Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lee 1985
Lee 1985
which, by definition [8], is cal. For finite values of surface resistance, the equations correctly
calculated both the resistive and reactive portions of the input
Zn(u)=( –l)-n.ln(jv). (16)
impedance.
For small arguments (V< 1) [9]
I_n(v)=
I,,(u) =+(;)n. (17)
IV. CONCLUSION
.lm_l(u)-Jm+l(u) =’2J;(r.J).
O(kr,)
1207
~
[
= t~-l[NO(kr,)/Jo(
Jj(kr, )+ Nj(k~)
Jf(kr,)+Nf(krl)
kr,)]
I 1’2
(A2)
(A3)
Nm(u+ju) =Nm(u)+juN; (u). (21)
~(kr,) = tan-l [- J1(kr,)/Nl(kr,)] (A4)
Using two additional recurrence relationships
$(kro) = tan-l[- J,(kro)/N,(kro)]. (A5)
J~(u) = –Jl(u) (22a)
and’ RHFERSNCES
[1] N. Marcuvitz, “Radial transmission line$” in Principles of Microwave
J;(U) =JO(U)–+J1(U) (22b)
Circui~s, C. Montgomery, R. H. Dicke, and E. M. Purcell, E&,
G.
(Radiation Laboratory Series, Vol. 8). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill,
the resulting equations with the substitutions u = ~r and v = – w 1947, pp. 240-282.
are [2] S. Rarno and J. R. Whinnery, Fteldr and Waves in Modern Radto, Second
Ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 1953, pp. 395-400.
Jo(h) = JO(/3r) + jcwJ1(flr) (23a) [3] H. A. Atwater, “ Microstrip reactive circuit elements,” IEEE Trans.
Microwaue Theory Tech., vol. MTT-31, pp. 488-491, June 1983.
.ll(~r) [4] B. A. Syrett, “A broad-band element for microstrip bias or tuning
functions
jar
[
Jo(&)-~
1 . (23b)
[5]
circuits,” IEEE
925-927, Aug. 1980.
‘f Broadband
Trans. Microwave
microstrip
Theory Tech., vol. MTT-28,
mixer;’
A~c~tion Note Number 976, Hewlett-Packard Co., Palo Alto, CA,
hdy 1980.
NO( kr) = NO(~r) + jarN1(~r) (23c) [6] J. P. Vinding, “Radial line stubs as elements in strip line circuits,”
NEREM Rec., pp. 108-109, Nov. 1967.
1
N1(/3r) [7] M. Abrarnowitz and I. E. Stegun, Eds., Handbook of Mathemaucal
Nl(kr) =N1(~r)– jar No(~r)–--jjy- . (23d) Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables, (Applied
[ Mathematics Series, Vol. 55). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, 1964, pp. 363, eq. 9.1.75.
The final analysis equations for radial-line stubs with attenuation
[8] Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and
result from substituting (23a) through (23d), with the appropriate Mathematical Tables, pp. 375, eq. 9.6.3.
arguments, into (5) and the latter, in turn, into (4). [9] Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and
=hutical Tables, pp. 375, eq. 9.6.6 and 9.6.7.
[10] Hundbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and
=;attcal pp. 361, eq. 9.1.27.
Tables,
III. I@CONiMENDATIONS
FORSTRIPLINEAND MICROSTRIP [11] S. L. March, “ Wcrostrip packaging: Watch the last step,” Microwaves,
vol. 20, pp. 83–94, Dec. 1981.
For stripline, the dimension h in (4), (6), (12), and (13) should
be replaced by the ground-plane spacing b.
For rnicrostrip, it is recommended that the relative dielectric
constant t, should be replaced by an effective dielectric constant Plot of Modal Field Distribution in Rectangular and
ce~~ calculated [11] for a microstnp of constant width w, where Circular Waveguides
o
w=(~+rO)sin ~ . (24) C. S. LEE, S. W. LEE, AND S. L. CHUANG
()
A computer program has been written to test these equations The earliest plots of modal field distribution in rectanguhu-/cir-
and to compare the results with the lossless formulation of cular waveguides were given by Southworth (1936) [1], Barrow
Vinding. For perfect conductors (R. = O), the results were identi. (1936) [2], Schelkunoff (1937) [3], and Chu and Barrow (1937) [4].
Manuscript received August 9, 1984; revised October 30, 1984. This work
was supported in part by NASA under Contract NAG3-475.
1This approximation, while providing reasonably accurate results, is not the The authors zre with the Electromagnetic Laboratory, Urriversity of Illinois,
formulation for effective dielectric constarrt used in Super-Compact. Urbana, IL 61801.
, ,
0
TE,O
,
I I
I 2
I $ 1
2 3
TE3,
TE30 TM3,
I 1
3 4
TEq,
TE22
TE40 TE12 TM4,
TEOZ TM,z TM22
I I 1 r I
1
4 5
TE,0
TE 32 TE51 TE4Z
TM32 TM5, TM*2
, 1 I , I
5
TE., 6
TE;3 TE
TE60TE13 TM61 TM52
52 TE,3
TE03TM,3 ‘“23 TM33 TE70
I
6 7
-., ., ~
m
.. -—_ .-.
., Z@, ,,
= ‘s3’:
e --- ❑ --- --
TE,3 TM13 TE6, TM3, T E.O TE02
‘“61
TM23 TE ,2 TM,, TE.,
ltIEUKI
n”., .
AMJ
.,-
TECHNIQUES, VOL. MTT-33, NO. 3, MARCH 1985 273
TE,, E
T,M,, a
&
L TE21
I I
2
TE,2
TErO TM2, TE22
TE02 TM,2 TM22
I I
2 3
TE3, TE3Z
TE,3 TE23
TE30 TM3, TM32
TE03 TM13 TM23
I I
3 TE
TE42 TE304
TE;: TE24 TE05
TE40 TM41 TE33 TM02 TE43TM43
TE04 TM14 TM35 TM24
TE34TM34
I
4 5
1, I
TE,O I to, TEL, TE13 TM31
TE2, TE,2
Fig. 4. Transverse modal field distribution for a square waveguide (first 30 modes)
c1 a
I T
I
~E6, 2
TM,,
TEO, TE3, TM2, TM02
I [
2 3 TM22 TE,3 TE71
TE02
TE2Z TM12
/ I I
3 TE,3 4
TE6,
51
TWI TE32 TM22
r , I !
4 5
TE8,
TE.2 TM32 TE52 TE91
I I , r 1
5 6
Fig. 5. Normalized modal cutoff frequencies for a circular waveguide,
~..-.
/---.’
,., /, - - . ‘,
,- \’\”,
~(11 !;:
. . -’ >,, ,,’ E—- ~“”
~\’\’ - -,
-------- ‘
@ ----- Fig. 6. (Continued)
TE,, TMO, TE2,
JERZY KRUPKA
E— H––-—-
Manuscript received August 7, 1984; revised October 29, 1984.
Fig. 6. Transverse modaJ field distribution for a circular waveguide (first 30 The author is with the Instytut Technologii Elektronowej, Politechnika
modes), Warszawska u1. Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warszawa, Poland.