Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stream Analysis and Component Mixing Using Aspen Plus

    Uploaded by

    Jay Maradiya
    36 views3 pages
    This document contains process stream data from an Aspen Plus simulation. Stream L-1 shows almost complete pickup of acetone by MIBK. When using different activity coefficient models in Aspen Plus to simulate stream L-2, NRTL predicts a flow rate of 26.23 lb/hr with a mole fraction of acetone of 0.0645, while RK-Soave and ideal models predict no acetone in the stream.

    Original Description:

    Aspen plus

    Original Title

    STREAM NAME

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains process stream data from an Aspen Plus simulation. Stream L-1 shows almost complete pickup of acetone by MIBK. When using different activity coefficient models in Aspen Plus to simulate stream L-2, NRTL predicts a flow rate of 26.23 lb/hr with a mole fraction of acetone of 0.0645, while RK-Soave and ideal models predict no acetone in the stream.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    36 views3 pages

    Stream Analysis and Component Mixing Using Aspen Plus

    Uploaded by

    Jay Maradiya
    This document contains process stream data from an Aspen Plus simulation. Stream L-1 shows almost complete pickup of acetone by MIBK. When using different activity coefficient models in Aspen Plus to simulate stream L-2, NRTL predicts a flow rate of 26.23 lb/hr with a mole fraction of acetone of 0.0645, while RK-Soave and ideal models predict no acetone in the stream.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    STREAM NAME FEED 2 MIBK MIXED L- 1 L- 2 VAPOUR

    From B1 B2 B2 B2
    To B1 B1 B2
    Stream Class CONVEN CONVEN CONVEN CONVEN CONVEN CONVEN
    Maximum
    Relative Error
    Cost Flow $/hr
    MIXED Substream
    Phase Liquid Phase Liquid Phase Liquid Phase Liquid Phase Liquid Phase
    Temperature F 75 75 59.38760512 75 75
    Pressure psi 50 50 50 50 50 50
    Molar Vapor
    Fraction 0 0 0 0 0
    Molar Liquid
    Fraction 1 1 1 1 1
    Molar Solid
    Fraction 0 0 0 0 0
    Mass Vapor
    Fraction 0 0 0 0 0
    Mass Liquid
    Fraction 1 1 1 1 1
    Mass Solid
    Fraction 0 0 0 0 0
    Molar Enthalpy cal/mol -62661.59085 -78113.40686 -70387.49885 -71585.62019 -69015.32501
    Mass Enthalpy cal/gm -1646.923644 -779.8809558 -1018.570932 -850.8161246 -3830.927374
    Molar Entropy cal/mol-K -55.6836605 -146.5452194 -100.7331732 -118.6981813 -39.05116857
    Mass Entropy cal/gm-K -1.46352392 -1.463101283 -1.457700356 -1.410762753 -2.167666248
    Molar Density mol/cc 0.020991102 0.007999324 0.011540832 0.009386109 0.053402832
    Mass Density gm/cc 0.798662331 0.801217751 0.797519639 0.789724596 0.962068297
    Enthalpy Flow cal/sec -789522.7639 -984212.3707 -1773735.135 -1393790.223 -395411.0131
    Average MW 38.04766 100.16068 69.10417 84.13759227 18.01530498
    Mole Flows lbmol/hr 100 100 200 154.5284264 45.47157362 0
    MIBK lbmol/hr 0 100 100 100 4.78E-10 0
    ACETONE lbmol/hr 50 0 50 49.99997165 2.84E-05 0
    WATER lbmol/hr 50 0 50 4.528454733 45.47154527 0
    Mole Fractions
    Mass Flows kg/hr 1725.812827 4543.212022 6269.024849 5897.449116 371.5757331
    Mass Fractions
    Volume Flow l/min 36.01465353 94.50639386 131.0108772 124.4621468 6.437099009

    Answer : So here MIBK pickup by acetone is seen as in L-1 stream that almost all acetone
    pickup
    ANSWER 2. FOR L-2 STRAM

    BY SOLVING A ASPEN PLUS

    METHOD TOTAL FLOW RATE (lb/hr) Acetone mole fraction


    RK- SOAVE 45.5448538240839 8.20 E-07
    IDEAL 0 0
    WILSON 0 0
    NRTL 26.2308192175165 0.0645111955259342

    FOR NRTL
    FOR RK SOAVE

    FOR IDEAL

    You might also like