Earlier is was believed that, men are superior than women because of their inherent physical

differences, men were given priority over women. The role of women in society have
changed dramatically in the past times, now women are no longer believed to be inferior
than men, women are excelling in all the fields and in some fields,even performing better
than men. So, I disagree with the statement that, women and men, because of their inherent
physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
There is no denibility in the statement that core strength of men is more than that of women,
there is a physical advantage to men over women, earlier manual labour used to do most of
the manufacturing work, so, men were preferred due to their more core strength. But in
today's market large machines perform most of the manufacturing tasks replacing labours,
so, due to rise of machines the manual labour is obsolete, now no longer men have the
advantage of physical work over women.
Today's businesses require more than physical strength, it requires mental strength,
communication skills, understanding the demand of consumer, men have these strengths
but women are behind them, women are handling businesses with the same preciseness as
that of men or even better than that. In the new companies women are preferred more than
men, because of their proficiency in social networking.
In education sector, earlier literacy rate of women was low, but now literacy rate of women
has increased, and the low literacy rate was not because of their physical difference, but
because of the family constrains. Earlier conservative family didn't allow their daughters to
study but now thinking have changed and women are encouraged to study, as women are
getting literate they can choose the career they want. So, women are pursuing careers of
their own choice, competing with men and are not restrained by physical difference.
Earlier also women were not behind because of their physical differences, but because they
were not encouraged, allowed to work, nowadays women are prospering in every field it may
be business, education, this concludes that women are suited for all the tasks and physical
difference is not a barrier to eschew them.
Space exploaration is a daunting task,it may include visiting to moon, other planets or may
be other galaxies. Space can be explored via manned space flight and unmanned space
flight, unmanned flights does not include humans, it includes only automated robots may be
an orbiter or a rover. Space travel is important to study other planets and finding out
existence of life on them, but space travel is a dangerous and costly task. The author claims
that manned flights are more costly and detrimental than unmanned flights. The author
states that because of recent success of a series of a unmanned space probes and
satellites, we should  invest our resouces more in unmanned space flight. To verify this claim
we need to scrutinize some stated and/or unstated assumptions.
The stated assumption of the argument is manned flights require more budget and are more
dangerous than automated space flights, but author have not taken into account the
development of technology. It may be possible that with proliferating technological
advancements, cost of equipment required may have reduced, it can also be possible that
now spaced flights are designed with more preciseness because of advanced softwares and
novel technologies. If this is the case then the stated assumption prove unwarranted, and
investing more in unmanned space flight might not be as cheap as it is considered.
The unstated assumption of the argument is the success of unmanned space flights are
providing more or same useful data as it was earlier provided by manned space flights. With
technological advances robots are getting improved, but they can never surpass human
capabilities, if this is the case then the unstated assumption proves to be unwarranted. If the
quality of data is not upto the mark by unmanned space flights, supporting unmanned space
flights over manned space flights will not increase productivity of space exploration.
Another stated assumption is regarding safety of unmanned space flights, it is assumed that
unmanned space flights have little risk, but it may be possible that the due to current position
of earth this advantage may have been provided to the unmanned satellites ,but whendue to
cosmological changes position of earth changes, launching of unmanned space flights may
become more dangerous. If this stated assumption proves unwarranted, investing more in
unmanned space flights will expose us to peril and there will be wastage of our valueable
resources.
All-in-all, these assumptions, updated cost of manned space flight, advanced safety
measures for humans, type of information provided by manned and unmanned space flight
needs to be verified to support the conclusion that investing our resources in unmanned
space flight will boost our space exploration results.