Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Report Follow Up Assessment On Impact From Irregular Electricity Electricity Supply On Kosovar Businesses PDF
Final Report Follow Up Assessment On Impact From Irregular Electricity Electricity Supply On Kosovar Businesses PDF
November 2015
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
IMPLEMENTED BY:
Disclaimer
The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the
United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government.
pg. 2
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
ACRONYMS
pg. 3
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Project Team:
Valmira Rexhëbeqaj (Team Leader), Berat Abdiu (Financial Modeller), Valon Feka
(Fieldwork Manager)
The research team would like to express their gratitude to USAID for entrusting us
with this follow-up assessment on impact from irregular electricity supply on Kosovar
businesses.
We would also like to thank KEDS and TAK for providing supplementing data and
invaluable support throughout the assessment process.
Finally, special thanks go to the business community, and the 560 interviewed
businesses in particular, for their willingness and patience to share their data and
opinions with us.
pg. 4
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACRONYMS ..............................................................................................................................................................3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .....................................................................................................................................4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................7
Study Approach and Methodology ........................................................................................................7
Report Results ..................................................................................................................................................8
1. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................9
Purpose of the study ..................................................................................................................................10
Definitions ........................................................................................................................................................10
2. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................12
2.1 KOSOVO’S PRIVATE SECTOR .........................................................................................................12
2.1.1 Private Sector Size Segmentation .....................................................................................12
2.1.2 Private Sector Industry Segmentation ...........................................................................12
2.2 KOSOVO’S ELECTRICITY SECTOR ...............................................................................................13
2.2.1 Energy demand .............................................................................................................................13
3. SURVEY RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................14
3.1 EXPENSES AND LOSSES DUE TO UNRELIABLE ENERGY SUPPLY ..............................14
3.1.1 Average Annual Expenses ......................................................................................................14
3.1.2 Average Annual Estimated Monetary Losses ..............................................................18
3.2 PRIVATE SECTOR BUSINESS IMPLICATIONS ......................................................................20
3.2.1 Analysis by Business Size .......................................................................................................20
3.2.3 Financial Impact to Businesses ..........................................................................................22
3.2.4 Analysis by Industry Segment.............................................................................................22
3.2.5 Up Close: Micro and Small Enterprises ...........................................................................24
3.2.6 Up Close: Medium and Large Businesses ......................................................................26
3.2.6 Up Close: Production Sector .................................................................................................27
3.3 ELECTRICITY END USAGE................................................................................................................28
3.4 ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF ELECTRICITY.............................................................................29
3.4.1 Usage of alternative power sources .................................................................................29
3.4.2 Irregular electricity supply affects product prices ..................................................32
3.4.3 Irregular electricity supply impacts business investment choices ................33
3.5 ROLE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ....................35
3.5.1 Businesses employ energy efficiency strategies ......................................................35
3.5.2 Firms are open to renewable energy sources ............................................................35
APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................................................37
APPENDIX I: STUDY APPROACH AND ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................37
Report Assumptions and Limitations ...........................................................................................37
APPENDIX II: QUANTITATIVE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE ...................................................38
APPENDIX III: SURVEY TABLES OF RESULTS ..............................................................................47
pg. 5
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
pg. 6
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Energy shortages and the irregular electricity supply have been identified by USAID
and the U.S. Mission's Integrated Country Strategy (ICS) as a persistent issue in
Kosovo which impact the country's ability to achieve stable, long-term economic
growth. The latest study conducted on this issue was carried out in 2013 and it
quantified the overall impact of irregular electricity supply on Kosovo’s businesses.
Since then, USAID commissioned a follow-up assessment in order to provide the
central government additional support and feedback for the implementation of its
Energy Strategy.
The study used a quantitative approach to collect data on the effects of power outages
and low quality of electricity supply on Kosovo’s businesses. A total of 560 businesses
were interviewed across Kosovo after being categorized by size and being randomly
selected from a Kosovo Tax Administration (TAK) database of 48,617 active
registered businesses in Kosovo. Supplementary data from TAK and KEDS were used
in the analysis for the estimation of energy related costs and the total impact of
irregular electricity supply to the Kosovo private sector.
The total costs incurred due to irregular electricity supply have been categorized into
three groups:
i. Alternative Power Supply Expenses: generator and inverter purchases,
maintenance and fuel costs for generators and inverters, and monetary
estimates of worker hours spent on dealing with generator related issues;
ii. Losses: monetary value of the destroyed/damaged raw materials/inputs,
monetary residual value of machinery/equipment that was
destroyed/damaged, loss in sales revenue, monetary value of losses in data
and labor productivity, and other losses related to the unreliable supply of
electricity;
iii. Additional Costs (to replace losses): the replacement cost of raw
materials, the repair/replacement cost of damaged machinery, investments
needed to reinstate the revenue generating services/product orders that were
disrupted, and investments needed to repurchase/recreate lost data.
The following formula was used to calculate the total cost of irregular electricity
supply to businesses:
pg. 7
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Report Results
The findings of this study show that a considerable financial burden is placed on
Kosovo’s businesses due to the irregular supply of electricity.
1
Effect of Unreliable Power Supply on Kosovar Businesses, USAID Kosovo, August 2013
2
KEDS Data, 2015
pg. 8
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
1. INTRODUCTION
Kosovo’s GDP as of 2014 is estimated to be 5,506 billion Euros3. With a GDP per
capita of 2,989 Euros4, Kosovo ranks among the lower middle income countries
according to the World Bank definition. Around 29 percent of the population lives in
poverty, and about of 10 percent live in extreme poverty5. These figures place Kosovo
as the poorest country in the region.
Despite having a favorable geographic location, ties with Western European
countries, and low labor costs, Kosovo has not been able to attract major foreign
investments. Shortcomings in the areas of productivity, connection to markets,
access to finance, workforce development and the general business environment
have hindered Kosovo’s potential to draw foreign investments. The problems in the
energy sector are the central issues within the area of business environment6.
Kosovo's fragile electricity infrastructure and inability to modernize the system has
challenged country's sustained economic growth and welfare of its citizens, while also
affecting the social and political stability7.
In this regard, USAID/Kosovo strategy8 centers its Development Objective 2 on
diversifying the economy and increasing the private sector’s contributions to
economic growth by promoting a more favorable business environment, by
emphasizing private sector growth, and by continuing to address the energy needs
of the country. Its Sub-Intermediate Result 2.3.1 focused on securing a more stable
energy supply, which is critical to the overall economic growth and welfare of citizens.
Through a study carried out in 2013, USAID was able quantify the overall impact of
irregular electricity supply on Kosovo’s businesses. In order to provide further support
to the Kosovo Government for the implementation of its Energy Strategy9, USAID
commissioned UBO Consulting to conduct a follow-up assessment to evaluate the
effect of electricity load shedding and voltage fluctuations on Kosovo’s business
community.
3
IMF, Staff Paper , July 2015
4
Ibid
5
Extreme poverty is defined as living on less than 2.5 USD a day.
6
Sector Assessment & Selection Report – USAID EMPOWER Private Sector, December 2014
7
Energy PAD
8
Kosovo: 2014 – 2018 Country Development Cooperation Strategy, USAID
9
Energy Strategy of the Republic of Kosovo 2009 - 2018, Ministry of Energy and Mining, 2009
pg. 9
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
This report aims at providing information regarding the overall impact of irregular
electricity supply on Kosovo’s private sector. Data presented in this report give
relevant stakeholders a picture on how irregular electricity supply and voltage
fluctuations affect Kosovo’s firms, and how firms modify their operations to meet
these difficulties.
Definitions
Quality of electricity supply refers to the under voltage and over voltage of the
electricity supplied to businesses.
Turnover is used as a proxy for revenue and it is reported at an annual level. The
turnover estimates are both self-reported and provided by TAK. They are aggregated
by industry size and segment in order to maintain the confidentiality of the business
data.
Company size is based on the annual turnover of the firm. The businesses are
grouped into the following size categories: micro, small, medium, and large. The
annual turnover associated with each business size is as follows:
Table 1. Business Size by Annual Turnover
pg. 10
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Commerce
Production;
Services;
Construction, Education, and Transportation (C/E/T);
Other
pg. 11
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
2. BACKGROUND
According to TAK data, currently there are 48,617 registered businesses functioning
in Kosovo. Micro businesses represent 64 percent of the total business population in
Kosovo, followed by small businesses (20%), medium businesses (14%), and lastly
large businesses with only 1.3 percent10. The survey followed a similar distribution of
interviews, with around 86 percent of the interviewed respondents representing
micro and small businesses and 14 percent of them representing medium and large
business entities.
In this report, businesses have been aggregated in five categories in order for each
category to represent a large enough sample for comparative purposes. The following
table presents the distribution of interviews as well as the total business population,
all segmented by the industry they operate in.
10
Definition/Disaggregation of businesses by size and sectors was kept the same as in the 2012 Assessment, to
allow for comparison between both reports
pg. 12
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Both energy consumption and load shedding levels have been decreasing over the
last few years in Kosovo. Whilst in 2011, the total energy consumption was 5,728,537
MWh, in 2014 it dropped to 5,503,685 MWh. Load shedding levels have dropped as
well, from 257,975 MWh in 2011 (4.5% of consumption) to 91,934 MWh in 2014
(1.7% of consumption)13. The rise in load shedding from 2013 to 2014 can be largely
attributed to the Kosovo A’s plant blast back in June 201414, as in the following three
months load shedding levels increased significantly, together accounting for 42
percent of the total load shedding in the year of 2014.
5,728,537 5,609,824 5,620,130 5,503,685
11
Public-Private Partnership Stories – Kosovo: Electricity Distribution, International Finance Corporation, 2013
12
Kosovo Human Development Report 2012 – Private Sector and Employment, UNDP, 2013
13
KEDS Data, 2015
14
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/06/us-kosovo-powerstation-blast-idUSKBN0EH10N20140606
pg. 13
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
3. SURVEY RESULTS
Businesses were asked to provide an annual average estimate for the additional
expenses and losses due to unreliable electricity in order to attain a better
understanding of the impact of irregular electricity supply. Businesses provided their
estimates in from a list of business expense categories that was presented in the
survey interview. The following tables illustrate the reported average annual amounts
for each of the expenses listed below:
pg. 14
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
All the aforementioned expenses are referred to as “total expenses” in the table
below. The Average column shows the mean value for a business at a national level,
after using proper weights to ensure the adequate representation of business size
categories.
As expected, the survey results showed that a large business spends the most on
average in alternative sources of electricity supply, whereas a micro business spends
the least. On average, a nationally representative business in Kosovo spends
approximately 2,642 Euros per year on securing alternative sources of electricity
supply, fuel and maintenance costs, and other generator related expenditures.
Table 4. Average Annual Alternative Electricity Supply Expenses per company by business size
Businesses were further asked to estimate their costs in the last 12 months in order
to restore/replace the damaged/destroyed items due to electricity cuts and poor
supply quality. Findings indicate that on average, firms’ expenditures went largely
towards replacement of products/raw material and repair or replacement of
equipment/machinery.
pg. 15
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Table 5. Average Annual Costs to Replace Losses per company by business size
Equipment/machinery repair or
€ 221 € 193 € 630 € 10,500 € 427
replacement
Revenues for production of goods or
€ 203 € 188 € 189 € 3,700 € 253
services provision
Other € 71 €2 € 31 €- € 44
Put together, total electricity related expenses amount to 4,104 Euros/year per
business in Kosovo. The table below shows the distribution of total expenses by
business size.
Table 6. Total Annual Expenses per company by business size
When expenses on alternative electricity sources and costs to replace losses are
disaggregated by industry, the results show that C/E/T and production businesses
are the ones that incur the highest costs in terms of usage of alternative sources of
electricity supply and replacement of losses due to irregular electricity supply.
pg. 16
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Table 7. Average Annual Alternative Electricity Supply Expenses per company by industry
Total
€ 1,182 € 2,092 € 1,567 € 1,833 € 1,175 € 1,462
pg. 17
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
As shown on the graph below, the costs to replace losses (36%) represent the largest
percentage of total expenses, followed by the fuel costs (28%), the generator and
inverter purchase (27%), and the maintenance and productivity costs (9%).
Maintenance and
productivity
9%
Costs to replace
Generator and
losses
inverter purchase
36%
27%
Fuel costs
28%
Apart from additional expenses to secure alternative sources of electricity supply and
replace losses, businesses also incur significant losses due to electricity cuts and poor
quality. In this regard, the survey asked questions regarding the loss in monetary
value of various business input factors that were destroyed or damaged during a
electricity outage or voltage fluctuation.
The losses listed below are included in estimating the total cost to businesses
resulting from the following formula:
Total cost to businesses from irregular electricity supply = losses + total expenses
(alternative power supply expenses + additional costs to replace losses)
Losses for the survey respondents are measured for the following business factors:
pg. 18
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
The sum of these factors is referred to as the losses to businesses due to irregular
electricity supply.
Findings show that a typical business in Kosovo loses 1,982 Euros annually due to
electricity cuts and voltage fluctuations. The largest losses in this regard were
reported by large businesses, and were mostly related to damages of product/raw
material.
pg. 19
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
This section of the report focuses on the implications of business expenses and losses
on their overall turnover. The table below displays the average annual monetary
burden to businesses of various sizes, and the overall national estimate for the entire
private sector in Kosovo.
** Total refers to the mean value per business and nation irrespective of business size. It is a weighted average of all business
sizes according to their relative proportions in the Kosovo economy.
As illustrated in the table above, the data from the survey show that the yearly
financial burden placed on Kosovo’s private sector due to irregular electricity supply
is estimated to be 296,019,267 Euros. This sum represents approximately 5.0
percent of Kosovo’s 2014 GDP (5,506 billion Euros). On average, regardless of
business size, a firm in Kosovo realizes an additional 6,086 Euros in cost due to
expenses and losses from power cuts and voltage fluctuations.
pg. 20
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
The total financial burden provides insights into the impact to businesses financial
performance when related to reported turnover data. Turnover data for the firms was
collected in two ways; self-reported figures and estimates provided by TAK,
aggregated by industry and size to protect the business confidentiality requirements.
In addition to turnover data, the study collected monthly billing amounts from KEDS
for each business surveyed. Both the data from TAK and KEDS were included in the
overall analysis to estimate the impact on business performance. The table below
illustrates a notional balance sheet representation for a firm. The expenses’ estimates
were provided by businesses in response to survey questions. The energy bill data
was provided by KEDS. The energy costs and losses are related to the estimates
provided in the previous sections of this report. The profit estimates are estimated
based on both the survey annual average turnover amounts reported by businesses
and TAK data. The table below breaks down total expenses and losses and compares
them to the corresponding firm’s financial data according to business size.
Table 13. Turnover and Electricity Related Average Annual Expenses by Company Size15
15
Survey Data, except for TAK turnover data
pg. 21
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Annual
Micro Small Medium Large Average per
business
As illustrated in the table, the smaller a business is, the larger the additional cost due
to unreliable electricity supply in proportion to the total turnover. Moreover, micro
businesses scored a negative percentage share of profit (-88.57%). However, as
pointed out in the previous survey on unreliable electricity supply on Kosovar
businesses, this can be related to the presence of an informal economy that is not
reflected in the reported turnover16.
When aggregated, the results show that a typical business’ additional costs due to
electricity constraints represent 9.66 percent of annual turnover, 11.6 percent
of expenses, and 57.91 percent of profits.
This section of the report elaborates on the effects of irregular electricity on the
financial performance of different industries within the business community. The table
below presents the expenses and losses due to electricity cuts and voltage
fluctuations, and compares them to the corresponding firm’s financial data according
to business industry.
16
Effect of unreliable power supply on Kosovar businesses, USAID Kosovo, August 2013
pg. 22
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Table 14. Turnover and Electricity Average Annual Related Expenses by Industry17
** Other industries represent a grouping of businesses from various, sparsely represented industries (i.e. financial services, IT,
science, culture, art, etc.)
*** This an average monthly electricity bill amount, calculated across all the businesses in the sample and could not be
disaggregated across industries
17
Survey Data, except for TAK turnover data
pg. 23
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
As the table illustrates, the businesses in the production sector are the most affected
ones from electricity-related issues since the energy related costs as percentages of
turnover, profit and total expenses are significantly higher than that of businesses in
other industries. Meanwhile, firms in the service industry were the least affected in
terms of their energy expenses and losses as a share of the total profit.
Micro and small enterprises represent around 84 percent of the overall business
community in Kosovo. As per self-reported data from the survey, together, micro and
small businesses comprise 16.5 percent of the Kosovo’s estimated GDP in 2014.
Moreover, the self-reported data from the survey show micro enterprises contribute
19 percent to the total turnover of businesses in Kosovo (9.1% of the GDP), and
small businesses contribute 15.4 percent (7.4% of the GDP) in this regard.
The survey results also showed that expenses and losses due to irregular electricity
supply caused to micro enterprises represent 42.3 percent of the total losses and
expenses in the private sector. Meanwhile, losses and expenses incurred by small
firms comprise 15.9 percent of the total losses and expenses in the business
community caused due to electricity loss and voltage fluctuations.
On average, a micro enterprise realizes 4,029 Euros yearly in additional costs and
losses due to irregular electricity supply. The largest share of these expenses go
towards securing alternative sources of electricity supply – generators and inverters
(63%), whereas the other share of expenses represents costs of investments of
recouping losses and damages due to electricity-related issues (37%).
Revenue
investments
7%
Fuel costs (Apr-
Sep) Inventory investments
11% 6%
Investment in data
Maintenance and information
generator & 2%
invertor Inverter Generator Other investments
6% 9% 13% 2%
pg. 24
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
A small enterprise incurs an average of 4,750 Euros annually in additional costs and
losses due to irregular electricity supply. Similar to micro enterprises, the largest
share of these expenses are generator and inverter related (75%), and the other
expenses are dedicated to investments made due to losses caused by electricity loss
and voltage fluctuations (25%).
Product/Raw
Generator Related issues material Equipment/machinery
(worker hours) 7% repair or replacement
4% 6%
Revenue investments
Fuel costs (Oct- 6%
Mar) Inventory investments
20% 6%
Investment in data
and information
0%
Fuel costs (Apr-Sep)
16%
Generator
Maintenance
23%
generator & invertor
Inverter
5%
7%
Graph 4. Share of expenses for small businesses
Can you please tell us how important are the following services for your business operations?
(1 = not important at all; 10 = very important)
Company Size Industry
Total
Micro Small Medium Large Trade Production Services C/E/T Other
the fixed
phone-line 4.02 3.77 4.01 5.15 4.11 3.57 5.08 4.47 3.40 3.92
supply?
water
8.04 8.04 7.86 8.39 8.67 7.76 8.72 8.42 7.18 8.00
supply?
garbage
collection
8.40 8.33 8.43 8.77 7.78 8.42 8.79 8.59 7.40 8.16
in your
area?
public
transport in 7.17 7.18 7.24 7.27 5.22 7.19 7.30 7.32 6.14 7.42
your area?
electricity
9.38 9.29 9.38 9.70 10.00 9.44 9.58 9.64 8.04 9.30
supply?
pg. 25
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Although they represent only 16 percent of the total business population, medium
and large businesses contribute considerably towards Kosovo’s economy. Together,
medium and large businesses comprise 31.4 percent of Kosovo’s estimated GDP. In
terms of total turnover from the business community in Kosovo, the data from the
survey show that medium businesses are accountable for 36.5 percent of the total
private sector turnover, whereas large businesses contribute with 29.1 percent in this
regard.
In terms of energy related costs, medium businesses incur 31.4 percent of the total
share of expenses and losses of the business community in Kosovo due to irregular
electricity supply. Meanwhile, expenses and losses suffered by large firms due to
electricity cuts and instability account for 10.4 percent of the overall amount.
On average, the additional costs due to irregular electricity supply are 13,365 Euros
per year for a typical medium sized business. Around 69 percent of these costs are
related to generators and inverters, and the other 31 percent are costs to recoup
damages and losses.
Generator
38%
pg. 26
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
On the other hand, survey results indicate that a large business incurs 48,955 Euros
annually on average in additional costs and losses due to irregular electricity supply.
In contrast to other sized businesses, the majority of these costs are related to
investments due to damages of equipment/machinery and revenue losses (51%).
Costs related to alternative sources of energy supply account for 42 percent of the
total additional costs due to electricity cuts and instability.
As pointed out earlier in the report, survey findings show that the production sector
in Kosovo is the most affected one by irregular electricity supply. The total expenses
related to energy amount to approximately 12,360 Euros for a typical business
within the production sector. Firms operating in this sector were also most likely to
claim they use generators as alternative electricity supply sources (47%).
Irregular electricity supply also affects the pricing of businesses’ products and
services. Results from the assessment illustrate that the biggest burden in this regard
is placed on production firms. The interviewed businesses in this sector stated that
prices of their products increase by an average of 5.6 percent due to the usage of
alternative sources of power.
Additionally, businesses operating in the production sector showed more readiness
than those from other sectors to hire new employees (34%) and expand their
service/product lines (24%) if they had regular and reliable electricity supply.
Production firms were also the most likely ones to state that they would stay longer
hours (20%) and open additional stores/locations (17%) if they could rely on regular
and stable electricity supply.
pg. 27
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Firms were asked to report on what they use electricity for. The results show that a
vast majority of 97 percent of businesses use electricity for lighting, whereas 62
percent of them use it for computers. Around half of businesses declared to use
electricity for manufacturing (52%), refrigeration (51%) and telecom expenses
(47%), whereas lower percentages of businesses used electricity for heating (33%)
and air-conditioning (28%).
Table 16. Percentage of companies that use electricity by function
Percentage of
Function
Businesses
Lighting 96.6
Computers 62.3
Manufacturing/service equipment* 52.0
Refrigeration 50.5
Telecom 47.4
Heating 33.3
Air-conditioning 27.9
* In this context, manufacturing is interpreted as any business functions that supports the sale of a service or good
Additionally, firms were asked to estimate the fraction of the total electricity bill that
each of the aforementioned energy usage accounts for. Interviewed businesses
declared that lighting amounts to 32 percent of the total electricity bill, followed by
manufacturing/service equipment (23%), and computers (12%).
Lighting
32%
Refrigeration
11%
Computers
12%
Manufacturing/service Heating
equipment 10%
23%
pg. 28
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Micro 6.3
Small 4.2
Medium 2.9
Large 7.8
Graph 8. Average days per month on alternative power sources – by business size
The following table presents the same data converted to working hours on monthly
basis.
pg. 29
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Inverters 5%
Disaggregated by size, the survey data show that the smaller the business is the less
likely it is to claim usage of alternative sources of power supply.
Table 18. Types of alternative power supply used for business operations – by business size
Meanwhile, split by business industry the findings show that businesses in operating
in services (52%) and production (47%) were the most likely to use alternative
energy supply sources.
Table 19. Types of alternative energy supply used for business operations – by business sector
When asked about the end-use of alternative sources of energy supply, the vast
majority of businesses reported that they use these sources for lighting (97%). Other
popular uses of alternative sources of energy include computers (61%),
manufacturing/service equipment (60%), and telecom equipment (47%).
pg. 30
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Lighting 97%
Computers 61%
Refrigeration 42%
Air-conditioning 17%
Heating 9%
Other 9%
Graph 10. End use of alternative energy supply for an average business in Kosovo
As businesses are faced with two main issues in regard to power supply, they were
asked to point out which one was more important, electricity quality (voltage
fluctuations) or power outage. Around 70 percent of interviewed businesses stated
that power outage more problematic to them, compared to 28 percent who stated
that quality is a bigger problem. In terms of company size, it should be noted that
large businesses were split in terms of their answers, as half of them said that
electricity quality is more problematic, and the other half placed more importance to
power outage.
Meanwhile, when data from this question were disaggregated by industry, businesses
in the production sector were the ones most likely to report that electricity quality is
a more important problem (44%).
pg. 31
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Around 26 percent of interviewed businesses said that apart from power outages,
they also face other problems related to the quality of electric energy. Seventy-seven
percent of these businesses identified under-voltage electricity as their issue in terms
of electricity quality, whereas 12 percent reported over-voltage as a problem. The
table below presents the results from this question categorized by business size and
industry.
Table 20. Types of Electricity Quality Issues that Businesses Faced (n = 145)
Apart from power outages, what kind of problems with quality of electric energy do you face?
Company Size Industry
Total
Micro Small Medium Large Trade Production Services C/E/T Other
Under-
77.6% 79.2% 79.5% 63.6% 100.0% 73.7% 82.8% 75.0% 83.3% 84.6%
voltage
Over-
11.6% 11.7% 9.1% 18.2% 12.3% 17.2% 13.9%
voltage
Other 3.4% 4.5% 13.6% 3.5% 8.3%
Businesses were asked whether there was any association between power cuts and
end prices of products. The findings from the survey show that there is an average
of four percent increase in the prices of products due to usage of alternative sources
of energy supply.
In terms of sizes, the most affected in this regard were small and large businesses,
as they reported the largest increase of product price as a result of using alternative
energy sources. Meanwhile, in regard to industries, businesses operating in the
production sector were the ones that declared the highest average increase of
product price due to power outages.
Table 21. Survey responses to how much final price has risen due to alternative sources of energy
By how many per cent the product price has increased as a result of using alternative source of
energy, such as generator, inverter and similar?
Product
price
increase 3.92 3.79 5.00 1.56 4.75 2.07 5.60 4.70 3.83 4.38
(%)
pg. 32
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
The survey asked companies about their willingness to invest in their business if they
had regular and reliable electricity supply.
The findings show that one in every five businesses showed willingness to hire more
workers if they had regular and reliable electricity supply. The production sector
showed more readiness to hire new employees (34%).
Table 22. Survey Responses to Investment/Expansion Options with Reliable Electricity Supply: Hire More Workers
Would you hire more workers if you had regular and reliable electricity supply?
Yes 19.5% 16.1% 21.0% 31.3% 22.2% 15.6% 34.2% 22.4% 15.7% 11.3%
No 64.6% 68.5% 62.3% 52.2% 66.7% 67.1% 50.0% 62.9% 66.7% 77.4%
Don’t
15.9% 15.5% 16.8% 16.4% 11.1% 17.3% 15.8% 14.7% 17.6% 11.3%
know/Refuse
Around 15 percent of the interviewed business stated that they would also expand
their service/product line if they could rely on stable and regular electric energy.
Again, businesses pertaining to the production industry were the most willing to
invest in this regard (24%).
Table 23. Survey Responses to Investment/Expansion Options with Reliable Electricity Supply: Service Line/Product Offering
Would you expand your service/product line offers if you had regular and reliable electricity supply?
Yes 15.2% 9.1% 23.4% 22.4% 22.2% 13.1% 23.7% 17.5% 13.7% 7.5%
No 60.5% 62.5% 58.7% 55.2% 66.7% 59.9% 47.4% 65.0% 56.9% 73.6%
Don’t
24.3% 28.4% 18.0% 22.4% 11.1% 27.0% 28.9% 17.5% 29.4% 18.9%
know/Refuse
pg. 33
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Around 13 percent said they would stay open longer hours if they could rely on stable
and regular electricity. When asked if they would open additional stores/locations if
they had regular and reliable electricity supply, 13 percent replied affirmatively.
Table 24. Survey Responses to Investment/Expansion Options with Reliable Electricity Supply: Stay Open Longer Hours
Would you stay open longer hours if you had regular and reliable electricity supply?
Yes 12.7% 10.1% 15.6% 19.4% .0% 11.8% 19.7% 16.1% 3.9% 5.7%
No 67.0% 65.0% 70.7% 64.2% 88.9% 66.2% 63.2% 71.3% 62.7% 67.9%
Don’t
20.4% 24.9% 13.8% 16.4% 11.1% 21.9% 17.1% 12.6% 33.3% 26.4%
know/Refuse
Table 25. Survey Responses to Investment/Expansion Options with Reliable Electricity Supply: Open Additional Stores
Would you open additional stores/locations if you had regular and reliable electricity supply?
Company Size Industry
Total
Micro Small Medium Large Trade Production Services C/E/T Other
Yes 13.2% 9.1% 16.8% 25.4% .0% 13.5% 17.1% 16.8% 2.0% 7.5%
No 68.8% 67.8% 71.3% 62.7% 100.0% 66.7% 60.5% 72.0% 76.5% 73.6%
Don’t
18.0% 23.0% 12.0% 11.9% .0% 19.8% 22.4% 11.2% 21.6% 18.9%
know/Refuse
pg. 34
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Businesses were asked questions on their awareness and practice of energy efficiency
solutions and methods. Based on the survey responses, the majority of businesses
employ various strategies to become more energy efficient. Among the most common
strategies mentioned by interviewed firms were turning off of unnecessary equipment
overnight (87%), and turning off of all or most of the lights overnight (87%).
Businesses also reported that they are more cautious when purchasing new
equipment, with 86 percent of them stating that they consider energy efficiency level
of equipment/appliances before buying the items.
Firms were also asked about their awareness and readiness to employ renewable
energy sources for their business operations. The level of knowledge on these sources
varied, as higher percentages of businesses declared their knowledge on solar energy
(86%) and wind power (79%). The least known renewable energy technology was
geothermal energy (33%).
pg. 35
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
When asked about their willingness to consider these forms of renewable energy,
around 56 percent of all interviewed businesses expressed their readiness to consider
solar energy, and 54 percent were willing to try wind power.
86.3%
Solar energy
56.3%
79.1%
Wind power
53.9%
46.8% Informed
Biofuel
22.3%
Willing to consider
41.6%
Biomass
16.6%
33.4%
Geothermal energy
25.0%
pg. 36
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
APPENDICES
This survey was conducted with a sample of active businesses registered in Kosovo.
Businesses for the purpose of this study were considered that are active as taxpayers
according to the Tax Administration of Kosovo (TAK). Face-to-face computer assisted
personal interviews (CAPI) were conducted with 560 business representatives. At a
95 percent confidence interval, this sample generates a margin of error of ±4.15
percent.
A two-stage stratified random sampling approach was used to design the sample,
where the first stratum represents municipal level quota for businesses proportionally
to the size of the sub-population in each municipality, and the second stratum
represents business sizes: micro, small, medium, and large.
pg. 37
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-1b. And how many hours a day is your business open to customers?
D-2. And on average, what is the total hours a day your business is operating, including pre-opening and
preparation hours, main business and closing time?
D-3a. What is the most important problem facing your company today?
D-4. Can you please tell me how important are the following services for your business operations using
a scale from ‘1’ to ‘10’, where ‘1’ stands for “not important at all”, while ‘10’ stands for “very
important”.
Ref/DK
a) the fixed phone-line supply? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 99
b) water supply? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 99
c) garbage collection in your area? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 99
d) public transport in your area? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 99
e) electricity supply? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 99
D-5. Apart from facing power restrictions do you also face problems with quality of electric energy
that you are getting?
1. Yes GO TO D-6
2. No SKIP TO D-8a
3. Refuse/don’t know SKIP TO D-8a
1. Undercurrent
2. Overcurrent
3. Other (specify)___________
8. Refuse
9. Don’t know
pg. 38
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
1. Power quality
2. Restrictions
8. Refuse
9. Don’t know
D-8a. Can you tell me what do you use electricity for? (READ OUT.MULTIPLE RESPONSE)
1. Lighting
2. Heating
3. Manufacturing/service equipment
4. Computers
5. Refrigeration
6. Telecom equipment (TV, phone, etc.)
7. Air-conditioning
8. Other ( specify)
D-8b. Can you give estimation in % about the share of electricity consumption for the electricity
spenders you just mentioned? SHOW CARD
D-9. Apart from the power supply from the electric utility company, what other types of power supply
you are relying on for the moment for your business operations? (READ OUT. MULTIPLE RESPONSE)
1. Generator (fuel)
2. Wind generator
3. Solar panels
4. Inverters
5. Other (specify) _____________________
6. Other (specify) _______________________
7. Other (specify)_________________________
8. Does not use any other energy sources [Skip to question D21]
pg. 39
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
IF COMPANY DOES NOT HAVE ANY OF THE ALTERNATIIVE SOURCES OF POWER IN D-9, SKIP TO
D-21
D-10. Could you please tell me when did you buy it-what year was this?
D-11. And do you remember what was the total price you paid to purchase and install this power
source?
D-12. How often did you purchase each of the following in the last 10 years)?
D-9. Source of power D-12. Frequency of purchase
1. Generator (fuel) (number of purchase)
2. Wind generator (number of purchase)
3. Solar panels (number of purchase)
4. Inverters (number of purchase)
5. Other (number of purchase)
6. Other (number of purchase)
7. Other (number of purchase)
D-13. And can you now give me an approximate total cost of maintenance for the past 12 months?
[Interviewer: Make sure respondent understands that generator maintenance is without fuel; the cost
of regular maintenance, repairs, change of filters, etc.]
pg. 40
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-14. Can you please tell me how many hours per month do you usually use this power source in a
typical month during the summer season (April through September)?
D-15. And how many hours per month do you usually use this power source in a typical month during
the winter season (October through March)?
D-16. Avg Total for a D-17. Avg Total for a D-18a. Capacity in KW D-18b. Hour spent
summer month winter month around generator
____________EUR ____________EUR ____________KW ____________hours
pg. 41
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-19. Can you please tell me which of the following are powered by your alternative source of power
during restriction periods?
Categories YES NO Don’t know
1. Lighting 1 2 9
2. Heating 1 2 9
3. Manufacturing/serviceequipment/production 1 2 9
4. Computers 1 2 9
5. Refrigeration 1 2 9
6. Telecom equipment (TV, phone, etc.) 1 2 9
7. Air-conditioning 1 2 9
8. Other 1 2 9
9. Other 1 2 9
D-20. By how many per cent the product price has increased as a result of using alternative source of
power, such as generator, inverter and similar?
__ __ __ %
D-21. What is the impact of electricity restrictions, if any, on your business activities? Please, use this
scale from 1 to 10, where 1 stands for ‘Not at all’, while 10 mean ‘A lot’.
Ref/DK
a) Production flow/process 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 99
b) Supply chain 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 99
c) Product delivery 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 99
d) Your business standing/reputation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 99
e) Other (specify) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 99
D-22a. Thinking about the past 12 months, can you give estimation about the likely loss in monetary
value (Euros) for each of the following, due to power restrictions or low power quality?
Value in Euros
a) Product/Raw material ____________EUR
b) Equipment/machinery repair or replacement ____________EUR
c) Revenues for production of goods or services provision ____________EUR
d) Data and information (loss in computer data from power) ____________EUR
e) Other ____________EUR
a) Other ____________EUR
pg. 42
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-22b. (ASK THOSE WHO MENTIONED ANY VALUE IN D-22a): And thinking about the last 12
months, how much you had to invest in each of the following, in order to restore/replace the damaged
items due to power restrictions or low power quality?
Categories Value in Euros
a) Product/Raw material ____________EUR
b) Equipment/machinery repair or replacement ____________EUR
c) Revenues for production of goods or services provision ____________EUR
d) Inventory ____________EUR
e) Data and information (loss in computer data from power) ____________EUR
f) Other ____________EUR
g) Other ____________EUR
D-23. (ASK ALL) Thinking about the past 12 months, did you have to hire or fire staff due to power
restrictions or low power quality? If YES, how many people?
Number of people
a) Hire people
b) Fire people
D-24. Can you please estimate in a typical month, how many hours your employees are not performing
their tasks due to power restrictions? Please give me the number of hours in a typical month and
number of employees doing nothing during these periods.
(Interviewer: For example a person working as a clerk on a computer, if there is no power, he/she will
not be working for the duration of the power cut.)
D-25. How much would you be willing to invest on an annual basis in expanding your business if you
had regular and reliable power supply? Would you…
D-25a D-25b
c. Stay open longer hours 1. YES How many hours a day? __ __ __hours
2. NO
9.Don’t know/Refuse
pg. 43
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-26. Can you please tell me if you regularly employ each of the following practices in your company?
Practices Don’t
YES NO
know
A. Turn off all or most of the lights overnight 1 2 9
B. Use energy efficiency light bulbs 1 2 9
C. Turn off unnecessary equipment overnight 1 2 9
Consider energy efficiency level of
D. 1 2 9
equipment/appliances when purchasing them
E. Encourage non-usage of electricity for heating 1 2 9
F. Other 1 2 9
D-27. Have you heard of/are you aware of the following alternative power sources?
Don’t
YES NO
know
A. Wind power 1 2 9
B. Solar energy 1 2 9
C. Biomass 1 2 9
D. Biofuel 1 2 9
E. Geothermal energy 1 2 9
D-28. (Filtered, ask for each the respondent in aware of) And would you be willing to consider the
following forms of renewable energy for use in your business in the near future?
Don’t
YES NO
know
A. Wind power 1 2 9
B. Solar energy 1 2 9
C. Biomass 1 2 9
D. Biofuel 1 2 9
E. Geothermal energy 1 2 9
pg. 44
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
DEMOGRAPHICS
1. Executive manager
2. Chief finance officer
3. Owner (small business)
4. Co-owner
5. Other (specify)______________________
6. Ref/Don’t know
A-4c. What sector does your company work in primarily? (Write down and then code the sector)
1. Production 1. Construction
2. Commerce 2. Science, culture, art
3. Services and Tourism 3. Army, police, security
4. Agriculture 4. Financial services
5. Education 5. Computers and IT systems
6. Health and healthcare 97. Other (specify)
7. Transport 99. Refused/Don’t Know
pg. 45
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
A-5b. And how many of them are working part-time, including you?
A-5a. Total Working A-5b. Part time
A-6. Thinking about the last 12 months, approximately how much did your company spend on a typical
month on each of the following items?
a. Communication _ _ _ _ ( euro )
b. Salaries (net) _ _ _ _ ( euro )
c. Rent _ _ _ _ ( euro )
d. Transportation _ _ _ _ ( euro )
e. Water bill _ _ _ _ ( euro )
f. Taxes (all taxes your company paid last month) _ _ _ _ ( euro )
g. Garbage collection _ _ _ _ ( euro )
h. Production/project/service expenditures _ _ _ _ ( euro )
A-7. Can you please tell me what the total revenues of your company were for the past 3 years?
pg. 46
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-1b. How many hours a day is your business open to customers? (hours per day)
D-2. On average, what is the total hours a day your business is operating, including pre-opening and preparation hours, main business and
closing time? (hours per day)
pg. 47
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-3a. What is the most important problem facing your company today?
Unfair
11.8% 7.7% 16.0% 16.1% 16.7% 10.3% 9.4% 13.5% 14.8% 14.8%
competition
Weak economy 6.9% 9.8% 5.0% 1.8% 12.3% 1.9% 2.7% 7.4% 3.7%
Others 15.40% 9.80% 22.70% 16.10% 16.70% 13% 7.50% 22.50% 11.10% 14.80%
pg. 48
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-4. Can you please tell me how important are the following services for your business operations?
pg. 49
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-5. Apart from facing power restrictions do you also face problems with quality of electric energy that you are getting?
pg. 50
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
pg. 51
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-8b. Can you give estimation in % about the share of electricity consumption for the electricity spenders you just mentioned?
pg. 52
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-9. Apart from the power supply from the electric utility company, what other types of power supply you are relying on for the moment for
your business operations?
D-10. Could you please tell me when did you buy it-what year was this? Generator (fuel)
pg. 53
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-10. Could you please tell me when did you buy it-what year was this? Inverters
D-11. And do you remember what was the total price you paid to purchase and install this power source?
D-12. How often did you purchase each of the following in the last 10 years)?
pg. 54
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-13. And can you now give me an approximate total cost of maintenance for the past 12 months?
D-14. Can you please tell me how many hours per month do you usually use this power source in a typical month during the summer season
(April through September)?
pg. 55
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-15. Can you please tell me how many hours per month do you usually use this power source in a typical month during the summer season
(October through March)?
D-16. Can you please tell me how much did you spend on fuel for your generator per month in a typical month during the summer season
(April through September)?
pg. 56
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-17. Can you please tell me how much did you spend on fuel for your generator per month in a typical month during the summer season
(October through March)?
D-18b. How many hours would you estimate are required a typical month for you or your employees to focus on generator-related issues
(fuel purchases, maintenance, shopping for parts, etc.)
pg. 57
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-19. Can you please tell me which of the following are powered by your alternative source of power during restriction periods?
D-20. By how many per cent the product price has increased as a result of using alternative source of power, such as generator, inverter and
similar?
pg. 58
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-21. What is the impact of electricity restrictions, if any, on your business activities?
D-22a. Thinking about the past 12 months, can you give estimation about the likely loss in monetary value (Euros) for each of the following,
due to power restrictions or low power quality?
Equipment/machinery repair or
573.3 425.7 327.9 1739.3 1,641.7 408.8 1076.4 580.0 781.3 368.8
replacement
Other 28.8 11.2 37.9 92.8 25.9 28.2 32.9 41.2 19.0
Other 5.2 0 2.4 37.5 3.6 5.1 9.2 4.2 2.4
pg. 59
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-22b. And thinking about the last 12 months, how much you had to invest in each of the following, in order to restore/replace the damaged
items due to power restrictions or low power quality?
pg. 60
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-24. Can you please estimate in a typical month, how many hours your employees are not performing their tasks due to power restrictions?
Please give me the number of hours in a typical month and number of employees doing nothing during these periods.
Total Company Size Industry
Micro Small Medium Large Trade Production Services C/E/T Other
Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean
hours per month 4.28 3.72 4.61 4.78 8.86 3.33 6.83 5.47 1.44 2.16
number of employees 3.04 3.08 2.36 4.80 3.14 2.83 3.27 1.63 12.81 2.41
D-25. How much would you be willing to invest on an annual basis in expanding your business if you had regular and reliable power supply?
Would you…
Total Company Size Industry
Micro Small Medium Large Trade Production Services C/E/T Other
Co % Co % Co % Co % Co % Co % Co % Co % Co % Co %
Yes 19.5% 16.1% 21.0% 31.3% 22.2% 15.6% 34.2% 22.4% 15.7% 11.3%
No 64.6% 68.5% 62.3% 52.2% 66.7% 67.1% 50.0% 62.9% 66.7% 77.4%
a. Hire more workers
Don’t
15.9% 15.5% 16.8% 16.4% 11.1% 17.3% 15.8% 14.7% 17.6% 11.3%
know/Refuse
Yes 15.2% 9.1% 23.4% 22.4% 22.2% 13.1% 23.7% 17.5% 13.7% 7.5%
b. Expand your No 60.5% 62.5% 58.7% 55.2% 66.7% 59.9% 47.4% 65.0% 56.9% 73.6%
service/product offers Don’t
24.3% 28.4% 18.0% 22.4% 11.1% 27.0% 28.9% 17.5% 29.4% 18.9%
know/Refuse
Yes 12.7% 10.1% 15.6% 19.4% 11.8% 19.7% 16.1% 3.9% 5.7%
No 67.0% 65.0% 70.7% 64.2% 88.9% 66.2% 63.2% 71.3% 62.7% 67.9%
c. Stay open longer hours
Don’t
20.4% 24.9% 13.8% 16.4% 11.1% 21.9% 17.1% 12.6% 33.3% 26.4%
know/Refuse
Yes 13.2% 9.1% 16.8% 25.4% 13.5% 17.1% 16.8% 2.0% 7.5%
d. Open additional No 68.8% 67.8% 71.3% 62.7% 100.0% 66.7% 60.5% 72.0% 76.5% 73.6%
stores/locations Don’t
18.0% 23.0% 12.0% 11.9% 19.8% 22.4% 11.2% 21.6% 18.9%
know/Refuse
Yes 10.5% 6.3% 15.0% 20.9% 8.4% 23.7% 11.2% 5.9% 3.8%
e. Expand
No 67.7% 66.2% 70.7% 62.7% 100.0% 65.4% 53.9% 74.8% 72.5% 73.6%
production/manufacturing
lines Don’t
21.8% 27.4% 14.4% 16.4% 26.2% 22.4% 14.0% 21.6% 22.6%
know/Refuse
pg. 61
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-25. How much would you be willing to invest on an annual basis in expanding your business if you had regular and reliable power supply?
D-26. Can you please tell me if you regularly employ each of the following practices in your company?
Use energy efficiency light bulbs No 21.1% 21.1% 22.2% 20.9% 17.7% 18.4% 32.2% 17.6% 13.2%
Don’t
6.3% 6.9% 5.4% 4.5% 11.1% 4.2% 3.9% 8.4% 17.6% 1.9%
know/Refuse
Yes 87.3% 85.2% 91.0% 89.6% 77.8% 87.8% 93.4% 87.4% 72.5% 90.6%
Turn off unnecessary equipment No 5.9% 6.6% 3.6% 7.5% 11.1% 5.9% 2.6% 4.9% 9.8% 9.4%
overnight Don’t
6.8% 8.2% 5.4% 3.0% 11.1% 6.3% 3.9% 7.7% 17.6%
know/Refuse
pg. 62
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
Yes 86.3% 85.2% 86.2% 91.0% 88.9% 85.7% 96.1% 85.3% 68.6% 94.3%
Consider energy efficiency level of
equipment/appliances when No 4.8% 6.3% 3.6% 1.5% 5.9% 2.8% 11.8% 5.7%
purchasing them Don’t
8.9% 8.5% 10.2% 7.5% 11.1% 8.4% 3.9% 11.9% 19.6%
know/Refuse
Yes 75.4% 77.9% 72.5% 71.6% 66.7% 77.2% 88.2% 67.8% 60.8% 83.0%
Encourage non-usage of electricity No 11.4% 9.1% 12.6% 19.4% 11.1% 9.7% 5.3% 16.1% 19.6% 7.5%
for heating Don’t
13.2% 12.9% 15.0% 9.0% 22.2% 13.1% 6.6% 16.1% 19.6% 9.4%
know/Refuse
Yes 6.6% 7.3% 4.8% 9.0% 5.9% 13.2% 2.1% 9.8% 9.4%
D-27. Have you heard of/are you aware of the following alternative power sources?
pg. 63
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
D-28. And would you be willing to consider the following forms of renewable energy for use in your business in the near future?
pg. 64
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
A-5b. And how many of them are working part-time, including you?
A-6. Thinking about the last 12 months, approximately how much did your company spend on a typical month on each of the following items?
Salaries (net) 24,213.38 9,206.86 17,389.66 46,390.19 514,300.00 17,426.47 19,244.18 26,020.46 70,017.45 12,736.68
Rent 1,802.54 1,108.98 1,865.21 4,334.15 6,222.22 1,417.51 977.21 3,528.88 970.76 850.38
Transportation 1,741.60 844.55 1,460.95 2,128.30 35,666.67 930.29 2,059.74 1,750.12 6,001.30 791.44
Water bill 304.07 217.89 330.52 647.16 294.40 242.85 388.25 332.83 429.49 258.81
Taxes (all taxes your
3,374.06 2,244.29 2,877.52 6,810.24 26,800.00 2,569.22 3,074.70 3,491.54 5,714.54 4,833.15
company paid last month)
Garbage collection 170.25 135.69 210.66 245.39 78.00 169.81 238.64 164.83 124.22 133.04
Production/project/service
12,253.59 6,070.00 10,734.00 35,929.00 82,000.00 9,937.73 18,948.08 13,055.77 14,796.71 8,398.28
expenditures
pg. 65
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT ON IMPACT FROM IRREGULAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY ON KOSOVAR BUSINESSES
A-7. Can you please tell me what the total revenues of your company were for the past 3 years?
2013 60,645.53 14,939.58 53,718.25 168,719.43 994,500.00 49,151.02 46,168.44 75,531.07 126,897.34 28,890.47
2012 174,158.82 14,367.56 404,342.98 228,718.52 1,125,000.00 211,149.21 127,423.42 156,104.99 213,521.14 86,600.04
pg. 66