Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Generic drugs are copies that one company makes of a brand-name drug that was
developed by another company. Generally, generic drugs sell at lower prices, and it is in
the public's interest to get generic drugs to the market quickly.
But, like any other scientific and regulatory process, approval of a generic drug takes time.
It takes FDA time to review the complex information needed to demonstrate that a given
generic drug can be substituted for the brand-name drug that it copies, and that time also
depends on the complexity of the drug product and the completeness of the application.
Here is why:
Prescription drugs have significant, sometimes life-saving, positive effects, but they also may
present significant risks. FDA approves a drug only after review of extensive testing showing that
a drug will provide the benefits described in its labelling, and that those outweigh its risks.
As a copy of the brand-name drug FDA originally reviewed, a generic drug application submitted
to FDA for approval must show that: points are listed below
The active ingredient is the same as that of the brand-name drug/innovator drug.
o An active ingredient in a medicine is the component that makes it pharmaceutically
active — effective against the illness or condition it is treating.
o Generic drug companies must provide evidence that shows that their active
ingredient is the same as that of the brand-name medicine they copy, and FDA must
review that evidence.
The medicine has the same route of administration (such as oral or topical).
The container in which the medicine will be shipped and sold is appropriate.
A prescription drug product is a drug product approved for marketing that can only be obtained
with a prescription from an appropriate health care practitioner.
The OTC drug review was established to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of OTC drug
products marketed in the United States before May 11, 1972. It is a three-phase public rulemaking
process (each phase requiring a Federal Register publication) resulting in the establishment of
standards (monographs or non-monographs) for an OTC therapeutic drug category.
The first phase was accomplished by advisory review panels. The panels were charged with
reviewing the ingredients in non-prescription drug products to determine whether these
ingredients could be generally recognized as safe and effective for use in self-treatment. They were
also charged with reviewing claims and recommending appropriate labelling, including
therapeutic indications, dosage instructions, and warnings about side effects and preventing
misuse.
According to the terms of the review, the panels classified ingredients in three categories as
follows:
Category I: generally recognized as safe and effective for the claimed therapeutic indication;
Category II: not generally recognized as safe and effective or unacceptable indications;
The second phase of the OTC drug review was the agency’s review of ingredients in each class of
drugs, based on the panel’s findings, on public comment, and on new data that may have become
available. The agency, in turn, publishes its conclusions in the Federal Register in the form of a
tentative final monograph. After publication of the tentative final monograph, a period of time is
allotted for objections to the agency’s proposal or for requests to be submitted for a hearing before
the Commissioner of FDA.
The publication of final regulations in the form of drug monographs is the third and last phase of
the review process. The monographs establish conditions under which certain OTC drug products
are generally recognized as safe and effective.
approval of a new drug submitted under section 505(b)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act)
approval of a new drug submitted under section 505(b)(2) of the FD&C Act
approval of an abbreviated new drug application under section 505(j) of the FD&C Act
licensure of certain biological products under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act
An abbreviated new drug application is described under section 505(j) of the Act as an application
that contains information to show that the proposed product is identical in active ingredient,
dosage form, strength, route of administration, labelling, quality, performance characteristics and
intended use, among other things to a previously approved application (the reference listed drug
(RLD)). ANDAs do not contain clinical studies as required in NDAs but are required to contain
information establishing bioequivalence to the RLD. In general, the bioequivalence determination
allows the ANDA to rely on the agency’s finding of safety and efficacy for the RLD.
An abbreviated new drug application is described under section 505(j) of the Act as an application
that contains information to show that the proposed product is identical in active ingredient,
dosage form, strength, route of administration, labelling, quality, performance characteristics and
intended use, among other things to a previously approved application (the reference listed drug
(RLD)). ANDAs do not contain clinical studies as required in NDAs but are required to contain
information establishing bioequivalence to the RLD. In general, the bioequivalence determination
allows the ANDA to rely on the agency’s finding of safety and efficacy for the RLD.
Prescription to OTC switch refers to over-the-counter marketing of a product that was once a
prescription drug product, for the same dosage form, population, and route of administration.
An efficacy supplement should be submitted to an approved NDA for a prescription product if the
sponsor plans to switch the drug product covered under the NDA to OTC marketing status in its
entirety without a change in the previously approved dosage form or route of administration. An
NDA 505(b)(1) should be submitted if the sponsor is proposing to convert some but not all of the
approved prescription indications to OTC marketing status. An original NDA (505)(b)(1) or 505(b)
(2) needs to be submitted if the sponsor plans to market either a new product OTC whose active
substance, indication, or dosage form has never previously been marketed OTC.
Because there are over 300,000 marketed OTC drug products, FDA reviews the active ingredients
and the labelling of over 80 therapeutic classes of drugs, for example analgesics or antacids,
instead of individual drug products. For each category, an OTC drug monograph is
developed and published in the Federal Register. OTC drug monographs are a kind of "recipe book"
covering acceptable ingredients, doses, formulations, and labelling. Many of these monographs
are found in section 300 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Once a final monograph is implemented, companies can make and market an OTC product
without the need for FDA pre-approval. These monographs define the safety, effectiveness, and
labelling of all marketing OTC active ingredients.
New products that conform to a final monograph may be marketed without further FDA review.
Those that do not conform must be reviewed by the New Drug Application process. A drug
company may also petition to change a final monograph to include additional ingredients or to
modify labelling.
The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 was the first piece of legislation to require that drugs be
cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration before being marketing for human use. This
act required that all new drugs be proved safe for human use before marketing, prohibited the
sale of dangerous, contaminated or misbranded products, and mandated labeling specifications.
A new drug application (NDA) has been required for all new drug entities that have been
introduced since the enactment of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. After an NDA is approved
by the FDA, the drug product may be marketed only by the sponsor of the NDA. Additional
manufacturers who wish to market similar products must seek approval to do so through
submission of a separate NDA. In some cases, such as with generic medications, an abbreviated
NDA may be submitted. NDAs are updated periodically to include post marketing information
and minor label changes. Labeled with sufficient instructions to allow safe, unsupervised use by
consumers, these amendments allowed labeling directed to physicians and pharmacists instead of
to consumers. Drugs with physician- and pharmacist-directed labeling were then available by
prescription only.
In 1962, the Kefauver-Harris amendments to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act were passed,
requiring that drug products be proved not only safe but also effective for their intended uses.
Enactment of these amendments compelled the FDA to determine the effectiveness of more than
4,000 newer drug products, including more than 500 OTC products that had been marketed before
the enactment of the amendments. The OTC Drug Review was begun in 1972 as an FDA-initiated
scientific review of OTC product ingredients in use at that time to ensure that appropriate safety,
effectiveness and labelling standards are met. This review process consists of three phases: an
advisory panel review, creation of a tentative monograph and publication of a final monograph
As a result of the initial OTC drug review findings, If OTC ingredients determined to be safe and
effective for their intended uses subsequently the FDA approved these products for general use.
And if found to be ineffective, these are considered to be unsafe. And the some cases required
submission of additional data before safety and effectiveness could be established by FDA
Two post-1938 regulatory pathways exist for the legal marketing of such products:
Two regulatory pathways exist for the legal marketing of such products:
NDA process.
OTC Monographs’
There are seven principles which FDA needs to consider before switching. They can be listed as
1) Ease/possibility of self-diagnosis
2) Self-limited or chronic condition
The process of reclassifying drugs from prescription to OTC status is referred to as an "Rx to OTC
switch." FDA regulations identify processes for initiating consideration of an Rx to OTC switch. A
proposal under this regulation to exempt a drug from prescription-only requirements may be
initiated by the Commissioner or by "any interested person" in the form of a sponsor submitting a
supplement to an approved new drug application (NDA) or, as in your case, by a third party
petitioning FDA. Regardless of who initiates a request for an OTC switch, however, the evidence
must demonstrate that the prescription-only dispensing requirements are no longer necessary to
protect the public health due to drug's toxicity or other potentiality for harmful effect, or by reason
of the method of the drug's use. Evidence must also demonstrate that the drug is safe and effective
for use in self-medication as directed in proposed labelling
Drugs are commonly switched one of two ways: under the "OTC drug review," or by a
manufacturer's submission of additional information to the original new drug application.
INDIA:
In India OTC has no legal recognition, drugs which are not included in the list of prescription-only
drugs are considered to be non-prescription drugs (or OTC drugs). Hence, OTC drugs means
drugs legally allowed to be sold Over the Counter by pharmacists, i.e. without the prescription of
a Registered Medical Practitioner or a physician. Prescription-only drugs are those medicines that
are listed in Schedules H and X of the Drug and Cosmetics Act 1940 and Drugs and Cosmetics
Rules. OTC drugs registered as “Ayurvedic Medicine” (i.e. traditional Indian system of medicines
containing natural / herbal ingredients) are also regulated by the DCA (Drugs and Cosmetics Act)
and DCR (Drugs and Cosmetics Rules).
India currently ranks 11th in the global OTC size. It is estimated that it will reach 9th position
within five years. The Indian OTC market was estimated at approximately USD 1,813 million
(euro 1362 million) with an annual growth rate of 10.7% at the end of calendar year 2009.
There are many products in the Rx sector which could be revitalised through OTC switches in
India. An analytical interpretation of various data places the focus on vitamins, cough & cold,
antacids, antipyretics and NSAIDs as opportunity areas for switch in India. India does not have a
well-documented process or a specific regulation on switching Rx to OTC products and this is the
need of the hour. Globally many countries have a formal process of transferring prescription (Rx)
drugs to over-the-counter (OTC) status, known as "Rx-to-OTC switch. In these markets Rx to OTC
switch is also seen as an efficient way of reducing healthcare costs by expanding the most
inexpensive form of health care with OTC medicines. Regulators in India should clearly define
OTC formally as a category because this would help promote access to market and will empower
consumers who want to take a more active role in their own health care. In fact, in the near future,
switching would be one of the most used strategies to enter OTC by new players.
MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
The major source for pharmaceutical regulation is the Drugs and Cosmetics Act (DCA) and its
subordinate legislation, the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules (DCR). This legislation applies to the
whole of India and to all sorts of medicines (e.g. allopathic, ayurvedic, homeopathic, etc.) whether
imported or made in India. The legislation is enforced by the Central Government (Ministry of
Health & Family Affairs) in New Delhi, which is responsible for its overall supervision. The office
of the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) has prime responsibility for approving all new
molecules and unique new formulations. However, power to provide manufacturing and selling
licenses which are the two main registrations required to manufacture and sell a drug – belongs to
each individual State government through its Food and Drug Administration (FDA), who also
carry out enforcement of DCA and DCR. Matters of new molecule approval and standards, clinical
trials, introduction of a new unique formulation and import licenses are handled by the DCGI.
Indian market faces the problem of ‘Deemed OTC market’ where in ethical drugs are also sold
without a prescription due to poor monitoring and control by FDA. Self-medication tendency is
traditionally very high due to the high availability of traditional medicines, the awareness and
acceptance of which is very high among the public. The Indian OTC pharmaceuticals market
generated total revenues of $2.5 billion in 2006,this representing a compound annual growth rate
of 8.3%for the five year period spanning 2002- 2006.In comparison ,the US and Chinese OTC
pharmaceuticals markets grew with CAGRs of 4.3% and 7% over the same period ,to reach
respective values of $21.2billion and $11.9billion in 2006. Traditional medicines proved the most
lucrative for the Indian OTC pharmaceuticals market in 2006, generating total revenues of $679.3
million. In comparison, sales of cough and cold preparations generated revenues of $492.6 million
in 2006