Running Head: SOCIAL CARE

Tackling Neglect and Abuse in Health and Social Care Settings

[Name of Student]

[Name of Institute]

[Date]
 Social Care 2

Table of Contents

TASK 1......................................................................................................................................3
Introduction................................................................................................................................3
Management Plan.......................................................................................................................4
Discussion..................................................................................................................................6
Factors that Contribute to Abuse and Neglect........................................................................6
Adult Safeguarding and the Mental Capacity Act 2005.........................................................6
Family-led Approaches to Safeguarding................................................................................7
The Rights, Needs, Preferences and Priorities of the Older Adult.........................................8
Secondary Research Sources......................................................................................................9
Conclusion................................................................................................................................10
Project Proposal.......................................................................................................................11
Selection of Topic.................................................................................................................11
Justification...........................................................................................................................12
Aims and Objectives.............................................................................................................13
Ethical Considerations..........................................................................................................13
TASK 2: Performance Review.................................................................................................14
References................................................................................................................................16

2
 Social Care 3

Tackling Neglect and Abuse in Health and Social Care Settings

TASK 1

Introduction

Abuses and neglect in the social and health environment exacerbate health and social

problems that are far-reaching and affect people of different backgrounds (Stanley et al.,

2016). Efforts at different levels are needed to avoid and fix this problem. Over time,

definitions of abuse and rejection by experienced adults were created, but two definitions

were given to define the user. The definition used by the “World Health Organisation (WHO)

and the International Network for the Prevention of Elder Abuse describes abuse and neglect

as an act of loneliness or exacerbation or lack of inappropriate action” (Dube, 2018).

The National Care for the Elderly Initiative (NICE) recently formulated an

appropriate definition of the British environment (Giordano and Neville, 2015). The most

serious form of adult abuse is the lack of complementary actions and practices that can lead

to actions or practices or harm. Several different types of violence are mentioned in writing.

The main types are physical abuse (e.g., rape, pushing, abuse of restraints), enthusiasm or

mental abuse (e.g., mitigation, compromise, child satisfaction), abuse of money or materials

(e.g., legal influence, attitude, sale of individual agents without consent), physical

exploitation (for example, all unwanted intercourse) and neglect (for example, refusing to

meet basic health needs). or clinic, discount). The various types and subtypes of abuse and

omission identified include violations, fundamental abuses and abuses in other parts of the

world (Baldwin et al., 2019).

Physician assistants, other health care providers, and chairpersons who guide and

instruct change in practice note that this record is important for the preparation of contracts,

methods, agreements, training projects and evaluations, d intercession and documenting

contracts (Baker et al., 2016). Hospital assistants and other hospital care providers benefit

3
 Social Care 4

from evaluating proposals and supporting documents. In particular, we recommend that the

learning environment translates these rules into understandable designs for everyday use.

Management Plan

The review met the standards of methodological research by organising simplicity and

reproducibility at every stage of the review process: search, selection, keywords and

combinations (Bailey et al., 2019). The philosophy used was largely driven by the “Centre for

Evidence-Based Educational Policy and Practice (EPPI Centre) and adapted to social work

and social assistance” of researchers and the use of EPPI. In this review, commentator’s

online programming was also used to get forum information and enter keywords.

The method considers the idea of research that does not meet the demanding

methodological needs of various effective research methods (Deidda et al., 2018). For

example, due to the joint efforts of Campbell or Cochrane, which are considered, for

example, in-depth in the region, “where it was previously clear that carefully controlled

reviews were rare”. In this sense, it was possible to include analyses, hypothetical

commitments, parts of the declaration and declaration, which undoubtedly play an important

role in the current state of knowledge.

The study used six databases as a trade-off between size, importance, and available

resources. They were: “ASSIA, PsycINFO, Medline, Social Care Online, Social Services

Summary and Social Science Handbook.” This rule of evidenced-based practice in patient

care is a comprehensive registry that provides resources for testing nursing practice (Sims,

Skinner and Rivett, 2019). “It is not intended to be a guide or guide, but rather a project or

tool for managing best practices to prevent abuse and neglect by experienced adults”. The

rule should be revised and applied based on the requirements of individual associations or

4
 Social Care 5

business environments, and the needs and trends of more established adults. The range also

offers structure and supports that are suitable for ideal, evidence-based treatment.

The expert group applied the ecological life course model to more relevant situations

of adult exploitation and neglect. The natural perspective shows that abuse and neglect are

unforeseen problems that connect elements and circumstances on many levels (Hinsliff-Smith

and McGarry, 2017). The model displays many elements connected to four unique levels:

personality, relationships, networks, or institution and culture. Components at each level can

increase the likelihood of abuse and neglect vulnerability or become defensive and help

reduce vulnerability.

Variables at this level, “such as physical and mental health and adaptability, can affect

whether an older person is at risk or can cause abuse and neglect. The relationship level also

includes numbers such as relationships with family units and care supplies. The network or

institutional components appear on the third level” (Longhi et al., 2016). For the most

established adults on the Internet, the risk of abuse and neglect is affected by, amongst other

things, travel access, the availability of money remitters, and social authentication or banning.

Experienced adults living in a treatment centre or office are affected by e.g. Workers

‘working conditions, the way they live in that environment, and hierarchical models and

methods. In the outer circle, cultural elements that affect the risk of abuse and neglect include

a mature mindset as well as medical and social approaches. Finally, the natural pattern is

established during existence (Longhi et al., 2016). This perspective combines life situations

and social conditions that arose during the life of the most established adult. Meetings that

create cumulative favourable conditions or poor service.

5
 Social Care 6

Discussion

Factors that Contribute to Abuse and Neglect

According to Short et al., (2019), “several theories have been developed to elucidate

the causes of child abuse and neglect, and several risk factors have been identified that can

lead to persistent adult weakness”. For example, theories refer to things that arise between

people, such as “strength and control, caregiver stress, and rude behaviour” that is scientific

after a whilst. Personally, the best-established risk factors for adults include dependence on

health care, psychological difficulties, social limitations, and dependence on health care

professionals who have problems with alcohol or drug abuse or abuse. violent past.

Key studies have also been used to distinguish the second letter (Manthorpe and

Martineau, 2017). The research is largely based on knowledge and skills gathered in the UK

since 2017. However, if this was limited, geographical surveys and more empirical studies

related to the UK environment have been used. This is not a deliberate study, but an

increasingly concise summary of the data that emerged from the study on neglect and abuse

to protect adults.

Adult Safeguarding and the Mental Capacity Act 2005

The “Mental Capacity Act 2005” (MCA) means empowerment and empowerment for

people who need the ability to make certain decisions themselves (Mercier et al., 2020). The

2005 MCA and Code of Conduct clarify the principle that a person may make a decision

about certain elections or carry out special monitoring for the benefit of a person who does

not have the ability to make his or her own decision. All those working with a legal entity or

working with a legal entity must adopt the MCA 2005 and follow a code of conduct that

proposes to vote or act on behalf of that entity.

6
 Social Care 7

The basic idea of MCA 2005 is to ensure that, where possible, a person in need of a

skill can make their own decisions (Hinsliff-Smith and McGarry, 2017). In cases where a

person feels able to justify a particular choice and all attempts to help him make his decision

have failed, the manager must either select the person’s potential interests or act accordingly.

Make a commitment to energise and empower people to become interested in events

or decisions that affect them, or “to improve their ability to participate as fully as possible”. If

a person cannot be forced to make his own decisions, decisions should be made with

maximum benefit, and this option should minimise his privileges and opportunities. The

current goal is to help adults achieve the necessary administrative authority, not to provide

insurance.

Family-led Approaches to Safeguarding

There are many ways to receive warnings, including, for example, “sensitive”

reactions such as talking to family members and, for example, “harsh” reactions, including

from the police or the courts. A petition is a formal response to raise issues. Assessors must

adapt to the abusing unit and be able to make all decisions so that protections do not affect

personal satisfaction, family relationships, or self-confidence (Parkinson et al., 2017). People

need information and support to help their work make decisions, but they also need to be

happy with their decisions and control. For this process to work, neighbouring experts must

advance the decision-making process during monitoring in order to fulfil their legal

obligations to protect people from abuse and harm.

There are many explanations for destructive relationships, including family

circumstances, financial benefits, and caregivers who feel overwhelmed and anxious about

their responsibilities (Silove, Ventevogel and Rees, 2017). Family relationships are often

interesting and can still be influenced by age, illness, disability, and addiction. Beaten people

7
 Social Care 8

may choose not to question this because they don’t want to harm relationships with people

they often trust. A person who has stopped abuse and who sometimes has problems of his

own, such as calming problems related to addiction or mental well-being. People with

intellectual disabilities may not be aware that they have been abused and therefore cannot

report it (Gold et al., 2017).

The Rights, Needs, Preferences and Priorities of the Older Adult

To successfully and successfully tackle abuse and neglect, physicians and other health

care providers must distinguish between the rights, needs, wants and trends of adults in their

lifestyles and practices. care solutions. According to research, mediation is more likely to be

just as effective if it adheres to social norms and conflicts with the advantages and aspirations

of experienced adults (Chinouya et al., 2017). For example, some of the more authoritative

adults have expressed the need to defend their freedom, stay at home, and allow neighbours

to help rather than outside (such as a competent administration) at home.

Even in subjective relationships, when the network followed the more experienced

adults and recognised helpful and needed support, the more authoritative adults reported the

need to own their homes and keep in touch with their networks and partners (Alghafri et al.,

2017). Deciding on the rights, “needs and trends of adults with experiences of abuse and

neglect aligns well with the idea of individualised (client-centred) care”.

An incredible effort to prevent and combat abuse and neglect by adults living in the

UK when the matter became the subject of an investigation and became an open agreement.

Maps and systems exchanged reports, created rules, and created criteria. Inventive methods

have been updated to highlight issues such as the collaborative efforts of generations of

younger and more experienced adults, the use of expressions of human experience (e.g.,

drama, migration, music) and monetary skills (Public Health England, 2020).

8
 Social Care 9

Interventions to tackle online “abuse and neglect” of experienced adults include

collaboration between congregations and different people (e.g., police, trusted networks,

banks, healthcare providers, social media, and more experienced adults). In the health sector,

“efforts to prevent and address the abuse and neglect of the more entrenched strategies”

(Davies et al., 2019).

Secondary Research Sources

The research team and the medical curator have developed a global research strategy

in light of the inclusion and rejection models implemented with the researcher. Relevant

English articles were searched in various databases and distributed between 2017 and 2020:

“Cumulative Family Care Index (CINAHL), Cochrane Controlled Studies (CT), Cochrane

Systematic Reviews (SR), Performance Data Synthesis (DARE), MEDLINE in Progress,

Ovid Health star and PsycINFO”.

Interesting facts about the “search strategy for conscious posting, including inclusion

and exclusion” rules and search terms. When the articles were found, the nursing researchers

freely evaluated the degree according to the review / prohibition rules (Baxter et al., 2018).

The study focused on peer-reviewed documentation of neglect and abuse in adult

settings, but also included methodological reviews and assessments of the role and abuse of

minors in institutions. public care. Research information comes from readily available

sources such as academic libraries, electronic databases, journals, and books, as well as

government-commissioned research and other key research, as defined by the authors, if any.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this review contains a wealth of information on the idea of neglect and

abuse and identifies a wide range of factors that increase the difficulty of understanding and

communicating in the life of skills self-neglect. and considerate. In any case, there is no clear

9
 Social Care 10

evidence of causation or feasibility of specific expert responses. “There is considerable

pressure between respect for self-government on the one hand and a clear commitment to

health and well-being on the other”. The above guide can be expanded, as can the notion that

a person who decides to bite the dust of self-esteem should not be prevented from acting as

such. They can start from the premise that we must act, whether or not they are opponents, to

ensure a person’s well-being and respect.

Human rights disputes can be handled from any perspective. Restrictions are a key

factor in how experts are ignored and misused and how they gradually react. Whilst

prototyping systems can also be involved in sharing information about mediation threats and

options, adult independence is likely to be seen at the border and efforts to establish and

maintain lasting connections. coordinated so that the administration can organise them in

time. However, the assessment of limit values should not include unforeseen ideas about limit

values. The written distinction between decision-making and the formal boundary is not

gradually clarified, and its role in deciding how to react to a waiver should be further

explored.

Although circumstances, including self-restraint, have caught the attention of U.S.

adult safety agencies, they currently go beyond the definitions that guide adult protection

policies in the United Kingdom. Responses are shared in the same way and may be due to

adult well-being or defence strategies that depend on the plans of neighbouring countries.

Whatever structure is used, experts clearly emphasise the importance of correspondence,

cooperation and risk-sharing with the agencies.

The rule provides guidance for good practice in three main areas: practice, training,

and strategy / partnership / structure. In order to achieve an ideal fit, the proposals of these

three areas should be implemented together. This includes coordinated practical proposals,

mainly for health professionals and other interprofessional group health care providers who

10
 Social Care 11

provide direct support to more experienced adults and their families in an institutional and

networked environment. The training courses are coordinated, for example, with those

responsible for staff training. B. with trainers, quality improvement teams, managers,

supervisors and training centres. The strategy, partnership and framework proposals apply to

different groups depending on the proposal. The audience consists of leaders, key personnel,

decision makers.

Project Proposal

Selection of Topic

In particular, the treatment of more established adults in abuse and neglect in health

and social services is fragmented, i.e. the suffering population is cloudy. A methodological

review of universal studies indicates an incidence of 3.2% to 27.5% and recommends that one

in four inexperienced adults (i.e., those in need of care from others) is at risk. Violence

(Stuckler et al., 2017).

In the UK, exploitation and abandonment represent 4% in any case. For this measure,

a survey of call offers was conducted amongst more than 2,000 randomly surveyed networks

that remained more established for adults and focused until 1989. Abuses and omissions by

experienced adults are unclear in the institutional setting (Baxter et al., 2018).

In Germany, for example, an extensive report claims that about 70% of nurses said

last year they were self-destructive or negligent of those arrested (WHO, 2016). The Creator

formulated the size problem by proposing that a living physician who treats 20 to 40 older

people daily could experience clinical or subclinical abuse of the elderly every day.

11
 Social Care 12

Justification

The causes of abuse and neglect are currently believed to go beyond the

characteristics and circumstances of a more established adult and an offensive or negligent

person. Social determinants of health and segregation that depend on age, sexual orientation,

culture, and needs are accepted to exacerbate their vulnerability and can lead to abuse and

neglect (Davies et al., 2019).

In addition, “organisations have some conditions that increase abuse and neglect”. For

example, “some institutional settings have ongoing staff shortages are not limited to meeting

the undeniably complex needs of experienced adults”. Adults established in these conditions

are particularly vulnerable.

The consequences of abuse and neglect are significant and inevitable. On a personal

level, “experienced adults who experience abuse and neglect face significant personal

satisfaction problems” (Public Health England, 2020). People may experience physical

injuries, loss of self-esteem and respect, loss of well-being and security, and even an

increased risk of premature death. The various outcomes mentioned in the document include

increases in inefficiencies and inefficiencies in research technologies, health services, law

enforcement hospital and financial costs.

Aims and Objectives

This study should intentionally develop best practice guidelines to help physicians

and clients decide on the appropriateness of medical treatment. Initiating motivation and

reference development for this current standard included three video chat discussions

involving a total of 26 subject matter experts and healthcare professionals across the UK, and

a personal centre attended by 20 adults with more experience living in London. Therefore, the

expert group achieved and set the following objectives:

12
 Social Care 13

 To raise awareness of abuse and neglect amongst more experienced adults and

provide evidence-based suggestions for combating and treating abuse and

neglect in all health settings during ongoing care.

 To identify lifestyle and care rights, needs, needs, and trends in established

adults.

 To gather information and resources that are believed to be adequate to

respond to suspected or suspected errors and deficiencies in full compliance

with the law, reporting methods and strategies, and expert practices.

 To set up a personal care system that is connected to numerous systems to

prevent or treat injuries.

Ethical Considerations

The research team has applied for and received ethical approval for the task of the

National Committee on the Ethics of Social Research. The assessment is based on ethical and

administrative principles. The research team would like to acknowledge the contributions of

researchers, and the key partners listed in the study (Public Health England, 2020). A

summary of the evidence and guidelines outlined in this report should allow for wider public

consultation prior to the limited and planned review. From a business perspective, the

literature reflects the administrative and ethical difficulties of neglect.

TASK 2: Performance Review

All studies reviewed showed positive changes in communication behaviour, skills,

and an infinite range of customer service interventions. The results showed significant

changes in the communication skills of the service’s clients, that is, they used more positive

13
 Social Care 14

ads, provided additional information to residents, gradually used open-ended questions, and

gradually classified as collaborative, interesting, and less complacent (Paavola, 2017).

The negative communication / interaction strategies of service customers, for

example, without rejection, decreased. The results for residents included increased

responsiveness and direct contact with clients, as well as decreased verbal denial, anger and

agitation amongst residents. In all studies, interventions had a cognitive or potentially

educational segment. Therefore, it was difficult to clearly define the contribution of certain

segments to customer service and, moreover, local results. Studies that included cognitive

and behavioural components in the intervention, however, showed significant, but not

insignificant, changes in client performance and some improvement in the population.

The two groups of experts also included a psychological component (positive

contributions from department heads to staff and support in reflecting on their new practices),

which allegedly contributed to maintaining the communication behaviour of department

clients. Two studies found positive results for customers and service residents (Skinner,

2016). The duration of the intervention could also influence the positive impact of the

research intervention.

I have taken responsibility for health and social services to prevent abuse and protect

vulnerable people in Irish society. I think that one thing is clear: no government organisation

can independently provide the necessary protection. Energy is growing amongst stakeholders

so that we can all contribute to the idea of zero flexibility.

In any case, others still need convincing. As mentioned earlier, the analyst invites you

to work with various agencies and assemblies in the National Défense Committee. The

proposed work for the meeting is to address issues such as public awareness, service delivery

and national policy. I think this meeting will highlight your interest in the plan and

demonstrate your commitment to moving it forward. If we can imagine what we can do to

14
 Social Care 15

promote human rights and prevent abuse, we may need to look closely and seek advice from

one of our pioneers.

15
 Social Care 16

References

Alghafri, Thamra S., Saud M. Alharthi, Samiya Al-balushi, Yahya Al-Farsi, Zakiya Al-

busaidi, Elaine Bannerman, Angela M. Craigie, and Annie S. Anderson. 2017.

“Health Professionals’ Perceptions about Physical Activity Promotion in Diabetes

Care within Primary Health Care Settings in Oman.” Heliyon.

Bailey, Cate, Anna Klas, Rachael Cox, Heidi Bergmeier, Julie Avery, and Helen Skouteris.

2019. “Systematic Review of Organisation-Wide, Trauma-Informed Care Models in

out-of-Home Care (OoHC) Settings.” Health and Social Care in the Community.

Baker, Philip R. A., Daniel P. Francis, Noran N. Hairi, Sajaratulnisah Othman, and Wan

Yuen Choo. 2016. “Interventions for Preventing Abuse in the Elderly.” Cochrane

Database of Systematic Reviews.

Baldwin, Helen, Nina Biehal, Linda Cusworth, Jim Wade, Victoria Allgar, and Panos

Vostanis. 2019. “Disentangling the Effect of Out-of-Home Care on Child Mental

Health.” Child Abuse and Neglect.

Baxter, Susan, Maxine Johnson, Duncan Chambers, Anthea Sutton, Elizabeth Goyder, and

Andrew Booth. 2018. “The Effects of Integrated Care: A Systematic Review of UK

and International Evidence.” BMC Health Services Research.

Chinouya, Martha, Anthony Hildreth, Deborah Goodall, Peter Aspinall, and Alistair Hudson.

2017. “Migrants and HIV Stigma: Findings from the Stigma Index Study (UK).”

Health and Social Care in the Community.

Davies, Dame Sally C., Frank Atherton, Michael McBride, and Catherine Calderwood. 2019.

“UK Chief Medical Officers’ Physical Activity Guidelines.” Department of Health

and Social Care.

Deidda, Manuela, Kathleen Anne Boyd, Helen Minnis, Julia Donaldson, Kevin Brown,

16
 Social Care 17

Nicole R. S. Boyer, and Emma McIntosh. 2018. “Protocol for the Economic

Evaluation of a Complex Intervention to Improve the Mental Health of Maltreated

Infants and Children in Foster Care in the UK (The BeST? Services Trial).” BMJ

Open.

Dube, Shanta R. 2018. “Continuing Conversations about Adverse Childhood Experiences

(ACEs) Screening: A Public Health Perspective.” Child Abuse and Neglect.

Giordano, Andrea, and Alison Neville. 2015. “Collaborating across Health and Social Care:

Joint Funding an Adult Protection Coordinator Post in Caerphilly, UK.” Journal of

Adult Protection.

Gold, Rachel, Erika Cottrell, Arwen Bunce, Mary Middendorf, Celine Hollombe, Stuart

Cowburn, Peter Mahr, and Gerardo Melgar. 2017. “Developing Electronic Health

Record (EHR) Strategies Related to Health Center Patients’ Social Determinants of

Health.” Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn, and Julie McGarry. 2017. “Understanding Management and Support

for Domestic Violence and Abuse within Emergency Departments: A Systematic

Literature Review from 2000–2015.” Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Longhi, Elena, Lynne Murray, Rachael Hunter, David Wellsted, Samantha Taylor-Colls,

Kathryn MacKenzie, Gwynne Rayns, Richard Cotmore, Peter Fonagy, and Richard

M. Pasc. Fearon. 2016. “The NSPCC UK Minding the Baby® (MTB) Home-Visiting

Programme, Supporting Young Mothers (Aged 14-25) in the First 2 Years of Their

Baby’s Life: Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial.” Trials.

Manthorpe, Jill, and Stephen Martineau. 2017. “Home Pressures: Failures of Care and

Pressure Ulcer Problems in the Community - The Findings of Serious Case Reviews.”

Journal of Adult Protection.

Mercier, Éric, Alexandra Nadeau, Audrey Anne Brousseau, Marcel Émond, Judy Lowthian,

17
 Social Care 18

Simon Berthelot, Andrew P. Costa, Fabrice Mowbray, Don Melady, Krishan Yadav,

Christian Nickel, and Peter A. Cameron. 2020. “Elder Abuse in the Out-of-Hospital

and Emergency Department Settings: A Scoping Review.” Annals of Emergency

Medicine.

Paavola, Jouni. 2017. “Health Impacts of Climate Change and Health and Social Inequalities

in the UK.” Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source.

Parkinson, M., S. M. Carr, R. Rushmer, and C. Abley. 2017. “Investigating What Works to

Support Family Carers of People with Dementia: A Rapid Realist Review.” Journal of

Public Health (United Kingdom).

Public Health England. 2020. “Guidance on Social Distancing for Everyone in the UK.”

Guidance on Social Distancing for Everyone in the UK.

Short, Jacqueline, Fiona Cram, Michael Roguski, Rachel Smith, and Jane Koziol-McLain.

2019. “Thinking Differently: Re-Framing Family Violence Responsiveness in the

Mental Health and Addictions Health Care Context.” International Journal of Mental

Health Nursing.

Silove, Derrick, Peter Ventevogel, and Susan Rees. 2017. “The Contemporary Refugee

Crisis: An Overview of Mental Health Challenges.” World Psychiatry.

Sims-Schouten, Wendy, Annie Skinner, and Kayleigh Rivett. 2019. “Child Safeguarding

Practices in Light of the Deserving/Undeserving Paradigm: A Historical &

Contemporary Analysis.” Child Abuse and Neglect.

Skinner, Heather. 2016. “Action Research.” in Formative Research in Social Marketing:

Innovative Methods to Gain Consumer Insights.

Stanley, Nicky, Siân Oram, Sharon Jakobowitz, Joanne Westwood, Rohan Borschmann,

Cathy Zimmerman, and Louise M. Howard. 2016. “The Health Needs and Healthcare

Experiences of Young People Trafficked into the UK.” Child Abuse and Neglect.

18
 Social Care 19

Stuckler, David, Aaron Reeves, Rachel Loopstra, Marina Karanikolos, and Martin McKee.

2017. “Austerity and Health: The Impact in the UK and Europe.” European Journal of

Public Health.

WHO, World Health Organization. 2016. Global Report on Psoriasis.

19