Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: A low carbon Nb–Ti microalloyed steel was subjected to hot torsion testing over the range of temperatures
Received 4 February 2010 from 900 to 1100 ◦ C and strain rates from 0.01 to 1 s−1 to characterize its hot deformation behavior.
Received in revised form 14 March 2010 The initiation and evolution of dynamic recrystallization were investigated by analyzing of hot flow
Accepted 22 March 2010
curves. Two important dynamic recrystallization parameters, the critical strain and the point of maximum
dynamic softening, derived from strain hardening rate- stress curves. These parameters then were used to
predict the dynamic recrystallized fraction. The results showed that the critical stress and strain increase
Keywords:
with decreasing deformation temperature and increasing strain rate. The hot deformation activation
Microalloyed steel
Torsion testing
energy of the steel investigated in the present work is 375 kJ/mol, and the expression for steady state
DRX flow stress is
Critical strain 0.14
375, 000
Peak strain SS = 0.07Z 0.14 = 0.07 · ε̇ exp
Steady state stress
RT
The volume fraction of dynamic recrystallization as a function of processing variables was established. It
was found that the model used for predicting the kinetic of dynamic recrystallization is in good agreement
with the data directly acquired from experimental flow curves.
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0921-5093/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.msea.2010.03.086
M. Shaban, B. Eghbali / Materials Science and Engineering A 527 (2010) 4320–4325 4321
Fig. 2. True stress–true strain curves of Nb–Ti microalloyed steel under different deformation conditions.
4322 M. Shaban, B. Eghbali / Materials Science and Engineering A 527 (2010) 4320–4325
Fig. 3. The effect of strain rate (a) and temperature (b) on the steady state stress flow stress at constant temperature and strain rate.
Therefore, according to Eq. (3) the power low exponent (q) can be reaches to zero at the end of first DRX cycle. Therefore, the steady
determined from the slope of the plot of steady state stress as a state strain can be defined from –ε curves. From –ε plots, it is
function of the logarithm of strain rate at constant temperature, as inferred that at 1100 ◦ C dynamic recrystallization is complete at all
shown in Fig. 3a. This value is calculated as q = 0.14 for this steel. strain rates. However, at 900 ◦ C dynamic recrystallization is partial
When the strain rate is constant, on taking partial derivative of both due to the fact that strain hardening rate does not reach to zero at
sides of Eq. (2) to the inverse deformation temperature we obtain: the end of deformation.
∂ ln SS Qd
1
=q (4)
∂ R
T ε̇
For the hot flow curves given in Fig. 2, the true stress–true strain
data were used to calculate the values of the strain hardening rate
( = d/dε). The strain hardening rate values were then plotted as
a function of the flow stress (Fig. 4) for deformation temperatures
ranging from 900 to 1100 ◦ C and strain rates ranging from 0.01 to
1 s−1 . According to the approach of Poliak and Jonas [5–8] and Ryan
and McQueen [9], in the curves of – the point at which the work
hardening rate equals zero ( = 0) represents the peak stress ( p ).
The inflection point of – curves indicates the critical stress ( c )
for the initiation of DRX.
From the data given in Fig. 4, the derivative of the strain hard-
ening rate (d/d) as a function of the flow stress for various
deformation temperatures and strain rates was calculated. The
d/d vs. plots are given in Fig. 5. The maximum points in these
plots represent the critical stress. The critical strain (εc ) can be
defined by mapping the critical stress back in to stress–strain curves
[12].
Table 1
Calculated DRX parameters of Ti-Nb steel at different deformation conditions.
The entire calculated DRX parameters are listed in Table 1. It is critical characteristics of DRX and Z. This can be expressed as fol-
obvious that when deformation temperature remains the same the lows:
mentioned parameters increase with increasing strain rate. How-
ever, in the case of equal strain rate, these parameters increase εc = 0.00055 Z 0.189 (6)
as the deformation temperature decreases. The dependence of the εc = 0.74283 Z 0.1433 (7)
critical and peak strain and stress of the present steel in the differ-
ent deformation conditions (different Z values) are shown in Fig. 7. The dependence of the peak stress and strain on temperature and
It can be seen that the critical characteristics of DRX increase with strain rate confirms that the deformation is controlled by a ther-
increasing Z parameter. The ratio of εc /εp and c / p are 0.64 and mally activated process [13,14].
0.9, respectively. Therefore, there is a linear relationship between
Fig. 6. Strain hardening versus strain for Nb–Ti steel deformed at different temper-
Fig. 5. (d/d)– curves of Nb–Ti steel at different temperature and strain rates. ature and strain rates.
4324 M. Shaban, B. Eghbali / Materials Science and Engineering A 527 (2010) 4320–4325
Fig. 7. The effect of deformation condition (Z parameter) on: (a) εp , εc , and (b) p , c .
Acknowledgements
References
Fig. 8. Predicted volume fraction of dynamic recrystallization obtained under dif-
ferent temperatures at constant strain rate of 0.1. [1] J.J. Jonas, Mater. Sci. Eng. A A184 (1994) 155–161.
M. Shaban, B. Eghbali / Materials Science and Engineering A 527 (2010) 4320–4325 4325
[2] H.J. McQueen, S. Yue, N.D. Ryan, E. Fry, Mater. Process. Technol. 53 (1995) [10] P.D. Hodgson, D.C. Collinson, B. Perett, Proceed. Seventh Int. Sympos. on Phys-
293–298. ical Simulation, Tsukuba, Japan, 1997, pp. 219–224.
[3] G.R. Stewart, J.J. Jonas, F. Montheillet, ISIJ Int. 44 (9) (2004) 1581–1589. [11] C.M. Sellars, G.J. Davies, Proceed. Int. Conf. on Hot Working, Metals Society,
[4] F. Montheillet, J.J. Jonas, Encycl. Appl. Phys. 16 (1996) 205–211. London, 1980.
[5] E.I. Poliak, J.J. Jonas, ISIJ Int. 43 (5) (2003) 684–691. [12] G.R. Stewart, A.M. Elwazri, S. Yue, J.J. Jonas, Mater. Sci. Technol. 22 (5) (2006)
[6] E.I. Poliak, J.J. Jonas, Acta Mater. 44 (1996) 127–136. 519–524.
[7] E.I. Poliak, J.J. Jonas, ISIJ Int. 43 (2003) 692–700. [13] S. Sakui, T. Sakai, K. Takeishi, Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. 17 (1977) 719–
[8] J.J. Jonas, E.I. Poliak, Mater. Sci. Forum 426–432 (2003) 57–66. 724.
[9] N.D. Ryan, H.J. McQueen, Can. Metall. Q 29 (1990) 147–152. [14] C.M. Sellars, W.J. McG Tegart, Mem. Scientif. Rev. Metall. LXIII 9 (1966) 731–736.