3G JIJIGA CITY POST Drive Test

Cluster-1

1
 Date
Version Prepared by Remark
(DD/MM/YYYY)
1/1/2020 V0.1 Sintayehu denbel

Kalid Ibrahim

Basazen Shibeshi

2 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)

 Test Type :
Test Type Short Call
Drive test date
Drive Test Duration 2 days
Measurement tool Nemo Handy
Analysis tool Actix Software
UE Type

Scope:

Test Type Test case Target

Voice Short call CSSR >=98%

CDR <=2%

Coverage : RSCP >-95dBm >95%

Quality : EcNo >-13dBM >95%

3 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)

 Cluster 1 post DT ROUTE information
Introduction

4 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)

5
d

AGENDA

1 Introduction
2 CS and PS Call Performance

3 Drive test result & Analysis

4 Conclusion & Recommendations
CS CALL STATISTICS PERFORMANCE BEFORE CS CALL STATISTICS PERFORMANCE AFTER

6
 PS CALL STATISTICS PERFORMANCE BEFORE PS CALL STATISTICS PERFORMANCE AFTER

• Call statistics there is attempted difference before and after, At before there is big lack of dominance serving cells it happened To
many serving cells(ping pong) and some of the area unable to attached to the network(hole) after optimization done no unable to
7 attached (solved no coverage area) and there is dominant Optimization
ENG-RAN-Wireless serving cells (for more information see page 17).
(EER)
 Drive test result & Analysis
BEFORE COVERAGE (RSCP) AFTER COVERAGE (RSCP)

Drive test result shows at JIJIGA CITY cluster Drive test result shows at JIJIGA CITY cluster
three 98.4% of coverage is within threshold three 99.7% of coverage is within threshold
target. target after optimization work done.
8
BEFORE QUALITY (ECNO) AFTER QUALITY (ECNO)

Drive test result shows at JIJIGA CITY Drive test result shows at JIJIGA CITY
cluster_13.9% of quality is bad , so 86.1% is blow cluster_5.3% of quality is bad , so 94.7% is blow
threshold target . threshold target .
9
CQI(CODE QUALITY INDICATOR)BEFORE CQI(CODE QUALITY INDICATOR)AFTER

▪ 89.2% of >=30dbm are Good ▪ 95% of >=30dbm are Good

▪ 10.3% of <= 30dbm are poor ▪ 5% of <= 30dbm are poor

10
APP THROUGHPUT DL (KBPS) BEFORE APP THROUGHPUT DL (KBPS) AFTER

Overall the DL throughput on cluster 1 it shows

Overall the DL throughput on cluster 1 it shows
is good result as you can see from the above
is good result as you can see from the above
chart >=1024M 59% above 1Mbps , B/n 384 and
chart >=1024M 49% as will as >=512 ,26.8% and
512kps is 32.1% SUM UP is 91.1 very good result
>=384% , 11.0% but the only the bad part is is
but the bad part 8.9% on this area due to
14% that means < 384%. As solution we should
separation of site and antenna height very short
11 improve the bad part
(151091).
 UE_TxPow(dBm)

In generally as you can see from above result shows

98.9% Very good but the bad part UE_TxPow(dBm) After optimization work is done the above legend
correlated with coverage , quality and overshooting shows 99.8% is excellent UE_TxPOW(dBm).
cells that serves from far distance because of no
dominant serves on the indicated area as solution we
12
should optimize mansion problem .
ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)
 ANALYSIS OF BAD COVERAGE and QUALITY

BEFORE After
A2 A2

A1 A1

As we can see the bad coverage and quality on the indicated area 1 and 2. Analysis before and after you
can get the next page.

13
 ANALYSIS OF BAD COVERAGE

BEFORE_A1 After_A1

Problem (Area 1) Solution for improved (Area 1)

▪ Near site not dominant serving (151094) cells • By making near site dominance serving cells
▪ Lake dominant serving due to antenna orientation for site id 151094 • Avoiding overshooting cells like 151535_
▪ Too many serving cells like 151535,151536,151532 and 151419. • Antenna adjustment for site id
▪ Missing neighbor 1.151094_2 and 151059_1
▪ Antenna height too short as will as 3G antenna place is at bottom among ▪ Parameter correction
three technology including CDMA, so we should give focuses to increase
14
the height as much as possible. ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)▪ Handover defined between 151094 and 151550
 After_A1

More serves cells 151094 _3 (SC 98)

BEFORE_A1 55.4% and 151059_1 SC 309 30.3% .
Before optimization:- After optimization done like :-
1.Bad coverage and 1.Adusting the antenna orientation of the three
quality sector for site id 151094
2.Low DL throughput 2. Adjustment for site id 151059_2 SC 309
3.Overshooting cells 3.We avoid those overshooting site specially
4.Lack of dominant Site id 151535_1 .
serves 4.By making dominant serving cells 151094_2&3
5. Too many serving and 151059_2 no pig pong .
cells 5.Defined the missing neighbor b/n 151094 with
151550
 ANALYSIS OF BAD COVERAGE

BEFORE_A2

After_A2

Problem (Area A2) Solution for improved area 2

▪ Near site not to be dominant serving
▪ Overshooting cells from far distance
▪ Too many serving cells (151535,151536,151532 and
151419) it happened pig pong it affect coverage and quality.
▪ Need parameter correction
16
▪ Near site as dominant serving(151536 and 151419)
compression from other site distance.
▪ By antenna adjustment for site id 151536_3 and 151419
▪ Parameter correction
▪ Avoiding overshooting cell 151004_3
 LOW DL THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS

Before After
A3 A3
A2 A2

A1 A1

As we can see the DL throughput on the indicated area 1,2 and 3. Analysis before and after
optimization done you can get the next page.
17 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)
 LOW DL THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS(Area one)

BEFORE_A1 AFTER_A1

Hole part on DL throughput is (N.A result during deriving test

that means no network coverage, unable to attached) due to
bad coverage and quality as will as too many serving cells.

After we improve the coverage and quality as we can see great improvement DL throughput on
the indicated area more than 1Mbps>=45.3% but before >=1Mbps is 12.2%.
18
 LOW DL THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS(Area two)

after
Before
SOLUTION
PROBLEM
• Antenna adjustment for site id 151536_3 and 151419_2
• Ping pong with weak signal serving cells
• Lake of dominant serving cells b/n 151094 and 151535 • We avoid overshooting cell 151004_3
• Overshooting cells 151004_3 • Handover correction
• Antenna height is to short 151094 .
• Separation distance b/n tow site is far 151419 and 151536
 LOW DL THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS(Area three)

Before After
PROBLEM Solution
➢ 3 Call drop ➢ After optimization no call statistics failure
➢ 42 Call setup failure ➢ Antenna adjustment for site id 151003 and 151004
➢ 1 Handover failure ➢ Making Dominance serving 151004 and 151003
➢ Too many serving cells ➢ Defined Missing neighbor b/n 151004 and 151003
➢ Missing neighbor b/n 151004 and 151003 ➢ Correction Un balanced power on site id 151003
➢ Un balanced power on site id 151003 ➢ Increase capacity of 151004 from U333 into U444
➢ 20Congestion on site id 151004 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)
RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION

▪At JIJIGA city during cluster one deriving test over all network status very good coverage
,good quality and nice DL throughput .But around old airport(around site 151094) there is huge
residential area and different governmental office like referral hospital, radio FMA, collages etc.
So it batter to add one new site in order to increase capacity and to solve poor network quality
happen due to separation distance between site more than 1.5KM. It is difficulty for the user
to access wireless data service. So I recommend to add one new site between 151536_3 and
151419_2.For more information you can see the google earth screen shoot about place
recommend site.

21 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)

 • The above figure shows the new site to
New site be add in the recommended located area,
To make batter network quality and DL
Throughput by solving the capacity
issue.

22
 RECOMMENDATION
➢ Tower height very short (151094 antenna height 22M) as will as WCDM(2100 UMTS) antenna
position is at bottom among two technology (GSM and CDMA) due this 151094 expected
range coverage area is limited due to this it become bad coverage and quality. As
recommendation the first option its batter to use the space between the antenna ( lifting up
to use the space ) but the second best solution increase tower height .

Top

Bottom

Figure _ 1 shows serving site there is blockage due to landscape

23
 Problem we faced
• Bad coverage and quality
• Low DL throughput
• Call drop and call setup failure
• Too many serving cells
around 151094 due to blockage at side of sector 1 and
3 the area to covered by
GSM AT 33METER And 151419 to be served by 151094 due to height .
Recommendation
• It batter to use the antenna space between
CDMA and GSM as recommendation you can
relocate from bottom position to middle position
the WCDM antenna to increase antenna height
as result of this we solve the above mansion
problem and we increase coverage area.

WCDMA AT 22M

Figure _ 2 Antenna(WCDMA) relocation from the bottom to middle .

24
• Increase the tower height of ADMIN site (151091), Due to antenna height very short it affect the service
quality and DL throughput (The location of this site is all regional office in one area near by site to be
served for those office , so we should give focus to solve antenna height ) .
Site ID Cell ID Frequency Band Longitude Latitude Height Vendor Circle

151091 30911 UMTS 2100 42.79472 9.35833 20 ZET Somali

• Regular DT measurement and analysis will improve coverage performance and customer experiences to
the network.
• In generally there is great improvement at CLUSTER ONE at JIJIGA CITY network after optimization work is
done coverage and quality as will as regional time asked the data problem on this city but on cluster one
bad part is only three area so we give those area optimization solution, the other part is before 49% above
1Mbps know 59% is above 1Mbps there 10% improvement above 1Mbps very good DL Throughput .

25 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)