Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Supreme Court
11TH JUDICIAL REGION
Regional Trial Court – Branch 27
Tandag City, Surigao del Sur
COMPLAINT
(AMENDED)
THE PARTIES
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
STATEMENT OF FACTS
10. They made it appear that they, being the only surviving heirs of
Benito, “for the best interest of the parties”, “sell the same to
Leopoldo P. Dalayan and Joerie B. Maglangit”;
11. However, the truth of the matter is, the land (Lot 745) is co-
owned by the Heirs of Benito Lozada. Upon the death of Benito, the
following compulsory heirs survive him, to wit:
Page 3 of 13
Petition for Declaration of Nullity of Contract, etc.
Helen Escuyos Urbita vs. Leopoldo Dalayan, et al.
12. Also, for several years, Juana was incapacitated. She cannot even
stand up or even eat by herself. On April 23, 2009, Juana dies in
Purok River Side, Brgy. Telaje, Tandag City, where she stayed and
never left during her last days. Before her demise, she was taken cared of by
Elena Ulvida Escuyos (ELENA), wife of Jacundiano L. Escuyos, Jr., for
several years;
14. Plaintiff’s relatives and siblings informed her that they are not aware
of any transaction involving the land they co-owned, specially selling
the said land to herein defendants Leopoldo and Joerie. In fact, they are
unison in saying that it is impossible for Juana to sign the EJS, as the latter
was “bedridden” due to her serious illness;
15. Sometime in the year 2008, when EJS was allegedly executed, Juana
was already in advanced age and she had been suffering with physical
condition where all of the time Juana laid on her bed. For a number of
years, she cannot use her hands properly. Elena, the one who accompanied
Juana, can prove these facts. Thus, it is highly beyond the reach of
Plaintiff’s imagination that her mother – Juana will enter into contract
of sale and was able to sign it the way it appear on the EJS;
16. So, plaintiff personally met and talked to Juana and Adela. Both
strongly denied selling the property to Leopoldo and Jorie. Upon
showing the EJS, they were shocked seeing their names and signatures.
Instantaneously, the two were made to write and express their
sentiments on a piece of paper dated April 23, 2008;
17. Because Juana can no longer write, she let plaintiff transcribe her
take on the matter and just affixed her true signature at that time. It takes a
minute or two for her to affix her signature because, again, she has
difficulty in writing. Accordingly, she did not give her consent about
selling the property in Hinaplian, Bayabas;
Page 4 of 13
Petition for Declaration of Nullity of Contract, etc.
Helen Escuyos Urbita vs. Leopoldo Dalayan, et al.
19. With these, it already appeared that the subject EJS is a fabrication.
It readily appear that the signatures of Juana and Adela in the EJS is very
different from their true signatures;
20. Earnest efforts have been made by the Plaintiff to settle the
conflict for reason that the parties are relatives. Plaintiff Helen has to
fly from Australia just to talk with the defendants. However, despite of that,
defendants were adamant to settle the same;
22. It is worthy to note that the plaintiff is the lawful heir of the late
Juana L. Escuyos, one of the owners of the land subject of this
complaint. As one of the legal heirs, Plaintiff is entitled to all legal
rights embodied by law, among these are the following; the right to
demand, recover or rescind on whatever unlawful transactions entered into
by other persons involving her rights/shares;
24. Definitely, she will consult every now and then the turn of events
of her family, especially to Elena who was with her all the time. Thus, it
is highly illogical that plaintiff’s mother (Juana), who was very sickly,
would engage into transaction that will eventually turn out into the
disadvantage of heir family;
26. Hence, this leads into logical conclusion that the signature
appeared in the EJS is not authored by Juana and Adela; either
it is done by means of forgery or fabrication;
Page 5 of 13
Petition for Declaration of Nullity of Contract, etc.
Helen Escuyos Urbita vs. Leopoldo Dalayan, et al.
27. As revealed also in the EJS, among the parties involved Leopoldo P.
Dalayan, Aida Z. Dalayan, Joerie B. Maglangit and Louime Z.
Maglangit, impleaded as defendants in the herein case, are not
considered by law as lawful heirs to represent Banito to inherit thru
intestate succession. They are not included as heirs of Benito to state
that they will “adjudicate unto and among themselves the above-
described real property extra-judicially as their common property”;
28. The plaintiff desires that the above real estate, if ever the heirs of
Benito and Juana will sold it, be sold to herein plaintiff as this land has
sentimental value to her and she would like to exercise her right of first
refusal;
LEGAL BASIS
29. Our Law on Sales specifically provides that the principal parties
who entered into contract of sale must have the capacity to enter
into contract, and it is required, inter alia, that consent of the parties
concerned must be freely given;
DAMAGES
32. Due to the erroneous and illegal transaction entered into by the
defendants and by prohibiting herein Plaintiff from enterig the land, the
latter suffered sleepless nights and serious anxiety for which she asked the
sum of P50,000.00 as moral damages and to set an example to others
similarly situated plaintiff should be awarded exemplary damages in
the sum of P20,000.00 and defendant to pay the cost of this suit;
D. FE QUIÑONEZ QUICO
- She will testify among others of the pertinent facts and issues of
the case and identifies pertinent documents related to the case;
- that she has an Special Power of Attorney from Helen Escuyos
Johnson to represent the latter to continue negotiating with the
Defendant for the return of the land;
- that she talked with Louime Z. Maglangit and the latter agreed to
return the land upon the return of the P60,000.00 alleged purchase
price of the land but when the money is to be handed to Louime
the latter surprisingly refused to accept;
- that she personally knew Juana L. Escuyos for several years for
being friend and previous co-worker when they used to work at
DSWD-Province of Surigao del Sur;
- that when she saw and have examined the EJS, she cannot believe
that Juana executed and have signed it as she personally know that
Juana was incapacitated for several years and was bed-ridden until
she died;
F. LETECIA QUIJADA
- She will testify among others of the pertinent facts and issues of
the case and identifies pertinent documents related to the case;
- that being a Municipal Councilor of Bayabas and being a long
time resident of the place, it is of public knowledge that the rice
land in Hinaplian, Bayabas is owned by Juana and Jacundiano
Escuyos;
- that she was with Fe Q. Quico negotiating with Louime Z.
Maglangit when the latter agreed to return the land to the family of
Juana Loazada-Escuyos;
G. CESAR ESCUYOS
- He will testify among others of the pertinent facts and issues of the
case;
- That he lives adjacent to the land subject of the case in Hinaplian,
Bayabas;
- that it is common in their place that Juana and Jacundiano Escuyos
are the owners of the land with an area of more or less 3 has. and
that it was the couple who cultivated the land for several years,
since 1960’s.
Page 9 of 13
Petition for Declaration of Nullity of Contract, etc.
Helen Escuyos Urbita vs. Leopoldo Dalayan, et al.
0002-00220 declared in others that the land with Lot
the name of Benito no. 745 in Hinaplian, Bayabas
Lozada (deceased) is possessed by the plaintiff
and her co-heirs in the concept
of an owners;
That real property taxes of the
land are paid by them;
“C” OCT No. 10049 (FP No. To show and prove among
508843) in the name of others of the ownership of the
Heirs of Benito Lozada land by the plaintiffs and her
Rep. by Jacundiano co-heirs;
Escuyos That real property taxes of the
land are paid by them;
“D” Extra Judicial Settlement To show proof of its existence;
with Deed of Absolute That it is a falsified document
Sale (EJS) having executed without the
consent of Juana L. Escuyos
and Adela L. Zapanta;
That it is null and void contract
having no consideration among
others;
“E” Death Certificate of To show and prove that Juana
Juana L. Escuyos died on April 23, 2009;
That the cause of death
incapacitates Juana for several
years;
“F” Kasayoran sa Tanan To show and prove among
dated April 3, 2008 others of its existence and due
execution;
To show and prove that Juana
and Adela has no participation
and did not consent to the
execution of the EJS;
That the subject EJS is null
and void for having no
consideration.
“G” Certificate to File Action To show and prove of its
existence and due execution;
To prove among others that
earnest efforts were exerted to
settle the matter with the
Defendants but to no avail;
PRAYER
Page 10 of 13
Petition for Declaration of Nullity of Contract, etc.
Helen Escuyos Urbita vs. Leopoldo Dalayan, et al.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Honorable Court
respectfully prayed to render judgment in favor of plaintiff and against
defendants, ordering the latter as follows:
1. Ordering the nullification of the documents arising from the fraudulent
and wrongful transaction invloving the said land including but not
limited to following document for being contrary to law as it lacks the
essential elements of a valid contract:
Plaintiffs further pray for such other reliefs and remedies just and
equitable in the premises.
Page 11 of 13
Petition for Declaration of Nullity of Contract, etc.
Helen Escuyos Urbita vs. Leopoldo Dalayan, et al.
TANDAG CITY OFFICE: CANTILAN OFFICE: BAROBO OFFICE:
086 Osmeña St., National Highway, National Highway,
Barangay Bag-ong Barangay Pag-antayan, Purok 6, Poblacion,
Lungsod, Cantilan, Surigao del Sur Barobo, Surigao del Sur
Tandag City, Surigao del Cel: 09506718589 Cel: 09507179827
Sur 09778523354 09176227475
Cel: 09070831860
09778531682
By:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name this 17th day of June 2020 in
Tandag City, Surigao del Sur.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me thiss 17th day of June 2020 at Tandag
City for Cantilan, Surigao del Sur, Philippines. I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have
personally examined the affiants who appeared to me personally and personally known to
me and I am fully satisfied that they have executed and understood this sworn statement.
Page 13 of 13
Petition for Declaration of Nullity of Contract, etc.
Helen Escuyos Urbita vs. Leopoldo Dalayan, et al.