Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Resolve That Death Penalty Should Be Legalized in Philippines

    Uploaded by

    Kibz Barrie
    13 views1 page
    The document summarizes the criteria for judging a debate between Oxford and Oregon universities on whether the death penalty should be legalized in the Philippines. It outlines the scoring breakdown for the debate proper, which awards points for evidence, delivery, interrogation, and respect for the opposing team. It also provides the criteria for judging the rebuttal portion of the debate, scoring evidence, delivery, and impact of the counter-argument. The debate was held on March 11, 2019 as a final exam for an English argumentation and debate course.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Criteria for Judging

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes the criteria for judging a debate between Oxford and Oregon universities on whether the death penalty should be legalized in the Philippines. It outlines the scoring breakdown for the debate proper, which awards points for evidence, delivery, interrogation, and respect for the opposing team. It also provides the criteria for judging the rebuttal portion of the debate, scoring evidence, delivery, and impact of the counter-argument. The debate was held on March 11, 2019 as a final exam for an English argumentation and debate course.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views1 page

    Resolve That Death Penalty Should Be Legalized in Philippines

    Uploaded by

    Kibz Barrie
    The document summarizes the criteria for judging a debate between Oxford and Oregon universities on whether the death penalty should be legalized in the Philippines. It outlines the scoring breakdown for the debate proper, which awards points for evidence, delivery, interrogation, and respect for the opposing team. It also provides the criteria for judging the rebuttal portion of the debate, scoring evidence, delivery, and impact of the counter-argument. The debate was held on March 11, 2019 as a final exam for an English argumentation and debate course.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    OXFORD – OREGON DEBATE

    Final Examination for English 112 (Argumentation and Debate)

    Debate Topic: Resolve that Death Penalty should be legalized in Philippines Date: March 11, 2019
    Affirmative / Negative Side: 1.
    2.
    3.

    CRITERIA FOR JUDGING (Debate Proper)


    EVIDENCE (40 %) RESPECT FOR OTHER
    DELIVERY (30 %) INTERPELLATION (20%) TOTAL FOR EACH
    The use of facts, info, Style and Tone of Delivery, Identification of weakness in TEAM (10%)
    SPEAKER Includes all statements, body SPEAKER
    statistics, data for the Organization and Clarity of Opposing team’s argument and
    the argument ability itself against attack language and responses to the (100%)
    argument opponents
    1
    2
    3
    GRAND TOTAL FOR TEAM’S PERFORMANCE

    CRITERIA FOR REBUTTAL


    EVIDENCE (50 %) IMPACT OF COUNTER -
    DELIVERY (40 %) TOTAL
    SPEAKER The use of facts, info, statistics, data Style and Tone of Delivery, Organization and ARGUMENT (10%)
    and fallacies for the rebuttal Clarity of the rebuttal Reflect the level of persuasion of the speaker (100%)
    on his rebut
    Team
    Captain

    Comments:

    You might also like