Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Keywords: Adaptive blade design; Smart blade; Wind turbine; Bend twist adaptive blade
1. Introduction
Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 117 3282643; fax: +44 117 3283800.
E-mail address: Ali2.Maheri@uwe.ac.uk (A. Maheri).
0960-1481/$ - see front matter r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.renene.2006.10.012
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2012 A. Maheri et al. / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 2011–2018
Nomenclature
turbine run condition and flow variations and adjust its aerodynamic characteristics to
affect the wind turbine performance. Comparing to active control systems, adaptive blades
have many advantages. Since they do not use moving mechanical parts and hence
problems like icing and soiling do not obstacle their operation, they are more reliable.
They do not need actuation energy and they are cheaper and lighter and do not need
maintenance.
Investigations towards exploring the potential benefits of using bend-twist adaptive
blades (BTAB) have shown that, theoretically, these blades can be used to enhance the
energy capture capabilities and decrease the fatigue loading [1,2]. But, since in these
investigations the induced twist due to the elastic coupling has been pre-assumed and has
not been modelled or predicted realistically, the results are only qualitative and therefore
unreliable. From another aspect, many investigations have been carried out regarding the
structural aspects of adaptive blades [3–5]. An overall assessment of these studies suggests
that these blades can be manufactured with the desired level of elastic coupling. Despite
knowing the two facts of that using BTAB has the potential of producing cheaper energy
and that they can be manufactured, making this concept practical has been obstructed by
the lack of a suitable method for the design of the BTAB.
Traditional methods for the engineering design of a wind turbine blade represent a
reversed design procedure. It means that through a search within possible solutions (design
space) the solution that optimises the objective is selected. This solution is a set of design
parameters including aerodynamic and structural characteristics of the blade. In
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Maheri et al. / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 2011–2018 2013
optimisation, since some of design parameters are related through nonlinear relations,
conventional analytical methods are not applicable and consequently optimisation process
must be based on numerical search in design space. Having a robust and efficient method
of search in design space is essential to reduce the number of evaluations. Also, objective
evaluation must be fast to reduce the evaluation time.
In BTAB the induced twist is the structural response of the blade to its aerodynamic
characteristics. This aerodynamic-structure interaction makes the simulation of these kinds
of wind turbines a coupled aero-structure (CAS) process, which is iterative in nature with a
FE solver running in a correction loop [6]. In aerodynamic objective evaluation, in
addition to the aerodynamic characteristics of the blade many structural and material
parameters are also involved. Therefore, the aerodynamic design of these blades cannot be
carried out without having the sufficient knowledge about the structural properties and
configurations of the blades and without running a FE-based CAS simulator for objective
evaluation. Also, involvement of structural and material parameters in aerodynamic design
increases the number of required evaluations exponentially.
A stall regulated wind turbine has been selected as the design case study. It has been
attempted to keep the geometry and topology of the new designed blades similar to the
original blades as far as possible. This makes the comparison between the performance of
the original ordinary blade and the designed adaptive one simple. Therefore, the design
parameters have been limited to the four parameters of (i) shell thickness, (ii) ply angle
of the anisotropic composite material of the blade to make it bend-twist elastic coupled,
(iii) pre-twist distribution and (iv) rotor radius (to keep the output power limited
at its rated value). Since the designed BTAB has the same chord and aerofoil distri-
bution as the original blade, the results obtained are not necessarily the best that can be
achieved.
Design methodology used in this study is a reversed design procedure in which the
numerical search in the design space is a genetic algorithm (GA) based one. The objective
of the design is to maximise the average power Pav of the wind turbine, defined as
Z VO
Pav ¼ PRðV Þ dV . (1)
VI
In which, R(V) is the wind velocity probability distribution function, P is the wind
turbine power and VI and VO are cut-in and cut-out velocities, respectively. In this study, a
Rayleigh probability distribution function, given by Eq. (2) has been used.
" #
2p V 2 p V 2
RðV Þ ¼ exp , (2)
V 4 V av 4 V av
bðr Þref
bðr ; V ; O; pitchÞ ¼ M hub ðV ; O; pitchÞ . (4)
M hub;ref
In which, r ¼ ðr Rhub Þ=ðR Rhub Þ and bðr Þref ¼ bðr ; V ref ; Oref ; pitchref Þ is the reference
induced twist and M hub;ref ¼ M hub ðV ref ; Oref ; pitchref Þ is the reference flap bending at the
hub, both obtained from the FEA-based CAS simulation of the wind turbine, at reference
condition.
To put the above design method in practice, a GA-based design tool has been developed.
Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of the design process and objective evaluation. This code
employs an ordinary wind turbine simulator, (based on blade element momentum theory),
for power prediction (for each wind speed). The computer code WTAB [8], has been linked
to the code to perform the required FEA-based CAS simulation at the reference run
condition for each individual (design solution). WTAB is a very efficient code that can
conclude a FEA-based CAS simulation (with 4400 number of DOF and eight iterations of
the correction loop) in about 25 s CPU-time on a 3 GHz PC. In the present study the
number of generations and the population size, (two GA parameters), have been set to
NGen ¼ 100 and NPop ¼ 5, respectively. It means that 500 objective evaluations (including
FEA-based CAS simulation) must be performed.
To increase the robustness of the search process, generation of new population takes
place under specific criteria. For example, a fibre angle that produces an induced twist
toward stall must not be accompanied with a rotor radius shorter than the original one. By
doing this, the individuals that cannot produce a high fitness are eliminated prior to
objective evaluation.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Maheri et al. / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 2011–2018 2015
Induced
Mhub at V
twist For each wind
Eq. ( 4) speed VI ≤ V ≤ VO
Constraint
Average
Fitness Penalty function power
Optimum
objective
For each individual
up of the entire upper and lower surfaces of the blade with respect to each other. That is
the mechanical properties of the blade material together with the fibre orientation are
constant span-wise. The assumed blade material (graphite epoxy) has the mechanical
properties of: E1 ¼ 142 GPa, E2 ¼ E3 ¼ 9.8 GPa, G23 ¼ 4.8 GPa, G12 ¼ G13 ¼ 6.1 GPa,
n12 ¼ n13 ¼ 0.50 and n23 ¼ 0.42.
In the present study, since no constraint is applied on the structural characteristics and
behaviour of the blade (i.e. tip deflection, inter-laminate stresses, natural frequency, etc.),
the designed shell thickness or fibre angle may do not satisfy the usual structural design
criteria. Running the design code for the above case gives an optimal objective of
Pav ¼ 47.8 kW at a rotor radius of R ¼ 14.4 m, a fibre orientation of y ¼ 241 with respect
to the longitudinal axis of the blade (which produces an induced twist toward stall), a shell
thickness of t ¼ 4.2 mm and a pre-twist distribution as shown in Fig. 2.
This shows a significant improvement of about 15.5% in energy capture capabilities of
the wind turbine operating in a site with Rayleigh probability distribution function and an
average wind speed of 5.6 m/s.
This amount of enhancement in the average power is partly due to the 4.7% increase in
the rotor radius and partly due to the adaptivity nature of the blades. It should be noted
that increasing the blade span, if not accompanied with the effect of bend-twist elastic
coupling, does not necessarily cause an improvement. In other words, the adaptivity of the
BTABs not only makes the blades more efficient but also allows us to design longer blades
optimally without changing the design rotor speed.
Fig. 3 shows the simulated power curves of the wind turbine when using ordinary and
adaptive blades. According to this figure, BTABs produce more power in low and
moderate wind speeds, whilst the generated power by the original ordinary blades is higher
in high wind speeds. However, since the high wind speeds, comparing to the low and
moderate wind speeds, have much smaller probabilities, their contribution in the average
power is insignificant.
The power coefficients of the wind turbine with ordinary and adaptive blades are shown
in Fig. 4. It shows that the rotor with ordinary blades operates more efficiently in wind
speeds of greater than 13 m/s. That is the observed improvement in the generated power
corresponding to the adaptive blades in the range of 13–17 m/s is mostly because of using
longer blades. This behaviour can be explained by referring to Fig. 5, which shows the
induced twist at the tip of the blade against wind speed. Since in wind speeds of greater
10
8
Pre-Twist (deg)
4 Ordinary Blades
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Span Location, r∗ (-)
300
250
Power (KW)
200
150
Bend-Twist Adaptive Blades
100 Ordinary Blades
50
0
5 10 15 20 25
Wind Speed (m/s)
Ordinary Blades
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
5 10 15 20 25
Wind Speed (m/s)
8
Tip Induced Twist (deg)
0
5 10 15 20 25
Wind Speed (m/s)
than 13 m/s the topology of the adaptive blade is almost invariant, the adaptive blades
practically act as ordinary blades.
Fig. 6 shows the effect of site average wind speed on the amount of improvement in the
average power producing by the designed BTABs. More enhancements in the average
power in low and moderate site average wind speeds can be observed. This is consistent
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2018 A. Maheri et al. / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 2011–2018
16
%Increase in Pav
12
0
5.6 7 9
Site average wind speed, Vav (m/s)
with the behaviour of the power curves and power coefficients shown in Figs. 3 and 4,
respectively.
5. Conclusion
The Combined analytical/FEA-based CAS simulation method has made the design of
BTABs practical. In the present study by designing a BTAB and showing that significant
improvement in the energy capture capabilities of a stall-regulated wind turbine can be
achieved, one of the potential benefits of using these blades has been proven quantitatively.
However, to run a complete design, many more design parameters (both aerodynamic and
structural), and more constraint must be involved. A coupled design in which the
aerodynamic objective evaluation depends on the finite element analysis of the blade
structure could be very time consuming and therefore not efficient.
References
[1] Lobitz DW, Veers PS, Laino DJ. Performance of twist coupled blades on variable speed rotors. In:
Proceedings of 2000 ASME wind energy symposium held at 38th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and
exhibition, Reno, NV, 10–13 January 2000.
[2] Lobitz DW, Veers PS, Eisler GR, Laino DJ, Migliore PG, Bir G. The use of twist-coupled blades to enhance
the performance of horizontal axis wind turbines. Sandia National Laboratories, Report SAND2001-1003,
May 2001.
[3] Ong CH, Tsai S. The use of carbon fibers in wind turbine blade design: a Seri-8 blade example. Sandia
National Laboratories, Report SAND2000-0478, March 2000.
[4] Locke J, Hidalgo IC. The implementation of braided composite materials in the design of a bend-twist coupled
blade. Sandia National Laboratories, Report SAND2002-2425, August 2002.
[5] Locke J, Valencia U. Design studies for twist-coupled wind turbine blades. Sandia National Laboratories,
Report SAND2004-0522, June 2004.
[6] Maheri A, Noroozi S, Toomer C, Vinney J. Single step versus coupled aero-structure simulation of a wind
turbine with bend-twist adaptive blades. In: Proceedings of the European wind energy conference, Athens,
Greece, 27 February 2006–2 March 2006.
[7] Maheri A, Noroozi S, Vinney J. Combined analytical/FEA-based coupled-aero-structure simulation of a wind
turbine with bend-twist adaptive blades. J Renew Energy 2007;32(6):916–30.
[8] Maheri A, Noroozi S, Toomer C, Vinney J. WTAB, a computer program for predicting the performance of
horizontal axis wind turbines with adaptive blades. J Renew Energy 2006;31(1):1673–85.