Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
Hewitt, P. and Vidrine, S. (2006) 9th Topical Conference on Refinery Processing (TA015) –
#55 – Advances in Desalting of the 2006 Spring A.I.Ch.E Meeting, Orlando, FL, April 23-27, 2006
Challenges in desalting
applications
Although traditional level and interface measurement systems have their advantages, when
applied to the relatively dirty process experienced within a desalter, a number have been
found to demonstrate many shortcomings.
•Mechanical systems such as float have high capital and maintenance costs as well
as poor reliability and flexibility.
•Electrical based systems are more popular due to improved reliability and accuracy such
as Nucleonic, Capacitive, Guided Wave and DP. Although these still can present
problems with the presence of emulsion.
Optimising your chemical dosing
194oC/380oF.
The Tracerco Profiler™ has no moving parts and therefore
gives repeatable measurement.
Optimise your chemical dosing
Case Study
Feedback Cost Savings
• Operator confidence to run the interface
level at or within the lower electrostatic
grid – 82% level.
Chemistry Annual savings
• Separation optimisation of difficult blends
– improve crude flexibility (Escalante
crude blend increased from 30kbbl/d to Demulsifier $200,000
50kbbl/d). Neutraliser $75,000
• Increased upstream desalter mixing to
enhance chloride removals from Water clarifier $130,000
downstream vessels thus reducing
Asphaltene stabiliser $100,000
corrosion issues (between 3 to 4 ppm to
2ppm). No production loss due $330,000
• Optimisation of chemicals within the to desalter upsets
desalting process leading to
considerable cost savings. Total Improvement $835,000
• The elimination of process upsets
resulting from water carryover or oil carry
under from the desalter vessel.
Increase crude throughput
Increasing crude throughput
• This volume can be used to process more crude and accuracy of the
measurement gives operator confidence to run
the interface level at
or within the lower electrostatic grid – 82% level.
Summary of benefits
• Increase crude throughput.
• Ability to enhance feedstock blend without the need to re-calibrate
equipment with real time process optimisation.
• Eliminate interface excursion upsets and reduce demand on electrostatic
grid power by monitoring rag layer.
• High stability and accuracy across a wide range of ambient and process
temperatures.
• No radiation dose rate external to the vessel.
• Zero maintenance - Annual wipe test required on arming rod handle.
• Reduce maintenance costs and risk to plant by reduced corrosion risk.
• Reduce and optimise chemical processing costs.
• Reduce process cost of brine waste treatment by reducing oil carryover.
• Improves asset environmental compliance with less demand on water
treatment.
• Smart redundancy.
• No risk of damage to instrument under empty vessel conditions.
Find out more