,
with general requirements
Annex 1. Conformity Assessment in Legal Metrology
No. Term Definition Notes and examples Source
A1.13 audit systematic, independent, NOTE Whilst “audit” applies to ISO/IEC 17000,
documented process for obtaining management systems, “assessment” 4.4
records, statements of fact or other applies to conformity assessment bodies as
relevant information and assessing well as more generally.
them objectively to determine the
extent to which specified
requirements (3.1) are fulfilled
A1.16 attestation issue of a statement, based on a NOTE 1 The resulting statement, referred ISO/IEC 17000,
decision following review (5.1), to in this International Standard as a 5.2
that fulfillment of specified “statement of conformity”, conveys the
requirements (3.1) has been assurance that the specified requirements
demonstrated have been fulfilled. Such an assurance
does not, of itself, afford contractual or
other legal guarantees.
A1.19 certification (of third-party attestation (5.2) related NOTE 1Certification of a management ISO/IEC 17000,
conformity) to products, processes, systems or system is sometimes also called 5.5
persons registration.
A1.25 agreement group bodies that are signatories to the ISO/IEC 17000,
agreement on which an 7.10
arrangement is based
A1.27 reciprocity relationship between two parties NOTE 1 Reciprocity can exist within a ISO/IEC 17000,
where both have the same rights multilateral arrangement comprising a 7.11
and obligations towards each other network of bilateral reciprocal
relationships.