Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Snap Lock Design PDF
Snap Lock Design PDF
A Snap Joints/General
• Common features
• Types of snap joints
• Comments on dimensioning
Page
4 3 of 26 Snap-Fit Joints for Plastics - A Design Guide
A
Page
6 5 of 26 Snap-Fit Joints for Plastics - A Design Guide
A
Torsion snap joints
Fig. 7: Cross-sectional sketch (above) and photo (below) of a traffic light made of
Makrolon®polycarbonate. All the components are held together entirely be means of
snap joints
Page
8 7 of 26 Snap-Fit Joints for Plastics - A Design Guide
Cantilever Snap Joints B
Design Hints
Page
10 9 of 26 Snap-Fit Joints for Plastics - A Design Guide
Geometric factors K and Z for ring segment
Fig 10: Diagrams for determining K1 and K2 for cross-sectional shape type C in Table 1.
K1: Concave side under tensile load, K2: Convex side under tensile load
Fig 11: Graphs for determining the dimensionless quantity (Z/r23) used to derive the section modulus (Z) for cross-
sectional shape C in Table 1.
Z1: concave side under tensile stress, Z2: convex side under tensile stress
Fig 13: Determination of the permissible strain for the joining operation (left: material with distinct yield point;
right: glass-fiber-reinforced material without yield point)
Page
12 11 of 26 Snap-Fit Joints for Plastics - A Design Guide
B
Deflection force
Values for the secant modulus for various Table 2: General guide data for the allowable
Bayer engineering plastics can be determined short-term strain for snap joints (single join -
from Fig. 16. The strain value used should ing operation); for frequent separation and
rejoining, use about 60% of these values
Polyurethane Snap-Fits
always be the one on which the dimensioning
of the undercut was based.
Snap-fits are possible using certain
polyurethane systems. For more
information call Polymers Design
Engineering at 412-777-4952.
Fig. 16: Secant Modulus for Bayer engineering plastics at 23°C (73°F)
Page
14 13 of 26 Snap-Fit Joints for Plastics - A Design Guide
B
Mating Force
PTFE 0.12-0.22
The figures depend on the relative speed of the PE rigid 0.20-0.25 (x 2.0)
mating parts, the pressure applied and on the PP 0.25-0.30 (x 1.5)
surface quality. Friction between two different POM 0.20-0.35 (x 1.5)
plastic materials gives values equal to or PA 0.30-0.40 (x 1.5)
slightly below those shown in Table 3. With
PBT 0.35-0.40
PS 0.40-0.50 (x 1.2)
two components of the same plastic material,
SAN 0.45-0.55
the friction coefficient is generally higher. PC 0.45-0.55 (x 1.2)
Where the factor is known, it has been indicat- PMMA 0.50-0.60 (x 1.2)
ed in parentheses. ABS 0.50-0.65 (x 1.2)
PE flexible 0.55-0.60 (x 1.2)
PVC 0.55-0.60 (x 1.0)
Page
16 15 of 26 Snap-Fit Joints for Plastics - A Design Guide
B
Calculation example I
snap-fitting hook
Given:
a. Material = Makrolon® polycarbonate
b. Length (1) = 19 mm (0.75 in)
c. Width (b) = 9.5 mm (0.37 in)
d. Undercut (y) = 2.4 mm (0.094 in)
Fig. 19: Snap-fitting hook, design type 2, shape A
e. Angle of inclination (a) = 30°
Find: Solution:
a. Determination of wall thickness h
y = 1.09 ⑀1
2
Friction coefficient from Table 3 (PC against PC) µ = 0.50 x 1.2 = 0.6
µ + tan ␣
From Fig. 18: = 1.8 For µ = 0.6 and a = 30°
1—µ tan ␣
Given:
a. Material = Bayblend® PC/ABS Fig. 20: Snap-fitting hook, design type 2, shape C
b. Length (1) = 25.4 mm (1.0 in)
Solution:
c. Angle of arc () = 75°
d. Outer radius (r2) = 20 mm The permissible strain for a one-time snap-fit assembly in Bayblend® resin is 2.5%. Since the
(0.787 in) design is for frequent separation and rejoining, 60% of this value should be used or ⑀ pm = (0.6)
e. Inner radius (r1) = 17.5 mm (2.5%) = 1.5%.
(0.689 in) Deflection equation from Table 1, type 2, shape C: y = 1.64 K(2) ⑀ 12
f. Thickness (h) = 2.5 mm (0.1 in)
r2
g. / =/2=37.5° The variable for K(2) can be obtained from the curves in Fig. 10. Note that if the member is
deflected so that the tensile stress occurs in the convex surface, the curve for K1 should be used;
if it occurs in the concave surface, K2 should be used. In this case, the tensile stress will occur in
Find: the convex surface, therefore the curve for K2 should be used.
Alternate Solution:
This method may be used as a check or in place of using the curves in Fig. 10.
The value for c(3) which is the distance from the neutral axis to the outermost fiber, can be
calculated from the equations shown below:
c2 = r2[1– 2 sin (1 – h/r2 + 1 )]
3 2–h/r 2
c1 = r2[ 2 sin + (1 – —)
h 2 sin – 3 cos ]
3(2 _ h/r2) r2 3
Use c2 for c(3), if the tensile stress occurs in the convex side of the beam. Use c1 for c(3) if the
tensile stress occurs in the concave side. For this particular problem, it is necessary to calculate c2.
c(3) = c2 = 20 mm [1 (1 – + ] = 2.52 mm
2 sin 37.5 2.5 mm 1
3 (0.654) 20 mm 2 – 2.5 mm/20mm
Solving for y using c2 yields;
y = 0.55 (0.015) (25.4 mm) = 2.11 mm (0.083 in)
2
(2.52 mm
Both methods result in a similar value for allowable deflection.
The maximum permissible angle pm is limited by the persmissible shear strain ␥pm:
where
180 ␥pm • 1 pm = permissible total angle
pm = • r of twist in degrees
␥pm = permissible shear strain
1 = length of torsion bar
(valid for circular cross section) r = radius of torsion bar
The maximum permissible shear strain ␥pm for plastics is approximately equal to:
where
␥pm = permissible shear strain
␥pm (1 + ) ⑀pm ⑀pm = permissible strain
␥pm 1.35 ⑀pm = Poisson's ratio(for
plastics approx. 0.35)
Fig. 21: Snap-fitting arm with torsion bar
where
where
ES = secant modulus
= Poisson's ratio
Page
20 19 of 26 Snap-Fit Joints for Plastics - A Design Guide
Annular Snap Joints D
Permissible undercut
Ypm = ⑀pm .d
Note: ⑀pm is absolute value.
W = mating force
y = undercut
Fig. 24: Annular snap joint—symbols used
␣ = lead angle
␣' = return angle
t = wall thickness
d = diameter at the joint
1 The force P is applied at the end of the beam. (This corresponds 2 The force P is applied a long distance (co) from the end of the
to a snap joint with the groove at the end of the tube.) beam. (This is equivalent to an annular snap joint with the groove
remote from the end of the tube)
A somewhat simplified version of the theory may µ + tan ␣
be expressed as follows for joints near the end of W=P
the tube: 1 — µ tan ␣
P = y • d • Es • X where
µ = friction coefficient
where
␣ = lead angle
P = transverse force
y = undercut The geometric factor, assuming that the shaft
d = diameter at the joint ES = secant modulus is rigid and the outer tube (hub) is elastic, is as
Es = secant modulus follows:
X = geometric factor (d0/d — 1) / (d0/d + 1)
XN = 0.62 [( d0/d)2 + 1]/[(d0/d)2 – 1] +
The geometric factor X takes into account the
geometric rigidity.
where
As far as the mating force is concerned, friction d0 = external diameter of the tube
conditions and joint angles must also be taken into d = diameter at the joint
consideration. = Poisson's ratio
Page
22 21 of 26 Snap-Fit Joints for Plastics - A Design Guide
D
If the tube is rigid and the hollow shaft
elastic, then
(d/di – 1)/(d/di + 1)
Xw = 0.62
[(d/di)2 + 1]/[(d/di)2 – 1] –
where
where
d = joint diameter
t = wall thickness
where
y = undercut
d = diameter,
Required:
Occurring strain ⑀
Deflection force P
Mating force W
Page
24 23 of 26 Snap-Fit Joints for Plastics - A Design Guide
Both Mating Parts Elastic E
With all the examples of snap joints men- The mating force and the deformations occur- These "deflection curves" are then superim-
tioned so far, the stiffer of the two mating parts ring in two flexible mating parts can be deter- posed (Fig. 29c). The point of intersection of
was assumed to be absolutely rigid. mined most simply by using a graph. the two curves gives the actual deflection
Consequently, the more flexible of the two force P and the deflections y1 and y2.
com-ponents was theoretically deformed by For this purpose, the transverse force for each
the full amount of the undercut. component is determined as a function of With the aid of these quantities P, y1 and y2,
deflection on the assumption that the other the individual strains and the mating force can
Where both parts are deformable, however, component is absolutely rigid; a "deflective then be determined without diff i c u l t y, as
the sum of these deformations is equal to the curve" is then plotted for each mating part as described earlier.
undercut, i.e., each deformation is smaller. shown in Fig. 29a and b.
Fig. 29: Determination of deformation and transverse force when both mating parts are flexible
Page
26 25 of 26 Snap-Fit Joints for Plastics - A Design Guide
The manner in which you use and the purpose to which you put and utilize our products, technical assistance and information (whether verbal, written or by
way of production evaluations), including any suggested formulations and recommendations are beyond our control. Therefore, it is imperative that you test our
products, technical assistance and information to determine to your own satisfaction whether they are suitable for your intended uses and applications. This
application-specific analysis must at least include testing to determine suitability from a technical as well as health, safety, and environmental standpoint. Such
testing has not necessarily been done by us. Unless we otherwise agree in writing, all products are sold strictly pursuant to the terms of our standard condi-
tions of sale. All information and technical assistance is given without warranty or guarantee and is subject to change without notice. It is expressly understood
and agreed that you assume and hereby expressly release us from all liability, in tort, contract or otherwise, incurred in connection with the use of our prod-
ucts, technical assistance, and information. Any statement or recommendation not contained herein is unauthorized and shall not bind us. Nothing herein shall
be construed as a recommendation to use any product in conflict with patents covering any material or its use. No license is implied or in fact granted under
the claims of any patent.