Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.dbf-finance.com
EQUITIES
Francisco Parga Valle,CFA
EQUITY VALUATION:
Applications and
Processes
25
③ Select the appropriate valuation model
20
15
20 10 15 10 20 15
using a model based on the comparing it to the observable market value of “comparable” assets
variables the analyst believes
influence the value of the asset
STEPS
using a model based on the comparing it to the observable market value of “comparable” assets
variables the analyst believes
influence the value of the asset
USES
③ Determine the value of corporate actions ⑧ Portfolio management Not stand alone
Estimates the intrinsic value of an asset without Determine the value of an asset taking into account the
considering the value of other firms value of other assets.
Value of a company= the discounted present value of the cash P/E ratio
flows expected in the future
Before selecting an approach for valuing a company, an analyst should assess whether the model:
① Fits the characteristics of the company (dividend paying company?, earnings growth can be estimated?,
significant intangible assets?)
③ Is suitable given the purpose of the analysis. → Dividend vs cash flow models in minority vs controlling interest
The analyst does not have to consider only one→ Triangulation Pwc and McKinsey
Starts with analysis of the Starts with expectations of Incorporates elements of both top-
Company macroeconomic variables down and bottom-up
Different Businesses
Different relationships
with GDP
Different Geographies
Calculation of
Economies of Scale
COGS
Historical COGS
Forecast Estimate of future
COGS revenues
Revenues
Examine gross
Volume & Price Commodity type Consider Hedging
margins of firms
Analysis inputs (downside and
competitors
upside)
Francisco Parga, CFA
Forecast the following costs: cost of goods sold, selling general and CFA® Preparation
administrative costs, financing costs, and income taxes. www.dbf-finance.com
SG&A
Management
salaries
Gross Debt
Gross Interest
expense Market
interest rates
Net debt is gross debt minus cash, cash equivalents, and short-
term securities. Net interest expense is gross interest expense
minus interest income on cash and short-term debt securities.
① Statutory Tax Rate Tax rate in the country where the firm is domiciled
Historical depreciation should be increased by the inflation rate when estimating capital expenditure for
maintenance because replacement cost can be expected to increase with inflation.
NOPLAT
ROIC
Invested Capital
ROIC is a return to both equity and debt and is
preferable to return on equity (ROE) in some
Tax
contexts because it allows comparisons across
NOPLAT EBIT 1 firms with different capital structures.
rate
Net
Invested Operating Operating Fixed
Working
Capital assets liabilities assets
Capital
COMPETITIVE
Firm
ROIC
> Comparables
ROIC
ADVANTAGE
likely ROCE
Pretax earnings in
the numerator
① Threat of new entrants in the Industry The long term profitability of any
industry is determined by the
② Threat of substitutes
interaction of Porter´s competitive
③ Bargaining power of buyers forces
WARREN
BUFFET PAT
MICHAEL DORSEY,CFA
PORTER
Undifferentiated
Low Industry concentration High fixed costs and exit barriers Slow industry growth
products
BARRIERS TO ENTRY
Francisco Parga, CFA
Explain how to forecast industry and company sales and costs when they are CFA® Preparation
subject to price inflation or deflation. www.dbf-finance.com
Input costs can be significant in many No hedges nor is vertically integrated → how rapidly, and to
industries. Changes in these costs can what extent, the increase in costs can be passed on to customers,
significantly affect earnings. as well as the expected effect of price increases on sales volume
and sales revenue.
Companies with commodity-type inputs can
hedge their exposure to changes in input It may be the case that a firm can reduce the impact of an
prices through derivatives or, more simply, increase in an input price by switching to a substitute input;
fixed-price contracts for future delivery.
The effects of increasing a product’s price depend on the
Companies that are vertically integrated product’s elasticity of demand. For most firms, product
(and are in effect their own suppliers) will be demand is relatively elastic. With elastic demand, the
less subject to the effects of variations in percentage reduction in unit sales is greater than the percentage
input prices. increase in price, and a price increase will decrease total sales
revenue.
Modelling introduction of new Cannibalization 𝑁𝑒𝑤 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
products or new substitutes factor 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑒𝑤 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
When there are recent impactful events, such as acquisitions, mergers, or restructurings,
these events should be considered temporary, and the forecast horizon should be long
enough that the perceived benefits of such events can be realized (or not)
① g
② Normalized CF
A difficult part of an analyst’s job is recognizing inflection points—those instances when the
future will not be like the past, due to change in a company’s or an industry’s competitive
environment or to changes in the overall economy.
REVIEW BY YOURSELF
-EQUITY VALUATION:
Discounted Dividend Valuation
Strengths Weaknesses
② Dividends are less volatile than earnings or free cash flows ② It takes the perspective of a minority
shareholder, and therefore not useful for
controlling interests
DDM appropriate if
FCFF
FCFE
IGNORAR. MÁS
RESIDUAL INCOME TARDE A FULL
D1 P1 D1 D2 Dn Pn
V0 V0
1 r 1 r 2 n
1 r 1 r
1.35 Enter ↓ ↓
29.20
37.95 Enter ↓ ↓
NPV 12 Enter
↓ CPT 29.2
D0 1 g D1
V0 If a stock expects to pay dividends of $2.30 per share next
r g r g year, what is the value of the stock if the required rate of
return is 12% and the expected growth rate in dividends is
4%?
2.3
V0 28.75
12% 8%
GGM 4 variables g D r V0
Paco Bocatas is analyzing RQR,SL. In its most recent quarterly earnings report, RQRsaid it planned to increase its
dividend at an annual rate of 13% for the foreseeable future. Paco has an annual return target of 15.5% for RQR,SL. He
decides to use the dividend-growth rate to back out another return estimate to test against his. RQR,SL stock trades
for $55 per share and earned $3.01 per share over the last 12 months. The company paid a dividend of $2.15 per
share during the 12-month period, and its dividend-growth rate for the last five years was 9.2%.
Using the Gordon Growth model, the required annual return for RQR stock is closest to:
2.15 1 13%
55 r 17.42%
r 13%
E1
V0 PVGO
r
Value of
Firm´s
Equity E1 Growth Companies PVGO Assets in
Value of assets in Place
place
r
Assets in
Slow-growth Place
Industries PVGO
P0 P0 D0 1 g
Leading Trailing GGM V0
P/E P/E
E1 E0 r g
D0 1 g
Justified P0 1 b
E1
Leading V0 P0
P/E E1 r g r g
D0 1 g
Justified P0 1 b 1 g
E0
Trailing V0 P0
P/E E0 r g r g
D0 1 g 0.75
1 11%
Pablo Lopez, is evaluating a firm, for a potential IPO Justified 3.5
E0
that has the following characteristics: Trailing
P/E r g 13% 11%
•Current share price $100.00.
•Current earnings $3.50.
•Current dividend $0.75. Justified
•Growth rate 11%. Trailing 11.1
•Required return 13%. P/E
D1 0.75
Antonio Gonzalez is considering the purchase of Justified E1 3.5
common shares of firm Multiplera,SA, that has the leading
following characteristics: P/E r g 13% 11%
Value of perpetual
Dp
preferred shares
rp
Strengths Limitations
① Is applicable to stable, mature, dividend-paying firms. Very sensitive to small changes in growth rates and
① required returns.
② Is appropriate for valuing market indices
② Not easily applied to non-dividend-paying stocks
③ Is easily communicated and explained→ straightforward
For firms which future growths rates are difficult to
④ Can be used to determine price-implied growth rates, ③ be predicted, GGM difficult to be implemented,
required rates of return, and value of growth opportunities and unreliable outcomes
GROWTH PHASE
VARIABLE
Initial Growth Transition Maturity
Earnings Growth Very High Above average but falling Stable at long run level
Capital Investment Significant Decreasing Stable at lrl
Profit Margin High Above average but falling Stable at lrl
FCFE Negative May be +, and growing Stable at lrl
ROE vs Required r ROE > r ROE approaching r ROE= r
Dividend payout Low or zero Increasing Stable at lrl
Appropriate Model Three-stage Two-stage Gordon growth
Two-Stage
-0 Enter ↓
Time Period G D V CF
1.2 Enter ↓ ↓
0 - 1 - -
1.44 Enter ↓ ↓
H-Model
N
D0 1 gl D0 2
gs gl
V0
r gl r gl
Growth
Stage 1 Stage 2
time
Three-Stage
• DBF has organized an investing contest. CFA level TEAM-A TEAM-B TEAM-C
II candidates are asked to forecast future
dividends of a company called Dividends per share $1.5 $1.5 $1.5
EstablePagadora,SA. The pupils are organized in year 0
teams:
1. Team-A
Long term Bond 5% 5% 5%
2. Team-B Rate
3. Team-C Expected return of 12% 12% 12%
Find in the exhibit at the right, the dividend
IBEX 35
payment patterns forecast by each team. Beta of 1.4 1.4 1.4
EstablePagadora
Calculate the value of the stock today, based upon
each of the three assumptions Growth rate in Year 1; g=20% Years 1-3, Year 1-3 g=15%
dividends Year 2;g= 18% g=12.0% Then decline
Year 3;g= 16% After Year linearly to a
Year 4;g=9% 3, g=3.0% perpetual
Year 5;g=8% growth of g=3%
Year 6;g=7% in 4 years
After;g=4%
TEAM-AGuys
Due Diligence
• DBF has organized an investing contest. CFA level Time Period Growth Dividend Value Cash Flow CF 2nd CLR WORK
7 4% 3.23 ↓ ↓
2.9 Enter
Find in the exhibit at the right, the dividend Rf 5%
payment patterns forecast by each team. EMRP 7% 32.99 Enter ↓ ↓
TEAM-B
Valuations Guys
• DBF has organized an investing contest. CFA level Time Period Growth Dividend Value Cash Flow CF 2nd CLR WORK
2.28+24.53 Enter ↓ ↓
↓ CPT
20.74
4
2.28 1 3% 2.28 15% 3%
V3
2
24.55
14.8% 3% 14.8% 3%
• PPP,SA just paid a dividend of $3.0 , the • Given an equity risk premium of 6.5%, a
forecasted growth is 9%, declining over four forecasted dividend yield of 2.5% on the
years to a stable 6% thereafter. The current value market index and a U.S. government bond
of PPP´s shares is $50. What is the required yield of 3.5%, what is the consensus long-term
return? earnings growth estimate?
4 D0 1 g
3 1 6% 3 9% 6% P0
2
50 r g
re 6% re 6%
D1 10% g 2.5%
r g
re 12.72% P0 g 7.5%
• Given that a firm's current dividend is $2.00, A firm pays a current dividend of $1.00 which is expected to
the forecasted growth is 7%, declining over grow at a rate of 5% indefinitely. If current value of the firm's
three years to a stable 5% thereafter, and the shares is $35.00, what is the required return applicable to
current value of the firm's shares is $45, what the investment based on the Gordon dividend discount
is the required rate of return? model (DDM)?
3
2 1 5% 2 7% 5% 1 1 5%
2
45 35
re 5% re 5% re 5%
re 8%
re 9.8%
STUDY BY YOURSELF
SGR ROE b
Retention
b 1 Dividend pay-out rate
rate
Net
Income Dividends Net Income Sales Assets
SGR
Net Income Sales Assets Equity
Beginning or average
Company´s financial decisions balance sheets?
PERFORMANCE
Francisco Parga, CFA
Evaluate whether a stock is overvalued, fairly valued, or undervalued by the CFA® Preparation
market based on a DDM estimate of value. www.dbf-finance.com
IF Market
Price > Implied Price Overvalued
Cara 1 Cara 2
FCFFn
V0
FCFF1
n X X ENTERPRISE
1
y 1
y VALUE
y WACC
Cara 1 Cara 2
FCFEn
V0
FCFE1
n X X EQUITY
1
y 1
y VALUE
y Cost of
Equity
COMPANY-A COMPANY-B
COMPANY-A COMPANY-B
Equity
Equity
Home
Debt
Equity
Home
Debt
FCFF
FCFE
Francisco Parga, CFA
CFA® Preparation
INTRO FCFF & FCFE www.dbf-finance.com
COMPANY-A COMPANY-B
COMPANY-A COMPANY-B
Equity
ENTERPRISE VALUE
EQUITY VALUE
Francisco Parga, CFA
CFA® Preparation
www.dbf-finance.com
COMPANY-A COMPANY-B
+1 +2 +3
EBITDA
Equity
Fixed Assets Var. WC
CAPEX
IMPUESTO
Net Debt
Working Capital FCFF
FINANCING SOURCES
+1 +2 +3
EBITDA
Equity
Fixed Assets Var. WC
CAPEX
IMPUESTO
Net Debt
Working Capital FCFF 10 11 12
CAPITAL EMPLOYED
EBITDA
Equity
Fixed Assets Var. WC
CAPEX
IMPUESTO
Net Debt
Working Capital FCFF
INTERESES
PRINCIPAL
FCFE
INVESTED CAPITAL CAPITAL EMPLOYED
EBITDA
Equity
Fixed Assets Var. WC
CAPEX
IMPUESTO
Net Debt
Working Capital FCFF 10 11 12
INTERESES -1 -1 -1
PRINCIPAL -3 -3 -3
FCFE 6 7 8
INVESTED CAPITAL CAPITAL EMPLOYED
Equity
Fixed Assets
Net Debt
Working Capital FCFE 6 7 8
EQUITY VALUE 80
Book value of
Equity Equity
Total book
Fixed Assets value of the
FIRM
Net Debt
Equity
Market Value of Equity Enterprise
Value Market Value
Equity Value Value of Debt
Enterprise
Value
Market Value of
Debt
Dividends
Equity “Share-repurchase”
Required return
Market Value of on Equity
Equity (CAPM, APT, etc..)
WACC
Required return
Market Value of on Debt
Debt (Tax deductible)
FCF before:
② Dividends are paid at the discretion of the board of directors. Therefore, not representative of
the firm’s long-run profitability.
If a company is viewed as an acquisition target, free cash flow is a more appropriate
③
measure because the new owners will have discretion over its distribution (control
perspective).
④ Free cash flows may be more related to long-run profitability of the firm as compared
to dividends.
Net
FCFE NI NCC FCInv Δ WC Borrowings
Restructuring Increase in
Add back
provisions Deferred tax
liability (not Add back
Restructuring future reversal)
provisions Subtract
reversals
Amortization
of bond Add back
discount
Accretion of
bond Subtract
premium
Amortization of
Add back ISSUER PERSPECTIVE
bond discount
TOTAL 3,791
Francisco Parga, CFA
Non-Cash-Charges→ Bond premium/ Discount
CFA® Preparation
www.dbf-finance.com
Amortization of
Add back ISSUER PERSPECTIVE
bond discount
Amortization of
Subtract ISSUER PERSPECTIVE
bond premium
Amortization of
Subtract ISSUER PERSPECTIVE
bond premium
DEBIT CREDIT
Year BoP Interest Amortization EoP
YEAR 1 . Beginning of Year
1 103,993 8,319 (681) 103,312
CASH FINANCIAL DEBT
(103,993) (103,993) 2 103,312 8,265 (735) 102,577
FINANCIAL DEBT
(681)
Francisco Parga, CFA
Non-Cash-Charges→ Deferred Tax Assets/ Liabilities
CFA® Preparation
www.dbf-finance.com
Accounting Cash
< tax
Accounting < tax
DEBIT CREDIT
IF
No sales of l/t Sales of l/t
assets assets
SEE EXCEL
SPREADSHEET
(+) AC.
(-) (=) ENDING. AC.
BEG. AC. DEPRECIATION
DEPRECIATION DEPRECIATION
DEPRECIATION OF ASSETS
COST
SOLD
(+)
(-) SALE PRICE (=) NET CAPEX
PURCHASES
Francisco Parga, CFA
CAPEX
CFA® Preparation
www.dbf-finance.com
(-)
I BEG. NET
ASSETS
(+)
PURCHASES DEPRECIATION
COST
(-) NBV OF
ASSET SOLD
(=) ENDING
NET ASSETS
I
𝐵𝑒𝑔. 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 + 𝑃𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 − 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 − 𝐷𝑒𝑝. 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 𝐸𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 − 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡
- + 𝑃𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 − 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 = 𝐸𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 − 𝐵𝑒𝑔. 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 + −𝐷𝑒𝑝. 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 − 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡
II
(+)
(-) SALE PRICE (=) NET CAPEX
PURCHASES
(-)
I BEG. NET
ASSETS (150)
(+)
PURCHASES DEPRECIATION
(-) NBV OF
ASSET SOLD
(=) ENDING
NET ASSETS
COST (35) (134)
I
𝐵𝑒𝑔. 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 + 𝑃𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 − 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 − 𝐷𝑒𝑝. 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 𝐸𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 − 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡
- + 𝑃𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 − 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 = 𝐸𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 − 𝐵𝑒𝑔. 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 + 𝐷𝑒𝑝. 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 − 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡
II + 𝑃𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 − 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 = 134 − 150 + 35 − 14 = 5
(+)
(-) SALE PRICE (=) NET CAPEX
PURCHASES
Francisco Parga, CFA
Working Capital
CFA® Preparation
www.dbf-finance.com
Increase in
Working CASH OUT
Capital
Decrease in
Working CASH IN
Capital
Treat preferred
Not Tax Deductible
stock just like debt
Revise WACC
FCFF
Net
FCFE NI NCC FCInv Δ WC Borrowings
① Growth rate to FCFF0
FCFE I
FCFE II
𝐷
𝐷𝑅 =
𝐴
Francisco Parga, CFA
E): Describe approaches for forecasting FCFF and FCFE.
CFA® Preparation
www.dbf-finance.com
4 𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 200
𝐷𝑅 =
5
YEAR-1 YEAR-2
Net Income= 1,000 Net Income= 1,000
Equity Equity
Fixed Assets Fixed Assets
(1,000) (1,100)
Equity Equity
Fixed Assets Fixed Assets
(1,000) (1,100)
𝐹𝐶𝐹𝐸 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 − 2 = 1,000 + 200 − 300 − 100 + 160 = 960 𝐹𝐶𝐹𝐸 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 − 2 = 1,000 − [20% 𝑥 300 − 200 ] − 20% 𝑥 100 = 960
YEAR-1 YEAR-2
4
Net Income= 1,000 𝐷𝑅 = Net Income= 1,000
5
Equity Equity
Fixed Assets Fixed Assets
(1,000) (1,100)
Accounts Payable 30 30
Short-term debt 15 30
Current liabilities 45 60
Long term debt 150 171
Common Stock 75 75
Retained earnings 45 129
Total liabilities and equity 315 435
Balance Sheet
Income Statement 20X0 20X1
20X0 20X1 Cash 6 12
Sales 300 360 Account receivable 18 36
Inventory 36 48
COGS (120) (144)
Current assets 60 96
Gross Profit 180 216 Gross PP&E 360 480
SG&A (36) (42) Accumulated Depreciation -168 -228
EBITDA 144 174 Total Assets 252 348
Depreciation (48) (60)
Accounts Payable 24 24
EBIT 96 114
Short-term debt 12 24
Interest Expense (12) (18) Current liabilities 36 48
Gain from sale of Asset 30
PBT 84 126 Long term debt 120 136.8
CIT (25) (38) Common Stock 60 60
Retained earnings 36 103.2
Net Income 59 88
Total liabilities and equity 252 348
Francisco Parga, CFA
Exercises FCFF FCFE
CFA® Preparation
www.dbf-finance.com
Calculate the FCFE in 20x1 starting
from EBIT, given the data below. FCFE EBIT Tax Tax Net
1 Dep FCInv Δ WC Int 1
Assets with a net book value of $50 rate rate Borrowings
were sold for $80 during 20X1 .Tax
rate. 30%
Balance Sheet
20X0 20X1 Working Capital FCInv
Cash 6 12 20X0 20X1 Increase
Account receivable 18 36 Account receivable 18 36
Ending Net PP&E 252
Inventory 36 48 Inventory 36 48
Accounts Payable 24 24 (-) Beginning Net PP&E 192
Current assets 60 96
Gross PP&E 360 480 Net 30 60 30 (+) Depreciation 60
Accumulated Depreciation -168 -228 (-) Gain on sale 30
Total Assets 252 348 (=)FCInv 90
No Effect in No Effect in
Dividends
FCFF FCFE
No Effect in No Effect in
Share issues
FCFF FCFE
Poor proxy
Net Income
of FCFE Includes NCC
Poor proxy
EBITDA
of FCFF
Ignores:
Tax Tax
FCFF EBITDA 1 Dep Capex Δ WC • Taxes
rate rate • Working Capital
• CAPEX
① Reported amortization of a software developed internally by the firm 5 years ago totaling -50
+ 50
② Deferred tax liability increased by 50, and is expected to reverse in the future.
No effect
- 10
+ 30
- 5
② Deferred tax asset increased by 50, and is not expected to reverse in the future.
- 50
+ 5
① Future growth
② Multiple Approach
Terminal
value in Trailing
Earnings year n
year n P/E
Terminal
value in leading
Earnings year n+1
year n P/E
IF Market
Price > Implied Price Overvalued
-EQUITY VALUATION:
Market-Based Valuation: Price
and Enterprise Value Multiples
① Method of comparables
① ② Expected
Median trailing Pay-out ratio
growth rate 4% 30%
P/E of 18 Company A
Company A
comparable
companies Required
14%
Expected EPS 5.5 return stock A
EPS Company A
5
Company A 30%
Justified Value of
leading P/E 3 5.5 3 17
Value of 5 18 90 Company A
Company A 14% 4%
LOS 36.c: Describe rationales for and possible drawbacks to using alternative price multiples and dividend
yield in valuation
LOS 36.d: Calculate and interpret alternative price multiples and dividend yield.
Formula Exercise
Market price per share PARAPA,S.A:
Trailing • Reported Earnings current fiscal year:$100 million
P/E • EPS forecast next year: $3
EPS LTM
• Shares outstanding: 25 million. Market Price: 100 $ per share
• Calculate trailing and leading P/E
Market price per share
Leading
P/E 100 100
Trailing Leading
EPS next twelve
P/E P/E
months 4 3
Strengths Weaknesses
① Earnings power (EPS proxy) →primary determinant of investment value ① Earnings can be negative
② The P/E ratio is very popular. ② Earnings are volatile. Therefore, interpretation of P/Es difficult for
analysts.
Formula Exercise
market value of equity Market price per share BARABA,S.A:
P/B • Book Value of Equity 20X5: $60 million
ratio • Sales 20X5: $10 million
book value of equity Book value per share
• Shares outstanding: 30 million. Market Price: 10 $ per share
• Calculate P/B ratio
Strengths 300
P/B
Book value→ cumulative amount→ usually +, even → (-)EPS. ratio
① 60
Book value is more stable than EPS, so it may be more useful than P/E
② when EPS is particularly high, low, or volatile. Weaknesses
Book value→ appropriate measure of net asset value for firms that ① P/Bs do not reflect the value of intangible economic assets, such as
③ primarily hold liquid assets (i.e. finance, investment, insurance, and human capital.
banking firms.
② P/Bs can be misleading when there are significant differences in the
④ P/B useful in valuing companies that are expected to go out of business. asset size of the firms under consideration because in some cases the
firm’s business model dictates the size of its asset base. (i.e. outsourcing)
Empirical research shows that P/Bs help explain differences in long-run
⑤
average stock returns. Different accounting conventions can obscure the true investment in the
③ firm made by shareholders, which reduces the comparability of P/Bs
across firms and countries. (i.e. R&D)
Formula Exercise
market value of equity Market price per share BARABA,S.A:
P/S • Book Value of Equity 20X5: $200 million
ratio • Sales 20X5: $100 million
Total sales Sales per share
• Shares outstanding: 30 million. Market Price: 10 $ per share
• Calculate P/S ratio
Strengths 300
P/S
Sales always (+). Thus, meaningful even for distressed companies. ratio
① 100
Appropriate for valuing stocks in mature or cyclical industries and start-up ② P/S ratios do not capture differences in cost structures across companies.
④ companies with no record of earnings. It is also often used to value
investment management companies and partnerships While less subject to distortion, revenue recognition practices can still
③
distort sales forecasts.(i.e. bill and hold, etc)
Formula
Strengths
② FCFE is preferable to operating cash flow. But FCFE is more volatile than
operating cash flow, so it is not necessarily more informative.
Formula Exercise
BARABA,S.A:
Trailing 4 x most recent quarterly dividend • Just paid a dividend totaling: $1 per share
D/P • Consensus forecast of dividends over the next four quarters: 1.1, 1, 1.2
Market price per share and 1
• Current market price is $80
Forecast dividend over next four quarters • Calculate leading and trailing dividend yield
Leading
D/P 4 4.3
Market price per share Trailing Leading
D/P 80 D/P 80
Strengths Weaknesses
Dividends are not as risky as the capital appreciation component of total ② The dividend displacement of earnings concept argues that dividends
② return. paid now displace future earnings, which implies a trade-off between
current and future cash flows.
Using the data in the following table, calculate normalized earnings using the
method of historical average EPS and the method of average return on Average EPS 2.75
equity
If earnings are negative P/E ratio not meaningful Normalized EPS Restate as E/P
LOS 36.h: Calculate and interpret the justified price-to-earnings ratio (P/E),
price-to-book ratio (P/B), and price-to-sales ratio (P/S) for a stock, based on
forecasted fundamentals.
Formula
D0 1 g
Justified P0 1 b
E1
Leading V0 P0
P/E E1 r g r g
D0 1 g
Justified P0 1 b 1 g
E0
Trailing V0 P0
P/E E0 r g r g
D0 1 g 0.75
1 11%
Pablo Garcia Torrent, is evaluating a firm, for a Justified 3.5
E0
potential IPO that has the following characteristics: Trailing
P/E r g 13% 11%
•Current share price $100.00.
•Current earnings $3.50.
•Current dividend $0.75. Justified
•Growth rate 11%. Trailing 11.9
•Required return 13%. P/E
Justified
leading 10.7
P/E
Formula
D1 E
ROE g P0 1 b
B B ROE 1 b
V0
r g
B r g r g r g
r g r g
Justified Increases as ROE increases
P/B
The larger the spread
D E 1
between ROE and Re, the
b
larger the P/B
ROE 12%
Re 10%
Justified P/B 1.3
g 3%
b 25%
D0 0.25
E0 1
Formula
D1 E0
1 b 1 g
P0 S S0
S r g r g
FCFE0 1 g
V 0
r g
D0 1 g 1 r g D0 r g
P0
r g P0 D0 1 g P0 1 g
Dividend yield
Positively related to Required return
Predicted P/E Linear regression of historical P/E Over its fundamental variables
Expected Growth
Risk
Limitations
① The predictive power of the estimated P/E regression for a different time period and/or sample of stocks is uncertain.
② The relationships between P/E and the fundamental variables examined may change over time.
③ Multicollinearity is often a problem in these time series regressions, which makes it difficult to interpret individual regression coefficients
① Select and calculate the multiple that will be used ① P/E of another company’s stock in a similar industry with similar
operating characteristics.
② Select the benchmark and calculate the mean or median of its
② Average or median P/E of peer group within the company’s industry.
multiple over the group of comparable stocks.
③ Compare the stock’s multiple to the benchmark. ③ Average or median P/E for the industry
② The stock is properly valued, but the stock has a lower expected
growth rate than the benchmark, which leads to a lower P/E.
STUDY BY
YOURSELVES
PEG drawbacks
PEG of A 3.00
Appears to be undervalued
① The relationship between P/E and g is not linear, which makes
comparisons difficult.
③ The PEG ratio doesn’t reflect the duration of the high-growth period
for a multistage valuation model, especially if the analyst uses a
short-term high-growth forecast.
Strength Weakness
① Earnings-plus-non-cash-charges
③ FCFE
④ EBITDA
Strengths Weaknesses
① The ratio may be more useful than P/E when comparing firms with
different degrees of financial leverage. If working capital is growing, EBITDA will overstate CFO. Further, the
① measure ignores how different revenue recognition policies affect CFO.
Differences in
The use of relative Challenging in Accounting standards
Use of comparable
valuation methods international
firms
context Growth opportunities
Risk
Difficulties in
P/E dispersion Cultures
Benchmarks
Pension expense
Tangible asset revaluation
Weighted 1
Arithmetic Mean: 5.9
(15+5)/2= 10 Harmonic Mean
15 1 50 1
Harmonic Mean:
2/((1/15)+(1/5)) = 7.49
Return Concepts
Holding Period
Increase in price of an asset, plus any cash flow received divided by the initial price of the asset
Return
P1 P0 CF1
Holding period
Assumes that Cash Flow is received at the end of the period
return
P0
CF1 P1 P0
Holding period
return
P0 P0
Interest earned on
CF1 If CF received before the end of the period CF1 CF
reinvestment
Cash Flow Yield
P0
P1 P0
Return from Price
Appreciation
P0
Realized Return Actual historical return based on past observed prices and cash flows.
Expected based on forecasts of future prices and cash flows. Expectations can
Return result from elaborate models or subjective opinions.
Required return is also called the opportunity cost for investing in the
asset
IF Expected
return > Required return Undervalued
Return from V0 P0
convergence of
price to
intrinsic value P0
V0 P0
Expected Required
return return
P0
r = r + β ( r - r)
a f a m f
Systematic
Interest rates,
risk Risks that cannot be diversified away recessions, wars
Unanticipated changes in
Macroeconomic Inflation, Interest rates,
macroeconomic variables
investor confidence, real
business activity, others
Build-up
method
Steps for calculating a future Equity Risk Premium based on historical information
The risk-free return Consistent with the time horizon for the investment
After calculating the Equity Risk Premium It can be used to calculate the required return of individual stocks
Required Risk-free
return of return βi Equity risk premium Used in
Build-up Valuation of private businesses
stock i method
Strengths Weaknesses
Assumes that mean and variance are constant over time
① Objectivity
Geometric Arithmetic
Other
Considerations
① Method to calculate the mean mean ≤ mean
② Forward-Looking Estimates
② Supply-side models
.
② ① Gordon Growth Based Dividend discount
model
• Firms with stable growth rates
• Dividends ≈ FCFE
• Firms with stable leverage
Reasonable when:
D 1
① Applied to developed economies and markets
P 0 =
Ample sources of reliable forecasts for data such as
② dividends and growth rates (k- g)
P0 = Price of stock today
.
② ① Gordon Growth Based
Weaknesses
During expansion phases→ Low dividend yield, high expected growth rates
During recession phases→ High dividend yield, low expected growth rates
.
② ② Supply-side estimates→ Macroeconomic models
Macroeconomic Financial
AND
variables variables
Strengths Weaknesses
The use of proven models Estimates are only appropriate for developed countries
.
② ② Supply-side estimates→ Macroeconomic models
Ibbotson-Chen
Equity risk
premium
Ibbotson-Chen D1
Equity risk 1 1 Real growth rate Expected changes
Expected inflation 1 1 Rf
premium in EPS in P/E P0
.
② ② Supply-side estimates→ Macroeconomic models
Expected
Real
Real GDP growth Labour productivity Labour supply
Growth
growth rate growth rate
Rate
Expected
Market P/E expected to
changes IF
in P/E overvalued decrease
.
② ③ Survey estimates
Strengths Weaknesses
① CAPM
Required return
on stock i Risk-free-rate Equity risk premium βi
Calculate the required return on equity of a stock, if the current risk free rate
is 2.5%, the equity risk premium 6.5%, and beta of the stock is 1.3
Required return
on stock i 2.5% 6.5% 1.3 10.95%
② Multifactor Models
Required return
on stock i Risk-free-rate Risk premium 1 β1 Risk premium 2 β2 Risk premium n βn
Fama-French Model
Required return
on stock i RF β mkt,i Rmkt RF β SMB,i Rsmall RBig β HML,i RHBM RLBM
Pastor-Stambaugh Model
Required
R less R
return on Fama-French Model β Liquidity,i Liquid
more
Liquid
stock i
Factors:
Return of risky Return of riskless
Unanticipated changes in investors´ willingness to corporate government bonds
① Confidence risk undertake risks bonds
④ Business Cycle risk Unanticipated change in the level or real activity End of period Beginning of
expected period expected
activity index activity index
⑤ Market timing risk Not explained by 1 to 4
Build-up method Usually applied to closely held companies were betas are not readily obtainable
Controlling vs Required
Minority interest return on YTM long term bonds Risk Premium
Usually adjusted directly from the stock i
market value, not through the
Marketability required return
YTM long term Inflation Leverage Sensitivity to
bonds business cycle
3%-5%
① Public Companies
Regressing the returns of the company´s stock on the returns of the overall market
Length of the sampled period Five years of monthly data Two years of weekly data (Bloomberg)
Adjusted Regression
2/3 1/3 1
Beta Beta
𝑅𝑚
④ Lever up Estimated
0.8667
2
Beta 1 2.6
1
Estimated Debt company
Unlevered 1
Beta
Beta Equity company
Multifactor
Models
Higher explanatory power (not always) More Complex and more expensive
Build-up
Very simple Models
Can be applied to closely Use of historical values that may not be
held companies meaningful anymore.
Required
Yield of bonds Yield of bonds in Regression Model
return
developed in the emerging the developed
country market market
Y X
Equity Risk Premium Risk ratings
for developed countries (institutional
investor)
RESIDUAL INCOME
Francisco Parga Valle,CFA
RATIONALE FOR RESIDUAL INCOME It recognizes the cost of equity capital in the measurement of income.
• Capitalize and amortize R&D charges (rather than expense them), and add them back to earnings to
calculate NOPAT.
• Add back charges on strategic investments that will generate returns in the future
• Eliminate deferred taxes and consider only cash taxes as an expense
• Treat operating leases as capital leases and adjust nonrecurring items.
• Add LIFO reserve to invested capital and add back change in LIFO reserve to NOPAT
difference between the market value of a firm’s long-term debt and equity and the book
MVA value of invested capital supplied by investors. It measures the value created by
management’s decisions since the firm’s inception
Given the data below, calculate economic value added and market value added
NOPAT 3,000
WACC 10%
Invested Capital Beginning of Period 32,000
Invested Capital End of Period 35,000
Share price ($) 200
nº of shares outstanding 400
Market Value of Long term Debt 15,000
EVA NOPAT Capital Charge
EVA - 200,00 3.000 3.200,00
EVA and MVA, usually apply the concept of residual income to the measurement
of managerial effectiveness and executive compensation.
𝑅𝐼𝑡 = 𝐸𝑡 − (𝑟 𝑥 𝐵𝑉𝑡−1 )
𝑅𝐼𝑡 = 𝑅𝑂𝐸 − 𝑟 𝑥 𝐵𝑉𝑡−1
Given the data below, calculate residual income for 2019 and 2020
𝑅𝑂𝐸 − 𝑟 𝐵0
𝑉0 = 𝐵0 +
(𝑟 − 𝑔)
𝑅𝑂𝐸 − 𝑟 𝐵0
𝑉0 = 𝐵0 +
(𝑟 − 𝑔)
Given the data below, calculate the value of the shares today, using the
residual income approach
𝑅𝑂𝐸 − 𝑟 𝐵0
𝑉0 = 𝐵0 +
(𝑟 − 𝑔)
70,0
Francisco Parga, CFA
h: Explain continuing residual income and justify an estimate of continuing CFA® Preparation
residual income at the forecast horizon, given company and industry prospects. www.dbf-finance.com
STUDY BY YOURSELVES
DDM and FCFE models measure value by discounting a stream of expected cash flows
The residual income model starts with a book value and adds to this the present value of
the expected stream of residual income.
Theoretically, the intrinsic value derived using expected dividends, expected free
cash flow to equity, or book value plus expected residual income should be
identical if the underlying assumptions used to make the necessary forecasts are the
same.
① Terminal value does not dominate the intrinsic value estimate, ① The models rely on accounting data that can be manipulated by
management.
② Residual income models use accounting data, which is usually easy to find.
The models are applicable to firms that do not pay dividends or that do Reliance on accounting data requires numerous and significant
③ not have positive expected free cash flows in the short run
② adjustments.
The models assume that the clean surplus relation holds or that its
④ The models are applicable even when cash flows are ③ failure to hold has been properly taken into account.
volatile.
¡GRACIAS!
① Threat of new entrants in the Industry The long term profitability of any
industry is determined by the
② Threat of substitutes
interaction of Porter´s competitive
③ Bargaining power of buyers forces
WARREN
BUFFET PAT
MICHAEL DORSEY,CFA
PORTER
Probability of new entrants to the industry that can alter ① Economies of scale
the competitive landscape reducing the share of the value-
added realized by the incumbents ② Product differentiation and Brand identity
③ Switching costs
The probability of new entrants depends upon the size ⑤ Access to distribution channels
(and existence) of BARRIERS TO ENTRY
⑥ Government approvals or requirements
The higher the BARRIERS, the WEAKER THE THREAT Cost and quality advantages enjoyed by
⑦
incumbent firms
③ Switching costs
① Switching costs
How strong is the negotiation power of buyers→ Impact in
the distribution of value ② Availability of substitute products
③ Brand identity
④ Product differentiation
⑤ Profitability of the buyer
CONCLUSSION
⑥ Price relative to Total Purchases
Mainly dependent upon two factors:
(Porter). Ejemplo de Chrysler,GM y Ford con sus
Bargaining leverage proveedores.
(Porter) Customer concentration.
Buyer´s price sensitivity
(Dorsey) Cost:Benefit ratio
① Available options
Strength of the position of suppliers and their impact on
the distribution of the value added in the industry ② Presence of substitutes
⑤ Product differentiation
But in the absence of barriers to entry, attracts new Affect an industry temporarily
players
③ Government Policies
④ Complementary products
1. Assume the industry structure will not change→ Positioning Customer power→
2. Assume the industry can change→ Capitalising on Changes in Supplier power→ Use of standardized parts, outsourcing labour
Industry
3. Assume I can change the industry structure→ Creating Substitutes→ Differentiating, increasing product features
changes in the Industry Structure Threat of entry→ Raising fixed costs (R&D, mechanization, network,
advertising)
② Capitalizing on Changes in the Industry Rivalry→ Avoid price wars, focus on price differentiation, search of
niches
Forward / backward integration
③ Creating changes in the industry
Improvements in a substitute
Increasing industry value added overall → Improving distribution channel
Sudden changes in technology Redistributing the value added in its favour→ Increase prices after reducing
bargaining power of buyers through switching costs