Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
American Statistical Association, American Society for Quality, Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Technometrics
This content downloaded from 186.3.120.242 on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:54:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
TECHNOMETRICS VOL. 11, No. 1 FEBRUARY 1969
1. INTRODUCTION
The fact that data on flood flows are not normally distributed, but tend to be
positively skewed, has long been known to hydrologists. Various transformations
to make the data conform more nearly to a normal distribution have been tried.
Probably the first to use the logarithmic transformation was Horton, who stated
[see his contribution to the discussion of a paper by Fuller (1914)] that he had
made numerous plots of flood-frequency records on logarithmic paper prior to
1908. Hazen (1914) also substituted a logarithmic scale for the arithmetic scale,
but found that a normal curve still did not provide a completely satisfactory fit
to the data. He therefore developed, by empirical methods [see his contribution
to the discussion of a paper by Hall (1921)], a table of logarithmic skew curve
factors, based on the coefficient of variation and the coefficient of skew. Hall
himself, in the paper just mentioned, was apparently the first to propose the use
of Pearson Type III frequency curves in the analysis of data on flood flows. This
method of analysis was systematically developed by Foster (1924). Both Hall
177
This content downloaded from 186.3.120.242 on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:54:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
178 H. LEON HARTER
and Foster fitted a Pearson Type III curve to the original data. Over a period of
several decades, the methods of Hazen and of Foster have competed with each
other and with other methods, notably that of Gumbel (1941a, b), the latter
based on the theory of extreme values. More recently [see Beard (1962)] the
practice of fitting a Pearson Type III curve to the logarithmically transformed
data has become common, and the U. S. Water Resources Council (1967) has
proposed that this method of analysis be made the standard for use by Federal
agencies.
Foster (1924) cumputed the first tables of Pearson Type III skew curve factors
(percentage points of the Pearson Type III distribution) to be found in th
literature. These tables include percentage points (to two decimal places)
corresponding to cumulative probabilities .001, .01, .05, .1(.1).9, .95, .99, .999
[for coefficients of skew 0.0(0.2)3.0] and .00000001, .0000001, .000001, .00001,
.0001, .001, .01, .99, .999, .9999, .99999, .999999., .9999999, .99999999 [for
coefficients of skew 0.0(0.2)2.0]. Switzer and Miller (1929) gave an extension of
Foster's tables in diagrammatic form. Beard (1962) gave a two-decimal-place
table, for coefficients of skew -3.0(0.2) - 2.0(0.1)2.0(0.2)3.0, based partly on
Foster's tables and partly on interpolation in the table of the probability integral
of the Pearson Type III distribution computed by Salvosa (1930).
The distribution of the logarithms of peak flood discharges is often negatively
skewed; in arid regions the coefficient of skew of the original data may be as
large as + 9. The latter fact and the recent action of the Water Resources Counci
point to the need for more extensive and more accurate tables of percentage
points of the Pearson Type III distribution, which was called to the author's
attention by William H. Sammons of the Soil Conservation Service, U. S.
Department of Agriculture. While the author is not convinced that the metho
proposed as standard by the Water Resources Council is superior to others,
especially Gumbel's, he agreed, in view of their close relation to his previous
work [see Harter (1964a, b)] and their potentially wider applicability, to comput
the required tables.
3. METHOD OF COMPUTATION
The author (1964a, b) has computed extensive and highly accurate (six-
significant-figure) tables of percentage points of the chi-square distribution with
degrees of freedom v = 0.1(0.1)10(1)150(2)330. The chi-square distribution with
degrees of freedom v is a Pearson Type III distribution with mean , = v, stand-
ard deviation a = /2v, and skewness a3 = 7 = \8/v. Hence percentage
points of the standard Pearson Type III distribution with skewness y1 could be
obtained from the corresponding percentage points of the chi-square distribution
with degrees of freedom v = 8/ 2, read from the author's 1964 tables (interpola-
tion would be necessary in most cases of interest), by subtracting the mean jc = v
and dividing by the standard deviation a = \/2v. In order to avoid the incon-
venience (and possible inaccuracy) associated with interpolation and standard-
This content downloaded from 186.3.120.242 on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:54:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
PERCENTAGE POINTS OF THE PEARSON TYPE III DISTRIBUTION 179
ization, the author decided to modify the programs used in computing his 1
tables so as to obtain percentage points of the standard Pearson Type
distribution for a set of uniformly spaced values of 7, [0.0(0.1)9.0]. The progr
were also modified so as to include percentage points corresponding to cumulative
probabilities .02, .04, .96, .98, needed by hydrologists in estimating flood flo
with return periods 25 and 50 years, in addition to those included in the c
square tables [.0001, .0005, .001, .005, .01, .025, .05, .1(.1).9, .95, .975, .99, .9
.999, .9995, .9999].
The author (1964a) has given three methods of computing percentage poi
of the chi-square distribution; only methods 1 and 3 can be readily modified
as to yield the desired percentage points of the Pearson Type III distributi
Method 1 involves computation of the probability integral P(x2; v) = I(u, p
of X2 with v degrees of freedom, where u = x2/ /2 and p = v/2 - 1, and wh
This content downloaded from 186.3.120.242 on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:54:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
180 H. LEON HARTER
This content downloaded from 186.3.120.242 on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:54:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
PERCENTAGE POINTS OF THE PEARSON TYPE III DISTRIBUTION 181
This content downloaded from 186.3.120.242 on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:54:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
182 H. LEON HARTER
This content downloaded from 186.3.120.242 on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:54:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
PERCENTAGE POINTS OF THE PEARSON TYPE III DISTRIBUTION 1 83
0.9999
9.97784 10.10110 10.22307 10.34375 10.46318
12.74010 12.92977 13.11808 13930504 13.49066 13967495 13.85794
This content downloaded from 186.3.120.242 on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:54:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
184 M. LEON HARTER
This content downloaded from 186.3.120.242 on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:54:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
PERCENTAGE POINTS OF THE PEARSON TYPE III DISTRIBUTION 185
4. NUMERICAL EXAMPLE
Consider the following data, which represent peak 24-hour flood discharges (in
thousands of cubic feet per second) on the Tennessee River at Chattanooga dur-
ing each of the 61 years 1874-1934, arranged in order for lowest to highest:
85.9 142 161 180 188 195 217 248 259 271
108 143 162 181 189 201 220 252 261 275
123 143 163 182 189 202 221 252 266 283
125 146 164 183 190 210 229 252 266 285
133 146 167 183 195 210 229 253 267 310
134 157 178 188 195 212 246 254 269 349
361
This content downloaded from 186.3.120.242 on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:54:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
186 C. ROBERTS
Suppose one wishes to estimate from the above data the flood flow with
a return period of 100 years, called by hydrologists the 100-year flood. The
first step is to find, by interpolation in Table 1, the 99% point of the standard
Pearson Type III distribution with skewness equal to g, :, = 0.37096 (for the
original data) or g :, = -0.40747 (for the transformed data). The following
results indicate that 3-point Lagrangian (parabolic) interpolation is sufficiently
accurate in any case, while linear interpolation is good enough if the value of gi
is near one of the tabular values or if only three-decimal-place accuracy is
required:
3-pt. 4-pt.
Data/Method Linear Lagrangian Lagrangian
Original 2.59471 2.59481 2.59481
Transformed 2.02376 2.02376 2.02376
REFERENCES
[1] BEARD, L. R. 1962. Statistical Methods in Hydrology. U. S. Army Engineer District, Cor
of Engineers, Sacramento, California. 74 pp.
[2] FOSTER, H. ALDEN 1924. Theoretical frequency curves and their application to enginee
ing problems. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 87, 142-173; dis
cussion, 174-203.
[3] FULLER, W. E. 1914. Flood flows. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Enginee
77, 564-617; discussion, 618-694.
[4] GUMBEL, E. J. 1941a. The return period of flood flows. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1
163-190.
[5] GUMBEL, E. J. 1941b. Probability-interpretation of the observed return-period of fl
Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 22, 836-849; discussion, 849-850.
[6] HALL, L. STANDISH 1921. The probable variations in yearly run-off as determined from
study of California streams. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers
191-213; discussion, 214-257.
[7] HARTER, H. LEON 1964a. New Tables of the Incomplete Gamma-Function Ratio and
Percentage Points of the Chi-Square and Beta Distributions. U. S. Government Print
Office, Washington, D. C. xv + 245 pp.
[8] HARTER, H. LEON 1964b. More Tables of the Incomplete Gamma-Function Ratio and
Percentage Points of the Chi-Square Distribution. ARL 64-123, Aerospace Resear
Laboratories, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. iv + 92 pp.
[9] HAZEN, ALLEN 1930. Flood Flows. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 199 pp.
[10] OWEN, DONALD B. 1962. Handbook of Statistical Tables. Addison-Wesley Publishing
Inc., Reading, Mass. xii + 580 pp.
This content downloaded from 186.3.120.242 on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:54:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
PERCENTAGE POINTS OF THE PEARSON TYPE III DISTRIBUTION 187
This content downloaded from 186.3.120.242 on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:54:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms