Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A criticism of the MSM is that research by Logie (1999) has found that the suggestion that the STM is
involved before LTM is inaccurate. Logie pointed out that STM actually relies on LTM and therefore
cannot come first as suggested in the MSM. For example; in order to chunk a list of letters or numbers,
they are chunked so that they have meaning, this meaning has been recalled from the LTM store.
The MSM is supported by the case of HM; HM suffered brain damage after an operation to remove the
hippocampus on both sides of his brain in order to reduce the severe epilepsy that he suffered from. After
the operation HM’s personality and intellect remained intact but he could not form any new long term
memories, although he could remember things from before the operation. The hippocampus has been
linked in the past to the STM, so by removing the hippocampus the STM has been essentially removed.
HM can not form new memories although can remember memories from before the operation, which
supports the idea that information has to go through the STM store before it can be encoded into the LTM
store.
Another criticism of the MSM; Shallice & Warrington studied a patient with amnesia (known as KF), they
seemed to have deficits in some areas of the STM but not in others (STM for digits was very poor when
received verbally, but better when received visually) which suggests that STM is not one simple store as
MSM suggests. Additionally, there is a lot of research that LTM, like STM, is not a unitary memory store.
There is a LTM store for semantic memory (memories and facts about the world), a store for procedural
memory (how to ride a bike), and a store for episodic memory (personal memories about ourselves).