Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Where (g) is the mass in grams of material collected over time (sec). The value of “600” is taken into
account in order to convent the unit of MFR to g/10 min
The melt volume flow rate (MVR) from Method B is calculated as equation below
Where R is standard piston radios (R= 0.477 cm), tB is the time of the piston travel for a distance.
Based on ASTM D1238 can be set to be 0.635 +/- 0.025 cm or 2.540 +/- 0.025 cm measuring range
depending on the expected MFR of the samples. The value of “600” is taken into account in order to
convent the unit of MVR to cm3/10min
The ratio of the two values (MFR from Method A and MVR from Method B) is a measure of the melt
density of the polymer in g/cm3 as below
Figure 1 shows the results for apparent melt density for two different EVA materials using a Dynisco
LMI series melt indexer (test temperature: 190 C, weight: 2.16 kg). For this test 3 cutes were
collected within 1 minute time interval for Method A part as well as acquiring 3 flags with flag length of
6.35 mm for Method B part.
Fig. 1. Apparent melt density results from Dynisco LMI series.
This apparent melt density definition forces the two test methods to agree. It is called an “apparent”
melt density since it is actually a correlation coefficient which forces Method A and Method B to
agree. If there were no leakage past the plunger tip and the extrudate were bubble free and few other
minor factors were taken into consideration, then a true melt density could be assessed. This
apparent melt density value can be used for Method B tests to obtain MFR values without manual
cutting and weighing of the samples. Please note that the melt density of the polymer is a function of
temperature. Also, fillers, reinforcing agent. Etc. tend to change the melt density of the material.