You are on page 1of 1

422 / Index

commentaries (continued) consequences, in debate, 206 –17, 223,


texts, 107, 229 –30, 357n24; in 245, 267, 379n29, 380n39, 381n46,
study of the path, 172 –77; summa- 390n70
rizing, 184 – 85; Tibetan, 107 –9, conservatism: and Ge-dün Chö-pel,
147, 192; typology, 184 – 85; Vinaya 313, 314 –15; monks, 43; Shuk-den
studied through, 116 –18; word, Affair, 301; Theravada, 36; in Ti-
184 – 85; writing repression and, betan scholasticism, 111, 314 –15;
123. See also commentarial and writing repression, 122
institutions constitutions, monastic, 40, 114
Commentary on the Root Tantra contradiction, in debate, 215–17, 221,
(Shay-rab Seng-ge), 118 233, 243 – 45, 310, 379n31
Commentary on Valid Cognition conventional existence, 242, 285– 88,
(Dharmakı̄rti), 113, 127, 130, 171, 309 –10, 385n28
173, 177 –78, 234 –38, 373n26 conventional truth, 239 – 44
communities: Buddhist School of Dia- correct assumption, 371n3
lectics, 73 –74; discipline sustaining, cosmology: traditional, 88, 169 –70,
64 – 65; Nam-gyel, 54; orality, 150; 290, 297 –303, 394n37. See also dei-
ritual, 42, 44 – 49, 52, 87 –91; san- ties; worldview
gha, 33 –34, 47, 298, 396n10 councils: monastic seats, 49 –50; re-
comparative perspectives, 10 –11; cur- gional houses, 50
riculum, 101– 6, 115–16; debate in critical acumen, 23, 156, 165, 200. See
India/in Tibet, 203 –13, 216; debat- also understanding
ing/commentarial institutions, critical thinking: in debate, 232 –33,
132 – 48; hermeneutics, 191–94; 267, 269, 271–72, 274 –75. See also
hermitic/scholastic, 12 –13, inquiry; questioning; rationality;
337nn18,19; intellectual/folk, 9, Socratic approach
297 –304, 336 –37n18, 395n4; ratio- cultural capital, scholastic skills as,
nality, 296; reading, 152 –54; sectar- 164, 260
ian/nonsectarian, 30 –31, 111– 48. curriculum, 99 –148, 180 – 81; classical
See also dialectic; exoteric/esoteric Indian, 100 –110, 138 –39, 165;
distinctions; modernity/tradition; commentarial institutions/Nying-
monasticism in exile/in Tibet; reli- ma, 111, 128 – 48, 181, 364n44;
gion; Westerners comparing debating and commen-
compassion, 75, 179, 230 –31 tarial institutions, 132 – 48; compar-
Compendium on Reality ing Western and Tibetan traditions,
(Śāntaraks.ita), 124 101– 6, 115–16; debating institu-
composition, in curriculum, 103, 138, tions/Ge-luk, 99, 103, 108, 111–28,
185 132 – 48, 159, 181, 229 – 66, 307 –24,
concentration: in debate, 221; in medi- 328; general structure, 98 –110;
tation, 69, 170; memorization aid- memorization role in, 91–93; mod-
ing in, 96 –97, 170 –71; on single ernizing, 327; normative, 99, 101–
point, 69, 170, 177 4, 139, 312; Sa-pan. model, 103, 104,
confession ritual, 45, 319 –20 105, 138 –39, 185, 359n1; system-
conformity/nonconformity, 311, 313 – atic, 307 –12; Ta-shi Lhun-po, 121,
17, 383n12. See also conservatism; 383n3; two models, 111– 48, 359n1
discipline, monastic; dissent cutting, 277, 318, 392n21

You might also like