Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NURSING
SCIENCES, JAIPUR
ASSIGNMENT
ON
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
SUBMITTED
BY
PRAKASH SALVI
AVINASH CHOUDHARY
(M.SC. nursing final)
1
GENERAL DEFINITION:
POPULATION:
A population is the total collection of elements about which we wish to make some
inferences.
OR
The larger group from individuals are selected to participate in a study.
Example: A researcher needs to study the problem faced by post graduate nurses of India, in
this the population will be all the post graduate nurses who are Indian citizen.
TARGET POPULATION:
The target population which is also called the universe is composed of the entire group of
people or objects to which the researcher wishes to generalize the finding of the study.
Example: A researcher is interested in identifying the complication of diabetes mellitus type-
1nd in RUHS hospital Jaipur.
ACCESSIBLE POPULATION:
The target population consists of people or things that meet the designated set of criteria of
interest to the researcher.
OR
An accessible population is the portion of the target population to which the researcher has
reasonable access.
Example: All diabetic people in India who are members of particular health plan.
SAMPLE:
sample may be defined as representative unit of target population which is to be worked
upon by researchers during their study.
OR
a sample is the selected group of elements or units to represent a population.
SAMPLING:
sampling is the process of selecting a representative segment of the population under study.
Target population
Accessible population
Sample
SAMPLING FRAME:
A list of all elements or other units containing the elements in a population.
OR
It is a list of all those with in a population who can be sampled and may include individuals,
households or institutions.
Sampling technique
Merits:
Example:
Stratum A B C
Population size 100 200 300
Proportion ½ ½ ½
(sampling fraction)
Sample size 50 100 150
ii. Disproportionate Stratified random sampling:
Sample is chosen from each strata is not in equal proportion to the size of
total population.
sampling fraction is the only differences between Proportionate and
Disproportionate Stratified random sampling.
The different strata have dissimilar sampling fractions with Disproportionate
sampling.
Example:
Stratum A B C
Population size 100 20 300
0
Proportion ½ ¼ 1/6
(sampling fraction)
Sample size 50 100 150
Merits:
K = N/n or K =
Size of sample(n)
Example:
A researcher wants to choose about 100 subjects from a total target population of 500
people therefore.
Most common procedure for large scale when it is impossible to obtain a listing of all
elements.
In this sampling technique total population is divided, depending on the problem
under study into some recognizable subdivision which are termed as clusters.
Clusters are selected either by simple random or stratified random sampling.
The result for clusters samples are not reliable as the results of simple random
samples or stratified random samples, so it should only be used if practical
consideration do not allow a better sample scheme.
Types:
i. One - stage cluster sample:
Example: A researcher requiring to survey the academic performance of Indian high
school students.
One-stage cluster sample occurs when researcher included all the high school
student.
ii. Two – stage cluster sample:
Two – stage cluster sample is obtained when the researcher only select a 40 numbers
of students by using simple or stratified random sampling.
Merits:
(A) (B)
20 7 12 2 1
30 18 22 5 3
50 28 22 10 4
Progressively increasing sample size until inferences are drawn. It can be said that in above-
given values, out of 50 subjects, 28 smokers had almost double incidence of lung cancer as
compared to 22 smokers.
Merits:
Types: -
1. Purposive sampling:
Purposive sampling known as “Judgmental” or “authoritative sampling”. In this
method a desired number of sample units is selected deliberately or purposely
depending upon the objectives of the study.
Ex: - A researcher wants to study the lived experiences of post disaster depression
among people living in earthquake-affected area of Gujarat.
Merits: -
Simple to draw sample and useful in explorative studies.
Saves recourses, requires less fieldwork.
Demerits: -
Merits: -
This technique is considered easiest, cheapest, and least time consuming.
This sample technique may help in saving time, money and resources.
Demerits: -
The most obvious criticism about convenience sampling is sampling bias, and
that the sample is not representative of the entire population.
It does not provide the representative sample from the population of the
study.
Findings generated from these samples cannot be generalized on the
population.
3. Consecutive sampling:
Consecutive sampling is very similar to convenience sampling except that it
seeks to include all accessible subjects as part of the sample.
It is also known as “total enumerative sampling”. In this sampling technique,
the investigator picks up all the available subjects who are meeting the preset
inclusion and exclusion criteria. This technique is generally used in small-sized
populations.
Ex:
If a researcher wants to study the activity pattern of post kidney-transplant patients,
he can selects all the post kidney transplant patients who meet the designed
inclusion and exclusion criteria, and who are admitted in post-transplant ward during
a specific time period.
Merits: -
There is very little effort on the part of the researcher when performing this
sampling technique.
It is not expensive, not time consuming and not workforce intensive.
Ensures more representativeness of the selected sample.
Demerits: -
The researcher has a no set plans about the sample size and sampling schedule.
It always does not guarantee the selection of representative sample.
Results from this sampling technique cannot be used to create conclusions and
interpretations pertaining to the entire population.
4. Quota sampling:
In this the researcher ensures equal or proportionate representation of
subjects depending on which trait is considered as the basis of the quota. The
basis of the quota are usually age, gender, education, race, religion and socio-
economic status.
The quota sampling technique appears like stratified random sampling
technique.
Ex:
If the basis of the quota is college level and the researcher needs equal
representation, with a sample size of 100, he must select 25 first year students, 25
second year students, 25 third year and 25 fourth year students.
Merits: -
Economically cheap, as there is no need to approach all the candidates.
Suitable for studies where the fieldwork has to be carried out, like studies
related to market and public opinion polls.
Demerits: -
Ex.
A researchers wants to conduct a study on the prevalence of HIV/AIDS among
commercial sex workers.
Researcher use this sampling method if the sample for studies that are very
rare or are limited to very small subgroups of the population. This type of
sampling technique works like chain referral. Therefore it is also known as
“Chain Referral Sampling.”
Types: -
(a) Linear snowball sampling: - In this each selected sample is asked to provide
reference of only one similar subject, where a linear chain is created by the
completion of desired sample.
(b) Exponential non discriminative snowball sampling: - In this each sample member
is asked to provide reference of at least two similar subjects, because of which the
size of the sample size grows expontentially and a large sample size can be
achieved.
12
(c) Exponential discriminative snowball sampling: - In this initially one sample is
selected and asked for two references of similar subjects, out of which at least
one subjects must be active to provide further references and another could be
nonactive in providing references. Similarly each active references subject out of
them one should be active for further references.
Merits: -
The chain referral process allows the researcher to reach populations that are
difficult to sample when using other sampling methods.
The process is cheap, simple and cost-efficient.
This sampling technique needs little planning and lesser workforce compared to
other methods.
Demerits: -
The researcher has little control over the sampling method. The subjects that the
researcher can obtain rely mainly on the previous subjects that were observed.
Representativeness of the sample is not guaranteed. The researcher has no idea of
the true distribution of the population and of the sample.
Sampling bias is also a fear of researchers when using this sampling technique and
chances of poor coverage of entire population.
13