Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment 2
Submitted to:
Prof. Farhan
Submitted By:
0080
ADCS 3B
Arslan Wajid
[COMPANY NAME]
CONTENTS
EXAMPLE NO 1............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS H3: Express ideas is not a significant predictor of job satisfaction.......................................................................................... 3
Model Summary................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3
ANOVAa............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Coefficientsa....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
EXAMPLE NO 2............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Model Summary................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
ANOVAa............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
Coefficientsa....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
EXAMPLE NO 3............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Model Summary................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8
ANOVAa............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8
Coefficientsa....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
1
MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION (EXERCISE)
EXAMPLE NO 1
H4: Importance, advancement and express of ideas are significant predictor of job satisfaction.
2
MODEL SUMMARY
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Square Estimate
Total 3368.967 29
COEFFICIENTS A
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
RESULT
3
A multiple regression was conducted predicting job satisfaction to the variable’s connectedness,
importance, advancement and express of ideas. We checked the assumption of normality,
linearity, homoscedasticity and multicollinearity. . All the assumptions were met. Overall, the
regression model was significant, F (3,26) =11.51, p<.05, R 2=.47 (accounted of variance in
dependent variable). Of all the predictors investigated both importance (β=.552, t (26) =3.65,
p<.05) and expression of ideas (β=.372 t (26) =.2.53, p<.05) were significant. Advancement was
not a significant predictor of job satisfaction. (β=.113, t (26) =.849, p>.05). So that, Alternative
hypothesis H1, H3 and H4 are accepted while H2 was not supported by the data
EXAMPLE NO 2
4
Forgiveness and social support are significant predictors of happiness.
MODEL SUMMARY
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Square Estimate
ANOVA A
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Total 1008.000 24
COEFFICIENTS A
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
5
RESULT
A multiple linear regression was conducted to predict happiness from the variable’s forgiveness
and social support. We checked the assumption of normality, linearity, homoscedasticity and
multicollinearity. All the assumptions were met. Overall, the regression model was significant, F
(2, 22) =9.32, p<.05, R2=.56 (accounted of variance in dependent variable). Of all the predictors
investigated Forgiveness (β=.664, t (22) =4.22, p<.05) was significant. Social support was not a
significant predictor of happiness. (β=.187, t (22) =1.19, p>.05). Thus, H1 and H3 are accepted
while H2 was not supported by the data.
EXAMPLE NO 3
6
NULL HYPOTHESIS H0:
Wellbeing and meaning in life are not significant predictors of fear of death.
Wellbeing and meaning in life are not significant predictors of fear of death.
MODEL SUMMARY
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Square Estimate
ANOVA A
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Total 3788.880 49
7
COEFFICIENTS A
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
RESULT
A multiple linear regression was conducted to predict fear of death from the variables well-
being and meaning in life. We checked the assumption of normality, linearity, homoscedasticity
and multicollinearity. All the assumptions were met. Overall, the regression model was
significant, F (2, 47) =3.60, p<.05, R 2=.13 (accounted of variance in dependent variable). Of all
the predictors investigated meaning in life (β=-.407, t (47) =-2.68, p<.05) was significant. Well-
being was not a significant predictor of fear of death. (β=.209, t (47) =1.38, p>.05). Thus, H2 and
H3 are accepted while H1 was not supported by the data.